脱硫石膏煅烧工艺及在墙体材料中的应用研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
脱硫石膏是火电厂湿法脱硫过程中,用石灰或石灰石浆液吸收烟气中的二氧化硫,反应生成的副产物,其主要成分为二水硫酸钙(CaSO_4·2H_2O),颜色多为黄白色。随着我国脱硫工程的发展,脱硫石膏已成为火电厂中继粉煤灰后的又一大固体废物,占用大量土地,污染环境。因此研究掌握脱硫石膏的性质,将其变废为宝加以综合利用,对于促进我国脱硫工程的进一步发展大有裨益。
     本文以脱硫石膏为研究对象,利用化学成分分析、XRD分析、SEM分析、粒度分析、热分析等手段,研究了脱硫石膏化学成分、相组成、微观形貌、细度、热性能等基本性能,并与天然石膏进行了对比;探讨了脱硫石膏煅烧成为脱硫建筑石膏的煅烧工艺。研究缓凝剂、保水剂、减水剂、防水剂等对脱硫建筑石膏的影响规律,采用不同外加剂对脱硫建筑石膏改性,探讨了利用脱硫建筑石膏生产抹面材料、纸面石膏板、石膏砌块等墙体材料的可行性。以玉米秸秆纤维为增强材料,提高脱硫建筑石膏制品的强度,考查了纤维掺加方法、长度、掺量对试样性能的影响规律,采用碱处理法、接枝法、包覆法对玉米秸秆纤维进行表面改性,期望进一步提高复合材料的力学性能。
     研究结果表明,脱硫石膏的化学组成和矿物组成与天然石膏相似,二水硫酸钙含量可达95%以上,杂质较少,细度小于天然石膏,微观结晶颗粒多成柱状和板状。采用预烘干+煅烧的二步法工艺煅烧脱硫石膏效果最好,即先在50℃下烘干2h,进而在155℃下煅烧。此工艺条件下煅烧的脱硫石膏,初凝时间6min、终凝时间9min、抗折强度3.35MPa,抗压强度7.88MPa,均达到或超过了国家关于建筑石膏优等品的性能要求。
     在外加剂研究方面,主要研究了柠檬酸、骨胶、偏磷酸钠这三种缓凝剂,分析结果可知,随着缓凝剂掺量的加大,缓凝效果越来越好的同时试样的强度却明显下降,单一的缓凝剂很难达到在保证强度的前提下延长凝结时间的效果,所以采取复合缓凝剂效果较好。对于保水剂而言,随着掺量的增加保水效果越来越好,但是羧甲基纤维素及糊精的加入都造成了不同程度的强度损失,而甲基纤维素却对试样强度有增强效果。分析五种减水剂的实验结果,可以发现,随着减水剂掺量的增大,减水率上升,但试样强度先升后降,木质素磺酸钙系减水剂效果最优。各种外加剂的成分及掺量为:以柠檬酸、骨胶、偏磷酸钠为主要成分的复合缓凝剂,掺量0.4%;甲基纤维素类保水剂,掺量0.3%;木质素磺酸盐系减水剂、掺量0.5%。经工厂实验证明,以上外加剂改性后的脱硫建筑石膏制品均可符合国家相关标准要求。
     掺加玉米秸秆纤维后,提高了脱硫建筑石膏制品的强度,采用碱处理法、接枝法、包覆法对玉米秸秆纤维进行表面改性,有效改善了玉米秸秆纤维与石膏基体的界面结合状况,进一步提高了复合材料的力学性能。实验结果表明,取1.0-2.0cm长度的玉米秸秆纤维,经聚乙烯醇+沥青包覆法改性后,按脱硫建筑石膏重量的3%,采用秸秆纤维与脱硫建筑石膏干拌后加水的同掺法制得复合材料,较脱硫建筑石膏空白样,试块的力学性能有显著提高,抗折强度提高了200%,抗压强度提高了125%。
Flu gas desulfurization gypsum is a kind of byproduct produced in the process of wet desulphurization, its main component is calcium sulfate dihydrate and its color is yellowish-white. With the development of our country’s desulfurization project, flu gas desulfurization gypsum is another type of solid waste in thermal power plant except the fly ash, plenty of land are used for the storage of flu gas desulfurization gypsum, polluting the environment. So studying the property of flu gas desulfurization gypsum and comprehensively making use of it are benefit for the development of our country’s desulfurization project.
