不同植物蛋白含量代乳粉对早期断奶犊牛胃肠组织形态的影响
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
本试验以奶公犊为动物模型,采用国产的全脂奶粉、挤压全脂大豆,大豆浓缩蛋白以及玉米蛋白粉作为蛋白来源,研究植物蛋白分别代替总蛋白的60%、70%和80%的代乳粉对早期断奶犊牛营养物质表观消化率及胃肠组织形态等方面的影响,为犊牛代乳粉产品开发提供技术参考。
     该试验选择新生荷斯坦奶公犊牛20头,分4组,编号为A、B、C和D。其中A、B、C为试验组,分别饲喂植物蛋白含量占总蛋白的60%、70%和80%的代乳粉,D为对照组,饲喂鲜奶,每组5头。
     营养物质表观消化率试验结果显示:对照组犊牛略高于试验组犊牛,但差异不显著(P > 0.05),仅干物质和蛋白质的消化率方面对照组D显著高于B、C两组(P < 0.05)。结果显示60%植物蛋白的代乳粉对犊牛营养物质表观消化率影响不大。
     胃容积、重量测定结果显示:仅C组的网胃容积显著小于D组(P < 0.05)。胃组织形态学指标比较结果显示:仅A组网胃底乳头高度显著低于其他各组(P < 0.05)。小肠重量、长度测定结果显示:十二指肠与回肠的重量各组间差异均不显著(P > 0.05),空肠重量B组显著大于其他各组(P < 0.05),A组大于C组,且差异显著(P < 0.05),但与D组差异不显著(P > 0.05)。十二指肠长度仅B组显著小于其它三组(P < 0.05),空肠长度仅C组显著小于其它三组(P < 0.05)。
     小肠组织形态学指标比较结果显示:十二指肠绒毛长度和绒毛宽度,A组显著大于其他各组(P < 0.05);隐窝深度:A组仅深于D组,且差异显著(P < 0.05)。空肠前段绒毛长度,D组仅显著长于C组(P < 0.05);绒毛宽度,A组显著宽于C、D两组(P < 0.05)。空肠后段绒毛长度:A组显著长于C组与D组(P < 0.05);绒毛宽度,仅B组大于D组(P < 0.05);隐窝深度,C组显著深于B、D两组(P < 0.05)。十二指肠、空肠的粘膜厚度和肌层厚度各组差异不显著(P < 0.05)。回肠,仅A组粘膜厚度显著厚于C、D两组(P < 0.05)。通过比较各组肠段绒毛长度与隐窝深度的比值(V/C值),发现十二指肠的V/C值,B、C两组显著低于A、D两组(P < 0.05);空肠后段的V/C值,C组显著低于D组;回肠各组V/ C值差异不显著。比较结果显示,植物蛋白含量在70%以下的代乳粉使犊牛十二指肠和空肠的绒毛长度、宽度增加,促进了犊牛小肠的发育,但过高植物蛋白配制的代乳粉会使犊牛的V/C值升高,从而降低消化率。
     通过扫描电镜观察胃肠表面形态,发现过高比例植物蛋白配制的代乳粉会造成犊牛小肠表面的损伤,特别是十二指肠表面,但粗蛋白中植物蛋白含量为60%的试验组与对照组相比较无明显差异。
The experiment was conducted with calves to study the milk replacers which were fed containing 60,70,and 80% vegetable protein. The vegetable proteins come from Soy protein concentrate, expanded soybean and corn gluten meal. Objectives of this experiment were to text production and process of milk replacer, performance, digestibility and stomach and intestine morphology of calves and economy benefit in calf rearing.
     Holstein bull calves(n=20) were purchased,housed individually within an environmentally uncontrolled facility,were randomly allotted in batches to receive 1 of 4 experimental treatments. Treatments divided in 3 groups(A 60%,B 70%,and C 80%), the animal of control group(D) fed whole milk.
