摘要
基于生态完整性和社会服务功能对岳城水库健康状况进行评估,构建了水文水资源、物理结构、水质、生物和社会服务功能5个准则层18个指标的指标体系,采用分级指标评分法,逐级加权,综合评分,得出岳城水库健康指数为69. 2,属于健康状态。5个准则层中生物、水文水资源、水质3个准则层健康指数偏低,因此应充分重视岳城水库的生物多样性、上游来水水量和水质以及水体富营养化状况等。
The Lake health index of Yuecheng Reservoir is evaluated based on the ecological integrity and social service functions.And an index system of 18 indicators is constructed,which belongs to five criteria layers of hydrology and water resources,physical structure,water quality,biological and social service functions. Gradual weighting and comprehensive scores show that the Yuecheng Reservoir Health Index is 69. 2,which is a healthy state.The health index of biological,hydrologic and water resources and water quality in the five criterion layers is relatively low. Therefore,it is important to pay full attention to the biodiversity,upstream inflow and quality and eutrophication status of Yuecheng Reservoir.
引文
[1]中华人民共和国水利部.湖泊健康评估指标、标准与方法(试点工作用)[S].北京:水利部水文局,2010.
[2]彭文启.河湖健康评估指标、标准与方法研究[J].中国水利水电科学研究院学报,2018,5(16):394-404.
[3]BOULTON A J. An overview of river health assessment:philosophies,practice,problems and prognosis[J]. Freshwater Biology,1999(41):469-479.
[4]MEYER J L. Stream health:incorporating the human dimension to advance stream ecology[J]. The North American Benlho-Logical Society,1997,16(2):439-447.
[5]林木隆,李向阳,杨明海.珠江流域河流健康评价指标体系初探[J].人民珠江,2006(4):1-3.
[6]孙小玲,蔡庆华,李凤清.河流健康综合评价指数法的改进及其在昌江的应用[J].生态与农村环境学报,2011,27(6):98-103.
[7]李云成,王化儒,娄广艳.黄河内蒙古河段健康评估指标体系构建研究[J].人民黄河,2017,39(12):67-70.
[8]郭向楠,张晓冰,马涛.河流健康评估的研究与应用进展研究[J].环境科学与管理,2013,38(10):170-174.
[9]张春媛,于长水,潘高娃,等.湖泊生态系统健康评估初探-以乌梁素海为例[J].北方环境,2011,23(8):38-39.
[10]李丹,李品一,张明珠,等.广州市木强水库健康评估、病因诊断及预测预警[J].人民珠江,2018,39(10):39-43.
[11]漳卫南运河管理局.岳城水库[EB/OL].[2014-08-07].http://www. hwcc. gov. cn/zwnyhglj/zlk/sk/201506/t20150605_45696.html.
[12]于伟东.岳城水库水体富营养华趋势分析及保护对策[J].海河水利,2012(6):16-18.