城市化区域发展中的核心城市研究
|
摘要
随着工业化、城市化进程的加速,世界已经进入了所谓的“城市世纪”、“城市时代”,城市作为生产力空间的载体已日益成为区域经济的核心。一些国际性城市、大都市带、城市群或都市圈越来越控制和主宰着区域的经济命脉,城市的功能作用不断增强,在全球经济中所扮演的角色也由于城市间相互联系的广泛性而日益重要。世界上相继崛起了以纽约、伦敦、东京等为核心城市的世界级大都市圈,核心城市与其所在的大都市圈的快速发展和相互支撑,吸引了大量的资金流、物流和信息流等,并在区域经济发展中起到了举足轻重的作用。我国在改革开放以后,大量的城镇密集区域在东部沿海地区出现,并形成了三大沿海经济带——珠江三角洲、长江三角洲和环渤海城市群。从以上海为中心的长三角区域经济发展可以看到,核心城市在区域经济发展中发挥的聚集、示范、辐射作用是十分重要的。
目前,国内学者普遍关注的区域经济带以及核心城市功能研究仍然是以长三角经济带、环渤海经济带、珠三角经济带为主。在“十一五”规划时期,中央政府实施了振兴东北老工业基地战略。在这种情形下,黑龙江、吉林、辽宁先后提出建立以某些城市为主的经济带,带动地区经济振兴和崛起的发展思路。作为东北地区唯一的沿海区域,辽宁沿海经济带的发展对带动辽宁自身的经济发展,以及辐射东北腹地的经济发展具有重要的意义。随着辽宁沿海经济带的开发建设,城市化必然对带内经济产生消费拉动效应,对新兴产业的发展与结构升级形成空间支撑与集聚效应。但是,纵观现状,尚存在较多问题：如经济发展不平衡、产业结构安排不合理、与腹地经济发展的互动不足等。这就要求确立辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市的主体地位,并对其功能进行准确定位、完整评价,促进其功能改善,发挥核心城市在经济带发展中的作用。辽宁沿海经济带要形成以大连为核心,丹东、锦州、营口、盘锦、葫芦岛等为一体的区域经济带,依托经济结构调整和城市功能互补,实现区域的可持续发展。
本文以辽宁沿海经济带发展战略为背景,重点研究其核心城市功能评价及其提升,无论是在理论层面,还是在实践层面都具有一定的意义。在理论层面,研究成果将丰富区域经济发展中核心城市功能的相关理论。在实践层面,研究成果将在一定程度上为辽宁沿海经济带的发展提供具有参考意义的政策建议。
本文在对相关研究的文献综述分析基础上,通过整理现有相关理论、概念,以辽宁沿海经济带为研究背景,以其核心城市功能为研究主体,利用统计分析、态势分析等实证研究方法,对辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市竞争力进行评价,对核心城市功能进行分析,总结不足并提出针对性建议,为辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能选择以及功能提升提供了参考依据。
论文由七章构成,主要内容如下：
第1章绪论。首先对论文研究的背景及意义进行了说明,并对所要研究的问题进行了阐述。介绍了论文研究的基本内容和研究方法,并梳理了论文的研究思路,给出了研究的技术路线图。最后概括了论文的创新点。
第2章文献综述。从城市群与都市圈的相关基础概念和理论研究的阐述入手,结合现有文献和已有研究成果进行了综述,进而探讨了城市群与都市圈的相关联系。围绕城市群与都市圈中的核心城市相关概念进行了综述,阐释了核心城市在区域经济发展中应具备的功能,对已有核心城市功能评价的研究进行了归纳。
第3章区域经济发展与核心城市功能的理论框架。首先对区域与核心城市发展相关的理论进行了详细阐述,把区域经济均衡理论与区域经济非均衡发展进行深入对比,从而得出辽宁沿海经济带的发展理论依据——非均衡发展理论。通过进一步分析产业集聚理论,得出可以将具有相似产品或互补产品的产业布局在一起,同时是核心城市成为相似产业集聚区的原始推动力。区域经济一体化理论也从区域的角度阐述了产业集聚这一现象。然后又研究了城市功能理论,并将国内外最新的一些理论加以陈述与分析,为下一步理论的运用——实现对基于辽宁沿海经济带发展战略视角下的核心城市功能研究奠定了理论基础。
第4章核心城市竞争力综合评价体系构建及其应用。本章首先研究了国内外核心城市发展的现状,并进行了比较分析。然后重点通过实证分析对辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市竞争力进行评价。在对区域发展中核心城市的界定基础上,对评价指标的选取、评价方法与模型的构建进行了详细阐述。在此基础上,运用主成分分析法,选取了二十三个指标对辽宁沿海经济带的六个城市的城市竞争力进行了评价,并对各城市功能进行了比较分析。在提供了实证依据基础上,对辽宁沿海经济带的城市功能定位与核心城市的选择进行了分析。
第5章辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能定位——基于SWOT分析。本章选取了辽宁沿海经济带中最具有代表性的核心城市——大连进行重点分析。首先从优势、劣势、机遇、威胁四个维度,对大连作为辽宁沿海经济带的核心城市功能,进行了系统的分析。以此为基础,从经济功能、文化功能、社会功能三个角度,详细阐述了大连的核心城市功能。由此得出大连作为一个核心城市,在辽宁沿海经济带中所起到的各种功能与作用。最后,总结了大连作为核心城市,其功能有待提升的方面,并据此提出了的一些意见和建议。
第6章辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能提升的路径选择。以辽宁沿海经济带为区域背景,首先分析了其核心城市建设的重要意义,然后对核心城市的产业发展模式和空间发展模式及核心城市与沿海城市群发展之间的协调互动模式依次进行了研究。并从这三个层面研究了作为辽宁沿海经济带的核心城市提升其功能所应选择的路径。
第7章结论及不足之处。首先总结了论文研究的主要结论,然后对论文研究的不足进行了说明,在此基础上明确了需要进一步深入研究的问题。
本文的创新点如下：
(1)通过比较国内外核心城市的形成历史和发展现状,综合对比核心城市竞争力水平及其构成,构建了系统、科学的核心城市竞争力评价指标体系。以辽宁沿海经济带这一国家级发展战略为例,利用评价指标体系对区域内的城市进行全面比较和评价,确定大连为沿海经济带的核心城市,并且通过该指标体系的比较和评价,对区内的其他城市定位和功能进行了具体的界定。论文还系统研究了城市群内各城市间的协同发展关系和机理。
(2)在实证分析过程中,针对主成分分析只能对静态指标进行分析的局限性,采用不同时点对辽宁沿海经济带城市竞争力进行比较,从侧面反映出沿海经济带各城市竞争力随时间的变化结果,从而推导出导致各城市竞争力的变化原因及下一步需要改进与加强的方面。针对主成分的静态模式采用从不同时点的静态结果推导出随时间变化的主观原因,进而为今后各城市进一步发挥自身竞争力的优势寻找可行的路径。
(3)在核心城市竞争力评价模型的建立和指标选取方面有一定的创新。首先,在批判性继承波特的“钻石模型”和瑞士国际管理发展学院的国家竞争力模型的基础上,构建了以经济综合实力、产业竞争力、企业竞争力、科技竞争力作为城市竞争力的核心因素的城市竞争力模型。其次,核心城市发展指标体系的构建不仅遵循了社会效益、经济效益的划分标准,而且引入与目前可持续发展紧密关联的生态环境的子体系,选择经济效益、社会效益及生态状况作为一级指标,采用经济总量、产业结构、贸易状况、金融环境指标、教育、卫生、科技发展、绿化、污水处理、生活质量等十个方面作为二级指标以及具体的23个三级指标。
Along with the advancement of industrialization and urbanization, the world already entered the period which is so-called "the urban century", "the urban time", the city has become the core of regional economy day by day as the productive forces'carrier. Some international cities, metropolitan areas and urban agglomerations control the areas' economic development. The cities'function role has enhanced. It's more and more important in the global economy because of the cities'relationship. The world-class metropolitan areas had risen, which makes the center in New York, London, Tokyo and other cities. These cities and the metropolitan areas mutual support and rapidly develop, attracting a large number of people, capital, materials and information flow. It has played an irreplaceable role in the regional economic development. After reforming and opening, in China a large number of urban areas appear in the eastern coastal areas, and form three nationally recognized coastal economic belt--- Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta and Round Bohai urban agglomerations. Shanghai is the center of Yangtze River Delta, from the development of Yangtze River Delta regional economic, it can be seen that the core city's role is not to be ignored in the rapid development of regional economy.
