基于网络视角的创业环境对新创企业绩效的影响研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
企业所拥有的资源及资源的异质性是新创企业绩效产生差异的关键因素。由于新创企业自身所具有初始资源的短缺,如何从外部环境中获取这些资源并加以整合利用是新创企业绩效提升的关键。本文依据资源依附理论、资源基础理论、社会网络理论和交易成本理论,以资源为主线,以创业网络为“桥梁”,把创业环境特性、创业网络、资源可获得性、资源整合能力和新创企业绩效纳入整合到一个框架体系内,构建了基于网络视角的创业环境对新创企业绩效的影响模型。
     本文首先在综合探讨相关理论的基础上,对新创企业绩效、创业环境及创业网络的相关文献进行综述,并归纳出本文的基本研究要素,明确要素之间的逻辑关系;其次,对各研究要素内涵进行界定,划分了研究要素的维度,并提出基于网络视角的创业环境对新创企业绩效影响的概念模型;第三,在理论推导的基础上,明晰了各研究要素之间的关系,提出了12条假设,并运用相关统计软件对长春地区112家新创企业的问卷调研数据进行实证分析,结果表明12条假设中有9条通过检验;最后,对检验结果进行讨论,进一步明确本文研究在理论上和实践上的意义。
New venture performance has been the hot issue in academe .From the aspects of relevant research at home and abroad, the research on new venture performance should emphasizes four aspects of the colony zoology theory, cognition theory, resource theory and strategy of adaptation theory. The influential factors of new venture performance mainly include resource, environment, capacity, entrepreneur trait, strategy orientation, entrepreneurial, entrepreneurial network.
     Resources Based Approach (RBT) emphasizes that the resources owned by firm and resource heterogeneity are the main causes of difference of firm performance, meanwhile also emphasizes the significance of the resources owned by firm and the combination and distribution of these resources. Meanwhile, for new venture, because of their small scale and shortage of resource, it is important that to combine and distribute their own resources, but the more important one is that how to acquire these pivotal resources. Now our country is in the period of economic transference, and the environment in this period has the characteristic of high uncertainty, which represents in detail that the degree of market subdivision is much higher, the form of organization is more variable, policy becomes more discontinuous, increasing technology transformation, incomplete competitive market, complex embedded social relationship, etc. In this environment, it is significant for new venture how to acquire their needed resources from outside and upgrade the firm performance, and entrepreneurial network is just the“bridge”between new venture and their external environments. The favorable relationship between new venture and their external environment ensures that the new venture’s acquisition of resource, and then upgrade of new venture performance finally.
     Thereby, this dissertation analyzes relevant theories of new venture performance and the development practice of new venture and concludes the clue, that is resource is the important influential factor on new venture performance and the main clue of this dissertation; entrepreneurial network is the“bridge”which connects the new venture and their external environment, and also the angle of view of research on the influence of entrepreneurial environment on new venture performance; the organic combination of resource acquisition and capacity of resource combination is the key to upgrade of new venture performance.
     Although many scholars obtain some achievements in the research on new venture performance, the existent researches lack systematicness and penetration, usually pay attention to the effect of single factor but neglect the influences of other important factors, and don’t organically combine the internal factors of new venture and its external factors. Thereby, basing on the Resources Dependency Approach (RDA), Resources Based Approach(RBT), Transaction Cost Approach(TCA),and Social Network Approach (SNA), with the main clue of resource and the bridge of entrepreneurial network, this dissertation organically brings the characteristic of entrepreneurial environment, entrepreneurial network, resource acquisition, the capacity of resource combination and new venture performance to a frame work, builds the theory model of the affecting mechanism of entrepreneurial environment on new venture performance based on network view, deeply analyzes the operational relationship among these elements, validates the theory model and its hypothesis by normative empirical, discusses the result of hypothesis, and reveals the theory value and significance of direction.
     The context of this dissertation includes the following five parts, firstly, deeply analyzes the relevant theories of this dissertation, of which RDA analyzes the dependence of new venture on external environment, RBT emphasizes the influential factors of new venture performance, TCA analyzes the necessity and rationality of the establishment of the entrepreneurial network from the point of view of resource acquisition,and SNA analyzes the cost predominance brought by entrepreneurial network to new venture in the eye of economics. Basing on the analysis of basic theories, this dissertation summarizes the existing literatures related to new venture performance from home and aboard, entrepreneurial environment and entrepreneurial network, for instance the research on new venture performance based on resource view, evaluation of new venture performance, the investigation of the constitution system of entrepreneurial environment element and the constitution of environmental actor, the research on the relationship between entrepreneurial network and new venture. Predecessors have obtained some achievement, but there is still large research space left, which is the basis of this dissertation. Finally this dissertation summarizes its primary research elements, which include the characteristic of entrepreneurial environment, entrepreneurial network, resource acquisition, the capacity of resource combination and the new venture performance.
     Secondly, this dissertation builds the theory model of the affecting mechanism of entrepreneurial environment on new venture performance based on network view, divides the entrepreneurial environment into three dimensions of hostile, dynamic and complexity on the basis of current theory research, divides the entrepreneurial network into two dimensions of individual network and organizing network, and puts forward the theory model of the relationship among each element.
     Thirdly, this dissertation puts forward the hypothesis of relationship among each element in this theory model basing on the theory deduction, which includes in detail the hypothesis of relationship between characteristic of entrepreneurial environment and entrepreneurial network, hypothesis of relationship between entrepreneurial network and resource acquisition, hypothesis of relationship between resource acquisition and new venture performance, hypothesis of moderation of the capacity of resource combination to the relationship between resource acquisition and new venture performance, hypothesis of the effect degree of two kinds of entrepreneurial network in different development stage on resource acquisition and 12 hypothesis in all.
     The Fourth part is concerned with empirical research, which validates the theory model and relevant hypothesis with SEM and AMOS basing on the measurement of each variable. The data are obtained from the questionnaires to 112 new ventures in Changchun city, and the results show that 9 of 12 hypotheses are supported and 3 ones don’t gain supports.
