武汉市2017年中小学教室环境卫生监测结果分析
|
摘要
目的了解武汉市中小学教室环境卫生现状,为保障学生身心健康提供依据。方法 2017年随机抽取17所中小学,共51间教室,进行相关卫生指标监测,并根据《学校卫生综合评价》(GB/T 18205-2012)对监测结果进行分析。结果二氧化碳合格率为100.0%,课桌面照度合格率为90.2%,黑板照度合格率为39.2%,噪声合格率为7.8%。黑板照度在小学和中学间的差异有统计学意义(χ~2=4.251,P <0.05)。课桌面照度和黑板照度在中心城区和远城区间的差异均有统计学意义(χ~2=3.880、9.280,P <0.05)。结论武汉市中小学教室黑板照度和噪声合格率偏低,需采取相应改进措施。
Objective To understand the current situation of classroom environmental hygiene in primary and secondary schools in Wuhan,and to provide basis for guaranteeing students' physical and mental health.Methods In 2017,17 primary and secondary schools with 51 classrooms were randomly selected to monitor the related health indicators,and the monitoring results were analyzed according to the Comprehensive Appraisement for Health in Schools(GB/T 18205-2012).Results The qualified rate of carbon dioxide,desktop illumination,blackboard illumination and noise is 100.0%,90.2%,39.2% and 7.8%,respectively.The difference in blackboard illumination between primary and secondary schools was statistically significant(χ~2= 4.251,P<0.05).The difference between desktop illumination and blackboard illumination in the central and remote urban areas was statistically significant(χ~2= 3.880,9.280,P<0.05).Conclusion The qualified rate of blackboard illumination and noise in primary and secondary school classrooms in Wuhan is low,and corresponding improvement measures should be taken.
Objective To understand the current situation of classroom environmental hygiene in primary and secondary schools in Wuhan,and to provide basis for guaranteeing students' physical and mental health.Methods In 2017,17 primary and secondary schools with 51 classrooms were randomly selected to monitor the related health indicators,and the monitoring results were analyzed according to the Comprehensive Appraisement for Health in Schools(GB/T 18205-2012).Results The qualified rate of carbon dioxide,desktop illumination,blackboard illumination and noise is 100.0%,90.2%,39.2% and 7.8%,respectively.The difference in blackboard illumination between primary and secondary schools was statistically significant(χ~2= 4.251,P<0.05).The difference between desktop illumination and blackboard illumination in the central and remote urban areas was statistically significant(χ~2= 3.880,9.280,P<0.05).Conclusion The qualified rate of blackboard illumination and noise in primary and secondary school classrooms in Wuhan is low,and corresponding improvement measures should be taken.
引文
[1]季成叶.儿童少年卫生学[M].北京:人民卫生出版社,2012:285.
[2]卫生部.GB/T 18204.2-2014公共场所卫生检验方法第2部分:化学污染物[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[3]国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 5700-2008照明测量方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[4]卫生部.GB/T 18204.1-2013公共场所卫生检验方法第1部分:物理因素[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[5]卫生部.GB/T 18205-2012学校卫生综合评价[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[6]王会松,郭红侠,崔永强,等.北京市昌平区中小学教学环境卫生学评价[J].中国学校卫生,2008,29(12):1152-1153.
[7]钱红丹.无锡市2014-2015年学校教室和生活环境卫生现状[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(1):131-133.
[8]石艳,管恒燕,张明志.合肥市2014-2015年学校教学环境卫生监测结果[J].中国学校卫生,2016,37(8):1207-1209.
[9]严志玲,王萍,曾宪柳,等.2014-2017年柳州市中小学校教室采光照明卫生状况[J].应用预防医学,2017,23(5):384-386.
[10]应享频,黄晓明.浦江县中小学校教学环境卫生监测结果分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(10):1047-1050.
[11]张萍,杨韬,贾文英.中小学校教室和黑板照明状况分析与对策[J].中国现代教育装备,2008,11(7):139-140.
[12]袁樵.国际照明委员会照明标准(S008-2001)-室内工作场所照明[J].照明工程学报,2002,13(4):55-60.
[2]卫生部.GB/T 18204.2-2014公共场所卫生检验方法第2部分:化学污染物[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2014.
[3]国家标准化管理委员会.GB/T 5700-2008照明测量方法[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2008.
[4]卫生部.GB/T 18204.1-2013公共场所卫生检验方法第1部分:物理因素[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2013.
[5]卫生部.GB/T 18205-2012学校卫生综合评价[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2012.
[6]王会松,郭红侠,崔永强,等.北京市昌平区中小学教学环境卫生学评价[J].中国学校卫生,2008,29(12):1152-1153.
[7]钱红丹.无锡市2014-2015年学校教室和生活环境卫生现状[J].中国学校卫生,2017,38(1):131-133.
[8]石艳,管恒燕,张明志.合肥市2014-2015年学校教学环境卫生监测结果[J].中国学校卫生,2016,37(8):1207-1209.
[9]严志玲,王萍,曾宪柳,等.2014-2017年柳州市中小学校教室采光照明卫生状况[J].应用预防医学,2017,23(5):384-386.
[10]应享频,黄晓明.浦江县中小学校教学环境卫生监测结果分析[J].预防医学,2017,29(10):1047-1050.
[11]张萍,杨韬,贾文英.中小学校教室和黑板照明状况分析与对策[J].中国现代教育装备,2008,11(7):139-140.
[12]袁樵.国际照明委员会照明标准(S008-2001)-室内工作场所照明[J].照明工程学报,2002,13(4):55-60.