北京市典型风沙危害区景观动态及驱动力研究
详细信息    本馆镜像全文|  推荐本文 |  |   获取CNKI官网全文
摘要
荒漠化是当前世界上最严重的资源与生态环境问题之一。北京由于所处区域构造及气候地理位置,生态环境直接受荒漠化的严重威胁。近几年,北京受风沙袭击的沙尘天数和程度都远超过往年,首都经济、社会发展与人民生活均受到严重影响。
     北京市沙化土地依据地貌特征,土壤质地主要划分为山地、丘陵向平原过渡地带、平原三种类型。本研究通过选取康庄、南口、永定河三处典型风沙危害区为研究对象,借助遥感技术、地理信息系统技术、全球定位技术、景观生态学理论和相关数学研究方法,对八十年代、九十年代和2000年以后三个时期的景观动态进行分析和比较,进而探讨北京市土地沙化景观类型的动态变化。主要研究成果如下:
     从八十年代至今,北京沙化土地景观类型发生巨大变化。其中,以康庄、南口、永定河研究区为代表,沙荒地面积大幅度减少,由2117.03hm~2、320.49hm~2、3950.5hm~2,分别减少到1249.65hm~2、160hm~2、1542.74hm~2;减少了40.97%、50.08%、60.95%。
     通过选取相关景观指数对研究区景观类型进行分析可知,景观破碎化程度的变化趋势是:康庄风沙危害区先增加后减缓、南口风沙危害区持续增加、永定河风沙危害区先增加后减缓;对研究区景观类型的变化的分析表明,变化的原因与研究区所处地理位置,社会经济发展背景和人为干扰、政策导向密切相关。
     对影响研究区景观动态变化的主要因素分析可知,研究区主要受自然和人为两种条件影响最大。自然因素中,沙化土地变化主要与地貌特征、地表物质、降雨、温度、大风、水文条件等因素关系较密切;人为因素中,主要受人口增长、农业结构调整、林业工程实施和社会经济发展背景等因素的影响。
     依据景观结构变化特征及主要影响因素分析结果,建立了北京市沙化土地综合效益评价指标体系,为效益评价以及进一步决策提供了科学的依据。
     运用AHP法定量评价模型、多层次模糊综合评价方法结合沙化土地综合效益评价指标体系对不同区域沙地特点进行分析评价,结果表明:生态效益:康庄>永定河>南口;经济效益:永定河>南口>康庄;社会效益:南口>康庄>永定河;综合效益:永定河>南口>康庄。
     景观生态模式建立:参照综合效益评价结果并结合不同景观类型的发展特点,依据当地的区域优势,建立合理、经济、高效的沙地景观模式:康庄研究区—景观生态型荒滩综合治理防护模式;南口研究区—人工干预条件下近自然恢复砂滩治理防护模
Desertification is one of the most serious resource and eco-environment problems in the world at present. In the condition of region structure and climate geography location, Beijing's ecological environment has been severely affected. In recent years, the number of sandy days and the extent of sandy days influenced by wind and sand far overrun those in ancient years, so the economy, social development and the people's lives are all affected severely.
    According to the terrain and topographical features, the sandy land in Beijing mainly were divided into three types that are mountain ground, the transition zone from hill to plain and plain. In this paper, Kangzhuang, Nankou and Yongding River were selected as typical damage regions, in virtue of the Remote Sense Technology, Geography and Information Systems Technology, Global Localization Technology, landscape ecological theory and some mathematic analysis methods to analyze and compare the landscape dynamic process in 1980s, 1990s and three periods after 2000. and to discuss the dynamic changes of sandy landscape type. The main research results were listed as follows:
