摘要
炉废气监测中,烟道中二氧化硫的测定一般都是使用定电位化学法,其方法快捷、简单。但在测定时,定电位化学法比较容易受到烟道中各种因素影响,其中一氧化碳影响较大较明显。本文通过通入不同的标准气体,进行数据对比分析,探讨它们之间的相关性,得出结论并提出相关意见。
In the monitoring of boiler exhaust gas, the determination of sulfur dioxide in flue is usually done by potentiostatic chemical method, which is fast and simple. However, the potentiostatic chemical method is more susceptible to various factors in flue, in which carbon monoxide has a greater impact. In this paper, through the introduction of different standard gases, data comparison and analysis, to explore the correlation between them, draw conclusions and put forward relevant opinions.
引文
[1]姜汉山,赵辉.定电位电解法测定烟道内二氧化硫准确性探讨[J].辽宁城乡环境科技,2006,26(3):35-36.
[2]郭伟明.定电位电解法测定固定污染源废气中二氧化硫的方法.科教前沿,2013(13):70.
[3]张迪生,谢馨.CO对定电位电解法测定SO2的影响及对策探讨[J].环境监测管理与技术,2014,26(2):60-62.
[4]廖平德,王云龙,卢秋.定电位电解法测定SO2过程中出现的问题及解决方式[J].北方环境,2011,23(11):98-112.