黄泛沙地不同土地利用类型土壤风蚀规律及影响机制
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
土壤风蚀是黄泛平原土地风沙化的首要环节,直接影响区域的生产、生活、生态安全和农业经济的持续发展。为揭示平原区土壤风蚀规律,本研究以不同土地利用类型为研究对象,运用野外调查试验、定位监测与室内分析测试、地物光谱测定相结合的方法,研究了土壤风蚀的时空变化规律与动态、风蚀影响因子、地物光谱特征及其与有机质之间的关系,主要研究结果为:
     (1)不同用地类型土壤蚀积状况差异显著。农业用地以花生地风蚀深度和风蚀量最大,属中度侵蚀;撂荒地和农林间作地属轻度侵蚀;小麦地和玉米留茬地处于风积状态。林业用地土壤风蚀强度随造林年限增加而降低,1年造林地属中度风蚀,3年和5年造林地分别为轻度风蚀与微度风蚀,8年造林地为风积状态。
     (2)不同用地类型土壤蚀积月际变化规律及动态不同:花生地、撂荒地和造林地月际间均为风蚀状态,且呈“V”变化,第一和第二峰值分别出现于11月和4月;玉米留茬地和8年造林地月际间整体以风积为主;其他用地类型月际间蚀积变化复杂,大致呈单峰变化趋势。
     (3)不同土地利用方式土壤机械组成均以粉砂、极细砂和细砂为主。风蚀深度与砂粒含量呈正相关线性关系,与粘粒、粉粒含量成负相关,相关性不显著。土壤有机质含量与风蚀深度间呈显著线性负相关,其变化遵循D=0.646-0.383XO。紧实度、含水量均与土壤风蚀呈一定程度负相关,但无明显数量关系。
     (4)不同造林年限林地行间与树下微地形变化明显,受微地形及造林年限双重影响,呈现洼地风蚀弱于垄地,风积强于垄地的规律;随着造林年限的增加土壤有机质含量增加,风蚀减小而风积增强。人为翻耕土壤造成风蚀增大。
     (5)除花生地外,农业用地、林业用地对0.2m处的风速削弱作用明显,风速降低百分比分别为0.36%~40.07%和10.28%~52.46%,近地表粗糙度增大5.35~186.45倍和1.31~52.79倍。地表留茬、作物种植和造林等措施可增大地表粗糙度,减弱近地表风速,减缓土壤风蚀的发生。
     (6)不同用地类型风沙流活动于近地表50cm范围内,输沙率随高度的变化遵循y=ae-bx指数规律递减;输沙量随高度的分布呈现幂函数关系;随高度增加,风沙流砂粒含量减少而粉砂及粘土含量增多,风蚀物粒径逐渐变细。
     (7)不同土地利用方式其土壤光谱特征值差别明显,主要发生于500~750nm、1350~1500nm、1750-2000nm和1900~2200nm处,土壤有机质与光谱特征值间呈多元线性相关关系,但各拟合方程中涉及的特征波段并不相同。
Wind erosion, which is the essential part in the floodplain of the Yellow River wind-sandy land, influence directly the production, life, regional ecological security and agriculture economic sustainable development of the zone. The paper basing on different types of land use, combining methods that field investigation test, positioning monitoring and indoor analysis test and Spectral determination, studied temporal-spatial pattern and dynamic of wind erosion, wind erosion influence factors, spectral characteristics and its relationship with organic matter to reveal regional wind erosion rule. The main results are as follows:
     (1) The significant difference existed between different land types’soil erosion status. The wind erosion depth and amount of peanut sample plot in agricultural land was the largest, belonging to moderate erosion; the abandoned land and agroforesty systems belonged to mild erosion; the wheatland and corn stubble land was in wind-blown state. The wind erosion intensity of forestry land decreaced with the growth of afforestation years; one year’afforestation ground belonged to moderate wind erosion; three years and five years’afforestation grounds belonged to mild wind erosion, while eight years’afforestation ground was in wind-blown state.
     (2) The change rules and dynamic between months of soil erosion integrated varied from different land use types. Peanut sample plot, abandoned land and afforestation ground were in Wind erosion state between months, changing as the shape of "V", and the first and the second peaks appeared respectively in November and April; the corn stubble land and eight years’afforestation ground were mainly in wind-blown state between months; the soil erosion status changes of other land use types between months was complex, presenting roughly a single-peak trend.