     The trial results showed that compared on apparent nutrient digestibility of calves the control group was more superiority than other three experimental treatments. But dry matter digestibility and protein digestibility were no significant differences(P > 0.05) between control D and test group A. The weight and volume of stomach were not different among treatment groups(P > 0.05),except reticulum volume of A and D were significant differences(P < 0.05). In piece of intestine, the weight of jejunum B compared to A, C, D were significant difference(sP < 0.05), the same between A and C. The length of duodenum and jejunum C and other test groups were significant differences(P < 0.05).
     The results of histological section reacted that the treat group of feeding 60% vegetable protein was no significant differences with feeding the whole milk group(P > 0.05). Other groups were affected by milk protein content. The indexes of stomach were no significant differences(P > 0.05). Intestine indexes were value. Among villous height of duodenum and posterior of jejunum, villous width of forepart of jejunum, mucosa width of ileum, A and other groups were significant differences(P < 0.05).
     And the scanning election microscopy picture indicated that the milk replacers of higher proportion vegetable protein were made injury in calves’stomach and intestine, especially in the surface of duodenum. But the threatment group of contenting 60% vegetable protein was no significant differences with control group.
引文
[1]冀一伦.实用养牛科学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2001.
    [2]李辉,刁其玉.哺乳犊牛的消化特点与蛋白质营养研究进展[J].饲粉博览,2005,第ll期:13-15.
    [3]张乃锋,刁其玉,李岩松,等.犊牛代乳粉对早期断奶犊牛生长发育的影响[J].当代畜禽养殖业,2006,03:16-18.
    [4] J. T. Huber.Development of the Digestive and Metabolic Apparatus of the Calf[J].J Dairy Sci,1969,52: 1303-1315.
    [5]寇占英,李启鹏,莫放,等.犊牛主要消化器官的发育规律[R].中国畜牧兽医学会动物营养学分会第六届全国代表大会暨第八届学术研讨会,2000,533-537.
    [6] C. H.HOLLER, G. WARD, A. D. McGILLIARD,et al. The effect of age of the calf on the availability ofnutrients in vegetable milk-replacer rations[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1956,9: 1288-1298.
    [7] A.J.Heinrichs, S.J.Wells, W.C.Losinger. A study of the use of milk replacers for dairy calves in the United States[J]. J Dairy Sci,1995, 78:2831-2837.
    [8]周建民.奥耐尔犊牛代乳粉代替全乳饲喂荷斯坦母犊的试验报告[J].中国奶牛,1999,01:15-16.
    [9]叶纪梅,高艳霞,张祥,等.不同处理大豆粉在犊牛代乳粉中的应用效果比较[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006,33(11):3~6.
    [10]李启鹏.哺乳犊牛消化道主要消化酶发育规律的研究[M].北京:中国农业大学出版社,2000.
    [11]邱怀.牛生产学[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000.
    [12] Cruywagen, C. W. Effect of curd forming of colostrum on absorption of immunoglobulin G in newborn calves[J]. J Dairy Sci,1990, 73:3287-3290.
    [13] C. L.Davis, J. K. Drackley. The Development, Nutrition, and Management of the Young Calf. 1st ed. Iowa State University Press, Ames. 1998.
    [14] Dawson, D P, J L Morrill, P G Reddy, et al. Soy protein concentrate and heated soy flours as protein sources in milk replacer for preruminant calves [J]. J Dairy Sci, 1988, 71: 1301-1309.
    [15]赵晓静,李建国,孙涛,等.犊牛代乳粉的研究进展.饲料研究,2004,8:25-27.
    [16]崔伟,龚月生,黄利强,等.含高比例植物蛋白的代乳粉对早期断奶公犊牛的影响.中国奶牛,2008,7:14-16.
    [17]赵晓静,李建国,李秋凤,等.不同营养水平代乳粉对犊牛生产性能和腹泻率的影响.动物营养学报,2007,19(2):124-128.
    [18] Sanz MR,I Ruiz Mariscal F,etal.The effect of different concentrations of protein and fat in milk replacers on protein utilization in kid goats[J].British Society of Animal Science,1997,64:485-492.