At present, domestic scholars have paid attention to the economic region and the core city function research which is still mainly in the Yangtze River economic belt, Round Bohai economic belt and the Pearl River Delta economic zone. In the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" period, the central government's regional policy carried out the strategy which is based on revitalizing northeast old industrial bases. In this case, it has proposed establishing the economic belt which is round some cities, driving the regional economic development. As the only coastal region of Northeast area, the development of Liaoning coastal economic zone has a deeply effect on promoting Liaoning economic development and the other areas'economic development in Northeast. With the development and construction in Liaoning coastal economic zone, urbanization can pull the domestic consumption inevitably, support the new industry development and structure upgrade. However, in the current situation, there are many problems:such as the imbalance of economic development, the unreasonable structure arrangement, the lack of economic development interaction with the hinterland and so on. The Liaoning coastal economic belt should make Dalian as the core, integrate Dalian, Dandong, Jinzhou, Yingkou, Panjin, Huludao, rely on the adjustment of economic structure and city function complementary, implement the regional sustainable development. It requires to establish the core city's main position in Liaoning coastal economic belt, accurate situate its function, complete evaluate, promote its function improved. The central city should play its role in the economic zone's development.
This paper takes Liaoning coastal economic zone development strategy as the background, focus on its core city's selection and evaluation, whether in theory or in practice, all have the vital significance. At the theoretical level, research results will enrich the development of regional economy in the core city function theory. In practice, research results will be helpful to make the Liaoning coastal economic zone more quickly and better development, thus promote the northeast old industrial bases'revitalization.
Based on reviewing, studying and analyzing the related literature, through the collation of existing theories, concepts, make the coastal economic belt of Liaoning as the research background, make its core city's functions as the research subject, using statistical analysis, trend analysis and other empirical research methods. Evaluating the central city's competitiveness of Liaoning coastal economic belt, analyzing the central city's functions, summarizing the insufficiency, then giving some suggestions. It's providing reference basis for selecting the core city of Liaoning coastal economic belt and enhancing the functions.
The paper has seven chapters, and they are as follows,Chapter I introduction. First the background and the significance are described, and the problems are introduced. And then the basic contents and the research methods are introduced. Comb the methodology and give the technology roadmap. Finally, the innovation points are summarized.
Chapter II literature Review. First the related concepts and the theories about the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle are expounded, and the existing literatures and researches are reviewed. Research into the relation between the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle. Review the related concepts around the core city of the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle and explain the function of the core city on that basis. Finally, induce the existing researches on the function evaluation of the core city.
Chapter III theoretical framework of the regional economic development and the function of the core city. First,elaborate the related theories of the the development of region and core city,in-depth comparison of economic equilibrium theory and non-equilibrium theory,so as to arrive Liaoning's coastal economic belt theoretical basis for the development-the development of non-equilibrium theory.Through further analysis of industrial build-up theory, can be obtained with similar products or complementary products, industrial layout together, while the core city to become similar to the original impetus for industrial build-up area.
Chapter IV Liaoning's coastal economic belt core city function evaluation.This chapter first examined the status of core city in domestic and in forein, and give some comparative analysis.Then the through empirical analysis and focus on Liaoning's coastal economic zone in the core city competitiveness evaluation.The core of regional development in the city's definition, based on the evaluation of the selection, evaluation and model building carried out in more detail.On this basis, the use of principal component analysis, selected twenty-three indicators of Liaoning's coastal economic zone of the city's competitiveness in six cities were evaluated, and the city features a comparative analysis.In providing an empirical basis, based on the city of Liaoning's coastal economic belt positioning and function of the choice of the core cities were analyzed.
Chapter V analyzed the function of the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic belt which is based on the SWOT analysis. This chapter selected the core city in the economic belt-Dalian as the most representative for focus analysis. First, from four dimensions of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats the chapter made a systematic analysis on the function of Dalian, as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone. On this basis, it elaborated the core city function of Dalian from three angles of the economic, cultural and social functions. Then it resulted that as a core city of Dalian in Liaoning province's coastal economic belt it played a variety of functions and roles. Finally, the chapter summarized that as a core city of Dalian, its function would be improved, and accordingly the chapter put forward some suggestions for improvement. Chapter VI researched the routing selection of Dalian on how to enhance the function as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone. According the regional context of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone, the chapter analyzed the importance of urban core construction, then focused on the coordination interaction patterns between industrial development as well as the city's spatial development patterns, and urban as well as coastal cities. Last but not least, from the three levels above, it studied the path for Dalian as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone on how to upgrade its functions.
ChapterⅦconclusions and drawbacks. First of all, it summarizes the main conclusions. And then it gives the drawbacks of the research. Specify the problems of the further research on the basis.
The innovation points of this article are as follows:
Firstly, by comparing the domestic and foreign core of the city's formation history and development status, comprehensive comparison of competitiveness level and composition of core cities, build a System and scientific Central city competitiveness evaluation index system. Such as the Liaoning coastal economic belt which is the state-level development zone, using the evaluation index system to comprehensive evaluation and comparison the city inside area, determination of Dalian as coastal economic zone of the core city, and through the comparison and evaluation index system, to locate and define the specific functions of other cities in the region; make the cities of the entire economic belt as the urban agglomeration, and systematic study the coordinated development relationship and mechanism between the cities in the urban agglomeration.
Secondly, in the process of empirical analysis, according to the limitations that the principal component analysis can only for static index, using the different time of coastal economic belt of Liaoning city competitiveness, can be reflected some result from a side that the competitiveness of each city in the coastal economic belt change over time, and thus infer the reasons of city competitiveness change and the next step to improve and strengthen; aiming at the main components of static model, using the static results from different time to derive the subjective reason of time-varying, then to find a feasible path for each city to further exert their own competitive advantage in the future.
Thirdly, in the core city competitiveness evaluation model and index selection has certain innovation. Firstly, based on the critical inheritance of Potter's" Diamond Model" the Swiss International Institute for Management Development of national competitiveness model, to build a city competitiveness model with the comprehensive economic strength, competitiveness, the competitiveness of enterprises, the competitiveness of science and technology as the core factors of city competitiveness. Secondly, the construction of the core city development index system is not only follows the division standard of social benefit and economic benefits, but also introduced ecological sub-system which is closely related to current sustainable development, selection of economic, social and ecological conditions as an indicator, and use of economic gross, industrial structure and trade conditions, financial conditions index, education, health, technological development, afforestation, sewage treatment, quality of life in ten areas as secondary indicators as well as 23 third-specific indicators.