     Fifthly, this dissertation discusses the results which are checked out by hypothesis, which shows definitely the significance of theory and practice. The verifiably hypothesis could reveal the operational relationship among each elements, and the practical enlightenment of supported hypothesis; as for these hypothesis proved to be wrong, reveal the reasons combining with entrepreneurial environment and development practice of new venture.
     The practical enlightenments were put forward from the point of view of the self of new venture and the policy includes in detail new venture should adapt the external environments; should pay attention to the establishments of variable entrepreneurial network in its different development stage; should pay attention to the construction of internal capacity; strengthen the construction of the actor of organization of external environment.
     The basic conclusions of this research include that characteristic of entrepreneurial environment is related positively with individual network; the hostile of characteristic of entrepreneurial environment is related positively with organizing network; the relationship between dynamic, complexity and organizing network isn’t significant; entrepreneurial network related positively with resource acquisition; the capacity of resource combination has the effect of regulating the relationship between resource acquisition and new venture performance, the influence of individual network on resource acquisition is more significant in the early stage and grow-up stage.
     This dissertation has the following innovations, firstly, builds the synthesis model of the affecting mechanism of entrepreneurial environment on new venture performance based on network view; secondly, research on the effects of characteristic of environment on different entrepreneurial network (individual network and organizing network); thirdly, research on the effect of entrepreneurial network on new venture performance with the resource acquisition as intermediary variable and analyzes the affecting mechanism of different entrepreneurial network on resource acquisition; fourthly, research on the relationship between resource acquisition and the capacity of resource combination and bring these two elements to the model of influence of entrepreneurial environment on new venture performance.
引文
8 Das,T.K.,Teng,B.S.,Aresource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 2000, 26:31-61.
    12 Premaratne, S. P., Entrepreneurial networks and small business development: the case of small enterprises in Sri Lanka . Doctoral Dissertation of Eindhoven University of Technology,2002.
    16 Birley, S., Cromie, S.,Social Networks and Entrepreneurship in Northern Ireland, Paper presented at Enterprise in Action Conference, Belfast (September), 1988: 3-4.
    18 林嵩、姜彦福,结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用,科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(2): 38-42.
    19 曲波等,结构方程模型及其应用,中国卫生统计,2005,22(6):405-407.
    [1] Aldrich, H. E., Martinez, M. A., Many are called, but few are chosen: An evolutionary perspective for the study of entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2001, 25(4): 41-57.
    [2] Aldrich, H. E., Pfeffer, J., Environment of organizations. Annual Review of Sociology,1976,11:76-105.
    [3] Aldrich, H., Organizations and Environments, Englewood, NJ: Prentice Hall, 1979.
    [4] Aldrich, H., Reese, P. R., and Dubuni, P., Women on the Verge of a Breakthrough: Networking among Entrepreneurs in the United States and Italy, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1989: 339-356.
    [5] Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., and Woodward, B.L., Social Behavior and Entrepreneurial Networks, Summarized in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA, Center for Entrepreneurship Studies Babson Collage, 1986, 239-240.
    [6] Aldrich, H., Rosen, B., and Woodward, B.L., The Impact of Social Network on Business Founding and Profit: A Longitudinal Study in Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, Wellesley, MA, Center for Entrepreneurship Studies Babson Collage, 1987: 154-168.
    [7] Aldrich, H., Zimmer, C., Entrepreneurship through Social Networks, In Sexton, D.L., and Smilor, R., (eds.) The Art and Science of Entrepreneurship, Cambridge, 1986: 3-24.
    [8] Alvarez, S. A, Barney, J. B., How entrepreneurial firms can benefit from alliances with large partners, The Academy of Management, 2001, 15(1): 139-149.
    [9] Amin, A., Specialization without Growth: Small Footwear Firms in Naples, In Goodman, E., and Bamford, J., (eds), Small Firms and Industrial Districts in Italy, London: Routledge, 1989.
    [10] Amit, R., Schoemaker, P J H., Strategic assets and organizational rent, Strategic Management Journal, 1993, 14(1): 33-47.
    [11] Amsden, A. H., Big Business and Urban Congestion in Taiwan: the Origins of Small Enterprise and Regionally Decentralized Industry, World Development, 1991, 9(9): 1121-1135.
    [12] Andreas, R., Michael, F., Andreas, U., Effects of Human Capital and Long-Term Human Resources Development and Utilization on Employment Growth of Small-Scale Businesses: A Causal Analysis, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2005, 29(6): 681-695.
    [13] Annika, R., Assessing the functionality of an innovation system. Presented at the Nelson and Winter Conference Arranged by DRUID in Aalborg,2001.
    [14] Annika, R., Networking and Firm Performance, Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2000.
    [15] Bailey, C. A., A Guide to Field Research, Pine Forge Press: London New Delhi. 1996.
    [16] Baines, S., Whellock, J., Working for Each Other: Gender, the Household and Micro-Business, 1998.
    [17] Baker, W. E., Market Networks and Corporate Behavior, American Journal of Sociology, 1990, 96: 589-625.
    [18] Baptista, R., Swann P., The Dynamics of Firm Growth and Entry in Industrial Clusters—A comparison of the US and UK Computer Industries, WP, Center for Business Strategy, London Business School, London, 1996.
    [19] Barney, J. B., Arikan, A., The resource-based view: Origins and implication. Handbook of Strategic Management,2001.
    [20] Barney, J. B., Firm resource and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management,1991,17:99-120.
    [21] Basu A, Altinay E., Culture and Entrepreneurship: A Study of Ethnic Entrepreneurship in London. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2001.
    [22] Baum R, the relation of traits, competencies, motivation, strategy, and strecture to venture growth, 1995, University of Maryland.