     Flu gas desulfurization gypsum was taken as the research object, its basic properties, such as the flu gas desulfurization gypsum’s chemical composition, phase composition, were studied by means of chemical composition analysis, X-ray diffraction, scanning electron microscopy, grain-size analysis and thermo gravimetric analysis, and flu gas desulfurization gypsum’s basic properties were also compared with nature gypsum; the calcination technology that flu gas desulfurization gypsum changed into calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization were also discussed. The effect of retarder, water retaining agent, water reducing agent and water repellent on calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization were studied, calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization was modified by adding additive, and the possibilities of using calcined gypsum flu gas desulfurization to product wall-building material, such as rendering material, thistle board and plaster block, were discussed. Corn straw fiber was taken as reinforcement material to enhance the strength of calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization, the effect of methods of fiber doping, fiber length and fiber dosage on samples properties were checked, corn straw fibers were modified by the methods of alkaline treatment, grafting treatment and coating treatment, in order to enhance the mechanical property of composites further more.
     The results indicate that: flu gas desulfurization gypsum’s chemical composition is similar with the calcined natural gypsum, the content of calcium sulfate dehydrate is up to 95%, the content of impurity is little, grain-size is smaller than calcined natural gypsum, and Micro crystalline particles are likely to be cylindrical and slaty. The effect of the calcination technology using two step method is ;notable, first, flu gas desulfurization gypsum is dryinged at the temperature of 50℃for 2h, and then calcined at the temperature of 155℃. The initial setting time of the Calcined flu gas desulfurization gypsum using this technology is 6min, final setting time is 9min, flextural strength is 3.35 MPa, and compressive strength is 7.88MPa, all of the above properties are better than national requirements.
     Citric acid, bone glue and sodium metaphosphate are selected as retarder, the results imply that: with the increasing of doping dosage, retardation effect is more notable, but the strength of samples reduce obviously, Under the guarantee of owning good strength, the single type of retarder can not prolong the setting time, so the effect of compound retarder is better. With the increasing of water retaining agent, water retaining effect is better, but the addition of CMC and dextrin reduce the strength at the same time, only the MC can increase the strength of sample. With the increasing of water reducing agent, the water reduction rises, but the strength of samples go up first, then fall, the effect of calcium lignosulfonate is best. The doping dosages of each additive are: compound retarder made up of Citric acid, bone glue and sodium metaphosphate is 0.4%, MC is 0.3%, calcium lignosulfonate is 0.5%.Through the factory production testing,the products of calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization modified by the above additive accord with related national standards.
     The strength of calcined gypsum from flu gas desulfurization is enhanced by the addition of corn straw fiber; the interfacial bonding between the maize straw fibers and desulfurization gypsum is improved, due to the modification of fibers using alkaline treatment, grafting treatment and chemical coating treatment, resulting in that the mechanical properties of composite is increased further more. The results indicate that: when the length of corn straw fibers is 1.0-2.0cm, corn straw fibers are modified by the coating treatment using polyvinyl alcohol and asphaltum, and the doping dosage of corn straw fibers is 3%, the mechanical properties of samples are enhanced obviously: the flextural strength is enhanced by 200%, and the compressive strength is enhanced by 125%.
引文
[1]张增寿.脱硫石膏的资源综合利用[J].新材料产业,2007,(12):27-30.
    [2]冯金煌.脱硫石膏及其综合利用探讨[J].非金属矿, 2000, 23(6): 18-20.
    [3]张荫济,徐强,叶蓓红,等.湿法“石灰石一石膏”烟气脱硫(FGD)技术及烟气脱硫石膏应用的分析研究[J].应用技术, 2003(2): 22-24.