    [19] B. P. Lammers,A. J. Heinrichs, and A. Aydin. The Effect of Whey Protein Concentrateor Dried Skim Milk in Milk Replacer on Calf Performance and Blood Metabolites[J].J Dairy Sci,1998,81:1940-1945.
    [20]陈文,陈代文.玉米蛋白粉的饲用价值及鉴别[J].饲料博览,2003,第9期.29-30.
    [21]张锋斌,李维平.玉米蛋白的营养成分及应用[J].畜牧兽医杂志,1998,Vol.17.NO.4:26-28.
    [22]张艳铭,甄二英,宋智娟.玉米蛋白粉的营养价值及其应用[J].当代畜牧,2006,第1期:22-24.
    [23]孔祥珍,周惠明.小麦面筋蛋白特性及其应用[J].粮食与油脂,2004,第11期:14-15.
    [24]孙素玲,周如太.小麦面筋作饲料蛋白源[J].饲料工业,1995,Vol.16.NO.1:45.
    [24]内蒙古农牧学院,安徽农学院.家畜解剖学及组织胚胎学[M].农业出版社,1987.
    [25]曾球生.日粮营养水平对山羊瘤胃、瓣胃上皮生长及短链脂肪酸浓度的影响[D].南京农业大学,2006.
    [26]李伟.不同结构日粮对犊牛生长、胃发育及其消化机能的影响[D].黑龙江八一农垦大学,2006.
    [27] H.R.Conrad,J.W.Hibbs,N .Frank.High orughage system for raising calves based on early development of rumen function.IX.Effect of rumen inoculations and chlortetracycline on rumen function of calves fed high roughage pellets[J].J Dairy Sci,1958,41:1248.
    [28]周玉香,卢德勋,孙海洲.犊牛胃肠道生长发育以及促进其早期生长发育的措施[J].黑龙江畜牧兽医,2005,9:18-20.
    [29] H.Tamate, A. D. McGilliard, N. L. Jacobson,et al.Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf[J]. J Dairy Sci,1962,45 : 408.
    [30]武翠.阿尔巴斯绒山羊在不同饲养条件下小肠形态变化的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2007.
    [31]A. G. Silva, J. T. Huber, and R. M. DeGregorio. Influence of Substituting Two Types of Soybean Protein for Milk Protein on Gain and Utilization of Milk Replacers in Calves[J].J Dairy Sci,1986,69: 172-180.
    [32] T.Ruurd ,Zijlstra, Kwang-Youn Whang,et al. Effect of Feeding a Milk Replacer to Early-Weaned Pigs on Growth,Body Composition,and Small Intestinal Morphology,Compared with Suckled Littermates[J]. J Anim Sci,1996,74:2948–2959.
    [33] Andre R. Ebert, Adam S. Berman, Robert J. Harrell,et al.2005. Vegetable Proteins Enhance the Growth of Milk-Fed Piglets, Despite LowerApparent Ileal Digestibility[J]. J. Nutr,2005,135: 2137–2143.
    [34] A.J.Heinrichs, S.J.Wells, W.C.Losinger. A study of the use of milk replacers for dairy calves in the united states[j]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1995, 78: 2831-2837.
    [35]刁其玉,张乃峰,屠焰,等.犊牛代乳粉的研究进展[J].饲料工业,2003,24(8):6-8.
    [36]叶纪梅,高艳霞,张祥,等.不同处理大豆粉在犊牛代乳粉中的应用效果比较[J].中国畜牧兽医,2006,33(11):3-6.
    [37] NRC.Nutrient requirement of calves,10 rev.ed [M].Washington D.C.:National Academy Press,2001.
    [38]任慧波,张永根,潘军,等.不同蛋白来源的代乳粉代替全乳饲喂犊牛的试验报告[J].饲料工业,2005,(25)5:24-26.
    [39]孙泽威,秦贵信,张庆华,等.大豆抗原蛋白对犊牛生长性能、日粮养分消化率和肠道吸收能力的影响[J].中国畜牧杂志,2005,41(11):30-33.