    [23] Biemans, W. G., Internal and External Networks in Product Development—A Case for Integration, in M. Bruce and W. G. Biemans (eds.), Product Development—Meeting the Challenge of the Design-Marketing Interface, John Wiley & Sons, 1995.
    [24] Birley, S., Cromie, S., and Myers, A., Entrepreneurial Networks in Northern Ireland, Ulster Business School, Belfast, 1988.
    [25] Birley, S., Cromie, S., and Myers, A., Entrepreneurial Networks: Their Emergence in Ireland and Overseas, International Journal of Small Business, 1991, 9.
    [26] Birley, S., Cromie, S., Social Networks and Entrepreneurship in Northern Ireland, Paper presented at Enterprise in Action Conference, Belfast (September), 1988.
    [27] Birley, S., Cromie, S.,Social Networks and Entrepreneurship in Northern Ireland, Paper presented at Enterprise in Action Conference, Belfast (September), 1988: 3-4
    [28] Birley, S., Entrepreneurs Networks: Their Creation and Development in Different Countries, Cranfield: Cranfield School of Management, 1990.
    [29] Birley, S., The role of networks in the entrepreneurial process. Journal of Business Venturing,1985,1(1):107–117.
    [30] Borch, O. J., Huse, M., Senneseth, K., Resource configuration, competitive strategies, and corporate entrepreneurship: An empirical examination of small firms Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1999, 24(1): 49-71.
    [31] Borg, E.A., Problem Shifts and Market Research: The Roles of Networks in Business Relationships, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1991, 7(4): 285-295.
    [32] Brown, B., and Butler, J. E., Competitors as Allies: A Study of Entrepreneurial Networks in the U.S. Wine Industry, Journal of Small Business Management, 1995, 33(3): 67- 83.
    [33] Bruno, A. V., Tyebjee, T. T. The environment for entrepreneurship. In Kent, C A, Sexton, D L and Vesper, K H Encyclopedia of Entrepreneurship. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1982: 288-307
    [34] Brush, C. G, Chaganti, R., Businesses without glamour? An Analysis of resources on performance by size and age in small service and retail firms, Journal of Business Venturing, 1999, 14(3): 233-258.
    [35] Brush, C. G., Greene, P. G., Hart, M. M., From initial idea to unique advantage: the entrepreneurial challenge of constructing a resource base. Academy of Management Executive,2001,15:64-78.
    [36] Bryson, J., Wood. P., and Keeble, D., Business Networks, Small Firm Flexibility and Regional Development in the U.K. Business Serv ices, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1993, 5: 265-277.
    [37] Butler, J., Hansen, G. S., Network evolution, entrepreneurial success, and regional development. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development,1991,(3):1-16.
    [38] Butler, R., Sohod, S., Joint-Venture Autonomy: Resource Dependence and Transaction Costs Perspectives, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1995, 11(2): 159-175.
    [39] Bygrave, W., and Minniti, M., The Social Dynamics of Entrepreneurship, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2000, 24 (3): 25- 36.
    [40] Camagni, R., (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives, London, Belhaven Press, 1991.
    [41] Carlsson, B. and Stankiewicz, R., On the Nature, Function and Composition of Technological Systems, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 1991, 1 (2): 93–.
    [42] Chandler, G. N., Hanks, S. H., An examination of the substitutability of founders’ human and financial capital in emerging business ventures. Journal of Business Venturing,1998,13(5):353-369.
    [43] Chandler, G N, Hanks, S H, Founder competence, environment, and venture performance.Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1994,18(3):77–89.
    [44] Child, J., Organizational structure, environment and performance: The role of strategic choice. Sociology, 1972, 6: 1-22.
    [45] Choonwoo L., Kyungmook L., Johannes, M P., nternal capabilities, external networks, and performance: A study on technology-based ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 2001, 22(6/7): 615-634.
    [46] Chu, P., Social Network Models of Overseas Chinese Entrepreneurship: The Experience in Hong Kong and Canada, Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences, 1996, 13 (4): 358- 365.
    [47] Churchill, N. C., Lewis, V.L., The Five Stages of Small Business Growth, Harvard Business Review, 1983, 61(3): 30-40.
    [48] Coase, R. H., The Nature of the Firm, Economica, 1937, 4: 386 – 405.
    [49] Coelho, F., Eastingwood, C., Determinants of multiple channel choice in financial services: an environmental uncertainty model. The Journal of Services Marketing,2005,19(4):199-212.
    [50] Coleman, J.C., Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital, American Journal of Sociology, 1988.
    [51] Coleman, S., Access to Capital and Terms of Credit: A Comparison of Men- and Womenowned Small Businesses, Journal of Small Business Management, 2000, 38 (3): 37 –52.
    [52] Collis D., Montgomery C., Competing on resources: Strategy in the 1990s. Harvard Business Review, 1995. 73 (4), 118-128;
    [53] Cooke, Philip, The new wave of regional innovation networks: analysis, characteristics and strategy, Small Business Economics, 1996, 8: 159–171.
    [54] Cooke, Philip, Reinventing the Region—Firms, Clusters and Networks in Economic Development, Centre for Advances Studies, University of Wales, UK, 1994.
    [55] Cooper. A. C, Gimeno-gascon. F. J, Woo. C. Y. Initial human and financial capital as predictors of new venture performance. Journal of Business Venturing, 1994, 9(5):371-395.
    [56] Covin, J G., Slevin, D P. 1990. Content and performance of growth seeking strategies: A comparison of small firms in high and low technology industries. Journal of Business Venturing, 5(6): 391-412;
    [57] Cromie, S., and Birley, S., Networking by Female Business Owners in Northern Ireland, Journal of Business Venturing, 1992, 7: 237-51.
    [58] Cromie, S., Birley, S., and Callaghan, I., Community Brokers: Their Role in the Formation and Development of Business Ventures, In Veciana, J. M., (ed), SMEs: Internationalization, Networks and Strategy, Publisher Aveburg, Singapore. 1994.