     (3) The mechanical composition of soil in different land use types all major in powder sand, very fine and fine sand. It presents that the depth of wind erosion are in positive linear correlation with the sand content, in negative correlation with powder content where the correlation is not significant. The soil organic content correlate with the depth of erosion in a significant negative linear relation, whose variation follows as D =0.646-0.383×XO. Moreover, the soil compactness and the moisture content relate with the soil erosion presenting a negative relation to a certain degree, which is in no significant number relationship.
     (4) It changes obviously between the rows of trees with different afforestation age and the tiny terrain under the tree, which shows the discipline that the wind erosion of the depressions is less than that of the highland and that wind-blow is more than the highland, influenced by both the tiny terrain and the afforestation age. The content of the soil organic matter increase, the wind erosion decrease and the wind-blown increase with the afforestation age extension. The soil erosion increase caused by artificial landuse.
     (5) The agricultural land and the forestry land plays an important role on the weakness of the wind speed at the place of 0.2 meters except the earthnut land. The percentage of the decreased wind speeds are respectively 0.36%~40.07% and 28%~52.46%, with the increasing roughness of near land surface by 5.35~186.45 times and 1.31~52.79 times. The surface leaved stubbly, the crops and the afforestation can increase the surface roughness, decrease the wind speed near the land and slow down the wind erosion. Surface leave stubble, crop planting and silviculture measures such as surface roughness can increase, about the near-surface wind speed, slow down the occurrence of wind erosion.
     (6) Activities of different types of land in the near-surface of wind flow within 50cm, there is sediment transport rate with height follows y=ae-bx exponential decrease; and the weight of sediment load distribution with height power function relationship; Increasing altitude, wind flow silt and sand content decreased and clay content increased, erosion tapered diameter.
     (7) The spectral characteristics of the soil has big different in the different land use values, mainly in the 500~750nm, 1350~1500nm ,1750~2000nm and 1900~2200nm Department, and the spectral characteristics of soil organic matter was between the value of the multiple linear correlation, but the fitting Equations involved in the characteristic bands are not the same.
引文
拜格诺,R.A.(钱宁,林秉南译).风沙和荒漠沙丘物理学[M].北京:科学出版社,1959
    陈广庭,杨泰运,张伟民.山东省黄河冲积平原风沙化土地的研究[J].中国沙漠,1989,9(1):20-33.
    陈渭南,董光荣,董治宝.中国北方土壤风蚀问题的研究进展与趋势[J].地球科学进展,1994,7(5):6一12
    陈渭南.陕北黄土高原北部地带的营力结构及风蚀问题[J].干旱区研究,1988,11(2):11-18
    楚厄,H.(陈渭南译).线性沙丘的形态与形成过程[J].世界沙漠研究,1991,(4):8-11
    董光荣,李长治,金炯.关于土壤风蚀风洞实验的某些结果[J].科学通报,1987,32(4):277-301
    董光荣,申建友,金炯.我国土地沙漠化的分布与危害[J].干旱区资源与环境,1989,3(4):33-42.
    董光荣.关于土壤风蚀风洞实验的若干结果[J].科学通报,1987,32(2):297-301
    董玉祥.荒漠化概念释义[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(增刊):9-12
    董治宝,陈渭南,董光荣,等.植被对风沙土风蚀作用的影响[J].环境科学学报.1996,16(4):437-443
    董治宝,陈渭南,李振山,等.风沙土开垦中的风蚀研究[J].土壤学报,1997,34(l):74-80
    董治宝,陈渭南,李振山,等.风沙土水分抗风蚀性研究[J].1996,16(2):17-22
    董治宝,陈渭南,李振山,等.植被对土壤风蚀影响作用的实验研究[J].土壤侵蚀与水土保持学报.1996,2(2):1-8
    董智.乌兰布和沙漠绿洲农田沙害及其控制机理研究[D].北京林业大学,2004
    段争虎,刘发民.黄淮海平原豫北土地风沙化对土壤肥力的影响[J].中国沙漠.2000,20(增刊):176-178
    房用,王力,孙蕾,等.黄河三角洲湿地生态系统保育及恢复技术研究展望[J].林业科技开发,2004,18(4):16-18
    高安.鲁西北沙地风蚀及其防治[J].中国沙漠,1993,13(4):57-62
    韩致文,周玉麟,李晓云,等.豫北延津的风沙问题[J].中国沙漠,1995,15(4):378-384
    何挺,王静,程烨等.土壤水分光谱特征研究[J].土壤学报,2006,43(6):1027-1032.
