摘要
选近年来,基于分类评价的原则,对地质调查项目类型进行了划分;初步构建了制度框架,规范了地质调查项目绩效评价流程;开展了项目绩效评价试点,积累了相关经验。目前存在的问题:(1)绩效目标缺乏充分论证和合理测算,容易脱离实际;(2)绩效评价指标体系未分类设置,分类评价原则贯彻不彻底;(3)绩效自评不严格,弱化了绩效管理的权威性。建议:(1)调整绩效目标申报内容,强调成果导向;(2)建立分类评价指标体系,体现地质调查业务规律;(3)强化主体责任,提高绩效评价工作质效。
In recent years, based on the principle of classification and evaluation, the types of geo-survey projects have been classified, the system framework has been preliminarily constructed, and the performance evaluation procedures of geo-survey projects has been standardized, also, the pilot project performance evaluation has been carried out and relevant experiences have been accumulated. However, the existing problems are:(1) the lack of sufficient demonstration and reasonable measurement of performance objectives leading to easily divorced from reality;(2) the performance evaluation index system is unclassified and the principle of classification evaluation is carried out incompletely.(3) the self-evaluation of performance is loose, which weakens the authority of performance management. Finally, this paper suggestions:(1) adjusting the reporting content of performance objectives to achievement orientation;(2) constructing index system of classification evaluation to reflect the geo-survey rules;(3) strengthening the responsibility and improving the quality and efficiency of performance evaluation.
引文
[1]国土资源部.中央财政地质调查项目管理办法[Z].北京:国土资源部,2017-01-09.
[2]姚震,杜子图.关于新时代地质调查工作的战略思考[J].地质通报,2018,37(11):2120-2124.
[3]吕晓岚,王文,魏翔.地质调查项目绩效管理研究报告[R].北京:中国地质调查局发展研究中心,2018:32.
[4]中国地质调查局.地质调查项目绩效指标体系框架[Z].北京:中国地质调查局,2017-05-06.
[5]严兴华.地质调查预算财务管理工作进展与展望[N].中国矿业报,2019-03-22(05).
[6]中国地质调查局.地质调查项目绩效评价指南[Z].北京:中国地质调查局,2018-03-16.
[7]中国地质调查局.地质调查预算财务管理工作进展与展望[EB/OL].(2019-03-25)[2019-07-19].http://www.cgs.gov.cn/ddztt/jqthd/ddy/jyxc/201903/t20190325_477751.html.
[8]新浪财经.财政部:四个注重入手不断提高重点绩效评价工作质效[EB/OL].(2019-05-13)[2019-07-19].https://finance.sina.com.cn/roll/2019-05-13/doc-ihvhiqax8353201.shtml.
[9]白景明,程北平,王泽彩.中国财政绩效报告:理论与实践(2018)[M].北京:中国财政经济出版社,2018.