    Since 1980s, the sandy landscape type has experienced great change. Take Kangzhuang, Nankou and Yongding River as representation, the bare sandy land area decreased greatly, from 2117.03 hm~2、 320.49 hm~2、3950.5 hm~2 to 1249.65 hm~2、 160 hm~2、 1542.74 hm~2 respectively, the proportion is 59.03%、 49.92%、 49.05%。
    By selecting landscape indexes,to analyze landscape types in the studied area, we can see that the landscape breaking extent tendency is: aggravating at first and then slowing up in Kangzhuang sand and wind damage region, persisting increasing in Nankou sand and wind damage region, aggravating at first and then slowing up in Yongding River sand and wind damage region, which were nearly related to the geography location of studied area, social economical development background, man-made interference and policy guidance.
    By analyzing the major factors influencing landscape dynamic change, we can see that the important factors are nature and artificial factors In the nature factors, the sandy land change has more close correlation with terrain and topographical features, surface substance, precipitation, temperature, gale and hydrographic factor. And it is mainly affected by the artificial factors such as population incensement, agriculture structure adjustability, the implement of forest engineering and social economical development background and so on.
    According to the results of landscape structure changes characters and major influencing factors, the indicator system for the comprehensive benefit assessment was built, which can provide scientific
引文
1.北京市林业勘测设计院,北京市林业局防沙治沙办公室.北京市“三河两滩”综合治理工程规划(2003—2005年).2003:1-3.
    2.北京市三北工程规划办公室,1985.北京市三北二期工程规划说明书
    3.蔡常丰.数学模型建模分析.北京:科学出版社.1995
    4.蔡体久.基于遥感和GIS的荒漠化程度定量评价研究[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,2002
    5.常学礼.坝上地区沙漠化过程对景观格局的影响.中国沙漠.1996,16(3)
    6.陈昌笃,崔海亭等.景观生态学的由来和发展.中国林业出版社,1991
    7.陈广庭.北京强沙尘暴史和周围生态环境变化[J].中国沙漠,2002,22(3):210-213.
    8.陈广庭.近50年北京的沙尘天气及治理对策[J].中国沙漠,2001,21(4):402-407.
    9.陈浩,周金星.荒漠化地区生态安全评价——以首都圈怀来县为例[J].水土保持学报,2003,17(1):58-62.
    10.陈利顶等.景观连接度的生态学意义及其应用.生态学杂志,,1996.15(4)
    11.陈效逑,谭文垦.北京平原地区裸露土地的时空分布[J].水土保持研究,2003,10(3):18-20,25.