    [59] Crosa B., Aldrich H E., Keister L A., Is There a Wealth Affect? Financial and Human Capital as Determinants of Business Startups. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2002.
    [60] Crosa, B., Aldrich, H. E., Keister, L. A., Is there a Wealth Effect? Financial. and Human Capital as Determinants of Business Startups, Center for Entrepreneurship Studies Babson Collage, 2002.
    [61] Das, T.K., Teng, B.S., Aresource-based theory of strategic alliances. Journal of Management, 2000, 26:31-61.
    [62] Davidsson P,,Wiklund J, cultral values and regional variations in new firm formation,1995
    [63] Davidsson, P., The Domain of Entrepreneurship Research: Some suggestions. Working paper, 2003.
    [64] Day, G. S., Wensley, R., Assessing Advantage: A Framework For Diagnosing Competitive, Journal of Marketing, 1988, 52(2): 1 -21.
    [65] Deborah Markley. Community Environment for Entrepreneurship. Center for Rural Entrepreneurship, 2002.
    [66] DeBresson, Christian, An Entrepreneur Cannot Innovate Alone: Networks of Entreprises are Required, paper presented at the DRUID conference on Systems of Innovation, Aalborg, Denmark, 1999: 9–11.
    [67] Delacroix, J, Carroll, G R.,Organizational Foundings: An Ecological Study of the Newspaper Industries of Argentina and Ireland, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1983,28(2): 274-292
    [68] Dess, G., Beard, D., Dimensions of organizational task environments.Administrative Science Quarterly,1984,29:52-73.
    [68] Dierickx, I., Cool, K., Barney, J. B., Asset Stock Accumulation And Sustainability Of Competitive, Management Science, 1989, 35(12): 1504-1514.
    [69] Dollinger M J, Environmental Contacts and Financial Performance of the Small Firm, Journal of Small Business Management, 1985, 23(1): 24 -31.
    [70] Dollinger, M.J., Entrepreneurship: strategies and resources, Homewood, IL: Richard D. Irwin, 1995.
    [71] Donckels, R., and Lambrecht, J., Networks and Small Business Growth: An Explanatory Model, Small Business Economics, 1995, 7: 273-289.
    [72] Donckels, R., and Lambrecht, J., A Holistic Approach to the Expansion Decision of Small and Medium-sized Enterprises in a Metropolitan Area: The Case of Brussels, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1996, 8: 19-36.
    [73] Duchesneau, D. A., and Gartner, W. B., A Profile of New Venture Success and Failure in an Emerging Industry, in Kirchoff, B. A., (ed.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurial Research, Babson College, Wellesley, MA, 1988: 372 – 386
    [74] Duncan, K. D., Characteristics of organizational environments and perceived environmental uncertainty. Administrative Science Quarterly,1972,17:313-327.
    [75] Eisenhardt, K. M, Martin, J A., Dynamic capabilities: What are they?, Strategic Management Journal. Chichester, 2000, 21(10/11): 1105 -1130.
    [76] Elfring, T., Hulsink, W., Networks in entrepreneurship: The case of high-technology firms, Small Business Economics, 2003, 21(4): 409-420.
    [77] Evans, D. S., Jovanovic, B., An Estimated Model of Entrepreneurial Choice Under Liquidity Constraints, The Journal of Political Economy, 1989, 97(4): : 808-828.
    [78] Falemo, B., The Firms External Persons: Entrepreneurs or Network Actors?, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1989, 1: 167-77.
    [79] Fayolle, A., Servais, I., The influence of the support system on the entrepreneurial process, 7th Global Conference on Entrepreneurship Research, 1997.
    [80] Feldman, Maryanne, The Geography of Innovation, Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, 1994.
    [81] Filion L J, Brenner G A., Menzies T V., Ramangalahy C . Characteristics and Features of Chinese and Italian Ethnic Entrepreneurship in Canada: Implications for Businesses, Research and Government Policy. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2001.
    [82] Galunic, D C, Rodan, S., Resource recombinations in the firm: Knowledge structures and the potential for Schumpeterian innovation, Strategic Management Journal, 1998, 19(12): 1193 -1205.
    [83] Gartner, W. B., A conceptual framework for describing the phenomenon of new venture creation. The Academy of Management Review,1985,10(4):696 – 709.
    [84] Gefen, D., Straub, D., Boudreau, M.-C. Structural Equation Modeling and Regression: Guidelines for Research Practice. Communications of AIS, 2000, 4(7): 1-80.
    [85] Georgellis, Y., Wall, H. J., Entrepreneurship and the Policy Environment, Review - Federal Reserve Bank of St. Louis. St, 2006, 88(2): 95-112.
    [86] Georgellis, Y., Wall, H. J., The Fertility Effect of Dependent Tax Exemptions: Estimates for the United States, Applied Economics, 1992, 24(10):1139-1146.
    [87] Gibb, A.A., Key Factors in the Design of Policy Support for the Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) Development Process: an overview, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1993, 7: 1-24.
    [88] Gnyawali, D. R., Fogel, D. S., Environments for entrepreneurship development: key dimensions and research implications. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,1994,18(4):43–62.
    [89] Granovetter, M., Getting a Job: A Study of Contacts and Careers, 2nd edition, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.1995.
    [90] Granovetter, M., Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91 (3): 481- 510.
    [91] Granovetter, M., Network Sampling: Some First Steps, American Journal of Sociology, 1976), 81: 1287-1303.
    [92] Granovetter, M., The Nature of Economic Relationships, in R. Swedberg (ed.) Explorations in Economic Sociology, New York: Russell Sage Foundation, 1993: 3-41.
    [93] Granovetter, M., The Strength of Weak Ties: A Network Theory Revisited, in Marsden, P.V. and Nan Lin, (eds.), Social Structure and Network Analysis, Beverly Hills, Calif, Sage, 1982: 113-132.
    [94] Granovetter, M., The Strength of Weak Ties, American Journal of Sociology, 1978, 78: 1360-1380.