    [40]邓代君,黄锡霞,米热古丽,等.8~25日龄犊牛对牛乳和处理大豆料消化性的研究[J].动物营养学报,2000,(1):53-56.
    [41] J.P. Lalles. Nutritional and antinutritional aspects of soybean and field pea proteins used in veal calf production: a review[J]. Livest. Prod. Sci,1993,34: 181–202.
    [42] J.P.Lalles,H.M.Tukur,R.Toullec,et al.Analytical criteria for predicting apparent digestibility of soybean protein in preruminant calves[J]. J Dairy Sci,1996, 79:475–482.
    [43] J. Kanjanapruthipong. Supplementation of milk replacers containing soy protein with threonine, methionine, and lysine in the diets of calves[J]. J Dairy Sci,1998, 81:2912-2915.
    [44] A. M.Raven. Fat in milk replacers for calves[J]. J Sci Food Agric,1970, 21: 352-359.
    [45] B.Graulet, D. Gruffat-Mounty, D. Durand,et al. Effects of milk diets containing beef tallow or coconut oil on the fatty acid metabolism of liver slices from preruminant calves[J]. Br J Nutr,2000, 84:309–318.
    [46] K. J. Jenkins, J. K. G. Kramer, F. D. Sauer,et al. Influence of triglycerides and free fatty acids in milk replacers on calf performance, blood plasma, and adipose lipids[J]. J Dairy Sci,1985, 68: 669-680.
    [47] A. Huuskonen, H. Khalili, J. Kiljala,et al. Effects of vegetable fats versus lard in milk replacers on feed intake digestibility, and growth in Finnish Ayrshire bull calves[J]. J Dairy Sci,2005, 88:3575-3581.
    [48]胡坚,张宛如,王振权.动物饲养学(实验指导)[M].吉林科学技术出版社,1994.
    [49] P. S.Mir, J. H. Burton. B. N. Wilkie,et al. Reduction of 8-conglycinin antigenicity and rate of acid-pepsin proteolysis of proteins in extruded or rumen fluid-treated soybean meal[J]. J. Anim. Sci,1989, 69: 727.
    [50]黄锡霞,雒秋江,孟庆龄,等.犊牛对乳和处理大豆料消化性的比较研究[J].新疆农业大学学报,1997,(2):9-15.
    [51]李影球.犊牛代乳料中用大豆蛋白替代部分乳蛋白的试验研究[D].广西大学,2005.
    [52] V. W.Hays, V. C. Speer, P. A. Hartman,et al. The effect of age and supplemental amino acids on the utilization of milk and soya proteins by the young pig[J]. J. Nutr,1959, 69:179–184.
    [53] D.P.Dawson,J.L.Morrill,P.G.Reddy,et al.Soy protein concentrate and heated soy flours as protein sources in milk replacer for preruminant calves[J].J Dairy Sci,1988, 71:1301.
    [54] P.J.Kilshaw,J.W.Sissons.Gastrointestinal allergy to soybean protein in preruminant calves:Allergenic constituents of soybean products[J].Res Vet Sci, 1979, (27): 366-371.
    [55] H. B. Stobo, J. F.Gaston, H. J. G. Anderton, et al. The effect of environmental temperature on the performance and health of the preruminant and ruminant calf[J]. British Journal of Nutrition, 1971, 26: 363-380.
    [56] R.Toullec, P.Guilloteau,J.Y.Coroller. Influence de la cinttique d’bvacuation gastrique de I’aliment sur I’absorption chez le veau pkruminant[J]. Ann Biol Anim Biochem Biophys,1979, 19:729.
    [57] J.P.Lalles, R Toullec, P Branco pardal. Hydrolyzed soy protein isolate sustains high nutritional performance in veal calves[J]. J Dairy Sci, 1995, 78: 194-204.
    [58] P.J.Kilshaw,J.W.Sissons.Gastrointestinal allergy to soybean protein in preruminant calves:Allergenic constituents of soybean products[J].Res Vet Sci, 1979, (27): 366-371.