    12.慈龙骏.我国荒漠化发生机理及防治对策.第四纪研究.1998(2),97-107
    13.慈龙骏等.中国荒漠化气候类型划分与潜在发生范围的确定.中国沙漠.1997,17(2):107-111
    14.戴万德,赵洪杰.平原农区防护林的气候效应[J].中国农业气象,1994,15(2):39-42.
    15.丁国栋.区域荒漠化评价中植被的指示性及盖度分级标准研究——以毛乌素沙区为例[J].水土保持学报,2004,18(1):158-160.
    16.丁国栋.荒漠化评价指标体系的研究-以毛乌素沙地为例[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,1998
    17.丁火平.北京及邻区土地荒漠化动态演变分析与建模.中国地质大学学位论文.2002
    18.董飞,刘大有,贺大良.风沙运动的研究进展和发展趋势[J].力学进展,1995,25:368~391
    19.董玉祥,刘玉璋等.沙漠化若干问题研究.西安:西安地图出版社,1995
    20.董玉祥.中国沙漠化危险度评价与发展趋势分析.中国沙漠.1996,16(2):127-131
    21.董智,李红丽,左合君,罗俊宝,孙保平.土壤凝结剂沙障防沙机理的风洞模拟实验研究.干旱区资源与环境.2004,3(18):154~159
    22.范建友.基于RS和GIS的正蓝旗植被动态与荒漠化评价研究.北京林业大学硕士学位论文.2004
    23.范文义,徐程扬,叶荣华等.高光谱遥感在荒漠化监测中的应用[J].东北林业大学学报,2000,5
    24.范文义.荒漠化程度评价高光谱遥感信息模型[J].林业科学,2002,2
    25.傅伯杰.黄土区农业景观空间格局分析.生态学报,1995,15(2)
    26.傅伯杰等.景观多样性的类型及其生态意义.地理学报,1996.51(5)
    27.傅蓉.地理信息系统技术在荒漠化监测中的应用[J].林业资源管理,2001.4
    28.高会军,邱少鹏.基于3S技术的沙质荒漠化动态监测[J].陕西环境,2001,8(4)
    29.高尚武,王葆芳,朱灵益等.中国沙质荒漠化土地监测评价指标体系[J].林业科学,1998(34)2:1-104
    30.高志海,魏怀东,丁峰.TM影像荒漠化解译与成图技术研究[J].遥感技术与应用,2002,17(6):293-298.
    31.高志海,魏怀东,丁峰TM影像荒漠化土地特征信息的提取[J].中国沙漠,1998,18(增刊1):42~ 45.
    32.高志海..基于RS雨IGIS的绿洲值被与荒漠化动态研究[D].北京林业大学博士学位论文,2003
    33.郭宝华.加大荒漠化治理力度 改善延庆县生态环境[J].北京农业职业学院学报,2003.17(2):23-24.
    34.郭发辉,郝京莆,宣捷.北京风沙天气基本特征[J].气象,2002,28(8):51-53.
    35.海春兴,刘宝元等.土壤湿度和植被盖度对土壤风蚀的影响[J].应用生态学报,2002,13(8):1057-1058.
    36.韩致文,王涛等.风沙危害防治的主要工程措施及其机理.地理科学进展,2004,1(23)14~19
    37.何春阳,史培军.北京地区土地利用/覆盖变化研究[J].地理研究,2001,20(6):679-687.
    38.贺北方等.多级模糊层次综合评价的数学模型及应用.系统工程理论与实践.1989(6):1-6
    39.贺红仕等.景观生态研究的模式—两种成熟的方法.生态学杂志,10(2)
    40.贺红仕等.景观生态—一种综合整体思想的发展.应用生态学报,1990.1(3)
    41.黄克新等.景观生态学的异质共生理论极其在景观生态建设中的应用.地理新论,1988.3(1)
    42.黄杏元等,1993.地理信息系统支持区域土地利用决策的研究.地理学报,48(2)
    43.贾瑞燕.北京地区风沙源生态恢复工程现状及其效果研究——以延庆县为例.北京林业大学硕士学位论文.2005
    44.姜恒春译.美国佐治亚州景观格局变化的研究.生态学进展,1989(3)
    45.蒋丽娟.国内外防护林研究综述[J].湖南林业科技,2000,27(3):22-27.
    46.寇晓军等.景观场——景观格局数量化研究的新视角.第二届景观生态学术会议论文.1996
    47.李哈滨.景观生态学—生态学领域里的新概念构架.生态学进展,1988(1)
    48.李哈滨等.景观生态学的数量研究方法.当代生态学博论.科学技术出版社.1992
    49.李清河,狲保平,孙立达.荒漠化动态监测与评价研究进展[J].北京林业大学学报,1998.20(3)
    50.李团胜译.景观与景观生态学的定义.地理译报.1988,(2)
    51.李秀江,杨春花等.农田防护林体系的效益及评价方法[J].河北林果研究,2000,15(1),89-94.
    52.李秀珍等译.景观与区域生态学的一般原理.生态学杂志,199615(3)