    [95] Granovetter, M., Economic Action and Social Structure: the Problem of Embeddedness, American Journal of Sociology, 1985, 91 (3): 481- 510.
    [96] Greene, P. G., & Brown, T. 1997. Resource needs and the dynamic capitalism typology. Journal of Business Venturing, 12(3): 161-174.
    [97] Greene, P. G., Brush, C. G., Brown, T. 1997. Resources in small firms: An exploratory study. Journal of Small Business Strategy, 8(2): 25-40
    [98] Greve, A., Networks and Entrepreneurship-An Analysis of Social Relations, Occupational Background, and Use of Contacts During the Establishment Process, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1995, 11(1): 1-24.
    [99] Gulati, R., Network Location and Learning: The Influence of Network Resources and Firm Capabilities on Alliance Formation, Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20: 397-420.
    [100] Gulati, R., and Gargiulo, M., Where do Inter -Organizational Networks Come from?, American Journal of Sociology, 1999:177- 231.
    [101] Gulati, R., Social Structure and Alliance Formation Pattern: A Longitudinal Analysis, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1995, 40: 619-52.
    [102] Haber, S., Reichel, A., Identifying Performance Measures of Small Ventures-The Case of the Tourism Industry, Journal of Small Business Management, 2005, 43(3): 257 -287.
    [103] Hakansson, H., Industrial Technology Development -A Network Approach, London: Croom Helm, 1987.
    [104] Hakansson, H.,Snehota, I., No business is an island: the network concept of business strategy. Scandinavian Journal of Management,1989,14:187-195.
    [105] Hammers. S. P. Munificence and carrying capacity of the environment and organization formation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1993, 17 (2): 77-86.
    [106] Hansen, G. S., Wernerfelt, B., Determinants Of Firm Performance: The Relative Importance, Strategic Management Journal, 1989, 10(5): 399-412.
    [107] Harrigan K. R., Joint ventures and competitive strategy, Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9: 141–158.
    [108] Heirman, A., Clarysse, B., How and Why do Research-Based Start-Ups Differ at Founding? A Resource-Based Configurational Perspective, Journal of Technology Transfer, 2004, 29(3-4): 247-268.
    [109] Helfat,C. E,Raubitschek, R.S, Product sequencing: Co-evolution of knowledge, capabilities and products, Strategic Management Journal, 2000, 21(10/11): 961-981.
    [110] Hellgren, B., and Stjernberg, T., Networks: An Analytical Tool for Understanding Complex Decision Processes, International Studies Mat. and Org., 1987, 1: 88-102.
    [111] Henderson, R, Cockburn, I, Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15: 63 -75.
    [112] Henderson, R., Cockburn, I., Measuring competence? Exploring firm effects in pharmaceutical research, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15: 63 -75.
    [113] Henri Grundstén. Entrepreneurial Intentions and the Entrepreneurial Environment. Helsinki University of Technology: Dissertation for the degree of Doctor, 2004: 1-162.
    [114] Hirschman, A. O., The Strategy of Economic Development, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press, 1958.
    [115] Hogan T, Hutson E. Capital structure in new technology-based firms: Evidence from the Irish software sector. Global Finance Journal,2005,15(3):369~387.
    [116] Holmquist C., Does Culture Matter for the Formation of Views on Entrepreneurship and Gender Roles? Case Studies of Women as High-Tech (IT) Entrepreneurs in Boston and Stockholm. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2001.
    [117] Huck, P., Rhine, S. L. W., Bond, P., and Townsend, R., Small Business Finance in Two Chicago Minority Neighborhoods, Economic Perspective (Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago), 1999, 23( 2) : 46- 62.
    [118] Humphrey, J., and Schmitz, H., The Triple C Approach to Local Industrial Policy, World Development, 1996, 24(12): 1859-1877.
    [119] Hunger J. D, Korsching P F., Auken H V,the interaction of founder motivation and environmental context in new venture formation,2002.
    [120] Hyungrae J, Lee, J., The. Relationship between an Entrepreneurs Background and Performance. in a New Venture, Tecnovation,1996,16(4):
    [121] Jackson, M. O., Wolinsky. A., A Strategic Model of Social and Economic Networks, Journal of Economic Theory, 1996, 71 (44): 44-74.
    [122] Jarillo, J. C., Entrepreneurship and Growth: The Strategic Use of external Resources, Journal of Business Venturing, 1989, 4:133- 47.
    [123] Jarillo, J. C., On Strategic Networks, Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9: 31-41.
    [124] Johannisson, B, Business Formation: A Network Approach, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 1988, 31 (3): 83-99.
    [125] Johannisson, B, Designing Supportive Contexts for Emerging Enterprises, in Karlsson, C., Johannisson, B., and Storey, D., (eds.) Small Business Dynamics, London: Rutledge, 1993: 117-142.
    [126] Johannisson, B., Anarchist and Organizers-Entreprene urs in a Network Perspective, International Studies of Management and Organization, 1987,17: 49-63.
    [127] Johannisson, B., Building an Entrepreneurial Career in a Mixed Economy: Need for Social and Business Ties in Personal Networks, Paper presented at the Academy of Management Annual Meeting, San Francisco, 1990: 12-15.
    [128] Johannisson, B., New Venture Creation: A Network Approach, in R. Ronstadt, (eds.), Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 1986: 236-38.
    [128] Johannisson, B., The Dynamics of Entrepreneurial Networks, Internet: http://www.babson.edu/entrep/fer/papers96/johannis.htm, 1996.
    [129] Keuschnigg C, Nielsen S B. Tax policy, venture capital, and entrepreneurship. Journal of Public Economics, 2003,87(1):175~203.
    [130] King, S. W., and Solomon, G., The Entrepreneur and the Ventures Life Cycle Stage: An Integrative Model Exploring Roles and Relationships, Center for Family Enterprise: The George Washington University, 1995.
