恩格尔定律的悖论情形及其解释
|
摘要
在学术界对恩格尔定律普遍达成共识,并主要关注恩格尔系数外部影响因素的背景下,本文对共识性的恩格尔定律提出悖论情形,从恩格尔定律与需求收入弹性的本质性关系出发,运用数理推导等定性定量方法对悖论情形进行了验证。然后,引入收入分解理论的份额思想,运用收入来源结构的面板数据,采用混合固定效应模型和随机效应模型,对恩格尔定律悖论情形内部机理进行分析,得出了支持恩格尔定律悖论情形的分项收入作用机制。
The academia reaches the consensus about Engel's Law,and most of existing researches focus on the external influence factors of Engel's Coefficient. This paper has proposed the paradox situation for the consensus Engel's Law. The qualitative and quantitative methods such as mathematical derivation are used to verify the paradox situation based on the essential relationship between Engel's Law and the Income Elasticity of Demand.Then,this paper has adopted Fixed Effect Model and Random Effect Model to analyze the internal mechanism of Engel's Law paradox situation by following the theory of Income Inequality Decomposition and by the panel data of income source. Finally,the paper draws a sub-income mechanism of action that supports the paradox situation of Engel's Law.
The academia reaches the consensus about Engel's Law,and most of existing researches focus on the external influence factors of Engel's Coefficient. This paper has proposed the paradox situation for the consensus Engel's Law. The qualitative and quantitative methods such as mathematical derivation are used to verify the paradox situation based on the essential relationship between Engel's Law and the Income Elasticity of Demand.Then,this paper has adopted Fixed Effect Model and Random Effect Model to analyze the internal mechanism of Engel's Law paradox situation by following the theory of Income Inequality Decomposition and by the panel data of income source. Finally,the paper draws a sub-income mechanism of action that supports the paradox situation of Engel's Law.
引文
[1] HOLCOMB B,PARK L,CAPPS O. Revisiting Engel’s Law:Examining expenditure patterns for food at home and away from home[J]. Journal of Food Distribution Research,1995,26(5):1367.
[2] CHANG M S,HU T Y,LIN C Y. Variation in Engel’s Law across quantiles in Taiwan:Toward an alternative concept of near poverty line[J]. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,2016,21(1):103-115.
[3]曾先峰,章洁.基于恩格尔曲线的中国CPI偏差估计[J].统计与决策,2018,34(3):10-14.
[4] PRITCHETT L,SPIVACK M. Estimating income/expenditure differences across populations:New fun with old Engel’s Law[R].Working Papers,2013.
[5] HOUTHAKKER S. Aninternational comparison of household expenditure patterns,commemorating the centenary of Engel’s Law[J]. Econometrica,1957,25(4):532-551.
[6] ATSUSHI M,SATOSHI O. Engel’s Law in Vietnam and the Philippines:Effects of in-kind consumption on inequality and poverty[M]//Poverty,inequality and growth in developing countries:Theoretical and empirical approaches. Taylor and Francis Inc,2015:44-72.
[7]孟昌,邱捷捷.城市化中农村居民消费演变的“反恩格尔”事实———来自北京市数据的测算[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2018,33(2):116-126.
[8] CHAKRABARTY M,HILDENBRAND W. How should Engel’s Law be formulated?[J]. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,2015:1-21.
[9]李建德.恩格尔定律在我国的适应性[J].经济研究,1984(6):59-63+10.
[10]邵宗明,周金城.恩格尔定律在我国的适应性[J].统计研究,1985(1):22-25.
[11]吴健琳.收入增加恩格尔系数反而上升的原因探析———兼论恩格尔定律的适用条件[J].消费经济,1993(4):38-39.
[12]谢健.恩格尔定律的适用性及恩格尔系数的修正[J].统计研究,1993(1):68-71.
[13]王芳.物价对城乡恩格尔系数的影响分析[J].商业研究,2006(14):112-115.
[14]刘建国.价格因素和生活费成本对各地区城镇居民实际收入水平的影响[J].上海经济研究,2006(7):73-78.
[15]王宋涛,谢兰兰.公平分配与居民福利———收入差距对中国居民恩格尔系数的影响分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2013,28(3):56-62.
[16]杭斌,申春兰.恩格尔系数为什么降的这么快[J].统计研究,2005(1):33-37.
[17]张磊,范淑娟,赵悦辰.我国农村恩格尔系数影响因素的研究[J].华东经济管理,2013,27(2):42-46.
