美国设计规范IBC 2000和UBC 97对抗震设计的差异浅析

详细信息 本馆镜像全文    |  推荐本文 | | 获取馆网全文

英文篇名：Analysis of Differences between American Design Code IBC 2000 and UBC 97 for Seismic Design 中文刊名：医药工程设计 英文刊名：Pharmaceutical & Engineering Design 作者：邵辉 英文作者：Shao Hui(Westinghouse Industry Products International Company LLC Shanghai Office Shanghai ; 200051) 中文关键词：地震分区 ; 地震设计重现期 ; 结构重要性系数 ; 结构类别修正系数 ; 地震力影响系数 英文关键词：seismic zone ; return period ; structural important factor ; structural category modification factor ; seismic influence factor 出版日期：2009-08-20 机构：美国西屋工业产品国际公司上海代表处; 年：2009 期：04 出版单位：医药工程设计

摘要

从IBC 2000和UBC 97在地震参数、结构重要性系数、地震分区的方面来阐述两者在抗震设计中的差别,并通过实例来分析在相同条件下IBC 2000和UBC 97所得出的不同地震基底剪力的原因。
Based on the seismic design parameters,such as structural important factor and seismic zone,in this article,the differences existed in IBC 2000 and UBC 97 were described.With some practical examples,then,the cause of why different seismic shear forces in base were obtained with IBC 2000 and UBC 97 was analyzed.

引文

[1]International Code Council.International Building Code.Falls Church,VA,2000(IBC2000).
    [2]International Conference of building Officials.Uniform Building Code.Whittier,CA,1997(UBC1997).
    [3]Building Seismic Safety Council.National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program.Recommended Provisions for the development of Seismic Regulations for New Buildings.Washington D.D,1994(NEHRP1994).
    [4]American Concrete Institute.Building Code Requirement for Structural Concrete(ACI318-99).