    [131] Kogut, B, Joint Ventures: Theoretical and Empirical Perspectives, Strategic Management Journal, 1988, 9: 319-32.
    [132] Krackhardt, D., Entrepreneurial Opportunities in an Entrepreneurial Firm: A Structural Approach, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Spring, 1995: 53 - 69.
    [133] Kreiser P, Marino L, Weaver K M., assessing the relationship between enterpreneuria orientation,the external environment, adn firm performance, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2002.
    [134] Larson, A, A., and Starr, J. A., A Network Model of Organization Formation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter, 1993: 5 –15.
    [135] Larson, A, A., and Starr, J. A., A Network Model of Organization Formation Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, Winter, 1993: 5 –15.
    [136] Larson, A., Starr, J. A.,A network model of organization formation, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 1993., 17(2): 5 -16.
    [137] Leblebici, H., Salancik, G. R., Effects of Environmental Uncertainty on Information and Decision Processes in Banks, Administrative Science Quarterly,1981, 26( 4):578 -597.
    [138] Leung, A., Zhang, J., Wong, P K, Foo, M. D., The use of networks in human resource acquisition for entrepreneurial firms: Multiple "fit" considerations, Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(5): 664-684.
    [139] Liao, J, Welsch, H., Social capital and entrepreneurial growth aspiration: A comparison of technology- and non-technology-based nascent entrepreneurs, Journal of High Technology Management Research, 2003, 14(1): 149-167.
    [140] Lichtenstein, B M B, Brush, C.G., How do "resource bundles" develop and change in new ventures? A dynamic model and longitudinal exploration, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 2001, 25(3): 37 -59.
    [141] Lumpkin, G. T., Dess, G. G., Linking two dimensions of entrepreneurial orientation to firm performance: The moderating role of environment and industry life cycle. Journal of Business Venturing,2001,16(5):429-451.
    [142] Ma, H., Tan, J., Key components and implications of entrepreneurship: A 4-P framework, Journal of Business Venturing, 2006, 21(5): 704-721.
    [143] Mahoney, J T., Pandian, J. R., The Resource-Based View Within the Conversation of Strategic Management, Strategic Management Journal, 1992, 13(5): 363-381.
    [144] Makadok, K., Toward a synthesis of the resource-based and dynamic-capability views of rent creation. Strategic Management Jounal,2001,22:387–401.
    [145] McEvily, B., Zaheer, A., Bridging ties: A source of firm heterogeneity in competitive capabilities, Strategic Management Journal, 1999, 20(12): 1133 -1154.
    [146] McGahan, A. M, Porter, M. E., Michael E Porter. How much does industry matter, really? Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18: 15 -31.
    [147] Miller, D., Friesen, P.H., Strategy-making and environment: the third link. Strategic Management Journal, 1983.4(3): 221-235.
    [148] Miller, D., Shamsie, J., The resource-based view of the firm in two enviroments: The Hollywood film studios from 1936 to 1965, Academy of Management Journal, 1996, 39(3): 519-544.
    [149] Morris M H., Schindehutte M., Values as a Factor in Ethnic Entrepreneurship: A Comparison of Seven Sub-Cultures. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2002.
    [150] Mount, J., Terence, Z., and Forsyth, G. R.,Organizing for Development in the Small Business, Long Range Planning, 1993, 26: 111- 20.
    [151] Murphy, G. B, Trailer, J. W, Hill, R. C., Measuring performance in entrepreneurship research, Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36,(1):15 -24.
    [152] Myers, R.A., Demographic consequences of precocious maturation of Atlantic salmon (Salmo salar)., 1984, 41: 1349-1353.
    [153] Nelson, R R., Winter, S G., The Schumpeterian Tradeoff Revisited, The American Economic Review, 1982, 72(1): 114-133.
    [154] Niels,B., Mirjam, P., Roy T., Gerrit,W., The Value of Human and Social Capital Investments for the Business Performance of Startups, Small Business Economics, 2004, 23( 3): 227-240.
    [155] Noy E., Total business strategy—the missing link. Long Range Planning, 1998, 31(6): 927-932.
    [156] Oliver, A.L., and Liebeskind, J. P., Three Levels of Networking for Sourcing Intellectual Capital in Biotechnology, International Studies of Management and Organization, 1998, 27( 4): 76-103.
    [157] Olson, P. D., Entrepreneurship and Management, Journal of Small Business Management, 1987, 25(3): 7 –13.
    [158] Osborn, R. N., and Hagedoorn, J., The Institutionalization and Evolutionary Dynamics of Inter-organizational Alliances and Networks, Academy of anagement Journal, 1997, 40(2): 261-278.
    [159] Ostgaard, T.A., Birley, S., New Venture Growth and Personal Networks, J l f B i R h 1996 36 (1) 37 50Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36 (1): 37-50.
    [160] Ostgaard, T.A., and Birley, S., New Venture Growth and Personal Networks, Journal of Business Research, 1996, 36 (1): 37-50.
    [161] Ozcan, G. B., Small Business Networks and Local Ties in Turkey, Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 1995, 7: 265-282.
    [162] Peng, M. W., Organizational changes in planned economies in transition: An eclectic model, Advances in International Comparative Management, 1994, 9: 223 -252.
    [163] Peng, M.W., Heath, P.S., The growth of the firm in planned economies in transition: institutions, organizations, and strategic choice. Academy of Management Review, 1996,21(2):492-528.
    [164] Penrose, E. The theory of growth of the firm. New York, 1959.
    [165] Peteraff, M A, 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: A resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 14(3): 179-192.
    [166] Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R., The external control of organizations: a resource dependence perspective. New York: Harper & Row,1978.
    [167] Piore, M. J., Sabel, C. F., The Second Industrial Divide: Possibilities for Prosperity, New York: Basic Books, 1984.
    [168] Porter, M. On Competition, Harvard Business School Press:Boston. 1998
    [169] Powers, J. B, McDougall P P. University start-up formation and technology licensing with firms that go public: a resource-based view of academic entrepreneurship. Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(3):291~311.
