服务业全球价值链位置提升与制造业技术进步
|
摘要
文章基于最新全球投入产出表构建更加细化的服务业全球价值链参与度和位置指数,分别利用OP和LP方法测算了中国工业企业数据库中制造业企业全要素生产率,并对二者进行匹配,实证分析了服务业全球价值链嵌入位置提升所带来的自身技术创新和产业升级对制造业生产分割和全要素生产率的潜在效益。结果显示:服务业全球价值链嵌入位置提升对于制造业企业技术进步具有显著的促进作用,其中国内服务业全球价值链位置提升对制造业生产率的创新效应大于国外服务要素投入带来的溢出效应;服务业全球价值链位置提升对制造业技术进步的影响具有显著的异质性,其中东部地区、民营企业和外资企业创新效率提高更明显;降低制造业投入成本、技术创新和溢出是服务业全球价值链位置提升对制造业技术进步的主要影响机制,基于中国制造业服务投入结构现状,信息技术服务、研发与商业服务、金融服务业等高技术服务对中国制造业的技术溢出和创新效应需要得到进一步释放。
Based on the latest global input-output table,this paper builds a more detailed global service value chain participation and position index,and uses OP and LP methods to measure the total factor productivity of manufacturing enterprises in China' s industrial enterprise database. Data match is carried out to empirically analyze the potential benefits of the technological innovation and industrial upgrading brought about by global value chain position improvement of the service industry,and the potential benefits to the production segmentation and total factor productivity of the manufacturing industry. The results show that:( 1) The improvement of global value chain position for service industry has a significant role in promoting technological progress of manufacturing industry. Among them,the innovative effect of the domestic service industry on manufacturing productivity is greater than the spillover effect brought by foreign service factor input.( 2) The improvement of service industry global value chain position on technological progress in manufacturing has significant heterogeneity. Among them,the innovation efficiency on the eastern region,private and foreign-funded enterprises is more obvious.( 3) Reducing manufacturing input costs,technological innovation and spillovers are the main influencing mechanisms for the technological progress of the manufacturing industry caused by the improvement of service industry global value chain position. Based on the status quo of China's manufacturing service input structure,the technology spillover and innovation effects of high-tech services such as information technology services,R&D and commercial services,and financial services industries on China's manufacturing industry need to be further released.
Based on the latest global input-output table,this paper builds a more detailed global service value chain participation and position index,and uses OP and LP methods to measure the total factor productivity of manufacturing enterprises in China' s industrial enterprise database. Data match is carried out to empirically analyze the potential benefits of the technological innovation and industrial upgrading brought about by global value chain position improvement of the service industry,and the potential benefits to the production segmentation and total factor productivity of the manufacturing industry. The results show that:( 1) The improvement of global value chain position for service industry has a significant role in promoting technological progress of manufacturing industry. Among them,the innovative effect of the domestic service industry on manufacturing productivity is greater than the spillover effect brought by foreign service factor input.( 2) The improvement of service industry global value chain position on technological progress in manufacturing has significant heterogeneity. Among them,the innovation efficiency on the eastern region,private and foreign-funded enterprises is more obvious.( 3) Reducing manufacturing input costs,technological innovation and spillovers are the main influencing mechanisms for the technological progress of the manufacturing industry caused by the improvement of service industry global value chain position. Based on the status quo of China's manufacturing service input structure,the technology spillover and innovation effects of high-tech services such as information technology services,R&D and commercial services,and financial services industries on China's manufacturing industry need to be further released.
引文
[1] G. S. Olley,A. Pakes. The Dynamics of Productivity in the Telecommunications Equipment Industry[J]. Econometrica,1996,64(6).
[2] J. Levinsohn,A. Petrin. Estimating Production Function Using Inputs to Control for Observables[J]. 2000,70(2).
[3] L. Halpern,M. Koren,A. Szeidl. Imports and Productivity[J]. Cepr Discussion Papers,2005,93(1).
[4] M. Amiti,J. Konings J.. Trade Liberalization,Intermediate Inputs,and Productivity:Evidence from Indonesia[J]. American Economic Review,2007,97(5).
[5] R. Koopman,W. M. Powers,Zhi Wang. Give Credit Where Credit is Due:Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Papers,No. 11299,2010.
[6] Wang Z,Wei S J,Yu X. Characterizing Global Value Chains:Production Length and Upstreamness[J]. Nber Working Papers,2017.
[7]顾乃华.生产性服务业对工业获利能力的影响和渠道——基于城市面板数据和SFA模型的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(5).
[8]江小涓等.服务全球化与服务外包:现状、趋势及理论分析[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[9]刘维刚,倪红福.制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步:效应及作用机制[J].财贸经济,2018,39(8).
[10]吕越,李小萌,吕云龙.全球价值链中的制造业服务化与企业全要素生产率[J].南开经济研究,2017(3).
[11]刘斌,王乃嘉.制造业投入服务化与企业出口的二元边际——基于中国微观企业数据的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2016(9).
[12]孙浦阳,侯欣裕,盛斌.服务业开放、管理效率与企业出口[J].经济研究,2018,53(7):136-151.
[13]唐荣,顾乃华.上游生产性服务业价值链嵌入与制造业资源错配改善[J].产业经济研究,2018(3).
(1)2018年3月5日,李克强总理代表国务院在十三届全国人大一次会议上作《政府工作报告》,http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018lh/2018-03/22/c_1122575588.htm。
[2] J. Levinsohn,A. Petrin. Estimating Production Function Using Inputs to Control for Observables[J]. 2000,70(2).
[3] L. Halpern,M. Koren,A. Szeidl. Imports and Productivity[J]. Cepr Discussion Papers,2005,93(1).
[4] M. Amiti,J. Konings J.. Trade Liberalization,Intermediate Inputs,and Productivity:Evidence from Indonesia[J]. American Economic Review,2007,97(5).
[5] R. Koopman,W. M. Powers,Zhi Wang. Give Credit Where Credit is Due:Tracing Value Added in Global Production Chains. NBER Working Papers,No. 11299,2010.
[6] Wang Z,Wei S J,Yu X. Characterizing Global Value Chains:Production Length and Upstreamness[J]. Nber Working Papers,2017.
[7]顾乃华.生产性服务业对工业获利能力的影响和渠道——基于城市面板数据和SFA模型的实证研究[J].中国工业经济,2010(5).
[8]江小涓等.服务全球化与服务外包:现状、趋势及理论分析[M].北京:人民出版社,2008.
[9]刘维刚,倪红福.制造业投入服务化与企业技术进步:效应及作用机制[J].财贸经济,2018,39(8).
[10]吕越,李小萌,吕云龙.全球价值链中的制造业服务化与企业全要素生产率[J].南开经济研究,2017(3).
[11]刘斌,王乃嘉.制造业投入服务化与企业出口的二元边际——基于中国微观企业数据的经验研究[J].中国工业经济,2016(9).
[12]孙浦阳,侯欣裕,盛斌.服务业开放、管理效率与企业出口[J].经济研究,2018,53(7):136-151.
[13]唐荣,顾乃华.上游生产性服务业价值链嵌入与制造业资源错配改善[J].产业经济研究,2018(3).
(1)2018年3月5日,李克强总理代表国务院在十三届全国人大一次会议上作《政府工作报告》,http://www.xinhuanet.com/politics/2018lh/2018-03/22/c_1122575588.htm。