    53.李自珍.治沙生态工程中植物固沙效益的综合评判.兰州大学学报(社会科学版).1997.25(4):40~47
    54.廖超英,李广毅等.毛乌素沙地防风固沙林结构与效益研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(2):90-98.
    55.林进,孙司衡,王君厚.沙尘暴多发区土地风蚀荒漠化诊断评价方法[J].中国沙漠,1999(19)4:375-377
    56.刘发明,赵登耀.张掖农田防护林生态效益研究[J].甘肃林业科技,1997,2:54-58.
    57.刘建军等.延安市张梁试区退耕地植被自然恢复与多样性变化[J].西北林学院学报,2002,17(3):8-11.
    58.刘永兵.北京市永定河沙地土壤风蚀与人工植被防风阻沙效益研究.北京林业大学硕士学位论文.2004
    59.刘玉平.毛乌素沙区草场荒漠化评价的指标体系及荒漠化驱动力研究.中国科学研究院博士学位论文.1997
    60.刘振国等.景观格局指标计算机测定及计算方法.景观生态学—理论、方法及应用.中国林业出版社.1991
    61.卢琦主编.全球沙尘暴警世录[M].北京:中国环境科学出版社.2001.199-233.
    62.麻保林,漆建忠.几种灌木固沙林的效益研究.水土保持通报 1994 14(7)22~25
    63.马克平,黄建辉,于顺利等.北京东陵山植物群落多样性研究(Ⅱ)——物种丰富度、均匀度利物种多样性指数[J].生态学报,1995,15(、3):268-277.
    64.马世威,马玉明,姚洪林等编.沙漠学[M],内蒙古人民出版社,1998年
    65.倪绍祥等.我国士地评价研究的近今进展.地理学报,1993.48(1)
    66.任海,彭少棱.恢复生态学[M].北京.科学出版社.2002
    67.史建忠,谢清.北京地区风沙危害及对策[J].中国林业,2002,4(A):56-56.
    68.宋如华.地理信息系统支持下的区域土地资源评价和土地利用规划..北京林业大学学位论文.1996
    69.孙保平主编.荒漠化防治工程学[M].北京:中国林业出版社,2000
    70.孙儒泳,李博等.普通生态学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,1997.
    71.孙中伟.试论景观的动态变化.生态学杂志,1995,14(4)
    72.童庆禧.遥感发展趋势的思考——遥感新进展与发展战略[M].北京:科学技术出版社,1996
    73.王葆芳,熊士平等.乌兰布和沙地新开发人工绿洲防护林体系综合效益评价[J].林业科学,1998,34(6):12-20.
    74.王礼先,王瑞斌,朱金兆,余新晓编著.林业生态工程.北京:中国林业出版社,1998.
    75.王礼先.全球荒漠化防治现状及发展趋势[J].世界林业研究,1994,7(1):10-17
    76.王晓慧,孙保平.北京市大兴永定河沙地综合治理效益评价.水土保持通报.1998,18(6):34-38
    77.王秀兰,包玉海.土地利用动态变化研究方法探讨[J].地理科学进展,1999,18(1):81-87
    78.王仰麟.景观生态分类的理论方法.应用生态学报,1996,7(增刊)
    79.王仰麟译.景观生态学导言.地理译报,,1988(2)
    80.王忠林,李广毅等.毛乌素沙地农田防护林效益研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(2):128-135.
    81.吴波.毛乌素沙地的景观动态与荒漠化成因研究.中国科学研究院博士学位论文.1997
    82.吴正.浅论我国北方地区的沙漠化问题[J].地理学报,1991,46(3):266~276
    83.吴正主编.风沙地貌与治沙工程学[M].北京:科学出版社,2003
    84.伍业钢等.景观生态学的发展.当代生态学博论..科学技术出版社.1992
    85.武建林,张良谱,刘随存.晋中农田防护林建设现状及其效益评述[J].山西林业科技,2001,(3):40-44.
    86.肖笃宁..宏观生态学研究的特点与方法.应用生态学报,1994,5(1)
    87.肖笃宁.当代景观生态学的进展和展望.第二届全国景观生态学术讨论会论文汇编.1996
    88.肖笃宁.生态空间理论与景观异质性.第二届全国景观生态学术讨论会论文汇编.1996
    89.肖笃宁等,1990.沈阳西郊景观格局变化的研究.应用生态学报,19901(1)
    90.肖笃宁等译.景观生态学.科学出版社.1990
    91.肖笃宁主编.景观生态学—理论、方法及应用.中国林业出版社.1991
    92.徐化成.景观生态学.中国林业出版社.1995
    93.许慧等.景观生态学的理论与应用.中国环境科学出版社.1993
    94.薛建辉,吴永波等.退耕还林工程区困难立地植被恢复与生态重建[J].南京林业大学学报,2003,27(6):84-88.
    95.俞孔坚.论景观的概念及研究的发展.中国园林1987,(3)