    [170] Premaratne, S. P., Entrepreneurial networks and small business development: the case of small enterprises in Sri Lanka. Doctoral dissertation of Eindhoven University of Technology.2002.
    [171] Pyke, F., Industrial Development Through Small -Firm Cooperation, Geneva, ILO, 1992.
    [172] Ring, P.S., Processes Facilitating Reliance on Trust in Iter-Organizational Networks, In Ebers Mark, (ed) The Formation of Inter-Organizational Networks, Oxford University Press, Oxford, 1997.
    [173] Romanelli, E., Organization birth and population ecology: a community perspective on origins /CUMMINGS. L, STAW. B. M. Research in organizational behavior. Greenwich: CT. JAI Press, 1989: 211-246.
    [174] Rosenstein, J., Bruno, A. V, Bygrave, W. D, Taylor, N. T., The CEO, venture capitalists, and the board, Journal of Business Venturing, 1993, 8,( 2): 99 -114.
    [175] Rujoub, M. A, Cook, D. M, Hay, L. E., Using cash flow ratios to predict business failures, Journal of Mathematical Economics, 1995, 7(1): 75-92.
    [176] Sawyerr, O. O., McGee, J. E., The impact of personal network characteristics on perceived environmental uncertainty: An examination of owners/managers of new high technology firms. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research,1999.
    [177] Saxenian A., Silicon Valleys New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California, Working Paper, 2000.
    [178] Scott, W., Organizations: Rational, Natural, and Open Systems, (3r d ed.), Englewwod Cliffi NJ: Prentic Hall, 1992.
    [179] Sexton, D., Bowman-Upton N., Entrepreneurship: Creativity and Growth. New York: Macmillan, 1991.
    [180] Shane, S, Cable, D, Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures, Management Science, 2002, 48(3): 364 -382.
    [181] Shane,S.,Stuart, T., Organizational endowments and the performance of university start-ups, Management Science,2002, 48(1): 154-171.
    [182] Shrader, R. C, Simon, M., Corporate versus independent new ventures: Resource, strategy, and performance differences, Journal of Business Venturing, 1997,12(1): 47 -67.
    [183] Sirmon, D. G., Hitt, M. A., Ireland, R. D., Managing firm resources in dynamic environments to create value: Looking inside the black box. Academy of Management Review,2007,32(1):273-292.
    [184] Sirmon, D. G., and Hitt, M. A., Managing resources: linking unique resources management and wealth creation in family firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice,2003,27(4):339–358.
    [185] Slevin, D P. ,Covin J G.,new ventures and total competitiveness : a conceptual model, empirical results, and case study examples, 1995
    [186] Smith J F., Rhyne R D., A Resource Manager for Distributed Resources: Fuzzy Decision Trees and Genetic Optimization. IC-AI 1999: 669-675
    [187] Staber, U., Networks and Regional Development: Perspectives and Unresolved Issues, in Staber, U.H., Schaefer, N. V., and Sharma, B., (eds.) Business Networks: Prospects for Regional Development, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York. 1996.
    [188] Starr, J.A., and McMillan, I. C., Resource Cooptation via Social Contracting: Resource Acquisition Strategies for New Ventures, Strategic Management Journal, 1990, 11: 79-92.
    [189] Steier, L., and Greenwood, R., Entrepreneurship and the Evolution of Angel Financial Networks, Organization Studies, 2000, 21 (1): 163-92.
    [190] Stevenson L, Lundstr?m A., Towards a Framework for the Development of Entrepreneurship Policy and Practice. Babson College: Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research, 2001.
    [191] Stinchcombe A. L., Social structure and organizations /March J G. Handbook of Organizations. Rand McNally, Chicago, 1965: 153–193.
    [192] Storey, D. J., Tether, B. S., Public policy measures to support new technology-based firms in the European Union . Research Policy,1998,(26):1037-1057.
    [193] Stuart,T. E, Hoang,H., Hybels, R. C., Interorganizational endorsements and the performance of entrepreneurial ventures, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1999, 44(2): 315-350.
    [194] Szarka, J, Networking and Small Firms, Journal of International Small Business, 1990, 8(2): 10-22.
    [195] Szarka, J., Networking and Small Firms, Journal of International Small Business, 1990, 8(2): 10-22.
    [196] Tan, J J., Litschert, R. J., Environment-strategy relationship and its performance implications: An empirical study of the Chinese electronics industry, Strategic Management Journal, 1994, 15(1): 1-21.
    [197] Tan, J. J., Perceived environment, Strategy orientation, ownership effect and implication in a transition economy: an empirical study in the Peoples Republic of China. Doctoral dissertation of Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University,1993.
    [198] Teece, D J. Capturing value from knowledge assets: The new economy, markets for know-how, and intangible assets.Industrial Marketing Management, 2002,31
    [199] Teece, D. J, Pisano,G., Shuen, A., Dynamic capabilities and strategic management, Strategic Management Journal, 1997, 18(7): 509 -534.
    [200] Terpstra, D. E., and Olson, P. D., Entrepreneurial Start-up and Growth: A Classification of Problems, Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice. 1993.
    [201] Thorelli, H. B., Networks: Between Markets and Hierarchies, Strategic Management Journal, 1986, 7: 37- 51.
    [202] Timmons, J. A., New Venture Creation, 4th edition, Boston: MA, Irwin. 1994.
    [203] Tsai, W., Ghoshal, S., Social capital and value creation: The role of intrafirm networks, Academy of Management Journal, 1998, 41( 4): 464 -477.
    [204] Uzzi, B., Embeddedness in the Making of Financial Capital: How Social Relations and Networks Benefit Fir ms Seeking Financing, American Sociological Review, 1999, 64: 481-505.
    [205] Uzzi, B., Social Structure and Competition in Inter-firm Networks: The Paradox of Embeddedness, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1997, 42 (1): 5-67.
