中国省级全域旅游发展水平测度及时空演化研究
|
摘要
构建测度省域全域旅游发展水平的方法体系,并利用全域旅游发展水平的方法体系对我国31个省、市、自治区的全域旅游发展水平进行了综合评价,对其时空分异和演化特征进行了对比分析。研究发现:①2013—2016年,我国各省域非景区旅游接待发展整体上处于较高水平,区域差异不明显,仅有部分省份出现了不同程度的波动。②各省域的泛旅游化指数整体较低,泛旅游化发展呈现较低水平,空间格局整体呈现东高西低的格局。③4年间,大部分省份的旅游投资收益指数基本处于较低水平,旅游投资收益发展水平整体处于中等水平以下,空间格局呈现南高北低的格局。④旅游就业强度指数显示,2013—2016年各省份旅游就业强度指数整体趋势无明显变化,仅有部分省份出现复杂性波动,旅游就业强度发展水平整体呈现东高西低的格局。⑤2013—2016年各省域全域旅游发展指数整体呈现波动上升趋势,各省域全域旅游发展水平提升较为明显,区域差异不断缩小,上海和北京的全域旅游发展一直保持着高等水平,位居全国前列。4年间全域旅游发展空间格局由"中东部集中"发展为"南高北低、东高西低"。
This paper firstly attempted to construct a methodological system for measuring the level of tourism development in the province from the theoretical research level for comprehensively evaluating the tourism development level of 31 provinces,and analyze comparatively its spatial and temporal differentiation and evolution characteristics. The results found that: ① From 2013 to 2016,the tourism reception index of non-scenarios in various provinces in China was at a relatively high level,and the regional differences were not obvious. Only some provinces had different degrees of fluctuation. ②The pan-tourization index of each province was low overall,the development of pan-tourism showed a low level,and the spatial pattern as a whole showed"high east and low west". ③In the past 4 years,the tourism investment income index of most provinces was basically at a low level,and the developmental level of tourism investment income was below the medium level wholly,and the spatial pattern showed"south high and low north". ④The tourism employment intensity index showed that there was no significant change in the overall trend of tourism employment intensity index in each province from 2013 to 2016,and the level of tourism employment intensity development was"high east and low west". ⑤From 2013 to 2016,the overall tourism development index of all provinces showed a volatility. The national tourism development level of the whole province was more obvious,and the regional differences continued to shrink. The global tourism developmental level of Shanghai and Beijing were high,ranking first in the country. In the past four years,the spatial pattern of global tourism development developed from"central concentration in the central and eastern regions"to"high north and low east"and"high east and low west".
This paper firstly attempted to construct a methodological system for measuring the level of tourism development in the province from the theoretical research level for comprehensively evaluating the tourism development level of 31 provinces,and analyze comparatively its spatial and temporal differentiation and evolution characteristics. The results found that: ① From 2013 to 2016,the tourism reception index of non-scenarios in various provinces in China was at a relatively high level,and the regional differences were not obvious. Only some provinces had different degrees of fluctuation. ②The pan-tourization index of each province was low overall,the development of pan-tourism showed a low level,and the spatial pattern as a whole showed"high east and low west". ③In the past 4 years,the tourism investment income index of most provinces was basically at a low level,and the developmental level of tourism investment income was below the medium level wholly,and the spatial pattern showed"south high and low north". ④The tourism employment intensity index showed that there was no significant change in the overall trend of tourism employment intensity index in each province from 2013 to 2016,and the level of tourism employment intensity development was"high east and low west". ⑤From 2013 to 2016,the overall tourism development index of all provinces showed a volatility. The national tourism development level of the whole province was more obvious,and the regional differences continued to shrink. The global tourism developmental level of Shanghai and Beijing were high,ranking first in the country. In the past four years,the spatial pattern of global tourism development developed from"central concentration in the central and eastern regions"to"high north and low east"and"high east and low west".
引文
[1]赵慧莎,王金莲.国家全域旅游示范区空间分布特征及影响因素[J].干旱区资源与环境,2017,31(7)∶176-182.
[2]李金早.全域旅游的价值和途径[N].人民日报,2016-03-04.
[3]厉新建,张凌云,崔莉.全域旅游:建设世界一流游目的地的理念创新以北京为例[J].人文地理,2013,28(3)∶130-134.
[4]吕俊芳.辽宁沿海经济带“全域旅游”发展研究[J].经济研究参考,2013,(29)∶52-56,64.
