超越“主体之惑”:儒家文化的“主体观”对化解生态危机的价值
|
摘要
因人的"主体"属性过度膨胀而引发的生态危机,使得自然环境呈现出被掠夺的殖民化状态。在化解生态危机问题上,西方社会的不少学者陷入对人的"主体"属性批判和否定所引发的历史虚无和价值真空的尴尬境地,出现了化解生态危机过程中不知如何正确把握和安放人的"主体"属性的"主体之惑"。儒家文化的"主体观"在人的"主体"属性问题上给予了更为合理的阐释,有效避免"主体之惑"的出现,对化解生态危机有着重要价值。
The ecological crisis caused by the excessive expansion of human subject has brought the natural environment to a state of colonization.During the process of resolving ecological crisis,western scholars passively fall in the predicament of historical nihilism and value nihilism, which are caused by criticizing and disapproving of human's subjectivity.They come up against subject perplex when dissolving the ecological crisis without knowing how to understand and place human being's subjectivity. Confucianism's subject concept renders more suitable explanation about human being's subjectivity.It can effectively avoid subject perplex and enlighten the way of resolving ecological crisis.
The ecological crisis caused by the excessive expansion of human subject has brought the natural environment to a state of colonization.During the process of resolving ecological crisis,western scholars passively fall in the predicament of historical nihilism and value nihilism, which are caused by criticizing and disapproving of human's subjectivity.They come up against subject perplex when dissolving the ecological crisis without knowing how to understand and place human being's subjectivity. Confucianism's subject concept renders more suitable explanation about human being's subjectivity.It can effectively avoid subject perplex and enlighten the way of resolving ecological crisis.
引文
[1]海德格尔选集(下卷)[M].孙周兴译.上海:上海三联书店,1996.
[2][美]弗莱德·R·多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].万俊人译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992.
[3]贺来.“主体性”批判的意义及其限度[J].江海学刊,2011(03).
[4][美]大卫·格里芬.后现代科学---科学魅力的再现[M].马季方译.北京:中央编译出版社,1995.
[5][美]弗莱德·R·多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].万俊人译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992.
[6]刁龙.生态伦理建构的哲学基础:从主体性到主体间性[J].广西社会科学,2015(10).
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[8]杨信礼.马克思主义价值论与当代中国价值观的建构[J].山东社会科学,2008(02).
[9]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[10]马克思恩格斯全集(第19卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[11]张岱年.传统文化之我见[J].人民论坛,1998(06).
[12]杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[13]朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[14]戴圣.礼记[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
[15]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1985.
[2][美]弗莱德·R·多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].万俊人译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992.
[3]贺来.“主体性”批判的意义及其限度[J].江海学刊,2011(03).
[4][美]大卫·格里芬.后现代科学---科学魅力的再现[M].马季方译.北京:中央编译出版社,1995.
[5][美]弗莱德·R·多尔迈.主体性的黄昏[M].万俊人译.上海:上海人民出版社,1992.
[6]刁龙.生态伦理建构的哲学基础:从主体性到主体间性[J].广西社会科学,2015(10).
[7]马克思恩格斯选集(第1卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1995.
[8]杨信礼.马克思主义价值论与当代中国价值观的建构[J].山东社会科学,2008(02).
[9]马克思.1844年经济学哲学手稿[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[10]马克思恩格斯全集(第19卷)[M].北京:人民出版社,1979.
[11]张岱年.传统文化之我见[J].人民论坛,1998(06).
[12]杨伯峻.论语译注[M].北京:中华书局,1984.
[13]朱熹.四书章句集注[M].北京:中华书局,1983.
[14]戴圣.礼记[M].北京:中华书局,1989.
[15]黎靖德.朱子语类[M].北京:中华书局,1985.