山丘区中低产田改造评价指标体系构建——以云南省沾益县大坡乡为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Comprehensive Evaluation of Transformation of Medium and Low Yield Fields Based on Analytic Hierarchy Process A Case Study of Dapo Township,Zhanyi County,Yunnan Province
  • 作者:石平平 ; 赵众 ; 欧福超 ; 王兰 ; 王静
  • 英文作者:SHI Pingping;ZHAO Zhong;OU Fuchao;WANG Lan;WANG Jing;Yunnan Province Key Laboratory of Water Security and Water Saving and Emission Reduction;College of Water Conservancy,Yunnan Agricultural University;
  • 关键词:人地矛盾 ; 动态平衡 ; 层次分析法 ; 综合权重 ; 影响率
  • 英文关键词:human-land contradiction;;dynamic balance;;analytic hierarchy process;;comprehensive weight;;impact rate
  • 中文刊名:农业工程
  • 英文刊名:Agricultural Engineering
  • 机构:云南省高校水安全与节水减排重点实验室;云南农业大学水利学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-09-20
  • 出版单位:农业工程
  • 年:2019
  • 期:09
  • 基金:国家科技支撑计划项目子课题“水资源高效利用与抗旱灌溉技术研究与示范”(项目编号:2012BAD40B02);; 云南省高校重点实验室建设计划资助项目“云南省城乡水安全与节水减排”(项目编号:20163709);; 云南农业大学科技创新创业基金(项目编号:2018ZKY141)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:98-102
  • 页数:5
  • CN:11-6025/S
  • ISSN:2095-1795
  • 分类号:S156.93
摘要
为缓和我国人地矛盾的尖锐程度,从本质上实现耕地的动态平衡,以云南省沾益县大坡乡为例,在实地调研与相似地区中低产田改造项目成果分析相结合的基础上,从土壤条件、气候地貌条件和社会条件3个方面构建评价体系,采用层次分析法计算各项评价指标的综合权重,以此构建山丘区中低产田改造综合评价指标体系。结果表明:构建的评价指标体系中土壤条件、气候地貌条件和社会条件的权重分别为0. 428、0. 428、和0. 144;其中土壤条件指标中影响率最大的是土壤质地(0. 15)和土层厚度(0. 15),气候地貌条件指标中影响率最大的是坡度(0. 261),社会条件中影响率最大的是经济投入(0. 046)。
        In order to alleviate sharpness of contradiction between human and land in China,and realize dynamic balance of cultivated land,taking Dapo township of Zhanyi county as an example,an evaluation system from three aspects: soil conditions,climatic and geomorphological conditions and social conditions was constructed,based on combination of on-the-spot investigation and analysis of results of the low-yield field reconstruction project in similar areas. Comprehensive weight of each evaluation index was calculated by using AHP and a comprehensive evaluation index system for transformation of middle and low yield fields in hilly areas was constructed. Results showed that weights of soil conditions,climatic and geomorphic conditions and social conditions in constructed evaluation index system were 0. 428,0. 428,and 0. 144,among them,soil texture index (0. 15)and soil thickness (0. 15) were the most influential. The most influential rate of climate and geomorphic conditions was the slope (0. 261),and the most influential in social conditions was economic input (0. 046).
引文
[1]朱道林.农村土地制度改革须以土地资源本质属性为基础[J].中国土地,2018(11):13-15.
    [2]屈宝莉.大坡中低产田(地)现状及成因分析[J].吉林农业,2010(8):55-56.
    [3]夏建国,魏朝富,朱钟麟,等.中国中低产田土改造研究综述[J].中国农学通报,2005,2(4):212-217,240.XIA Jianguo,WEI Chaofu,ZHU Zhonglin,et al.Research review on the improvement of low-mediem yielding farnlands in China[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2005,2(4):212-217,240.
    [4]张晓玲,徐保根,樊兰瑛,等.中低产田成因类型划分方法的研究[J].资源科学,1999,21(4):35-38.ZHANG Xiaoling,XU Baogen,FAN Lanying,et al.Probing into the methodology for classifying causes types of medium-low yield farmland[J].Resources Science,1999,21(4):35-38.