目前,国内学者普遍关注的区域经济带以及核心城市功能研究仍然是以长三角经济带、环渤海经济带、珠三角经济带为主。在“十一五”规划时期,中央政府实施了振兴东北老工业基地战略。在这种情形下,黑龙江、吉林、辽宁先后提出建立以某些城市为主的经济带,带动地区经济振兴和崛起的发展思路。作为东北地区唯一的沿海区域,辽宁沿海经济带的发展对带动辽宁自身的经济发展,以及辐射东北腹地的经济发展具有重要的意义。随着辽宁沿海经济带的开发建设,城市化必然对带内经济产生消费拉动效应,对新兴产业的发展与结构升级形成空间支撑与集聚效应。但是,纵观现状,尚存在较多问题：如经济发展不平衡、产业结构安排不合理、与腹地经济发展的互动不足等。这就要求确立辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市的主体地位,并对其功能进行准确定位、完整评价,促进其功能改善,发挥核心城市在经济带发展中的作用。辽宁沿海经济带要形成以大连为核心,丹东、锦州、营口、盘锦、葫芦岛等为一体的区域经济带,依托经济结构调整和城市功能互补,实现区域的可持续发展。
本文以辽宁沿海经济带发展战略为背景,重点研究其核心城市功能评价及其提升,无论是在理论层面,还是在实践层面都具有一定的意义。在理论层面,研究成果将丰富区域经济发展中核心城市功能的相关理论。在实践层面,研究成果将在一定程度上为辽宁沿海经济带的发展提供具有参考意义的政策建议。
本文在对相关研究的文献综述分析基础上,通过整理现有相关理论、概念,以辽宁沿海经济带为研究背景,以其核心城市功能为研究主体,利用统计分析、态势分析等实证研究方法,对辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市竞争力进行评价,对核心城市功能进行分析,总结不足并提出针对性建议,为辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能选择以及功能提升提供了参考依据。
论文由七章构成,主要内容如下：
第1章绪论。首先对论文研究的背景及意义进行了说明,并对所要研究的问题进行了阐述。介绍了论文研究的基本内容和研究方法,并梳理了论文的研究思路,给出了研究的技术路线图。最后概括了论文的创新点。
第2章文献综述。从城市群与都市圈的相关基础概念和理论研究的阐述入手,结合现有文献和已有研究成果进行了综述,进而探讨了城市群与都市圈的相关联系。围绕城市群与都市圈中的核心城市相关概念进行了综述,阐释了核心城市在区域经济发展中应具备的功能,对已有核心城市功能评价的研究进行了归纳。
第3章区域经济发展与核心城市功能的理论框架。首先对区域与核心城市发展相关的理论进行了详细阐述,把区域经济均衡理论与区域经济非均衡发展进行深入对比,从而得出辽宁沿海经济带的发展理论依据——非均衡发展理论。通过进一步分析产业集聚理论,得出可以将具有相似产品或互补产品的产业布局在一起,同时是核心城市成为相似产业集聚区的原始推动力。区域经济一体化理论也从区域的角度阐述了产业集聚这一现象。然后又研究了城市功能理论,并将国内外最新的一些理论加以陈述与分析,为下一步理论的运用——实现对基于辽宁沿海经济带发展战略视角下的核心城市功能研究奠定了理论基础。
第4章核心城市竞争力综合评价体系构建及其应用。本章首先研究了国内外核心城市发展的现状,并进行了比较分析。然后重点通过实证分析对辽宁沿海经济带中核心城市竞争力进行评价。在对区域发展中核心城市的界定基础上,对评价指标的选取、评价方法与模型的构建进行了详细阐述。在此基础上,运用主成分分析法,选取了二十三个指标对辽宁沿海经济带的六个城市的城市竞争力进行了评价,并对各城市功能进行了比较分析。在提供了实证依据基础上,对辽宁沿海经济带的城市功能定位与核心城市的选择进行了分析。
第5章辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能定位——基于SWOT分析。本章选取了辽宁沿海经济带中最具有代表性的核心城市——大连进行重点分析。首先从优势、劣势、机遇、威胁四个维度,对大连作为辽宁沿海经济带的核心城市功能,进行了系统的分析。以此为基础,从经济功能、文化功能、社会功能三个角度,详细阐述了大连的核心城市功能。由此得出大连作为一个核心城市,在辽宁沿海经济带中所起到的各种功能与作用。最后,总结了大连作为核心城市,其功能有待提升的方面,并据此提出了的一些意见和建议。
第6章辽宁沿海经济带核心城市功能提升的路径选择。以辽宁沿海经济带为区域背景,首先分析了其核心城市建设的重要意义,然后对核心城市的产业发展模式和空间发展模式及核心城市与沿海城市群发展之间的协调互动模式依次进行了研究。并从这三个层面研究了作为辽宁沿海经济带的核心城市提升其功能所应选择的路径。
第7章结论及不足之处。首先总结了论文研究的主要结论,然后对论文研究的不足进行了说明,在此基础上明确了需要进一步深入研究的问题。
本文的创新点如下：
(1)通过比较国内外核心城市的形成历史和发展现状,综合对比核心城市竞争力水平及其构成,构建了系统、科学的核心城市竞争力评价指标体系。以辽宁沿海经济带这一国家级发展战略为例,利用评价指标体系对区域内的城市进行全面比较和评价,确定大连为沿海经济带的核心城市,并且通过该指标体系的比较和评价,对区内的其他城市定位和功能进行了具体的界定。论文还系统研究了城市群内各城市间的协同发展关系和机理。
(2)在实证分析过程中,针对主成分分析只能对静态指标进行分析的局限性,采用不同时点对辽宁沿海经济带城市竞争力进行比较,从侧面反映出沿海经济带各城市竞争力随时间的变化结果,从而推导出导致各城市竞争力的变化原因及下一步需要改进与加强的方面。针对主成分的静态模式采用从不同时点的静态结果推导出随时间变化的主观原因,进而为今后各城市进一步发挥自身竞争力的优势寻找可行的路径。
(3)在核心城市竞争力评价模型的建立和指标选取方面有一定的创新。首先,在批判性继承波特的“钻石模型”和瑞士国际管理发展学院的国家竞争力模型的基础上,构建了以经济综合实力、产业竞争力、企业竞争力、科技竞争力作为城市竞争力的核心因素的城市竞争力模型。其次,核心城市发展指标体系的构建不仅遵循了社会效益、经济效益的划分标准,而且引入与目前可持续发展紧密关联的生态环境的子体系,选择经济效益、社会效益及生态状况作为一级指标,采用经济总量、产业结构、贸易状况、金融环境指标、教育、卫生、科技发展、绿化、污水处理、生活质量等十个方面作为二级指标以及具体的23个三级指标。
Along with the advancement of industrialization and urbanization, the world already entered the period which is so-called "the urban century", "the urban time", the city has become the core of regional economy day by day as the productive forces'carrier. Some international cities, metropolitan areas and urban agglomerations control the areas' economic development. The cities'function role has enhanced. It's more and more important in the global economy because of the cities'relationship. The world-class metropolitan areas had risen, which makes the center in New York, London, Tokyo and other cities. These cities and the metropolitan areas mutual support and rapidly develop, attracting a large number of people, capital, materials and information flow. It has played an irreplaceable role in the regional economic development. After reforming and opening, in China a large number of urban areas appear in the eastern coastal areas, and form three nationally recognized coastal economic belt--- Pearl River Delta, Yangtze River Delta and Round Bohai urban agglomerations. Shanghai is the center of Yangtze River Delta, from the development of Yangtze River Delta regional economic, it can be seen that the core city's role is not to be ignored in the rapid development of regional economy.
At present, domestic scholars have paid attention to the economic region and the core city function research which is still mainly in the Yangtze River economic belt, Round Bohai economic belt and the Pearl River Delta economic zone. In the "Eleventh Five-Year Plan" period, the central government's regional policy carried out the strategy which is based on revitalizing northeast old industrial bases. In this case, it has proposed establishing the economic belt which is round some cities, driving the regional economic development. As the only coastal region of Northeast area, the development of Liaoning coastal economic zone has a deeply effect on promoting Liaoning economic development and the other areas'economic development in Northeast. With the development and construction in Liaoning coastal economic zone, urbanization can pull the domestic consumption inevitably, support the new industry development and structure upgrade. However, in the current situation, there are many problems:such as the imbalance of economic development, the unreasonable structure arrangement, the lack of economic development interaction with the hinterland and so on. The Liaoning coastal economic belt should make Dalian as the core, integrate Dalian, Dandong, Jinzhou, Yingkou, Panjin, Huludao, rely on the adjustment of economic structure and city function complementary, implement the regional sustainable development. It requires to establish the core city's main position in Liaoning coastal economic belt, accurate situate its function, complete evaluate, promote its function improved. The central city should play its role in the economic zone's development.