    [206] Uzzi, B., The Sources and Consequences of Embeddedness for the Economic Performance of Organization: The Network Effect, American Sociological Review, 1996, 61: 674-98.
    [207] Van Dijk, M.P., Small Enterprise Associations and Networks: Evidence from Accra, in van Dijk, M. P., and Rabellotti, R., (eds.) Enterprise Clusters and Networks in Developing Countries, ADI Book Series 20, Frank CASS, London, 1997.
    [208] Veciana, J.M., and Clarke, A. M., Theoretical Approaches to Entrepreneurship: The Social Network Approach, European Doctoral Programme in Entrepreneurship and Small Business Management, University of Autonoma, Barcelona, 1996.
    [209] Venkataraman, S., The distinctive domain of entrepreneurship research: An editor’s perspective. In J. Katz & R. Brockhaus, (Eds.), Advances in entrepreneurship research, firm emergence and growth. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press. 1997.
    [210] Visser, E. J.,Local Sources of Competitiveness Spatial Clustering and Organization Dynamics in Small-Scale Clothing in Lima, Peru, Tinbergen Institute Research Series, University of Amsterdam, 1996.
    [211] Wernerfelt, B., A resource-based view of the firm, Strategic Management Journal,1984,5(2):171-180.
    [212] Wiklund, J., Shepherd, D., Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. Journal of Business Venturing,2005,20(1):71-79.
    [213] Wiklund, J., Small firm growth and performance: entrepreneurship and beyond. Jonkoping International Business School,1998,(5):138-139.
    [214] Williamson, O. E., Transaction Costs Economics: The Governance of Contractual Relations, Journal of Law and Economics, 1975, 22: 3-61.
    [215] Williamson, O. E., The Economic Institutions of Capitalism, New York: Free Press, 1985.
    [216] Williamson, O. E., The Economics of Organization: The Transaction Cost Approach, American Journal of Sociology, 1981, 87: 548-77.
    [217] Williamson, O. E., Comparative Economic Organization: The Analysis of Discrete Structural Alternatives, Administrative Science Quarterly, 1991, 36: 269-296.
    [218] Yoo, M., the ties that (un)bind: Social networks and entrepreneurship in high technology industries, a dissertation submitted in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of doctor of philosophy in the university of Michigan, 2003
    [219] You J, Small Firms in Economic Theory, Cambridge Journal of Economics, 1995, 19: 441-462.
    [220] Zahra, S. A., Bogner, W. C., Technology strategy and software new ventures performance: exploring the moderating effect of competitive environment. Journal of Business Venturing,2000,15(2):135-173.
    [221] Zhang, J., Wong, P., SOH, P., Social network, prior knowledge, and entrepreneurial resource acquisition. NUS Entrepreneurship Centre,2005.
    [222] Zimmer, C., Aldrich, H. E., Resource mobilization through ethnic networks: kinship and friendship ties of shopkeepers in England. Sociological Perspectives,1987,30(4):422-455.
    [223] Zott, F. C.,Dynamic Capabilities And The Emergence OF Intraindustry Differential Firm Performance:Insights From A Simulation Study strategic Management Journal .2003, (24) :97—125.
    [224] Zucker, L., Institutional Patterns and Organizations, Cambridge MA: Ballinge, 1988.
    [225] 宝贡敏、徐碧祥,企业声誉对战略联盟伙伴选择的影响机理研究,技术经济,2006, 25(7): 10-12.
    [226] 宝贡敏、余红剑,关系网络与创业互动机制研究,研究与发展管理,2005, 17(3): 46-51.
    [227] 蔡莉、崔启国、陈巍,我国科技型中小企业创业环境演进规律研究,首届(2006)中国管理学年会,2006,10:16.
    [228] 蔡莉、崔启国、史琳,创业环境研究框架,吉林大学社会科学学报,2007,47(1):50-56.
    [229] 蔡莉、王旭、李雪灵,科技型企业创生要素的系统分析. 科研管理. 2005,26(2):29-34
    [230] 陈震红、董俊武,成功创业的关键——如何获取创业资源, 科技创业月刊 ,2003,(9):48-49.
    [231] 池仁勇,美日创业环境比较研究,外国经济与管理,2002, 24(9): 13-19.
    [232] 董俊武、黄江圳、陈震红, 基于知识的动态能力演化模型研究,中国工业经济, 2004,(2):77-85.
    [233] 杜卓君、苏一石,资源视角的创业研究,经济论坛,2005,12:40-42
    [234] 盖文启,创新网络---区域经济发展新思维,北京:北京大学出版社,2002.
    [235] 高建、姜彦福、李习保、程源, 全球创业观察中国报告----基于 2005 年数据的分析, 清华大学出版社,2006.
    [236] 姜彦福、张帏,创业管理学,清华大学出版社,2005.
    [237] 李乾文,创业绩效四种理论视角及其评述,经济界,2004, (6): 93-96.
    [238] 林嵩、张帏、林强,高技术创业企业资源整合模式研究. 科学学与科学技术管理,2005,(3).
    [239] 饶扬德. 企业资源整合过程与能力分析.工业技术经济:2006.9
    [241] 叶学锋、魏江,关于资源类型和获取方式的探讨,科学学与科学技术管理 ,2001, (9):40-42.
    [242] 张乃平、程承坪,替代性机制与企业所有权安排,生产力研究,2001,(5):150-153.
    [243] 张其仔,新经济社会学,中国社会科学出版社,2001.
    [244] 张玉利、李新春,创业管理,清华大学出版社,2006.
    [245] 赵道致、张靓,资源杠杆——基于企业网络的竞争优势获取模式, 科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(9):169-170.
    [246] 林嵩、姜彦福,结构方程模型理论及其在管理研究中的应用,科学学与科学技术管理,2006,(2):38-42.
    [247] 曲波等,结构方程模型及其应用,中国卫生统计,2005,22(6):405-407.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700