    [4]王方群,原永涛,齐立强.脱硫石膏性能及其综合利用[J].粉煤灰综合利用, 2004(1): 41-44.
    [5]谢红波,曹杨,曹凤霞,等.脱硫石膏综合利用现状及其抹面材料的研制[J].再生资源研究, 2006(6): 28-30.
    [6]吴晓琴,吴忠标.烟气脱硫石膏资源化利用及展望[J].重庆环境科学, 2003, 25(11): 192-195.
    [7]胡述刚,李云媂,吕宪俊.烟气脱硫石膏综合利用技术研究与展望[J].有色矿冶, 2006 (22): 46-48.
    [8]田贺忠,郝吉明,孔祥应,等.燃煤电厂烟气脱硫石膏综合利用途径及潜力分析[J].中国电力, 2006,39(2): 64-69.
    [9] Bijen J.Benefits of slag and fly ash[J].Constr Build Mater 1996,10(5):309-314.
    [10]尹连庆,徐峥,孙晶.脱硫石膏品质影响因素及资源化利用[J].电力环境保护,2008,24(1):28-30.
    [11]关晓东.热电厂烟气快速湿式脱硫石膏的性质[J].有色金属, 2004, 56(2): 112-114.
    [12]黄孙恺,俞新浩.用烟气脱硫石膏制备建筑石膏的工艺技术[J].建筑石膏与胶凝材料, 2005(1): 27-28.
    [13]陶有生.烟气脱硫石膏在建筑业建材业中的应用[J].电力设备, 2003, 4(4): 9-13.
    [14]刘红岩,施惠生,单卫良.烟气脱硫石膏的资源化利用[J].粉煤灰, 2007 (3): 38-41.
    [15] Y. Li, M. Sadakata. Study of gypsum formation for appropriate dry desulfurization process of flue[J]. gas Fuel ,1999(78): 1089-1095.
    [16]董梅,金鑫,袁金梅.脱硫废弃物-脱硫石膏的利用前景[J].辽宁化工,2007,36(11):764-766.
    [17] P. S Valimbe, V.M. Malhotra. Effects of water content and temperature on the crystallization behavior of FGD scrubber sludge[J]. fuel, 2002(81): 1297-1304.
    [18]店欧靖,等.利用宝钢电厂脱硫石膏研制粉刷石膏产品[J].粉煤灰, 2007(3): 23-24.
    [19]张惊宇,孙乐,侯世勇.电厂脱硫产物的处置和综合利用[J].内蒙古环境科学, 2007, 19(3):99-102.
    [20]张方,马彦涛,胡将军.国内外火电厂烟气脱硫石膏的特点利用及处置[J].粉煤灰综合利用, 2003(4): 50-51.
    [21]陈云嫩,王海宁.烟气脱硫石膏的利用新途径[J].矿业安全与环保, 2002, 29(3): 34-36.
    [22]彭志辉,季建新.烟气脱硫石膏及其建材资源化研究[J].重庆环境科学,2000,22(6):26-29.
    [23]李传炽,李波.太原热电厂脱硫技术的特点及脱硫石膏的利用[J].粉煤灰, 2003(2): 18-19.
    [24]申士富,张连松,孙传尧.脱硫石膏综合应用研究[J].矿冶, 2003, 12(3): 49-51.
    [25]董风芝,刘家弟.脱硫石膏粉煤灰胶结材研究[J].非金属矿, 2005, 28(4): 34-35.
    [26] Loreal V.Heebink, David J.Hassett. Mercury release from FGD[J]. Fuel,2005(84): 1372-1377.
    [27] P.Stefan,D.Golden.FGD gypsum utilization:surrey of current Practices and assessment of market potential[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2007: 1-6.
    [28] George J Venta.Utilization of chemical gypsum in Japan[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2001, (114): 161-168..1991(5):12-15.
    [29] V.Steln.FGD-gypsum in the Germany-trends of demand and suppiy[J]. Fuel,1991(5):12-15.
