摘要
透闪石属于角闪石族矿物,与阳起石构成完全类质同象,有关透闪石和阳起石的红外光谱和拉曼光谱的特征差异还未见有报道。本文以外观特征相似的5件广西大化黑青色阳起石样品和2件新疆塔县青玉样品为研究对象,在前期矿物成分测试的基础下,采用红外光谱和拉曼光谱进行测试和对比分析。结果表明,阳起石的红外光谱和拉曼光谱都表现为闪石类矿物的特征峰,与透闪石的特征峰存在细微差异,漫反射红外光谱的差异特征是鉴别两者最准确、快速、无损的依据,并且适用于任意形状的样品,符合珠宝玉石饰品实验室检测领域的要求,可为和田玉的分类分级和产地鉴别等提供科学依据。按照GB/T 16552-2017与GB/T 16553-2017规定,广西大化黑青色阳起石可定名为和田玉。
Tremolite belongs to amphibole group minerals and is a complete isomorphism of actinolite. The difference of infrared and Raman spectra between the tremolite and actinolite has not been reported. Five bluish black actinolite samples from the Dahua in Guangxi, and two gray jade samples from the Taxkorgan County in Xinjiang are used as the research object for testing and comparing their infrared and Raman spectra on the basis of previous analyses of their mineral compositions. Testing results show that the infrared and Raman spectra of actinolite show characteristic peaks of amphibole group minerals, with subtle differences to those of tremolte, respectively. The characteristic difference of diffuse reflection spectra between tremolite and actinolite is the most accurate, fast, and nondestructive basis for identifying actinolite and tremolite in any forms. It can provide some scientific evidences for the classification, grading and locality identification of the Hetian jade. According to provisions of the GB/T 16552-2017 and GB/T 16553-2017, the bluish black actinolite samples from the Dahua in Guangxi should be named the Hetian jade.
引文
Apopei, Buzgar. 2010. The Raman study of amphiboles. Iasi, Romania: Alexandru Ioan Cuza University, 57-83
Gopal N O, Narasimhulu K V, Rao J L. 2004. EPR, optical, infrared and Raman spectral studies of Actinolitemineral. Spectrochimica
Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy, 60(11): 2441-2448
Korybska-Sad?o I, Gil G, Gunia P, Horszowski M, Sitarz M. 2018. Raman and FTIR spectra of nephrites from the Z?oty Stok and Jordan Sudetes and Fore-Sudetic Block, SW Poland). Journal of Molecular Structure 1166: 40-47
卢保奇. 2005. 四川石棉软玉猫眼和蛇纹石猫眼的宝石矿物学及其谱学研究. 博士学位论文. 上海: 上海大学, 34-39
彭帆, 赵庆华, 裴磊, 王超, 尹作为. 2017. 广西大化墨玉的矿物学及谱学特征研究. 光谱学与光谱分析, 37(7): 2237-2241
彭文世, 刘高魁. 1982. 矿物红外光谱图集. 北京: 科学出版社, 364
申晓萍, 刘莉, 魏进国. 2017. 广西大化黑青色和田玉的矿物组成. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 19(5): 25-29
唐延龄, 陈葆章, 蒋壬华. 1994. 中国和阗玉. 乌鲁木齐: 新疆人民出版社
唐延龄, 刘德权, 周汝洪. 2002. 和田玉的名称、文化、玉质和矿床类型之探讨, 岩石矿物学杂志, 21(S1): 13-21
王长秋, 孙鹏, 王时麒. 2014. 大化墨玉的矿物学特征. 岩石矿物学杂志, 33(S2): 1-9
王铎, 徐泽彬, 孙猛, 曹姝旻. 2009. 不同产地碧玉的红外光谱研究. 红外技术, 31(12): 698-701, 707
杨晓丹, 施光海, 刘琰. 2012. 新疆和田黑色透闪石质软玉振动光谱特征及颜色成因. 光谱学与光谱分析, 32(3): 681-685
张蓓莉. 2006. 系统宝石学. 2版. 北京: 地质出版社, 365-369
赵虹霞, 干福熹. 2009. 不同产地软玉的拉曼光谱分析及在古玉器无损研究中的应用. 光散射学报, 21(4): 345-354
支颖雪, 廖冠琳, 陈琼, 李英哲, 周征宇. 2011. 贵州罗甸软玉的宝石矿物学特征. 宝石和宝石学杂志, 13(4): 7-13
邹天人, 郭立鹤, 李维华, 段玉然. 2002. 和田玉、玛纳斯碧玉和岫岩老玉的拉曼光谱研究. 岩石矿物学杂志, 21(S1): 72-78