党内法规“党言党语”与“法言法语”的界分与融合
|
摘要
语言承载意志,是组织或个体主动构建以传播影响的工具。"党言党语"与"法言法语"作为党内法规建设与法律制度建设的话语体系支撑,是执政理念的表达与治国要义的彰显,二者各具特色与功能。党内法规的"党"姓要求与"法"质属性强调党规文本必须在严格界分"党言党语"与"法言法语"的基础上实现二者的融合,从而体现党的政治性与法的规范性,确保依法治国与依规治党统筹推进。通过综合运用文本分析法、语料库分析法和批评隐喻分析法等,对近5年修订出台的基础性党内法规进行横向、纵向与静态、动态的综合比较分析,发现党内法规用语既不是纯粹的"党言党语"模式,也不是纯粹的"法言法语"模式,而是界分基础上的融合模式,且二者的融合在不同类型的党内法规以及同一类型党内法规的不同发展阶段,融合程度也各不相同,总体呈现出文本表达形式的"去法律化"与文本结构规范的"法律化"趋势。
language carries the will,which is the tool of organization or individual active construction to spread the influence of power.As the discourse system support for the construction of the inner-party laws and regulations and the construction of the legal system,The language of the Party and the language of law are the expression of the ruling idea and the manifestation of the essential meaning of governing the country,and have their own characteristics and functions.The inner-party laws and regulations have the dual attributes of the party and the law,which requires that the text of Party rules must be integrated on the basis of strict demarcation of the language of the Party and the language of law.This paper makes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the basic inner-party laws and regulations and try to explore the necessity of the integration and the form and law of the fusion on the basis of comparing the linguistic and legal linguistic characteristics of the Party,This is of positive significance to promote the rule of law construction of political parties and to constructing the system of the rule of law in the inner-Party of China.
language carries the will,which is the tool of organization or individual active construction to spread the influence of power.As the discourse system support for the construction of the inner-party laws and regulations and the construction of the legal system,The language of the Party and the language of law are the expression of the ruling idea and the manifestation of the essential meaning of governing the country,and have their own characteristics and functions.The inner-party laws and regulations have the dual attributes of the party and the law,which requires that the text of Party rules must be integrated on the basis of strict demarcation of the language of the Party and the language of law.This paper makes a comprehensive comparative analysis of the basic inner-party laws and regulations and try to explore the necessity of the integration and the form and law of the fusion on the basis of comparing the linguistic and legal linguistic characteristics of the Party,This is of positive significance to promote the rule of law construction of political parties and to constructing the system of the rule of law in the inner-Party of China.
引文
[1]许宝强,袁伟.话语与翻译的政治[M].北京:中央编译出版社,2001.
[2]秦强.党内法规的规范表征[N].中国社会科学报,2019-06-27.
[3]马克思恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5]习近平.习近平谈治国理政[M].北京:外文出版社,2014.
[6]毛泽东选集:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1977.
[7]胡洪彬.习近平新时代党的政治建设思想论析[J].探索,2017(6):184-192.
[8]魏娟辉.试论依规治党背景下“党言党语”的基本特征[J].学校党建与思想教育,2018(22):38-40.
[9]马丁.马丁文集(4):语域研究[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2012.
[10]丁建新,廖益清.批评语言学[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011.
[11]常轶军.政治认同:习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的主线[J].探索,2018(6):5-13.
[12]孙懿华,周广然.法律语言学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997.
[13]沃纳·赛佛林.传播理论———起源、方法与应用[M].郭镇之,译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2006.
[14]谢立中.走向“多元话语分析”:后现代思潮的社会学意涵[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[15]邹东升,姚靖.改革开放以来党内反腐倡廉法规的建设与经验[J].甘肃社会科学,2019(2):35-43.
[16]邹东升,姚靖.新时代微腐败治理的纪法衔接[J].理论探讨,2019(1):128-134.
[17]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[18]宋功德.党规之治[M].北京:法律出版社,2015.
(1)本表根据八个党规文本分析制作。
(1)本表根据《纪律处分条例》三次修订形成的四个文本分析制作。
(1)本表根据对三个党规文本和2018年刑法修订版比较分析制作。
(1)本表系根据《纪律处分条例》经三次修订形成的四个文本分析制作。
[2]秦强.党内法规的规范表征[N].中国社会科学报,2019-06-27.
[3]马克思恩格斯全集:第3卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2002.
[4]马克思恩格斯选集:第1卷[M].北京:人民出版社,2012.
[5]习近平.习近平谈治国理政[M].北京:外文出版社,2014.
[6]毛泽东选集:第5卷[M].北京:人民出版社,1977.
[7]胡洪彬.习近平新时代党的政治建设思想论析[J].探索,2017(6):184-192.
[8]魏娟辉.试论依规治党背景下“党言党语”的基本特征[J].学校党建与思想教育,2018(22):38-40.
[9]马丁.马丁文集(4):语域研究[M].上海:上海交通大学出版社,2012.
[10]丁建新,廖益清.批评语言学[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2011.
[11]常轶军.政治认同:习近平新时代中国特色社会主义思想的主线[J].探索,2018(6):5-13.
[12]孙懿华,周广然.法律语言学[M].北京:中国政法大学出版社,1997.
[13]沃纳·赛佛林.传播理论———起源、方法与应用[M].郭镇之,译.北京:中国传媒大学出版社,2006.
[14]谢立中.走向“多元话语分析”:后现代思潮的社会学意涵[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2009.
[15]邹东升,姚靖.改革开放以来党内反腐倡廉法规的建设与经验[J].甘肃社会科学,2019(2):35-43.
[16]邹东升,姚靖.新时代微腐败治理的纪法衔接[J].理论探讨,2019(1):128-134.
[17]博登海默.法理学:法律哲学与法律方法[M].邓正来,译.北京:中国政法大学出版社,2004.
[18]宋功德.党规之治[M].北京:法律出版社,2015.
(1)本表根据八个党规文本分析制作。
(1)本表根据《纪律处分条例》三次修订形成的四个文本分析制作。
(1)本表根据对三个党规文本和2018年刑法修订版比较分析制作。
(1)本表系根据《纪律处分条例》经三次修订形成的四个文本分析制作。