This paper takes Liaoning coastal economic zone development strategy as the background, focus on its core city's selection and evaluation, whether in theory or in practice, all have the vital significance. At the theoretical level, research results will enrich the development of regional economy in the core city function theory. In practice, research results will be helpful to make the Liaoning coastal economic zone more quickly and better development, thus promote the northeast old industrial bases'revitalization.
Based on reviewing, studying and analyzing the related literature, through the collation of existing theories, concepts, make the coastal economic belt of Liaoning as the research background, make its core city's functions as the research subject, using statistical analysis, trend analysis and other empirical research methods. Evaluating the central city's competitiveness of Liaoning coastal economic belt, analyzing the central city's functions, summarizing the insufficiency, then giving some suggestions. It's providing reference basis for selecting the core city of Liaoning coastal economic belt and enhancing the functions.
The paper has seven chapters, and they are as follows,Chapter I introduction. First the background and the significance are described, and the problems are introduced. And then the basic contents and the research methods are introduced. Comb the methodology and give the technology roadmap. Finally, the innovation points are summarized.
Chapter II literature Review. First the related concepts and the theories about the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle are expounded, and the existing literatures and researches are reviewed. Research into the relation between the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle. Review the related concepts around the core city of the urban agglomeration and the metropolis circle and explain the function of the core city on that basis. Finally, induce the existing researches on the function evaluation of the core city.
Chapter III theoretical framework of the regional economic development and the function of the core city. First,elaborate the related theories of the the development of region and core city,in-depth comparison of economic equilibrium theory and non-equilibrium theory,so as to arrive Liaoning's coastal economic belt theoretical basis for the development-the development of non-equilibrium theory.Through further analysis of industrial build-up theory, can be obtained with similar products or complementary products, industrial layout together, while the core city to become similar to the original impetus for industrial build-up area.
Chapter IV Liaoning's coastal economic belt core city function evaluation.This chapter first examined the status of core city in domestic and in forein, and give some comparative analysis.Then the through empirical analysis and focus on Liaoning's coastal economic zone in the core city competitiveness evaluation.The core of regional development in the city's definition, based on the evaluation of the selection, evaluation and model building carried out in more detail.On this basis, the use of principal component analysis, selected twenty-three indicators of Liaoning's coastal economic zone of the city's competitiveness in six cities were evaluated, and the city features a comparative analysis.In providing an empirical basis, based on the city of Liaoning's coastal economic belt positioning and function of the choice of the core cities were analyzed.
Chapter V analyzed the function of the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic belt which is based on the SWOT analysis. This chapter selected the core city in the economic belt-Dalian as the most representative for focus analysis. First, from four dimensions of the strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats the chapter made a systematic analysis on the function of Dalian, as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone. On this basis, it elaborated the core city function of Dalian from three angles of the economic, cultural and social functions. Then it resulted that as a core city of Dalian in Liaoning province's coastal economic belt it played a variety of functions and roles. Finally, the chapter summarized that as a core city of Dalian, its function would be improved, and accordingly the chapter put forward some suggestions for improvement. Chapter VI researched the routing selection of Dalian on how to enhance the function as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone. According the regional context of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone, the chapter analyzed the importance of urban core construction, then focused on the coordination interaction patterns between industrial development as well as the city's spatial development patterns, and urban as well as coastal cities. Last but not least, from the three levels above, it studied the path for Dalian as the core city of Liaoning province's coastal economic zone on how to upgrade its functions.
ChapterⅦconclusions and drawbacks. First of all, it summarizes the main conclusions. And then it gives the drawbacks of the research. Specify the problems of the further research on the basis.
The innovation points of this article are as follows:
Firstly, by comparing the domestic and foreign core of the city's formation history and development status, comprehensive comparison of competitiveness level and composition of core cities, build a System and scientific Central city competitiveness evaluation index system. Such as the Liaoning coastal economic belt which is the state-level development zone, using the evaluation index system to comprehensive evaluation and comparison the city inside area, determination of Dalian as coastal economic zone of the core city, and through the comparison and evaluation index system, to locate and define the specific functions of other cities in the region; make the cities of the entire economic belt as the urban agglomeration, and systematic study the coordinated development relationship and mechanism between the cities in the urban agglomeration.
Secondly, in the process of empirical analysis, according to the limitations that the principal component analysis can only for static index, using the different time of coastal economic belt of Liaoning city competitiveness, can be reflected some result from a side that the competitiveness of each city in the coastal economic belt change over time, and thus infer the reasons of city competitiveness change and the next step to improve and strengthen; aiming at the main components of static model, using the static results from different time to derive the subjective reason of time-varying, then to find a feasible path for each city to further exert their own competitive advantage in the future.
Thirdly, in the core city competitiveness evaluation model and index selection has certain innovation. Firstly, based on the critical inheritance of Potter's" Diamond Model" the Swiss International Institute for Management Development of national competitiveness model, to build a city competitiveness model with the comprehensive economic strength, competitiveness, the competitiveness of enterprises, the competitiveness of science and technology as the core factors of city competitiveness. Secondly, the construction of the core city development index system is not only follows the division standard of social benefit and economic benefits, but also introduced ecological sub-system which is closely related to current sustainable development, selection of economic, social and ecological conditions as an indicator, and use of economic gross, industrial structure and trade conditions, financial conditions index, education, health, technological development, afforestation, sewage treatment, quality of life in ten areas as secondary indicators as well as 23 third-specific indicators.
引文
①鄂锐.港口经济与区域经济发展一依托港口经济推动辽宁沿海经济带发展[J].党政干部学刊,2010, (2)： 37-38.
②从空间分布看,辽宁沿海经济带呈斜“Z”字分布,从字头依次为绥中城镇群、葫芦岛市和锦州市,字中间为从盘锦、营口到大连的沈大经济带,字底为庄河花园口城镇群和丹东城市圈。
①刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011,(2)：136-138.
①王丹,谭啸.辽宁“五点一线”沿海经济带发展战略研究[J].中国商界,2008, (11)：127.
②潘中毅,支大林,韩建雨.辽宁沿海经济带一体化发展对策研究[J].东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(6)：160-165.
①刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011,(2)：136-138.
①潘承仕.城市功能综合评价研究[D].重庆大学硕士论文,2004.
②王书汉.现代城市功能结构的优化思路[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2006(5)：17.
①Dennis A. Rondinelli and Gyula Vastag, Urban Economic Growth in the21s'Century:Assessing the International Competitiveness of Metropolitan Areas,Migration, Urbanization and Developmen New Directions and Issues, United NationsPopulation Fund,1993:129-131
①吴晓隽,《上海大都市圈的结构及功能体系研究》,2006
①陈琳霞,上海城区竞争力研究,博士学位论文,复旦大学,2004.4:30-22
②国家计委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组,对区域性中心城市内涵的基本界定[J],经济研究参考,2002年第52期.
①黄旭成,唐礼智,城市竞争力理论浅析,福建地理,2001,16(2):20-21
[1]Dennis A. Rondinelli and Gyula Vastag.Urban economic growth in the2ls Century:assessing the international competitiveness of Metropolitan areas,migration urbanization and developmen new directions and issues[M].United Nations Population Fund,1993:129-131.
[2]Lain B.Cities and competitiveness[J].Urban Studies,2000, (3):795-842.
[3]Andrew F.Haughwout.Centraleity infrastrueture investment and suburbanhouse values [J].Regional Seienee and Urban Eeonomies,1997,27:199—215.
[4]B.K.Chakrabarty.Urban managementand optimizing urban development models[J]. Habitat International,1998,22(4):503—522.
[5]Charles A.M. deBartolome, Stevhen L.Ross. Who's in eharge of three ntraleity?Thee onfliet between effieieney and equity in the design of ametro politanarea[J]. Journal of Urban Eeonomies,2004,56 (3):458—483.
[6]John Me Carthy. Revitalization of the eoreeity:theease of Detroit[J].Cities,1997, 14(1):1-11.
[7]Graham Haughton.Enveloping sustainable urban development models[J]. Cities,1997,14(4):189—195.
