脱贫攻坚与乡村振兴有机衔接中的生态环境关切
|
摘要
现阶段,我国正处于乡村振兴与脱贫攻坚叠加推进、历史交汇的时期,生态环境保护在两项战略中均发挥着重要作用。生态扶贫和生态振兴具有内在一致性,均是在"两山理论"的指导下,通过合理可持续地利用生态资源发展生态产业,将"绿水青山"变成"金山银山"的现实表现。但是在目标、侧重、总体要求三个层面存在着不同。在脱贫攻坚阶段,生态扶贫通过公益岗位设置、人居环境整治、生态产业发展等取得了积极进展,为生态振兴提供了良好的基础与有效经验,但是仍然存在体制机制衔接不畅、资金投入短缺、生态产业发展升级困难等问题。为此,应着力在生态规划引领、资金投入多级打通、产业多元发展等方面精准发力,推动乡村振兴与脱贫攻坚的有机衔接。
Currently, China is in the period of cooperative implementation for rural revitalization and poverty alleviation strateges, in which eco-environmental protection plays vital role. Ecological poverty alleviation and ecological revitalization are inherently consistent which can make the development of"lucid waters and lush mountains" a reality by developing ecological industries with the rational and sustainable use of ecological resources under the guidance of the "two mountains" theory. However, there are differences from three aspects of objectives, emphasis, and overall requirements between the rural revitalization and poverty alleviation. In the stage of poverty alleviation, ecological poverty alleviation has made positive progress through the establishment of public welfare posts, the renovation of human settlements, and the development of ecological industries, providing a good foundation and effective experience for ecological revitalization. However, there are still problems such as uncoordinated institutional mechanisms, shortage of capital investment, and difficulties in the development and upgrading of ecological industries. To this end, efforts should be made to focus on ecological planning multi-level capital investment, and diversified industrial development, and to promote the organic connection of rural revitalization and poverty alleviation.
Currently, China is in the period of cooperative implementation for rural revitalization and poverty alleviation strateges, in which eco-environmental protection plays vital role. Ecological poverty alleviation and ecological revitalization are inherently consistent which can make the development of"lucid waters and lush mountains" a reality by developing ecological industries with the rational and sustainable use of ecological resources under the guidance of the "two mountains" theory. However, there are differences from three aspects of objectives, emphasis, and overall requirements between the rural revitalization and poverty alleviation. In the stage of poverty alleviation, ecological poverty alleviation has made positive progress through the establishment of public welfare posts, the renovation of human settlements, and the development of ecological industries, providing a good foundation and effective experience for ecological revitalization. However, there are still problems such as uncoordinated institutional mechanisms, shortage of capital investment, and difficulties in the development and upgrading of ecological industries. To this end, efforts should be made to focus on ecological planning multi-level capital investment, and diversified industrial development, and to promote the organic connection of rural revitalization and poverty alleviation.