    96.曾德慧.论农田林网的景观功能.第二届全国景观生态学术讨论会论文汇编.1996
    97.张华,李锋瑞等.沙质草地植被防风抗蚀生态效应的野外观测研究[J].环境科学,2004,25(3): 119-124.
    98.张晋英.半干旱风沙区农田防护林的功能及效益评价[J].山西林业科技,1999,4:28-31.
    99.张跃.模糊数学方法及其应用.北京:煤炭工业出版社,1992
    100.章家恩,徐琪.恢复生态学研究的一些基本问题探讨.应用生态学报.1999,1(10):109~113
    101.赵景柱.景观生态空间格局动态度量指标体系.生态学报,1990,10(2)
    102.赵宗哲.农田防护林学.中国林业出版社.1993
    103.郑兴年等.大城市边缘区土地利用动态遥感研究.地理科学,1995.15(1)
    104.中国大百科全书地理学编辑委员会.中国大百科全书(地理卷).中国大百科全书出版社.1990
    105.中国大百科全书生物学编辑委员会.中国大百科全书(生物卷).中国大百科全书出版社.1991
    106.中国土壤学会.土壤农业化学分析方法[M].北京:中国农业出版社,2000,146-195,272-276.
    107.中华人民共和国林业部防治沙漠化办公室编.联合国关于在发生严重干旱和/或荒漠化的国家特别是在非洲防治荒漠化的公约.北京:中国林业出版社.1994,2
    108.钟中,董婕.防护林气象效应研究的现状[J].气象科技,1997,(4):59-63.
    109.周冰冰.北京的风沙危害及其控制技术[J].中国林业,2002,2(B):12-13.
    110.周晓东.基于RS和GIS的我国大尺度沙质荒漠化现状评价方法的研究[D].北京师范大学博士学位论文,2002
    111 .周心澄,李广毅等.毛乌素沙地生态经济型防护林体系效益研究[J].水土保持研究,1995,2(2):36-55.
    112.周学东,董晓敏等.防护林体系区域性气候效应的探讨[J].南京林业大学学报,1995,19(4):80-84.
    113.朱朝云,丁国栋,杨明远.风沙物理学.北京,中国林业出版社,1992,8
    114.朱会义,李秀彬,何书金等.环渤海地区土地利用的时空变化分析[J].地理学报,2001,56(3):253-260
    115.朱廷曜,关德新等编.农田防护林工程学.北京:中国林业出版社,2001.
    116.朱震达,陈广庭.中国土地沙质荒漠化[M].北京:科学出版社,1994
    117.朱震达,陈广庭著.中国土地沙质荒漠化[M].北京:科学出版社,1994
    118.朱震达.邹本功等.北京地区风沙活动及其整治的初步研究中国沙漠.1987,7(3)
    119.朱震达.治沙工程学[M].北京:中国环保科学出版社,1998.96~97
    120.朱震达等.中国北方地区沙漠化过程及其治理区划.北京:中国林业出版社.1981
    121.朱震达等.中国沙漠化及其治理.北京:科学出版社.1989
    122.朱震达等.中国土地沙质荒漠化.北京:科学出版社.1994
    123.朱祖希.构筑北京绿色屏障防治风沙肆虐危害[J].城市环境,2000(4):46-48.
    124.邹学勇,董光荣.风沙物理学发展与展望[J].地球科学进展,1993,8(6):44~49
    125. Aber, J.D.&W.Jordan Restoration ecology: An environmental middie ground. Bioscience. 1985, 35(7):339.
    126. Aronson, J.Restoration and rehabilitation of degraded ecosystems in arid and semi-arid lands.I view from the south Restoration Ecology. 1993,1(1):8-17.
    127. Berger, J.J.ed.Ecological restoration in the San Francisco Bay Area.Restoring the Earth, Berkeley, 1990.
    128. Bradshaw, A.D.Restoration: An acid test for ecology.in:W.R.Ⅲ.Jordon , N.Glpin & J.Abereds.Restoration Ecology:A synthetic Approach to Ecological Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University press. 1987, 23-29.
    129. Cairns, J.Jr. Restoration ecology. Encyclopedia of Environmental Biololgy. 1995, (3): 223-235.
    