[8]Axel Borsdorf, Rodrigo Hidalgo, Rafael Sdnehez.A new model of urban development in Latin Ameriea:The gate deommunities and feneedeities in the metro[J]. Politanareas of Santiagode Chileand Val Paraiso Cities,2007,24: 365—378.
[9]Sharma S. Persistence and stability in city growth[J] Journal of Urban Economics, 2003,53 (2):300-320.
[10]Ciccone Antonio. Agglomeration Effects in Europe[J]. European Economic Review, 2002,46 (2):213-227.
[11]AXEL BORSDORF. A new model of urban development in Latin America:The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valpara'so[J].Cities,2007, (5):365-378.
[12]M. Hoshiko,K. Hara,T. Ishitake. Health impact assessment of the transition to a core city in Japan [J].Public Health,2009,2:771-781
[13]Zhang WL,Liu ZYJiang ZH. Evaluation index system of innovative city and developmental objectives of Dalian. [C].Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology,2007.
[14]Lu DY. Establishing a municipal urban district index system to speed up urban economic development[C].Proceedings of the 2005 Conference of System Dynamics and Management Science.2005:300-304.
[15]Cook, Braczyk, Heidenreic. Regional Innovation Systems:The role of governance in a globalized world[M].London:UCL Pres,199,:49-6.
[16]Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Analysis Ecosystem services in urban areas.Ecological Economics,1999,29,29 (2):293-301.
[17]Eric Hopenbrouwer,Eric Louw. Mixed-use Development:Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Dockland[J]. European Planning Studies,2005,13 (7):968-983.
[18]Gnyawali D R, Madhavan R. Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics:A Structural Embeddedness Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001,26 (3):431-445.
[19]Gereffi G, Humphrey J,Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains[J].Review of International Political Economy,2003,12 (1):78-104.
[20]Engright. Regional Clusters:What We Know and What We Should Know[A].the Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition.2001,10:315-327.
[21]J.S. Metcalfe. Knowledge of growth and the growth of knowledge[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2002,12:1-2.
[22]鄂锐.港口经济与区域经济发展—依托港口经济推动辽宁沿海经济带发展[J].党政干部学刊,2010,(2)：37-38.
[23]徐芃.以科技创新引领辽宁沿海经济带产业结构优化升级的若干思考及建议[J].中国发展,2010,10(5)：29-36.
[24]董洁芳,邓椿.核心城市在城市经济圈发展中的功能研究[J].科技和产业,2008,8(6)： 55-58.
[25]王君.我国区域性核心城市发展现状分析[J].经济研究参考,2002,(81)：9-14.
[26]刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011, (2)：136-138.
[27]王丹,谭啸.辽宁“五点一线”沿海经济带发展战略研究[J].中国商界,2008,(11): 127.
[28]潘中毅,支大林,韩建雨.辽宁沿海经济带一体化发展对策研究[J].东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008, (6)：160-165.
[29]顾朝林,于涛方,刘志虹等.城市群规划的理论与方法[J].城市规划,2007,(10).
[30]许岩.大连对辽宁沿海经济带辐射能力比较研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,32(1)：87-88.
[31]吕林.高速城市化背景下的我国都市圈发展战略研究[J].山东工商学院学报,2005,19(1)：11-16.
[32]王何,逢爱梅.我国三大都市圈域中心城市功能效应比较[J].城市规划汇刊,2003,(2)：72-77.
[33]张贡生.都市圈：文献综述[J].太原城市职业技术学院学报,2004,(58):5-7.
[34]谷人旭,殷为华.论长江三角洲都市经济圈的形成及其核心城市上海的功能定位[J].地域研究与开发,2001,20(1)：27-31.
[35]周游,张敏.经济中心城市的集聚与扩散规律研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2000, (4)：16-22.
[36]祁金立.城市化聚集效应和辐射效应分析[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学),2003,25(5)：30-34.
[37]寇亚辉.论城市核心竞争力[J].经济体制改革,2004,(3):147-150.
[38]李媛媛.论核心城市在城市群经济发展中的作用[J].时代金融,2007,(11):21-23.
[39]杨新年,董丹红.建设创新型中心城市提升区域自主创新能力[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(3)：5-7.
[40]谷国锋.区域经济发展的动力系统研究[D].东北师范大学,2005.
[41]范文韬.中心城市对区域经济发展的意义[J].赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版),2005,26(1)：68-69.
[42]刘崇献.北京与上海经济辐射能力差异探析[J].北京社会科学,2005,(4)：40-44.
[43]孟祥林.城市化进程研究[D].北京师范大学,2006.
[44]李保平,张晶.甘肃省省际边界中心城市发展研究—以陕甘省际边界地区为例[J].甘肃科技,2008,(4).
[45]蓝树江.重庆城市对农村经济的辐射带动作用[J].探索,2003,(5):131-132.
[46]徐晓红等.泛珠三角经济辐射发展模式探析[J].宜春学院学报,2005,27-29.
[47]冯德显,贾晶,乔旭宁.区域性中心城市辐射力及其评价——以郑州市为例[J].2006,26(3):266-272.
[48]李滨烽.浅析经济区现代化中心城市的功能[J].福建商业高等专科学校学报, 2005,(3)：8-10.
[49]黄莹,周黎俊(2008).中国三大都市圈核心城市辐射能力研究[J].陕西农业科学,2008, (1)：155-158.
[50]彭书凤.重庆市可持续发展指标体系与能力评估[D].重庆师范大学,2008.
[51]王宁.天津生态城市评价指标体系研究[D].天津财经大学,2009.
[52]刘卿.城市竞争力评价指标体系和评价方法研究[D].天津大学,2006.
[53]刘力,丁四保.吉林省区域核心城市可持续发展能力的定量化研究[J].人文地理,2002,17(4)：59-62.
[54]陆立军,唐耀林.浙中城市群综合集聚度及核心城市[J].经济地理,2008,28(4):552-556.
[55]杨志恒.山东省复合型核心城市系统发展研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2003,(1)： 16-18.
[56]郭连乐.登封市可持续发展指标体系与综合评价研究[D].河南农业大学,2009.
[57]蒋博.创新型城市指标体系与评价研究[D].重庆大学,2008.
[58]许萌.基于GIS的区域城市化水平综合评价研究[D].新疆大学,2006.
[59]郝寿义,倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力研究——以若干城市为案例[J].经济科学,1998,(3)：50-56.
[60]马文军.国际性中心城市规划建设指标体系的比较研究—以上海为例[J].城市规划,2009,(2)：52-59.
[61]薛丽芳,欧向军,谭海樵.基于熵值法的淮海经济区城市中心性评价[J].地理与地理信息科学,2009,25,(3)：63-66.
[62]温洁洁.珠三角城市群中心城市竞争和功能联系研究[D].暨南大学,2007.
[63]黄莹,周黎俊.中国三大都市圈核心城市辐射能力研究[J].陕西农业科学,2008,(1)： 155-158.
[64]杨东方.空间：环渤海地区经济合作的现实[J].北方经济,2010, (10)：44-45.
[65]郭荣朝,宋双华,苗长虹.城市群结构优化与功能升级—以中原城市群为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(3)：322-328.
[66]史育龙,周一星.关于大都市带(都市连绵区)研究的论争及近今进展述评[J].国际城市规划,2009增刊,160-166.
[67]高汝熹,罗明义.城市圈域经济论[M].昆明：云南大学出版社,1998.
[68]胡序威等.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[69]吴泓,陈修颖,顾朝林.基于非场所理论的徐州都市圈发展研究[J].经济地理, 2003,23(6)：766-771.
[70]王建.区域与发展[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1996.
[71]李宁.中原城市群能级评价的实证研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2010.
[72]鲍悦华,陈强.基于城市功能的城市发展质量指标体系构建[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(5)：778-784.
[73]潘承仕.城市功能综合评价研究[D].重庆大学硕士论文,2004.
[74]沈金华,曾翔旻.城市功能的优化与提升[J].中国城市经济,2007(5)：56.
[75]王书汉.现代城市功能结构的优化思路[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2006(5)：17.
