抗侧滚扭杆对悬挂式单轨车动力学性能影响分析
|
摘要
以某国产悬挂式单轨车辆为研究对象,利用多体动力学软件SIMPACK建立悬挂式单轨车辆动力学模型,分析抗侧滚扭杆刚度对车辆动力学性能的影响。计算结果表明:抗侧滚扭杆刚度对车辆平稳性无较大影响,对曲线通过性能会有所恶化,但可以减小车辆限界,且在高等级风力作用时,抗侧滚扭杆刚度越大,车辆抗风能力越强。综合考虑设置抗侧滚扭杆的影响,其刚度设置在0.5 MNm/rad～1 MNm/rad之间较好。
Taking a domestic suspended monorail vehicle as the research object, the multi-body dynamics software SIMPACK is used to establish the dynamic model of the suspended monorail vehicle, and the influence of the anti-rolling torsion bar stiffness on the dynamic performance of the vehicle is analyzed. The calculation results show that the stiffness of the anti-rolling torsion bar has no significant influence on the stability of the vehicle, and the performance of the curve will be deteriorated.However, the vehicle limit can be reduced, and when the high-grade wind acts, the rigidity of the anti-rolling torsion bar is greater, and the wind resistance of the vehicle is stronger. Considering the influence of setting the anti-rolling torsion bar, the stiffness can be set between 0.5 MNm/rad～1 MNm/rad.
Taking a domestic suspended monorail vehicle as the research object, the multi-body dynamics software SIMPACK is used to establish the dynamic model of the suspended monorail vehicle, and the influence of the anti-rolling torsion bar stiffness on the dynamic performance of the vehicle is analyzed. The calculation results show that the stiffness of the anti-rolling torsion bar has no significant influence on the stability of the vehicle, and the performance of the curve will be deteriorated.However, the vehicle limit can be reduced, and when the high-grade wind acts, the rigidity of the anti-rolling torsion bar is greater, and the wind resistance of the vehicle is stronger. Considering the influence of setting the anti-rolling torsion bar, the stiffness can be set between 0.5 MNm/rad～1 MNm/rad.
引文
[1] 王伯铭.城市轨道交通车辆总体及转向架[M].北京:科学出版社,2013.
[2] 梁云,李文学,王云朋.轨道交通车辆抗侧滚结构形式的选型分析[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(2):20-24.
[3] 冯帅,黄运华,曹先智,等.抗侧滚扭杆对地铁车辆动力学性能影响分析[J].机械工程与自动化,2014(5):14-16.
[4] 潘春花,王伯铭,刘远奎.轨道车辆抗侧滚扭杆的设计及动力学性能分析[J].机车车辆工艺,2012(6):6-9.
[5] 刘宇.抗侧滚扭杆对高速车辆动力学性能影响研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2015:43-54.
[6] 马荣成,王开云,吕凯凯,等.抗侧滚扭杆失效状态下车辆曲线通过的动态包络线分析[J].兰州交通大学学报,2016,35(1):124-128.
[7] 王爱彬,滕万秀,杨建龙.抗侧滚扭杆刚度对地铁车辆动态限界的影响[J].铁道技术监督,2017,45(7):38-41.
[8] 刘雷雨.悬挂式单轨车辆动力学性能及动态包络线研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018:24-30.
[9] 唐玉.基于ADAMS的悬挂式单轨车辆动力学分析与侧风影响研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016:31-40.
[10] 杨昕时.悬挂式单轨列车动力学及关键参数关键工况分析[D].成都:西南交通大学,2017:37-54.
[11] 毕鑫,罗世辉.抗侧滚扭杆装置建模方式对车辆动力学性能的影响[J].铁道车辆,2012,50(8):1-3,47.
[2] 梁云,李文学,王云朋.轨道交通车辆抗侧滚结构形式的选型分析[J].城市轨道交通研究,2017,20(2):20-24.
[3] 冯帅,黄运华,曹先智,等.抗侧滚扭杆对地铁车辆动力学性能影响分析[J].机械工程与自动化,2014(5):14-16.
[4] 潘春花,王伯铭,刘远奎.轨道车辆抗侧滚扭杆的设计及动力学性能分析[J].机车车辆工艺,2012(6):6-9.
[5] 刘宇.抗侧滚扭杆对高速车辆动力学性能影响研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2015:43-54.
[6] 马荣成,王开云,吕凯凯,等.抗侧滚扭杆失效状态下车辆曲线通过的动态包络线分析[J].兰州交通大学学报,2016,35(1):124-128.
[7] 王爱彬,滕万秀,杨建龙.抗侧滚扭杆刚度对地铁车辆动态限界的影响[J].铁道技术监督,2017,45(7):38-41.
[8] 刘雷雨.悬挂式单轨车辆动力学性能及动态包络线研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2018:24-30.
[9] 唐玉.基于ADAMS的悬挂式单轨车辆动力学分析与侧风影响研究[D].成都:西南交通大学,2016:31-40.
[10] 杨昕时.悬挂式单轨列车动力学及关键参数关键工况分析[D].成都:西南交通大学,2017:37-54.
[11] 毕鑫,罗世辉.抗侧滚扭杆装置建模方式对车辆动力学性能的影响[J].铁道车辆,2012,50(8):1-3,47.