摘要
主应力轴旋转是砂土响应的重要特点,尤其是在波浪等循环荷载下,它可能引起超静孔隙水压力和塑性应变的累积,进而导致严重的砂土液化及结构位移。然而考虑主应力轴旋转的岩土工程边值问题有限元研究目前仍较少。因此,选取考虑主应力轴旋转的PSR模型以及适宜的数值积分方法,将其应用至波浪作用下的海床有限元分析中,以对海床中的主应力轴旋转效应及其引发的超静孔隙水压力累积、砂土液化等现象展开研究。
Cyclic loadings, for example, wave loadings, can generate considerable principal stress rotation(PSR) in sand. Continuous PSR may cause the accumulation of excess pore water pressures and plastic strains, thus leading to sand liquefactions and displacements of the structure. However, there are few finite element investigations on geotechnical boundary value problems concerning the PSR. Therefore, this paper adopts an explicit integration method and applies a PSR model in the finite element analysis of seabed under wave loadings to investigate the sand behaviors in the seabed induced by the PSR, such as the build-up of excess pore water pressures, liquefactions, etc.
引文
[1]ISHIHARA K,TOWHATA I. Sand response to cyclic rotation of principal stress directionsas induced by wave loads[J]. Soils and Foundations,1983,23(4):11.
[2]ISHIHARA K,YAMAZAKI A. Analysis of wave-induced liquefaction in seabed deposits of sand[J]. Soils and Foundations,1984,24(3):85.
[3]BHATIA SK,SCHWAB J,ISHIBASHI I. Cyclic simple shear,torsional shear and triaxial—A comparative study[C]. Proceedings of advanced in the art of testing soils under cyclic conditions,New York:ASCE,1985:232.
[4]MIURA K,MIURA S,TOKI S. Deformation behavior of anisotropic dense sand under principal stress axes rotation[J]. Soils and Foundations,1986,26(1):36.
[5]GUTIERREZ M,ISHIHARA K,TOWHATA I. Flow theory for sand during rotation of principal stress direction[J]. Soils and Foundations,1991,31(4):121.
[6]LI Y,YANG Y,YU HS,ROBERTS G. Correlations between the stress paths of a monotonic test and a cyclic test under the same initial conditions[J]. Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,2017,101:153.
[7]杨忠年.基于CPT波致粉质土海床液化概率研究[D].青岛:中国海洋大学,2015:9.
[8]GAO ZW,ZHAO JD. A non-coaxial critical-state model for sand accounting for fabric anisotropy and fabric evolution[J].International Journal of Solids and Structures,2017,106/107:200.
[9]GUTIERREZ M,ISHIHARA K,TOWHATA I. Model for the deformation of sand during rotation of principal stress directions[J].Soils and Foundations,1993,33(3):105.
[10]TIAN Y,YAO YP. Constitutive modeling of principal stress rotation by considering inherent and induced anisotropy of soils[J].Acta Geotechnica,2018,13(6):1.
[11]YANG Y,YU HS. A kinematic hardening soil model considering the principal stress rotation[J]. International Journal for Numerical and Analytical Methods in Geomechanics,2013,37:2106.
[12]MANZARI MT,DAFALIAS YF,A critical state two-surface plasticity model for sands[J]. Geotechnique,1997,47(2):255.
[13]DAFALIAS YF,MANZARI MT. Simple plasticity sand model accounting for fabric change effects[J]. Journal of Engineering Mechanics,American Society of Civil Engineers,2004,130(6):622.
[14]ABBOAJ. Finite elementalgorithms for elastoplasticityand consolidation[D]. Newcastle:UniversityofNewcastle,Australia,1997.
[15]SASSA S,SEKIGUCHI H. Wave-induced liquefaction of beds of sand in a centrifuge[J]. Geotechnique,1999,49(5):621.
[16]SASSA S,SEKIGUCHI H. Analysis of wave-induced liquefaction of sand beds[J]. Geotechnique,2001,51(2):115.
[17]WANG Z,YANG YM,LU N,et al. Effects of the principal stress rotation in numerical simulations of geotechnical laboratory cyclic tests[J]. Computers and Geotechnics,2019,109:220.