    何挺,王静,程烨等.土壤氧化铁光谱特征研究[J].地理与地理信息科学,2006,22(2):30-34.
    何挺,王静,林宗坚,等.土壤有机质光谱特征研究[J].武汉大学学报(信息科学版), 2006, 31(11):975-979.
    贺大良,邹本功,李长治.地表风蚀过程风洞实验的初步研究[J].中国沙漠,1986,6(l):25-31
    贺军亮,蒋建军,周生路等.土壤有机质含量的高光谱特性及其反演[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(3):638-643.
    胡孟春.科尔沁沙地土壤风蚀的风洞实验研究[J].中国沙漠,1991,11(1):22-29
    胡英娣.几种化学固沙材料抗风蚀的风洞实验研究[J].中国沙漠,1997,17(1):103-106.
    李福兴.黄淮海平原砂地土壤的基本特性及其改造利用的初步研究—以山东省夏津县黄河故道区为例[J].中国沙漠,1989,9(1):47-60.
    李海凤,戴诚,王先芸.莘县近50年旱涝特征分析[J].山东气象,2008,28(4):35-37
    李红丽,董智,张昊,等.黄泛平原发展牧草产业治理风沙化土地的探讨[J].中国草地学报.2006,28(5):104-109
    李新荣,贾玉奎,龙利群,等.干旱半干旱地区土壤微生物结皮的生态学意义及若干研究进展[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(1):4-11.
    刘德,王玉俭,钱祖林,等.山东省水土保持普查要点及区划类型[J].水土保持研究,1994,1(2):12-28
    刘焕军,张柏,赵军,等.黑土有机质含量高光谱模型研究[J].土壤学报,2007,44(1):27-32.
    刘贤万,杨根生,陈广庭,等.宁夏灵武县碎石井矿区沙害预测及防治[J].干旱区研究1988,1:33-38
    刘贤万.实验风沙物理与风沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,1995
    刘晓民,程国彦,郝建国,等.农田留茬覆盖抗风蚀效果浅析[J].农村牧区机械化, 2005,1:10-12
    刘玉璋.影响土壤风蚀主要因素的风洞实验研究[J].中国沙漠,1992,12(4):41-48
    卢艳丽,白由路,杨俐苹,王红娟.高光谱的土壤有机质含量预测模型的建立与评价[J].中国农业科学,2007,40(9):1989-1995.
    马世威.风沙流结构的研究[J].中国沙漠.1988,8(3):8-22
    马昭让,岳彩田.黄河故道沉沙区综合治理技术研究[J].山东林业科技,2005,3:27-28.
    派伊,K.(台益和,张选阳译).风扬粉尘及粉尘沉积物[J].北京:科学出版社,1991.
    彭杰,张杨珠,周清等.去除有机质对土壤光谱特性的影响[J].土壤,2006,38(4):453-458.
    任中兴,房用,杨吉华,等.黄泛沙地小网格农田防护林网防风固沙和增产效益的研究[J].山东农业大学学报(自然科学版).2009,40(3):398-404
    沙晋明,陈鹏程,陈松林.土壤有机质光谱响应特性研究[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(2):21-24.
    邵立业.风沙化土地的整治与利用[J].自然资源学报.1990,5(3):237-245
    史同广,孙希华,闫业超.基于卫星遥感的鲁西北季节性风沙化土地研究[J].地域研究与开发,2003,22(5):42-45
    王少英.黄泛平原的土壤侵蚀灾害及防治对策[J].灾害学,1994,9(2):59-61
    吴正,凌裕泉.风沙运动的若干规律及防止风沙危害问题的初步研究[J].治沙研究,1965,第7号,北京:科学出版社
    吴正.风沙地貌学[M].北京:科学出版社,1987
    吴正.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
    夏训诚等.新疆沙漠化与风沙灾害治理[J].北京:科学出版社,1991
    徐彬彬,季耿善,朱永豪.中国陆地背景和土壤光谱反射特性的地理分区的初步研究[J].环境遥感,1991,6(2):142-151.