    [30] G. Tzouvalas, G.Rantis, S.Tsimas. Alternative calcium-sulfate-bearing materials as cement retarders[J]. Cement and Concrete Reasearch, 2004(34): 2119-2125.
    [31] Xiao Lu Guo, Hui Sheng Shi, et al. Thermal treatment and utilization of flue gas desulphurization gypsum as an admixture in cement and concrete[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2007: 1-6.
    [32]陈云嫩.烟气脱硫石膏的资源化利用[J].金属矿山, 2003(8): 51-53.
    [33] Manjit Singh and Mridul Garg. Activation of gypsum anhydrite-slag mixtures[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1995, 25(2): 332-338.
    [34] Paolo Davini. Flue gas desulphurization by activated carbonbers obtained from polyacrylonitrile by-product[J]. Carbon, 2003(41): 277-284.
    [35] J T Crews, W.A. Dick, et al. Liming acid forest soils with flue gas desulfurization by-product: growth of Northern red oak and leachate water quality[J]. Environmental Pollution, 1998, 103: 55-61.
    [36] L. Chen, W.A. Dick , S. Nelson, et al. Flue gas desulfurization by-products additions to acid soil:alfalfa productivity and environmental quality[J]. Environmental Pollution, 2001(114): 161-168.
    [37]耿春女,钱华,李小平,等.脱硫石膏农业利用研究进展与展望[J].环境污染技术治理与设备,2006,7(12):15-19.
    [38]李国忠.石膏基植物纤维复合板的研制[J].混凝土与水泥制品, 1996(6): 7-11.
    [39] Guozhong Li*,Yanzhen Yu,Zhongjian Zhao,Jianquan Li,Changchun Li. Properties study of cotton stalk fiber/gypsum composite[J].Cement and Concrete Research, 33(2003):43-46.
    [40] Pavel Tesarek, Jaroslava Drchalova, et al. Flue gas desulfurization gypsum: Study of basic mechanical,hydric and thermal properties[J]. Construction and Building Materials, 2006: 1-10.
    [41]陈燕,岳文海,董若兰.石膏建筑材料(第一版).北京:中国建材工业出版社,2003.
    [42] Koslowski Th, Ludwing U. The effect of admixtures in the production and application building plasters[J]. ZKG International, 1999, (5): 274-285.
    [43]岑如军,唐蕾,鲍水红.建筑粉刷石膏的研制[J].建筑石膏与胶凝材料, 2003(11): 36-40.
    [44]赵海君,严云.粉刷石膏的保水性研究[J].新型建筑材料, 2005(3): 49-50 .
    [45]王波,王静静,张丽华.真空吸收法测定粉刷石膏保水率[J].烟台大学学报, 2006, 19(2): 45-48.
    [46]姜丛盛,王莹.外加剂及掺材对粉刷石膏性能的影响[J].硅酸盐通报, 2005(5): 92-94.
    [47] Manjit Singh, Mridul Garg. Retarding action of various chemicals on setting and hardening characteristics of gypsum plaster at different pH[J]. Cement and Concrete Research, 1997, 27(6): 947-950.
    [48]李仲谨,杨连利,苏秀霞,等.保水剂的发展现状及未来开发方向[J].咸阳师范学院学报,2003,18(6):30-32.
    [49]柏玉婷,李国忠.适用于脱硫建筑石膏的减水剂[J].墙材革新与建筑节能,2009(5):35-37.
    [50]高峰,姚穆.纤维含量对纤维增强复合材料断裂强度的影响[J].西北纺织工学院学报,2001.15(2):275-279.
    [51]邬义明.植物纤维化学[M].北京:北京轻工业出版社, 1991.
    [52]向红,张钦发,周亚莉.自然纤维表面对自然纤维复合材料性能的影响[J].包装工程, 2004, (6): 58-60.
    [53] Prasad S V, Parith ran C. A lkali treatment of coir fibres for coir-plyester compofites [J]. Mater Sci, 1983, (18): 1443-1454.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700