城镇化与服务业的空间格局及耦合协调态势——以河南省为例
|
摘要
为厘清城镇化与服务业的关系,基于河南省的城镇化与服务业两大系统,选取23个指标,通过因子分析法、协调度模型测度2007-2017年河南省各地级市的城镇化与服务业的指数,构建出两者"耦合-协调性"的评价指标体系,进一步衡量了河南省各地级市城镇化与服务业发展水平的耦合协调情况。结果表明:河南省城镇化与服务业的整体格局呈现出比较显著的空间异质性现象和明显的"三级分化"的空间分类态势;郑州、洛阳的城镇化发展水平与其服务业发展水平是高度协调型(即第一级分化)且洛阳的耦合-协调度高于郑州,呈现出"双极面状"的空间格局;焦作、许昌、南阳、鹤壁、漯河、安阳、新乡和平顶山的城镇化与服务业综合水平差异较小,属于中度耦合协调型(即第二级分化),在空间上呈现以郑洛为核心逐渐向外围递减的圈层状空间格局且呈现出趋同态势;周口、商丘、三门峡、开封、信阳和驻马店属于低度耦合协调型(即第三级分化),主要区位指向河南东南部和西部地区。基于河南的空间格局和耦合现状,进一步给出了相应的政策建议。
Based on the two major systems of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province, 23 indicators were selected to construct an evaluation index system to measure the ‘coupling-coordination' between them.Factor analysis method and coordination degree model were used to measure the index of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province, as well as the coupling and coordination between the two. The results were as follows.(1)The comprehensive level of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province had a relatively significant spatial heterogeneity and a clear ‘three-level differentiation' in terms of the spatial classification.(2) The development level of urbanization in Zhengzhou and Luoyang and the level of service industry development were highly coordinated(that is,first-level differentiation), and Luoyang ‘coupling-coordination' was higher than Zhengzhou's, showing a ‘bipolar' spatial pattern.(3) The difference in the level of urbanization and service industry development in Jiaozuo, Xuchang, Nanyang,Hebi, Luohe, Anyang, Xinxiang, and Pingdingshan was small and belonged to the moderate coupling coordination type(that is, second-level differentiation). Prefectures and cities with moderate ‘coupling-coordination' presented a coordinated spatial pattern. Zhengzhou-Luoyang, which was taken as the core circle that gradually wants to reduce the circle-like spatial pattern of peripheral cities, presented the spatial trend of a ‘convergence club phenomenon'.(4) Finally, the comprehensive index of urbanization development level and service industry development level of Zhoukou, Shangqiu, Sanmenxia, Kaifeng,Xinyang, and Zhumadian was relatively poor, belonging to the low level(that is, third-level differentiation). Prefectures and municipalities of this type are mainly located in southeastern and western Henan.
Based on the two major systems of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province, 23 indicators were selected to construct an evaluation index system to measure the ‘coupling-coordination' between them.Factor analysis method and coordination degree model were used to measure the index of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province, as well as the coupling and coordination between the two. The results were as follows.(1)The comprehensive level of urbanization and service industry development in Henan Province had a relatively significant spatial heterogeneity and a clear ‘three-level differentiation' in terms of the spatial classification.(2) The development level of urbanization in Zhengzhou and Luoyang and the level of service industry development were highly coordinated(that is,first-level differentiation), and Luoyang ‘coupling-coordination' was higher than Zhengzhou's, showing a ‘bipolar' spatial pattern.(3) The difference in the level of urbanization and service industry development in Jiaozuo, Xuchang, Nanyang,Hebi, Luohe, Anyang, Xinxiang, and Pingdingshan was small and belonged to the moderate coupling coordination type(that is, second-level differentiation). Prefectures and cities with moderate ‘coupling-coordination' presented a coordinated spatial pattern. Zhengzhou-Luoyang, which was taken as the core circle that gradually wants to reduce the circle-like spatial pattern of peripheral cities, presented the spatial trend of a ‘convergence club phenomenon'.(4) Finally, the comprehensive index of urbanization development level and service industry development level of Zhoukou, Shangqiu, Sanmenxia, Kaifeng,Xinyang, and Zhumadian was relatively poor, belonging to the low level(that is, third-level differentiation). Prefectures and municipalities of this type are mainly located in southeastern and western Henan.
引文
[1]李小建,罗庆.新型城镇化中的协调思想分析[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2014,24(2):47-53.LI X J, LUO Q. Analysis of coordination thought in new-type urbanization[J]. China Population, Resources and Environment,2014,24(2):47-53.