[76]国家计委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组.对区域性中心城市内涵的基本界定[J],经济研究参考,2002, (52):2-13.
[77]江曼琦,中心城市与区域经济发展关系的再认识[A],区域与旅游规划空间站(http://www.plansky.net),2005年10月10日.
[78]郭震洪、李云娥.从增长极理论探讨中心经济城市在区域经济中作用[J],山东社会科学,2006,(8):68-71.
[79]国家发改委经济运行司.加快中心城市发展促进区域经济腾飞[J],当代经济,2005,(12)：1.
[80]李京文等.国际竞争力综合影响因素分析[J].中国软科学,2001,(11):15-21.
[81]陈琳霞.上海城区竞争力研究[D].复旦大学,2004.4:30-22.
[82]唐礼智.试析城市竞争力[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2001,(6):94.
[83]黄旭成,唐礼智.城市竞争力理论浅析[J].福建地理,2001,16(2):20-21.
[84]吴峥嵘.开发区综合竞争力评价指标体系的研究[D].同济大学,2004:45-46.
[85]郭凯锋,周婷,王灿.江苏省北部地区核心城市构建与组织分析[J].华东经济管理,2007,(10)：23-26.
[86]郑适、汪洋.中国产业集中度现状和发展趋势研究[J].财贸经济,2007,(6):111-117.
[87]洪银兴.城市功能意义的城市化及其产业支持[J].经济学家,2003,(2):20-24.
[88]朱英明.城市群经济空间分析[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.45-56.
[89]程玉鸿.基于城市群的城市竞争力研究——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[D].中山大学,2004:1-5.
[90]韩海娟.浅析武汉城市竞争力的提升[J].现代城市研究,2006,(5):5-9.
[91]姚士谋,王书国.区域发展中“城市群现象”的空间系统探索[J].经济地理,2006,(9)：34-36.
[92]张建华,洪银兴.都市圈内发展现代农业研究[J].中州学刊,2008,(5):23-27.
[93]王发曾,刘静玉.中原城市群整合发展的关键问题[J].经济地理,2008,(9):34-36.
[94]汪淳,陈璐.基于网络城市理念的城市圈布局——以苏锡常城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2006,(6)：56-83.
[95]张文忠.经济区位论[M].北京：科学出版社,2000:45-67.
[96]于向英.郑州与中部省会城市首位度比较[J].中国统计,2007,(5)：56-57.
[97]吴海东,李庆.我国城市的经济集聚扩散机理与动力机制分析——以重庆主城区为例[J].天府新论,2005,(5)：64-66.
[98]王莉岚,辛灵,钟小燕.城市群核心城市对外交通规划[J].科技与经济,2008,(1):46-50.
[99]孟祥林.核心城市与腹地间的关系：以京沪为例的经济学分析[J].区域与城市,2008,(2)：36-39.
[100]仇保兴.应对机遇与挑战——中国城镇化战略研究主要问题与对策[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[101]杨保军.区域协调发展析论[J].城市规划,2004,28(5)：20-24.
[102]姚士谋,朱英明,陈振光.中国城市群[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.
[103]张京祥.中国都市密集地区区域管治中行政区划的影响研究[J].城市规划,2002,26(9)：16-21.
[104]周一星.城市地理学[M].北京：商务印书馆,1995:315.
[105]崔功豪.当前城市区域规划问题的几点思考[J].城市规划,2002,(2)：40-42.
[106]崔功豪.中国城镇发展研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1992.
[107]王建.中国区域经济发展战略研究[J].管理世界,1996,(4):175-189.
[108]孙一飞.中国城镇密集区研究[D].南京大学,1994.
[109]张泉.在全省城市工作会议上的讲话[J].江苏城市规划,2000,(5).
[110]邹军,陈小卉,等.城镇体系空间规划再认识[J].城市规划,2001,(1)：30-33.
[111]张京祥,邹军,吴启焰,等.论都市圈地域空间的组织[J].城市规划,2001,(5):19-23.
[112]邹军,王兴海,张伟,等.日本首都圈规划构想及启示[J].国外城市规划,2003,(2).
[113]周一星.济宁—曲阜复合中心城市研究[J].城市规划,2001,(12):7-12.
[114]茅杰.上海欲联手江浙十五城市建设世界第六大都市圈[N].新华日报,2002-11-07(C1).
[115]王东辉.长兴岛-助推大连核心城市建设[J].共产党员,2009.6.
[116]欧阳华.把南宁打造成广西北部湾经济区的核心城市[J].广西经济,2008, (5)：48-49.
[117]张红力.我国核心城市规划中的几个问题[J].人民论坛,2005,(6):38-39.
[118]曹敏娜.区域核心城市周边中小城市的发展思路研究—以句容为例[J].江苏城市规划,2006,(9)：3-7.
[119]李佳沼,孙铁山,李国平.中国三大都市圈核心城市职能分工及互补性的比较研究[J].地理科学,2010,(4)：53-509.
[120]卢万合,刘继生.中国十大城市群城市流强度的比较分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2010,(2)：60-64.
[121]郭荣朝,宋双华,苗长虹.城市群结构优化与功能升级——以中原城市群为例[J].地理科学,2011,(3)：322-328.
[122]武前波,宁越敏.基于网络体系优势的国际城市功能升级——以上海为例[J].南京社会科学,2010,(8)：7-13.
[123]程必定.上海世博会后长三角城市群的功能提升[J].城市发展研究,2010,(4):12-19.
[124]匡文慧,刘纪远,邵全琴,等.区域尺度城市增长时空动态模型及其应用[J].地理学报,2011,(2)：178-188.
[125]王士君,宋飓,冯章献,等.东北地区城市群组的格局,过程及城市流强度[J].地理科学,2011,(3)：287-294.
[126]左学金,陈建华.城市连绵区和皖江城市带发展[J].江淮论坛,2011,(2):5-12.
[127]吕芳.大连自由贸易港的建设及其目标模式[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,(2)：239-242.
[128]付丽萍,舒亚东.试论武汉城求功能定位——兼与中部省会城市的功能定位比较[J].江汉论坛,2010,(4)：23-28.
②从空间分布看,辽宁沿海经济带呈斜“Z”字分布,从字头依次为绥中城镇群、葫芦岛市和锦州市,字中间为从盘锦、营口到大连的沈大经济带,字底为庄河花园口城镇群和丹东城市圈。
①刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011,(2)：136-138.
①王丹,谭啸.辽宁“五点一线”沿海经济带发展战略研究[J].中国商界,2008, (11)：127.
②潘中毅,支大林,韩建雨.辽宁沿海经济带一体化发展对策研究[J].东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008,(6)：160-165.
①刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011,(2)：136-138.
①潘承仕.城市功能综合评价研究[D].重庆大学硕士论文,2004.
②王书汉.现代城市功能结构的优化思路[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2006(5)：17.
①Dennis A. Rondinelli and Gyula Vastag, Urban Economic Growth in the21s'Century:Assessing the International Competitiveness of Metropolitan Areas,Migration, Urbanization and Developmen New Directions and Issues, United NationsPopulation Fund,1993:129-131
①吴晓隽,《上海大都市圈的结构及功能体系研究》,2006
①陈琳霞,上海城区竞争力研究,博士学位论文,复旦大学,2004.4:30-22
②国家计委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组,对区域性中心城市内涵的基本界定[J],经济研究参考,2002年第52期.
①黄旭成,唐礼智,城市竞争力理论浅析,福建地理,2001,16(2):20-21
[1]Dennis A. Rondinelli and Gyula Vastag.Urban economic growth in the2ls Century:assessing the international competitiveness of Metropolitan areas,migration urbanization and developmen new directions and issues[M].United Nations Population Fund,1993:129-131.
[2]Lain B.Cities and competitiveness[J].Urban Studies,2000, (3):795-842.
[3]Andrew F.Haughwout.Centraleity infrastrueture investment and suburbanhouse values [J].Regional Seienee and Urban Eeonomies,1997,27:199—215.
[4]B.K.Chakrabarty.Urban managementand optimizing urban development models[J]. Habitat International,1998,22(4):503—522.