    [5]辛绍翠.我国西南边境地区土地资源优化配置研究,以云南省瑞丽市为例[D].昆明:云南财经大学,2010.LI Shaocui.Study on optimal allocation of land resources in Southwest China's border Areas,taking Ruili city of Yunnan province as an example[D].Kunming:Yunnan University of Finance and E-conomics,2010.
    [6]冀咏赞,闫慧敏,刘纪远,等.基于MODIS数据的中国耕地高中低产田空间分布格局[J].地理学报,2015,70(5):766-778.JI Yongzan,YAN Huimin,LIU Jiyuan,et al.A MODIS data derived spatial distribution of high-,medium-and low-yield cropland in China[J].Acta Geographica Sinica,2015,70(5):766-778.
    [7]汪少勇,李建忠,郭秋麟,等.层次分析法在致密油有利区优选中的应用:以川中侏罗系大安寨段为例[J].地球科学进展,2015,30(6):715-723.WANG Shaoyong,LI Jianzhong,GUO Qiulin,et al.Application of AHP method to favorable area optimization for tight Oil:a case study in Daanzhai formation,jurassic,central of the Sichuan Basin[J].Advances in Earth Science,2015,30(6):715-723.
    [8]楚存坤,孙思琴,韩丰谈.基于层次分析法的高校图书馆学科服务评价模式[J].大学图书馆学报,2014,32(6):86-90.CHU Cunkun,SUN Siqin,HAN Fengtan.Subject service evaluation model study in university library based on AHP[J].Journal of Academic Libraries,2014,32(6):86-90.
    [9]穆永铮,鲁宗相,乔颖,等.基于多算子层次分析模糊评价的电网安全与效益综合评价指标体系[J].电网技术,2015,39(1):23-28.MU Yongzheng,LU Zongxiang,QIAO Ying,et al.A comprehensive evaluation index system of power grid security and benefit based on multi-operator fuzzy hierarchy evaluation method[J].Power System Technology,2015,39(1):23-28.
    [10]康世崴,彭建春,何禹清.模糊层次分析与多目标决策相结合的电能质量综合评估[J].电网技术,2009,33(19):113-118.KANG Shiwei,PENG Jianchun,HE Yuqing.Comprehensive evaluation of power quality based on the integration of fuzzy analytic hierarchy process with multi-objective decision-making[J].Power System Technology,2009,33(19):113-118.
    [11]兰继斌,徐扬,霍良安,等.模糊层次分析法权重研究[J].系统工程理论与实践,2006,26(9):107-112.LAN Jibin,XU Yang,HUO Liangan,et al.Research on the priorities of fuzzy analytical hierarchy process[J].Systems Engineering Theory&Practice,2006,26(9):107-112.
    [12]李春好,李孟姣,赵裕平,等.目标导向序依赖层次分析法[J].系统工程理论与实践,2018,38(10):2 668-2 678.LI Chunhao,LI Mengjiao,ZHAO Yuping,et al.Targets-oriented analytic hierarchy process for ordinal preferencedependence[J].Systems Engineering-Theory&Practice,2018,38(10):2 668-2 678.
    [13]闫敏慧,姚秀萍,王蕾,等.用层次分析法确定气象服务评价指标权重[J].应用气象学报,2014,25(4):470-475.YAN Minhui,YAO Xiuping,WANG Lei,et al.Determining weight coefficient of meteorological service evaluation criteria with AHP[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2014,25(4):470-475.
    [14]李艳萍,乔琦,柴发合,等.基于层次分析法的工业园区环境风险评价指标权重分析[J].环境科学研究,2014,27(3):334-340.LI Yanping,QIAO Qi,CHAI Hefa,et al.Study on environmental risk assessment index weight of Industrial park based on the analytic hierarchy process[J].Research of Environmental Sciences,2014,27(3):334-340.
    [15]王慧.浅谈中低产田项目绩效评价理论与指标体系构建[J].内蒙古科技与经济,2015(5):28,30.
    [16]杨婷婷,王静,杨智成,等.石漠化地区水土保持效益评价指标体系的构建:以云南省曲靖市官麦地小流域为例[J].贵州农业科学,2018,46(7):82-85,90.YANG Tingting,WANG Jing,YANG Zhicheng,et al.Construction of evaluation index system for water and soil conservation benefit in stony desertification region-taking Guanmaidi small watershed,Qujing city,Yunnan as a case[J].Guizhou Agricultural Sciences,2018,46(7):82-85,90.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700