    130. Chepil, W S,and N P woodruff. The physics of wind erosion and its contro[J]. Advances in
    
    131. Chepil, W.S, Siddoway, F. H. and Armbrust, D. V, Prevailing wind erosion direction[J], J.Soil and
    
    132. Dan G Blumberg,& Valentin Freilikher. Soil water-content and surface roughness retrieval using ERS~2 SAR data in the Negev Desert, Israel. Journal of Arid Environments (2001) 49: 449-464.
    
    133. Daniel R Parsonsa,, Ian J Walkerb, Giles F S Wiggsc.Numerical modelling of flow structures over idealized transverse aeolian dunes of varying geometry. Geomorphology 59 (2004) 149-164.
    
    134. Fang Tianzong, Zhao Tingning.Effects of desertification control project based on windbreak system in Daxing county, Beijing.Forestry Studies in China.2001,3(2): 54-59.
    
    135. Faragalla A A. Impact of agro desert on a desert ecosystem[J].Journal of arid environment, 1988, 15(1):99-102.
    
    136. Forman, R.T.T.Land Mosaics.Cambridge:Cambridge University press, 1995.
    
    137. Free E E. The movement of soil by wind[M]. USDABUL,1991,68:2713.
    
    138. Fryear D W. Soil cover and wind erosion[J].Trans actions of the ASAE,1985,28(3):781-784.
    
    139. Fryrear D W, Merzouk A, Gupta J P. Mechanics, measurement and prediction of wind erosion[A]. Challenges in dry land agriculture. A global perspective [R]. Texas agricultural experiment station, college station, Texas,1988.77-78
    
    140. Fryrear D.W, Krammes C. A.Computing the wind erodible fraction of soil[J]. Soil and Water Conservation, 1994,49(2): 183-188
    
    141. Fryrear, D W, Stout, J E, Hagen, L J and Vorics, E D.. . Wind erosion field measurement and analysis[J], Trans. 1991,ASAE 34, 155-160
    
    142. Gaynor, V.prairie restoration on a corporate site.Restoration and Reclamation Review. 1990, 1(1):35-40.
    
    143. Haim Tsoar, Dan G Blumberg, Yoav Stolen Elongation and migration of sand dunes. Geomorphology 57 (2004) 293-302.
    
    144. Harper, J.L.Self-effacing Art: Restoration as I mitation of Nature in:W.R.III.Jordon, N.Gilpin and JAbereds.Restoration Ecology:A Synthetic Approach to Ecological Research.Cambridge:Cambridge University press. 1987, 35-45.
    
    145. Henry C.P.and Amore C.ReStoration ecology of riverine wetlands:A Scientific base Environmental Management.1995,19(6): 891 -902.
    
    146. Hobbs,R.J.,&Norton D.A.Towards a conceptual frameword for restoration ecology. Restoration Ecology. 1996,4(2): 93-110.
    
    147. Horikawa D, Shen H W. Sand movement by wind action[J]. US Army, Corps of Engineers, Beach Erosion Board/Tech.Mema 1960,1196.
    
    148. Jakson,L.L., D Lopoukine & D.Hillgard.Ecological Restoration:a definition and comments.Restoration Ecology. 1995,3(2): 71-75.
    
    149. Kusler J.A.et al.Wetland Scientific American.1994,1:58-62.
    
    150. Lancaster N. Arid geomorphology [J]. Progress in Physical Geography, 1997, 21:285-290.
    
    151. Leon Lyles.Basic wind erosion processes[J]. Agri-culture Ecosystems and Environment, 1988,22/23:91-10.
    
    152. Liu Xianwan, Li Sen & Shen Jianyou. Wind tunnel simulation experiment of mountain.Dunes Journal of Arid Environments (1999) 42: 49-59.
    
    153. Mansfleld,B.& D. TownS.Lessons of the Islands: Restoration in New Zealand. Restoration and Management Notes, 1997,15(2): 150-154.
    
    154. McKee E. D. A Study of global sand seas[M], U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D. C, 1979,137-169
    
    155. McKee E. D. A Study of global sand seas[M], U.S. Government Printing Office, Washington D. C, 1979,137-169
    
    156. Middleton,B.Wetland restoration:Flood pulsing and Disturbance Dynamics.New York: John wiley & Sons,Inc, 1999.
    
    157. Muhtar Qong,Hiroki Takamura,Mijit Hudaberdi. Formation and in the internalstructure of Tamarix cones Taklimakan Desert. Journal of Arid Environments (2002) 50: 81}97.
    
    158. N. Levin, E. Ben-Dor. Monitoring sand dune stabilization along the coastal dunes of Ashdod-Nizanim, Israel, 1945-1999. Journal of Arid Environments 58 (2004) 335-355
    
    159. Owen P R. Saltation of uniform grains in air[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1964,20:225-242.
    
    160. Pankov E I, Kuzmina Z V, Treshkin, S E. The water availiability effect on the soil and vegetation cover of Southern Gobi oases[J]. Water Resource, 1994,21 (3):358-364.
    