[2]陈振.城市土地立体化登记研究[J].上海国土资源,2017,38(4):24-28.CHEN Z. Study on the three-dimensional registration of urban land[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources, 2017,38(4):24-28.
[3]CHANG G H, BRADA J C. The paradox of China growing underurbanization[J]. Economic Systems, 2006,30(1):24-40.
[4]樊杰,刘毅,陈田,等.优化我国城镇化空间布局的战略重点与创新思路[J].中国科学院院刊,2013,28(1):20-27.FAN J, LIU Y, CHEN T, et al. Strategic emphasis and innovative thinkingofoptimizingspatialdistributionofurbanizationin China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013,28(1):20-27.
[5]潘德蓓.生产性服务业发展与规划土地管理优化的互动机制研究[J].上海国土资源,2016,37(4):43-46.PAN D B. Interactions between producer services development and optimizing land management[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources,2016,37(4):43-46.
[6]曾淑婉,赵晶晶.城市化对服务业发展的影响机理及其实证研究——基于中国省际数据的动态面板分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2012,32(6):60-66.ZENG S W, ZHAO J J. A dynamic panel analysis based on China's inter-provincial data[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, 2012,32(6):60-66.
[7]王洋,方创琳,王振波.中国县域城镇化水平的综合评价及类型区划分[J].地理研究,2012,1(7):1305-1316.WANG Y, FANG C L, WANG Z B. Comprehensive evaluation and typologicaldivisionofurbanizationlevelinChinesecounties[J].Geographical Research, 2012,1(7):1305-1316.
[8]李若洁,崔许锋.武汉市新型城镇化发展水平评价及其障碍因素研究[J].上海国土资源,2018,39(2):27-32.LI R J, CUI X F. Evaluation of the development level of new urbanization and its obstacle factors in Wuhan[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources, 2018,39(2):27-32.
[9]姚士谋,张平宇,余成,等.中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J].地理科学,2014,34(6):641-647.YAO S M, ZHANG P Y, YU C, et al. China's new urbanization theoryandpractice[J].ScientiaGeographicaSinica,2014,34(6):641-647.
[2]陈振.城市土地立体化登记研究[J].上海国土资源,2017,38(4):24-28.CHEN Z. Study on the three-dimensional registration of urban land[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources, 2017,38(4):24-28.
[3]CHANG G H, BRADA J C. The paradox of China growing underurbanization[J]. Economic Systems, 2006,30(1):24-40.
[4]樊杰,刘毅,陈田,等.优化我国城镇化空间布局的战略重点与创新思路[J].中国科学院院刊,2013,28(1):20-27.FAN J, LIU Y, CHEN T, et al. Strategic emphasis and innovative thinkingofoptimizingspatialdistributionofurbanizationin China[J]. Bulletin of Chinese Academy of Sciences, 2013,28(1):20-27.
[5]潘德蓓.生产性服务业发展与规划土地管理优化的互动机制研究[J].上海国土资源,2016,37(4):43-46.PAN D B. Interactions between producer services development and optimizing land management[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources,2016,37(4):43-46.
[6]曾淑婉,赵晶晶.城市化对服务业发展的影响机理及其实证研究——基于中国省际数据的动态面板分析[J].中央财经大学学报,2012,32(6):60-66.ZENG S W, ZHAO J J. A dynamic panel analysis based on China's inter-provincial data[J]. Journal of Central University of Finance and Economics, 2012,32(6):60-66.
[7]王洋,方创琳,王振波.中国县域城镇化水平的综合评价及类型区划分[J].地理研究,2012,1(7):1305-1316.WANG Y, FANG C L, WANG Z B. Comprehensive evaluation and typologicaldivisionofurbanizationlevelinChinesecounties[J].Geographical Research, 2012,1(7):1305-1316.
[8]李若洁,崔许锋.武汉市新型城镇化发展水平评价及其障碍因素研究[J].上海国土资源,2018,39(2):27-32.LI R J, CUI X F. Evaluation of the development level of new urbanization and its obstacle factors in Wuhan[J]. Shanghai Land&Resources, 2018,39(2):27-32.
[9]姚士谋,张平宇,余成,等.中国新型城镇化理论与实践问题[J].地理科学,2014,34(6):641-647.YAO S M, ZHANG P Y, YU C, et al. China's new urbanization theoryandpractice[J].ScientiaGeographicaSinica,2014,34(6):641-647.