[5]Charles A.M. deBartolome, Stevhen L.Ross. Who's in eharge of three ntraleity?Thee onfliet between effieieney and equity in the design of ametro politanarea[J]. Journal of Urban Eeonomies,2004,56 (3):458—483.
[6]John Me Carthy. Revitalization of the eoreeity:theease of Detroit[J].Cities,1997, 14(1):1-11.
[7]Graham Haughton.Enveloping sustainable urban development models[J]. Cities,1997,14(4):189—195.
[8]Axel Borsdorf, Rodrigo Hidalgo, Rafael Sdnehez.A new model of urban development in Latin Ameriea:The gate deommunities and feneedeities in the metro[J]. Politanareas of Santiagode Chileand Val Paraiso Cities,2007,24: 365—378.
[9]Sharma S. Persistence and stability in city growth[J] Journal of Urban Economics, 2003,53 (2):300-320.
[10]Ciccone Antonio. Agglomeration Effects in Europe[J]. European Economic Review, 2002,46 (2):213-227.
[11]AXEL BORSDORF. A new model of urban development in Latin America:The gated communities and fenced cities in the metropolitan areas of Santiago de Chile and Valpara'so[J].Cities,2007, (5):365-378.
[12]M. Hoshiko,K. Hara,T. Ishitake. Health impact assessment of the transition to a core city in Japan [J].Public Health,2009,2:771-781
[13]Zhang WL,Liu ZYJiang ZH. Evaluation index system of innovative city and developmental objectives of Dalian. [C].Proceedings of the Fifth International Symposium on Management of Technology,2007.
[14]Lu DY. Establishing a municipal urban district index system to speed up urban economic development[C].Proceedings of the 2005 Conference of System Dynamics and Management Science.2005:300-304.
[15]Cook, Braczyk, Heidenreic. Regional Innovation Systems:The role of governance in a globalized world[M].London:UCL Pres,199,:49-6.
[16]Bolund P, Hunhammar S. Analysis Ecosystem services in urban areas.Ecological Economics,1999,29,29 (2):293-301.
[17]Eric Hopenbrouwer,Eric Louw. Mixed-use Development:Theory and Practice in Amsterdam's Eastern Dockland[J]. European Planning Studies,2005,13 (7):968-983.
[18]Gnyawali D R, Madhavan R. Cooperative Networks and Competitive Dynamics:A Structural Embeddedness Perspective[J]. Academy of Management Review,2001,26 (3):431-445.
[19]Gereffi G, Humphrey J,Sturgeon T. The Governance of Global Value Chains[J].Review of International Political Economy,2003,12 (1):78-104.
[20]Engright. Regional Clusters:What We Know and What We Should Know[A].the Kiel Institute International Workshop on Innovation Clusters and Interregional Competition.2001,10:315-327.
[21]J.S. Metcalfe. Knowledge of growth and the growth of knowledge[J]. Journal of Evolutionary Economics,2002,12:1-2.
[22]鄂锐.港口经济与区域经济发展—依托港口经济推动辽宁沿海经济带发展[J].党政干部学刊,2010,(2)：37-38.
[23]徐芃.以科技创新引领辽宁沿海经济带产业结构优化升级的若干思考及建议[J].中国发展,2010,10(5)：29-36.
[24]董洁芳,邓椿.核心城市在城市经济圈发展中的功能研究[J].科技和产业,2008,8(6)： 55-58.
[25]王君.我国区域性核心城市发展现状分析[J].经济研究参考,2002,(81)：9-14.
[26]刘志虹,邬冰.辽宁沿海经济带的城市化响应机制与发展对策研究[J].社会科学辑刊,2011, (2)：136-138.
[27]王丹,谭啸.辽宁“五点一线”沿海经济带发展战略研究[J].中国商界,2008,(11): 127.
[28]潘中毅,支大林,韩建雨.辽宁沿海经济带一体化发展对策研究[J].东北师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2008, (6)：160-165.
[29]顾朝林,于涛方,刘志虹等.城市群规划的理论与方法[J].城市规划,2007,(10).
[30]许岩.大连对辽宁沿海经济带辐射能力比较研究[J].山西财经大学学报,2010,32(1)：87-88.
[31]吕林.高速城市化背景下的我国都市圈发展战略研究[J].山东工商学院学报,2005,19(1)：11-16.
[32]王何,逢爱梅.我国三大都市圈域中心城市功能效应比较[J].城市规划汇刊,2003,(2)：72-77.
[33]张贡生.都市圈：文献综述[J].太原城市职业技术学院学报,2004,(58):5-7.
[34]谷人旭,殷为华.论长江三角洲都市经济圈的形成及其核心城市上海的功能定位[J].地域研究与开发,2001,20(1)：27-31.
[35]周游,张敏.经济中心城市的集聚与扩散规律研究[J].南京师大学报(社会科学版),2000, (4)：16-22.
[36]祁金立.城市化聚集效应和辐射效应分析[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学),2003,25(5)：30-34.
[37]寇亚辉.论城市核心竞争力[J].经济体制改革,2004,(3):147-150.
[38]李媛媛.论核心城市在城市群经济发展中的作用[J].时代金融,2007,(11):21-23.
[39]杨新年,董丹红.建设创新型中心城市提升区域自主创新能力[J].科技进步与对策,2006,(3)：5-7.
[40]谷国锋.区域经济发展的动力系统研究[D].东北师范大学,2005.
[41]范文韬.中心城市对区域经济发展的意义[J].赤峰学院学报(汉文哲学社会科学版),2005,26(1)：68-69.
[42]刘崇献.北京与上海经济辐射能力差异探析[J].北京社会科学,2005,(4)：40-44.
[43]孟祥林.城市化进程研究[D].北京师范大学,2006.
[44]李保平,张晶.甘肃省省际边界中心城市发展研究—以陕甘省际边界地区为例[J].甘肃科技,2008,(4).
[45]蓝树江.重庆城市对农村经济的辐射带动作用[J].探索,2003,(5):131-132.
[46]徐晓红等.泛珠三角经济辐射发展模式探析[J].宜春学院学报,2005,27-29.
[47]冯德显,贾晶,乔旭宁.区域性中心城市辐射力及其评价——以郑州市为例[J].2006,26(3):266-272.
[48]李滨烽.浅析经济区现代化中心城市的功能[J].福建商业高等专科学校学报, 2005,(3)：8-10.
[49]黄莹,周黎俊(2008).中国三大都市圈核心城市辐射能力研究[J].陕西农业科学,2008, (1)：155-158.
[50]彭书凤.重庆市可持续发展指标体系与能力评估[D].重庆师范大学,2008.
[51]王宁.天津生态城市评价指标体系研究[D].天津财经大学,2009.
[52]刘卿.城市竞争力评价指标体系和评价方法研究[D].天津大学,2006.
[53]刘力,丁四保.吉林省区域核心城市可持续发展能力的定量化研究[J].人文地理,2002,17(4)：59-62.
[54]陆立军,唐耀林.浙中城市群综合集聚度及核心城市[J].经济地理,2008,28(4):552-556.
[55]杨志恒.山东省复合型核心城市系统发展研究[J].国土与自然资源研究,2003,(1)： 16-18.
[56]郭连乐.登封市可持续发展指标体系与综合评价研究[D].河南农业大学,2009.
[57]蒋博.创新型城市指标体系与评价研究[D].重庆大学,2008.
[58]许萌.基于GIS的区域城市化水平综合评价研究[D].新疆大学,2006.
[59]郝寿义,倪鹏飞.中国城市竞争力研究——以若干城市为案例[J].经济科学,1998,(3)：50-56.
[60]马文军.国际性中心城市规划建设指标体系的比较研究—以上海为例[J].城市规划,2009,(2)：52-59.
[61]薛丽芳,欧向军,谭海樵.基于熵值法的淮海经济区城市中心性评价[J].地理与地理信息科学,2009,25,(3)：63-66.
[62]温洁洁.珠三角城市群中心城市竞争和功能联系研究[D].暨南大学,2007.