    161. Qian Yi-Bing, Zhou Xing-Jia. Multi-sources of desert sands for the Jungger Basin. Journal of Arid Environments (2003) 53: 241-256.
    
    162. Qu Jianjun,Huang Ning-, Dong Guangrong& Zhang Weimin. The role and significance of the Gobi Desert pavement in controlling sand movement on the cliff top near the Dunhuang Magao Grottoes. Journal of Arid Environments (2001) 48: 357-371.
    
    163. Remigius Egwuonwu Okoli. Wind tunnel Study on Aeolian Saltation Dynamics and Mass flow. Journal of Arid Environments (2003) 53:569-583.
    
    164. Sharp R P. Wind-driven sand in Coachella valley, California[J]. Geological Society of America, Bulletin, 1964,75:785-804.
    
    165. Sherman D J. An equilibrum relationship for shear velocity and apparent roughness length in aeolian saltation[J]. Geomorphology. 1992,5:419-431.
    
    166. Shin-Ang Hsu. Wind stress criteria in eolian sand transport[J]. Journal of Geographyscial Research, 1976,76 (36): 84-86.
    
    167. Shin-Ang Hsu. Wind stress criteria in eolian sand transport[J]. Journal of Geographyscial Research, 1976 ,76 (36): 84-86.
    
    168. Singg, A.W.Wind tunnel studies of the movement of sedimentary material, 5th Hydraul. Conf. Proc, Iowa Inst Hydraul Bull1953, 34, 111-135
    
    169. Tong-Hui Zhang, Ha-Lin Zhao, Sheng-Gong Li,Feng-Rui Li, Yasuhito Shiratob, Toshiya Ohkurob. A comparison of different measures forstabilizingmoving sand dunes in the Horqin Sandy Land of Inner Mongolia, ChinaJournal of Arid Environments 58 (2004) 203-214.
    
    170. U.S National Research Council.Restoration of Aquatic Ecosystems.Washington DC: Nat Acad press, 1992.
    
    171. V, Prevailing wind erosion direction[J], J.Soil and Water Cons. 1964,19, 67-70.
    
    172. Weimin Zhang,Jianjun Qu,Zhibao Dong, Xiaoze Li& Wanfu Wang.The airflow field and dynamic processes of pyramid dunes. Journal of Arid Environments (2000) 45: 357-368.
    
    173. Xiaoping Yang Karl Tilman Rostb, Frank Lehmkuhlc, Zhu Zhendad, John Dodson. The evolution of dry lands in northern China and in the Republic of Mongolia since the Last Glacial Maximum. Quaternary International 118-119 (2004) 69-85.
    
    174. Xunming Wang, Zhibao Dong, Lichao Liu, Jianjun Qu. Sand sea activity and interactions with climatic parameters in the Taklimakan Sand Sea, China.Journal of Arid Environments 57 (2004) 85-98.
    
    175. Xunming Wang, Zhibao Donga, Ping Yanc, Jiawu Zhangb, Guangqiang Qiana. Wind energy environments and dunefield activity in the Chinese deserts. Geomorphology 2004.11 (6):57-62
    176. Y T Gumaa, I Haffar & M A.Al-Afifi.Financial appraisal of date-frond mat fence systems for wind erosion control and sand dune stabilization in the arid region of the United Arab Emirates.Journal of Arid Environments (1998) 39: 549-557.
    
    177. Yong Gao, Guo Yu Qiu ETAL.A 10-Year Study on Techniques for Vegetation Restoration in a Desertified Salt Lake Area, Journal of Arid Environments;2002 52:483-497.
    
    178. Zhibao Dong,Shangyu Gao, Donald W. Fryrear. Drag coefficients, roughness length and zero-plane displacement height as disturbed by artificial standing vegetation. Journal of Arid Environments (2001) 49: 485}505.
    
    179. Zingg A W. Wind tunnel studies of the movement of sedimentary material[A]. In: Proceedings of the 5th hydraulics conf. Bull[C].Iowa City: Inst of Hydraulics,1953, 34,111-135

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700