引文
[1]习近平．推动我国生态文明建设迈上新台阶[J]．求是，2019(3):3-8．
[2]沈茂英，杨萍．生态扶贫内涵及其运行模式研究[J]．农村经济，2016(7):3-8．
[3]魏后凯．当前“三农”研究的十大前沿课题[J]．中国农村经济，2019(4):2-6．
[4]祁新华，林荣平，程煜，等．贫困与生态环境相互关系研究述评[J]．地理科学，2013(12):1498-1505．
[5]欧阳祎兰．探索生态扶贫的实现路径[J]．人民论坛，2019(21):70-71．
[6]姚星星，张国防．生态减贫的“隧道效应”研究[J]．生态环境学报，2018(2):389-396．
[7]王晓毅．绿色减贫：理论、政策与实践[J]．兰州大学学报（社会科学版），2018(4):28-35．
[8]朱冬亮，殷文梅．贫困山区林业生态扶贫实践模式及比较评估[J]．湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版），2019(4):86-93．
[9]吴乐，朱凯宁，靳乐山．环境服务付费减贫的国际经验及借鉴[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2019(11):34-41．
[10]秦国伟，董玮．绿色减贫的理论内涵与路径创新[J]．东岳论丛，2019(2):94-101．
[11]万君，张琦．绿色减贫：贫困治理的路径与模式[J]．中国农业大学学报（社会科学版），2017(5):79-86．
[12]王佳宁，史志乐．贫困退出机制的总体框架及其指标体系[J]．改革，2017(1):119-131．
[13]黄国勤．论乡村生态振兴[J]．中国生态农业学报，2019(2):190-197．
[14]高尚宾，徐志宇，靳拓，等．乡村振兴视角下中国生态农业发展分析[J]．中国生态农业学报，2019(2):163-168．
[15]曹桢，顾展豪．乡村振兴背景下农村生态宜居建设探讨---基于浙江的调查研究[J]．中国青年社会科学，2019(4):100-107．
[16]张苏强．乡村振兴，生态治理是关键[J]．人民论坛，2019(19):60-61．
[17]邓玲，王芳．乡村振兴背景下农村生态的现代化转型[J]．甘肃社会科学，2019(3):101-108．
[18]周侃，王传胜．中国贫困地区时空格局与差别化脱贫政策研究[J]．中国科学院院刊，2016(1):101-111．
[19]祁毓，卢洪友．污染、健康与不平等---跨越“环境健康贫困”陷阱[J]．管理世界，2015(9):32-51．
[20]刘煜杰．坚持绿水青山就是金山银山[N]．中国环境报，2019-01-08(003）．
[21]高世楫，王海芹，李维明．改革开放40年生态文明体制改革历程与取向观察[J]．改革，2018(8):49-63．
[22]胡钰，金书秦，吴娜伟，等．畜禽养殖业布局调整政策环境风险评估---以黑龙江省为例[J]．环境保护，2019(6):61-64.
[2]沈茂英，杨萍．生态扶贫内涵及其运行模式研究[J]．农村经济，2016(7):3-8．
[3]魏后凯．当前“三农”研究的十大前沿课题[J]．中国农村经济，2019(4):2-6．
[4]祁新华，林荣平，程煜，等．贫困与生态环境相互关系研究述评[J]．地理科学，2013(12):1498-1505．
[5]欧阳祎兰．探索生态扶贫的实现路径[J]．人民论坛，2019(21):70-71．
[6]姚星星，张国防．生态减贫的“隧道效应”研究[J]．生态环境学报，2018(2):389-396．
[7]王晓毅．绿色减贫：理论、政策与实践[J]．兰州大学学报（社会科学版），2018(4):28-35．
[8]朱冬亮，殷文梅．贫困山区林业生态扶贫实践模式及比较评估[J]．湖北民族学院学报（哲学社会科学版），2019(4):86-93．
[9]吴乐，朱凯宁，靳乐山．环境服务付费减贫的国际经验及借鉴[J]．干旱区资源与环境，2019(11):34-41．
[10]秦国伟，董玮．绿色减贫的理论内涵与路径创新[J]．东岳论丛，2019(2):94-101．
[11]万君，张琦．绿色减贫：贫困治理的路径与模式[J]．中国农业大学学报（社会科学版），2017(5):79-86．
[12]王佳宁，史志乐．贫困退出机制的总体框架及其指标体系[J]．改革，2017(1):119-131．
[13]黄国勤．论乡村生态振兴[J]．中国生态农业学报，2019(2):190-197．
[14]高尚宾，徐志宇，靳拓，等．乡村振兴视角下中国生态农业发展分析[J]．中国生态农业学报，2019(2):163-168．
[15]曹桢，顾展豪．乡村振兴背景下农村生态宜居建设探讨---基于浙江的调查研究[J]．中国青年社会科学，2019(4):100-107．
[16]张苏强．乡村振兴，生态治理是关键[J]．人民论坛，2019(19):60-61．
[17]邓玲，王芳．乡村振兴背景下农村生态的现代化转型[J]．甘肃社会科学，2019(3):101-108．
[18]周侃，王传胜．中国贫困地区时空格局与差别化脱贫政策研究[J]．中国科学院院刊，2016(1):101-111．
[19]祁毓，卢洪友．污染、健康与不平等---跨越“环境健康贫困”陷阱[J]．管理世界，2015(9):32-51．
[20]刘煜杰．坚持绿水青山就是金山银山[N]．中国环境报，2019-01-08(003）．
[21]高世楫，王海芹，李维明．改革开放40年生态文明体制改革历程与取向观察[J]．改革，2018(8):49-63．
[22]胡钰，金书秦，吴娜伟，等．畜禽养殖业布局调整政策环境风险评估---以黑龙江省为例[J]．环境保护，2019(6):61-64.