[63]黄莹,周黎俊.中国三大都市圈核心城市辐射能力研究[J].陕西农业科学,2008,(1)： 155-158.
[64]杨东方.空间：环渤海地区经济合作的现实[J].北方经济,2010, (10)：44-45.
[65]郭荣朝,宋双华,苗长虹.城市群结构优化与功能升级—以中原城市群为例[J].地理科学,2011,31(3)：322-328.
[66]史育龙,周一星.关于大都市带(都市连绵区)研究的论争及近今进展述评[J].国际城市规划,2009增刊,160-166.
[67]高汝熹,罗明义.城市圈域经济论[M].昆明：云南大学出版社,1998.
[68]胡序威等.中国沿海城镇密集地区空间集聚与扩散研究[M].北京：科学出版社,2000.
[69]吴泓,陈修颖,顾朝林.基于非场所理论的徐州都市圈发展研究[J].经济地理, 2003,23(6)：766-771.
[70]王建.区域与发展[M].杭州：浙江人民出版社,1996.
[71]李宁.中原城市群能级评价的实证研究[D].南京航空航天大学,2010.
[72]鲍悦华,陈强.基于城市功能的城市发展质量指标体系构建[J].同济大学学报(自然科学版),2011,39(5)：778-784.
[73]潘承仕.城市功能综合评价研究[D].重庆大学硕士论文,2004.
[74]沈金华,曾翔旻.城市功能的优化与提升[J].中国城市经济,2007(5)：56.
[75]王书汉.现代城市功能结构的优化思路[J].鞍山师范学院学报,2006(5)：17.
[76]国家计委国土开发与地区经济研究所课题组.对区域性中心城市内涵的基本界定[J],经济研究参考,2002, (52):2-13.
[77]江曼琦,中心城市与区域经济发展关系的再认识[A],区域与旅游规划空间站(http://www.plansky.net),2005年10月10日.
[78]郭震洪、李云娥.从增长极理论探讨中心经济城市在区域经济中作用[J],山东社会科学,2006,(8):68-71.
[79]国家发改委经济运行司.加快中心城市发展促进区域经济腾飞[J],当代经济,2005,(12)：1.
[80]李京文等.国际竞争力综合影响因素分析[J].中国软科学,2001,(11):15-21.
[81]陈琳霞.上海城区竞争力研究[D].复旦大学,2004.4:30-22.
[82]唐礼智.试析城市竞争力[J].哈尔滨师范大学自然科学学报,2001,(6):94.
[83]黄旭成,唐礼智.城市竞争力理论浅析[J].福建地理,2001,16(2):20-21.
[84]吴峥嵘.开发区综合竞争力评价指标体系的研究[D].同济大学,2004:45-46.
[85]郭凯锋,周婷,王灿.江苏省北部地区核心城市构建与组织分析[J].华东经济管理,2007,(10)：23-26.
[86]郑适、汪洋.中国产业集中度现状和发展趋势研究[J].财贸经济,2007,(6):111-117.
[87]洪银兴.城市功能意义的城市化及其产业支持[J].经济学家,2003,(2):20-24.
[88]朱英明.城市群经济空间分析[M].北京：科学出版社,2004.45-56.
[89]程玉鸿.基于城市群的城市竞争力研究——以珠江三角洲城市群为例[D].中山大学,2004:1-5.
[90]韩海娟.浅析武汉城市竞争力的提升[J].现代城市研究,2006,(5):5-9.
[91]姚士谋,王书国.区域发展中“城市群现象”的空间系统探索[J].经济地理,2006,(9)：34-36.
[92]张建华,洪银兴.都市圈内发展现代农业研究[J].中州学刊,2008,(5):23-27.
[93]王发曾,刘静玉.中原城市群整合发展的关键问题[J].经济地理,2008,(9):34-36.
[94]汪淳,陈璐.基于网络城市理念的城市圈布局——以苏锡常城市群为例[J].长江流域资源与环境,2006,(6)：56-83.
[95]张文忠.经济区位论[M].北京：科学出版社,2000:45-67.
[96]于向英.郑州与中部省会城市首位度比较[J].中国统计,2007,(5)：56-57.
[97]吴海东,李庆.我国城市的经济集聚扩散机理与动力机制分析——以重庆主城区为例[J].天府新论,2005,(5)：64-66.
[98]王莉岚,辛灵,钟小燕.城市群核心城市对外交通规划[J].科技与经济,2008,(1):46-50.
[99]孟祥林.核心城市与腹地间的关系：以京沪为例的经济学分析[J].区域与城市,2008,(2)：36-39.
[100]仇保兴.应对机遇与挑战——中国城镇化战略研究主要问题与对策[M].北京：中国建筑工业出版社,2009.
[101]杨保军.区域协调发展析论[J].城市规划,2004,28(5)：20-24.
[102]姚士谋,朱英明,陈振光.中国城市群[M].合肥：中国科学技术大学出版社,2001.
[103]张京祥.中国都市密集地区区域管治中行政区划的影响研究[J].城市规划,2002,26(9)：16-21.
[104]周一星.城市地理学[M].北京：商务印书馆,1995:315.
[105]崔功豪.当前城市区域规划问题的几点思考[J].城市规划,2002,(2)：40-42.
[106]崔功豪.中国城镇发展研究[M].北京:中国建筑工业出版社,1992.
[107]王建.中国区域经济发展战略研究[J].管理世界,1996,(4):175-189.
[108]孙一飞.中国城镇密集区研究[D].南京大学,1994.
[109]张泉.在全省城市工作会议上的讲话[J].江苏城市规划,2000,(5).
[110]邹军,陈小卉,等.城镇体系空间规划再认识[J].城市规划,2001,(1)：30-33.
[111]张京祥,邹军,吴启焰,等.论都市圈地域空间的组织[J].城市规划,2001,(5):19-23.
[112]邹军,王兴海,张伟,等.日本首都圈规划构想及启示[J].国外城市规划,2003,(2).
[113]周一星.济宁—曲阜复合中心城市研究[J].城市规划,2001,(12):7-12.
[114]茅杰.上海欲联手江浙十五城市建设世界第六大都市圈[N].新华日报,2002-11-07(C1).
[115]王东辉.长兴岛-助推大连核心城市建设[J].共产党员,2009.6.
[116]欧阳华.把南宁打造成广西北部湾经济区的核心城市[J].广西经济,2008, (5)：48-49.
[117]张红力.我国核心城市规划中的几个问题[J].人民论坛,2005,(6):38-39.
[118]曹敏娜.区域核心城市周边中小城市的发展思路研究—以句容为例[J].江苏城市规划,2006,(9)：3-7.
[119]李佳沼,孙铁山,李国平.中国三大都市圈核心城市职能分工及互补性的比较研究[J].地理科学,2010,(4)：53-509.
[120]卢万合,刘继生.中国十大城市群城市流强度的比较分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2010,(2)：60-64.
[121]郭荣朝,宋双华,苗长虹.城市群结构优化与功能升级——以中原城市群为例[J].地理科学,2011,(3)：322-328.
[122]武前波,宁越敏.基于网络体系优势的国际城市功能升级——以上海为例[J].南京社会科学,2010,(8)：7-13.
[123]程必定.上海世博会后长三角城市群的功能提升[J].城市发展研究,2010,(4):12-19.
[124]匡文慧,刘纪远,邵全琴,等.区域尺度城市增长时空动态模型及其应用[J].地理学报,2011,(2)：178-188.
[125]王士君,宋飓,冯章献,等.东北地区城市群组的格局,过程及城市流强度[J].地理科学,2011,(3)：287-294.
[126]左学金,陈建华.城市连绵区和皖江城市带发展[J].江淮论坛,2011,(2):5-12.
[127]吕芳.大连自由贸易港的建设及其目标模式[J].辽宁师范大学学报(自然科学版),2011,(2)：239-242.
[128]付丽萍,舒亚东.试论武汉城求功能定位——兼与中部省会城市的功能定位比较[J].江汉论坛,2010,(4)：23-28.