    [59] L. Montagne, R. Toullec, T. C. Savidge,et al. Influence of protein source and antigenicity of soyabean on morphology and enzyme activities of the proximal jejunum in preruminant calf[J]. Reprod. Nutr Dev,1999, 39: 80-81.
    [60] P. S.Erickson, D. J. Schauff, and M. R. Murphy. Diet digestibility and growth of Holstein calves fed acidified milk replacers containing soy protein concentrate[J]. J Dairy Sci,1989, 72: 1528–1533.
    [61] A. P.Williams, and R. H. Smith. Concentrations of amino acids and urea in the plasma of the preruminant calf and estimation of the amino acid requirements[J]. Br J Nutr,1975, 33:149–158.
    [62] S. T. Woodford, H. D. Whetstone,M. R. Murphy, et al. Abomasal pH, Nutrient Digestibility, and Growth of Holstein Bull Calves Fed Acidified Milk Replacer[J]. J Dairy Sci,1987,70:888-891.
    [63]高艳霞.代乳粉中添加大豆蛋白对犊牛生长发育的影响[D].中国农业大学,2006.
    [64]李发第,郝正里,郑中朝,等.不同精粗饲比颗粒饲料对肥育羔羊消化道容积及内容物分布的影响.甘肃农业大学学报,2001,3(1):13-37.
    [65] H.TAMATE, A. D. MCGILLIARD, N. L. JACOBSON.Effect of various dietaries on the anatomical development of the stomach in the calf[J]. Journal of Dairy Science, 1962,45:408.
    [66] D.G Burrin,C.L.Ferrell,J.H.Eisemann,et al. Effect of level of nutrition on splanchnic blood flow and oxygen consumption in sheep[J].Br.J.Nutr,1998,62:23-34.
    [67]山田知钱,等.饲料特性对育成肥育牛消化道形态及机能的形响研完报告[R].(2001-2003).
    [68] W.Sun, A.I.Gocisch, L.A.Forster,et al. Forage and Splanchnic tissue mass in growing lambs:effects of dictary forage level and source on splanchnic tissue mass in growing lambs.British Journal of Nutrition, 1994,71:141-151.
    [69]李俊生,袁力,周宏力.黄羊胃的解剖形态学特征[J].东北林业大学学报.2000,11(6):67-71.
    [70]张海涛,王加启,卜登攀,等.影响犊牛瘤胃发育的因素研究.乳液科学与技术,2008,2:86-89
    [71]春香. 1.5岁阿尔巴斯绒山羊在不同饲养条件下瘤胃与网胃黏膜组织形态学改变的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2006.
    [72] Gaetano V. GaelaIlO Scala . MorphostnIc1Ura aDd ultrastructural characteristic of buffalo stomach [M], Journal of Buffalo Science and Technique, 1997.
    [73] H-D.德尔曼,E.M.布朗,兽医组织学[M].中国农业出版社,1989.
    [74]宋恩亮,陈耀星,王子旭,等.利杂犊牛小肠各段长度与黏膜结构的发育学变化[J].动物医学进展,2006,27(5):66-70.
    [75]韩正康.家畜营养生理学[M ].北京:农业出版社,1993.
    [76]姚浪群,萨仁娜,佟建明,等.安普霉素对仔猪肠道微生物及肠壁组织结构的影响[J].畜牧兽医学报,2003,34(3):250-257.
    [77]吴美玲. 1.5岁阿尔巴斯绒山羊在不同饲养条件下瓣胃与皱胃形态变化的研究[D].内蒙古农业大学,2005.
    [78]王郑媛.牦牛胃的结构与功能的研究[D].兰州大学,2005.
    [79] F. J. Seegraber and J. L. Morrill. Effect of Protein Source in Calf Milk Replacers on Morphology and Absorptive Ability of Small Intestine[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1986,69:460-469.
    [80] F. J. Seegraber and J. L. Morrill. Effect of Soy Protein on Calves' Intestinal Absorptive Ability and Morphology Determined by Scanning Electron Microscopy[J]. Journal of Dairy Science,1982,65:1962-1970.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700