[18]章平,刘启超.居民收入、物价水平和消费结构对恩格尔系数的影响———来自深圳市的实证[J].统计与决策,2017(19):91-94.
[19]毛中根,朱一勇.中国恩格尔系数下降原因新探[J].统计与信息论坛,2008(2):57-60.
[20]马敬桂,黄普.食品价格、城乡恩格尔系数差异对通货膨胀的冲击效应分析[J].统计与决策,2014(9):125-129.
[21] SHORROCKS A. Inequality decomposition by factor components[J]. Econometrica,1982,50(1):193-211.
[22]万广华.不平等的度量与分解[J].经济学(季刊),2008,8(1):347-368.
[23]傅娟.收入分解研究法评述[J].经济学动态,2008(5):111-115.
[24] FEI H,RANIS G,KUO Y. Growth and the family distribution of income by factor components[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978,92(1):17-53.
[2] CHANG M S,HU T Y,LIN C Y. Variation in Engel’s Law across quantiles in Taiwan:Toward an alternative concept of near poverty line[J]. Journal of the Asia Pacific Economy,2016,21(1):103-115.
[3]曾先峰,章洁.基于恩格尔曲线的中国CPI偏差估计[J].统计与决策,2018,34(3):10-14.
[4] PRITCHETT L,SPIVACK M. Estimating income/expenditure differences across populations:New fun with old Engel’s Law[R].Working Papers,2013.
[5] HOUTHAKKER S. Aninternational comparison of household expenditure patterns,commemorating the centenary of Engel’s Law[J]. Econometrica,1957,25(4):532-551.
[6] ATSUSHI M,SATOSHI O. Engel’s Law in Vietnam and the Philippines:Effects of in-kind consumption on inequality and poverty[M]//Poverty,inequality and growth in developing countries:Theoretical and empirical approaches. Taylor and Francis Inc,2015:44-72.
[7]孟昌,邱捷捷.城市化中农村居民消费演变的“反恩格尔”事实———来自北京市数据的测算[J].北京工商大学学报(社会科学版),2018,33(2):116-126.
[8] CHAKRABARTY M,HILDENBRAND W. How should Engel’s Law be formulated?[J]. The European Journal of the History of Economic Thought,2015:1-21.
[9]李建德.恩格尔定律在我国的适应性[J].经济研究,1984(6):59-63+10.
[10]邵宗明,周金城.恩格尔定律在我国的适应性[J].统计研究,1985(1):22-25.
[11]吴健琳.收入增加恩格尔系数反而上升的原因探析———兼论恩格尔定律的适用条件[J].消费经济,1993(4):38-39.
[12]谢健.恩格尔定律的适用性及恩格尔系数的修正[J].统计研究,1993(1):68-71.
[13]王芳.物价对城乡恩格尔系数的影响分析[J].商业研究,2006(14):112-115.
[14]刘建国.价格因素和生活费成本对各地区城镇居民实际收入水平的影响[J].上海经济研究,2006(7):73-78.
[15]王宋涛,谢兰兰.公平分配与居民福利———收入差距对中国居民恩格尔系数的影响分析[J].统计与信息论坛,2013,28(3):56-62.
[16]杭斌,申春兰.恩格尔系数为什么降的这么快[J].统计研究,2005(1):33-37.
[17]张磊,范淑娟,赵悦辰.我国农村恩格尔系数影响因素的研究[J].华东经济管理,2013,27(2):42-46.
[18]章平,刘启超.居民收入、物价水平和消费结构对恩格尔系数的影响———来自深圳市的实证[J].统计与决策,2017(19):91-94.
[19]毛中根,朱一勇.中国恩格尔系数下降原因新探[J].统计与信息论坛,2008(2):57-60.
[20]马敬桂,黄普.食品价格、城乡恩格尔系数差异对通货膨胀的冲击效应分析[J].统计与决策,2014(9):125-129.
[21] SHORROCKS A. Inequality decomposition by factor components[J]. Econometrica,1982,50(1):193-211.
[22]万广华.不平等的度量与分解[J].经济学(季刊),2008,8(1):347-368.
[23]傅娟.收入分解研究法评述[J].经济学动态,2008(5):111-115.
[24] FEI H,RANIS G,KUO Y. Growth and the family distribution of income by factor components[J]. Quarterly Journal of Economics,1978,92(1):17-53.