[5]周家俊,周晓鹏,黄莹.甘孜州全域旅游的内涵研究[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2015,(10)∶99.
[6]秦利民,杨静,康璇,等.发展乡村旅游,建设中国休闲大乡村[J].中共乐山市委党校学报,2015,17(6)∶12-16.
[7]樊文斌.“全域旅游”视角下大连旅游专项规划探析[J].规划师,2015,31(2)∶107-113.
[8]穆克瑞,范贤权,王维,等.坚持点线面结合推进全域景区化———琼海全域旅游建设的经验及做法[J].今日海南,2016,(3)∶23-25.
[9]吴海琴,张川.大都市近郊全域旅游型美丽乡村规划探索———以南京市汤山村为例[J].小城镇建设,2015,(11)∶74-79.
[10]朱,贾莲莲.基于旅游“城市化”背景下的城市“旅游化”———桂林案例[J].经济地理,2006,(1)∶151-155.
[11]杨振之.全域旅游的内涵及其发展阶段[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(12)∶1-3.
[12]陈凤君,周毅.全域旅游背景下的乡村旅游发展与对策研究[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2016,(3)∶21.
[13]黄华芝,吴信值.基于全域旅游视角的兴义市乡村旅游发展探讨[J].兴义民族师范学院学报,2015,(3)∶27-30.
[14]张辉.全域旅游的理性思考[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(9)∶15-17.
[15]唐烨.全域旅游视角下我国乡村旅游发展研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(7)∶202-207.
[16]宋晓丽,周金泉,陈丽琴,等.全域旅游视域下旅游小镇发展策略探析[J].经济问题,2017,(6)∶103-107.
[17]杨建容.全域旅游视角下甘孜州智慧旅游路径探析[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2016,(3)∶109-111.
[18]王磊,刘家明.宁夏建设全域旅游示范区研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2016,(4)∶123-127.
[19]葛继宏.全域旅游治理的路径探索———以杭州淳安县为例[J].浙江社会科学,2017,(3)∶142-148.
[2]李金早.全域旅游的价值和途径[N].人民日报,2016-03-04.
[3]厉新建,张凌云,崔莉.全域旅游:建设世界一流游目的地的理念创新以北京为例[J].人文地理,2013,28(3)∶130-134.
[4]吕俊芳.辽宁沿海经济带“全域旅游”发展研究[J].经济研究参考,2013,(29)∶52-56,64.
[5]周家俊,周晓鹏,黄莹.甘孜州全域旅游的内涵研究[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2015,(10)∶99.
[6]秦利民,杨静,康璇,等.发展乡村旅游,建设中国休闲大乡村[J].中共乐山市委党校学报,2015,17(6)∶12-16.
[7]樊文斌.“全域旅游”视角下大连旅游专项规划探析[J].规划师,2015,31(2)∶107-113.
[8]穆克瑞,范贤权,王维,等.坚持点线面结合推进全域景区化———琼海全域旅游建设的经验及做法[J].今日海南,2016,(3)∶23-25.
[9]吴海琴,张川.大都市近郊全域旅游型美丽乡村规划探索———以南京市汤山村为例[J].小城镇建设,2015,(11)∶74-79.
[10]朱,贾莲莲.基于旅游“城市化”背景下的城市“旅游化”———桂林案例[J].经济地理,2006,(1)∶151-155.
[11]杨振之.全域旅游的内涵及其发展阶段[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(12)∶1-3.
[12]陈凤君,周毅.全域旅游背景下的乡村旅游发展与对策研究[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2016,(3)∶21.
[13]黄华芝,吴信值.基于全域旅游视角的兴义市乡村旅游发展探讨[J].兴义民族师范学院学报,2015,(3)∶27-30.
[14]张辉.全域旅游的理性思考[J].旅游学刊,2016,31(9)∶15-17.
[15]唐烨.全域旅游视角下我国乡村旅游发展研究[J].中国农业资源与区划,2017,38(7)∶202-207.
[16]宋晓丽,周金泉,陈丽琴,等.全域旅游视域下旅游小镇发展策略探析[J].经济问题,2017,(6)∶103-107.
[17]杨建容.全域旅游视角下甘孜州智慧旅游路径探析[J].旅游纵览(下半月),2016,(3)∶109-111.
[18]王磊,刘家明.宁夏建设全域旅游示范区研究[J].宁夏社会科学,2016,(4)∶123-127.
[19]葛继宏.全域旅游治理的路径探索———以杭州淳安县为例[J].浙江社会科学,2017,(3)∶142-148.