    徐先英,唐进年,金红喜,等.3种新型化学固沙剂的固沙效益实验研究[J].水土保持学报,2005,19(3):62-65.
    张俊华,张佳宝.不同生育期冬小麦光谱特征对叶绿素和氮素的响应研究[J]土壤通报,2008,39(3):586-592
    张立新,白相萍,陈一丁,等.阴山北麓风蚀沙化区保护性耕作试验[J].内蒙古农业科技,2004(5):26-28
    张文群,蒋光润,商铁兰等.定西遥感试验场土壤光谱特征分析[J].遥感技术与应用,1992,7(2):25-31.
    张义丰,宁远.黄河故道的开发利用与发展前景[J].地理科学进展,1997,16(1):37-43
    张重阳.山东省聊城市水土流失现状及防治对策[J].云南地理环境研究.2004,16(4):10-13
    赵宏亮,侯立白,王萍等.彰武农田土壤风蚀物垂直分布规律的研究[J].水土保持研究,2006,13(2):
    朱廷曜,朱劲伟.林带防风作用的风洞实验研究—有效防护距离拟合公式的补正及其应用[J].中国农业气象,1981,1:76-81
    朱震达,赵兴梁,凌裕泉,等.1998.治沙工程学[M] .北京:中国环境科学出版社.
    朱震达,刘恕,邸醒民.中国的荒漠化及其治理[M].北京:科学出版社,1989
    朱震达,刘恕.关于沙漠化的概念及其发展程度的判断[J].中国沙漠,1984,4(4):2-8
    朱震达.土地荒漠化问题研究现状与展望[J].地理研究,1994,13(1):105-113
    朱震达.中国荒漠化防治[M].北京:中国林业出版社,1999
    Azizov .Influence of soil moisture on the resistance of soil to wind erosion[J].Soviet Soil Science,1977,9:105-108
    и.兹纳门斯基著.杨郁华译,朱震达校.沙地风蚀过程的实验研究和沙堆防止问题[M].北京:科学出版社,1960
    Anderson,R.S.,Sorensen,M.and Willetts,B.B..A review of recent progress in our understanding of aeolian sediment transport[J].In: Barndorff-Nielsen,O.E.and Willetts, B.B.(eds.), 1991,1:1-20.
    Ash,J.E.and Wasson,R.J.Vegetation and sand mobility in the Australian desert dunefiled[J]. Zeitschrift fur Geomorphoiogie Suppl.Bd.1983,45:7-25.
    B.A.费道洛维奇, (陈治平译).现代沙漠地貌的起源.见:沙漠地貌起源及研究方法(译文集) [M].北京:科学出版社,1962.
    Bagnold,R.A..The physics of blown sand and desert dunes[J].London:Methuen,1941.
    Barndorff-Nielsen,O.E.,Moller,J.T.,Rasmussen,K.R.and Willetts,B.B.(eds.).Proceedings of the international workshop on the physics of blown sand[M].Memoir,8, Dept.Theoretical Statistics, Institute of Mathematics, Univ. Aarhus, 1985.
    Barndorff-Nielsen,O.E.and Willetts,B.B.(eds.).Aeolian grain transport[J].Acta Mechanica Supplementum, 1991,1/2.
    Belly,P.Y.Sand movement by wind.(U.S.Army Coastal Engineering Research Center) [J].Technical Memorandum,1964,NO.1,Washington,D.C.
    Belnap J. Surface disturbances: their role in accelerateing desertification[J]. Environmental Monitoring and Assessment,1995,37:39-57.
    Belnap J. The world at your feet: desert biological soil crusts[J]. Frontiers in Ecological Environments,2003,1(5):181-189.
    Bisal,F.,J.Hsieh.1966.Influence of moisture on the erodibility of soil by wind[J].Soil Science, 1966,102,143-146
    Chepil ,W.S.Influence of moisture on erodibility of soil by wind[J].Proceedingd of Soil Society of America,1956,20,288-292
    Chepil,W.S.ProPerties of soil whieh inftuenee winderosion:Mechani calstability of structure[J]. Sci.,195la,72:465-478
    Chepil.W.S..Relationofwinderosiontowaterstableanddryelodstruetureofsoil[Jl.SoilSci.,1942,55:275-287
    Fnyrear,D.W. Soil cover and wind erosion[J].Transactiions of the ASSE,1984,28(3):781-784
    Fryrear,D.W. and Lyles,L..Wind erosion research accomplishments and needs[J].Transactions of the ASAE, 1977,20(5):916-918.
    Galvao L S,Vitorelloa.Variability of laboratory measured soil lines of soils from southeastern Brazil[J].Remote Sensing of Environment, 1998,63:166-181.
    Glenn O.Sehwab.风力侵蚀及其防治措施[J].水土保持科技情报.1993,4:45-48
    Goudie,A.S..Dust storms in space and time[J].Progress in Physical Geography, 1983,7:502-530.
    Greeley,R.and Iversen,J.D.. Wind as a geological process on Earth,Mars,Venus and Titan[M]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,1985.
    Gunsaulis F R,Kocher M F,Griffis C L.Surface structure effects on close-range reflectance as a function of soil organic matter content[J]. American Society of Agricultural Engineer,1991,34:641-649.
    Hagen,L.J.A wind erosion prediction system to meet the user’s need.[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation.1991,46(2):107-111.
    Johnson,J.W.Sand movement on coastal dunes.Federal Inter-Agency Sedimentation Conference[M].US Dept.Agric.Misc.Publ.1965,(970):747-755.
    Lyles,L.Threshold Velocities and Initial Particle Motion as Influence by Air Turbulence[J].Trans,ASSE,1987,14(3):563
    Nickling,W.G.,Ecclestone,M..The effects of soluble salts on the threshold shear velocity of fine sand[J].Sedimentolody,1981:28,505-510.
    Nickling,W.G.Eolian sediment ttransport during dust storms:Slims River Valley,Yukon Territory[J].C anadian Journal of Earth Sciences,1978,15,1069-1084
    Nickling,W.G.The stabilizing role of bonding agents on the entrainment of sediment by wind[J].Sedimentology,1984:31,499-511.
    Owen,P.R..Salation of uniform grains in air[J].Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1964,20:225-242.
    Pasak,V.Wind Erosion on Soils[J].VUM Zbraslaav,Scientific Monographs,1973,3:78-89.
    Pye,K..Aolian dust and dust deposits[J].London:Academic Press. 1987
    Pye,K.and Tsoar,H.Aeolian Sand and Sand Dunes[J].London,Hyman Unwin,1990
    R.S.Anderson.& P.K.Haft.Erosion profiles due to particles entrained by wind:application of eolian sediment-transport model[J],Geological Society of American Bulletin, 1988, 97: 1270-1278
    Sharp R P,Wind-driven sand in Coachella valley,California[J].Geologieal Society of Ameriea,Bulletin,1964,75:785-804
    Skidmore,E.L..Soil erosion by wind: an overview.in El-Baz F. and Hassan M.H.A.(eds.) Physics of desertification[J].Dordrecht:Martinus Nijhoff, 1986,261-273.
    T.ф.雅可波夫.土壤风蚀及其防治.[M].北京:农业出版社,1955
    Thomas,D.D..Holicence Aeolian Activity in the South westKalahari Desert,Southern Africa[J].Holocene,1997,7(3):273-281.
    Wasson,R.J.,Nanninga,P.M..Estimating wind transport of sand on vegetated surfaces[J].Earth Surface Processes and Landforms,1986:11,505-514.
    Werner B T,Haff PK.The impact process in Aeolian saltation:two-dimensional simulations[J]. Sedimentology,1988,35:189-196
    White.B.R.Two-Phase measurements of saltating turbulent boundary layer fiow[J].International Journal of Multi-Phase Flow,1982,9:459-473
    Willian F.sehilinger.Deep ripping fall-planted wheat after fallow to improve in filtration and Reduce erosion[J].Jounral of soil and water conservation.1964,52(3):198-202
    Woodruff, N.P. and Siddoway,F.H.. A wind erosion equation[J]. Soil Science Society of America Proceedings, 1965,29(5):602-608.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700