摘要
文章利用热释光剂量计(TLD)在连续6个月内多次测量同点位环境γ辐射剂量率,同时利用便携式γ辐射剂量率仪器开展瞬时测量,通过对结果进行分析,比较两种测量方法差异并探讨差异的原因,为环境γ辐射剂量率测量工作提供科学参考。
In this paper, thermoluminescence dosimeter(TLD) is used to measure environmental γ radiation dose rate at the same location for many times in 6 consecutive months. Meanwhile, portable γ radiation dose rate instrument is used to carry out instantaneous measurement. Through analysis of the results, the differences between the two methods are compared and the reasons are discussed,providing scientific reference for environmental γ radiation dose rate measurement.
引文
[1]殷小芳.个人辐射剂量仪的研制[D].成都:成都理工大学,2012.
[2]宫增艳,赵广翠,李雪贞,等.不同方法监测环境γ辐射剂量率的结果比较与分析[J].中国辐射卫生,2018,27(1):69-73.
[3]潘自强.电离辐射环境监测与评价[M].北京:原子能出版社,2007.
[4] GB/T 10264-2014.中华人民共和国国家质量监督检验疫总局.个人和环境监测用热释光剂量测量系统[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1993.
[5] GBZ 128-2016.中华人民共和国国家卫生和计划生育委员会.职业性外照射个人监测规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,2016.
[6] GB/T 14583-9.国家环境保护局.3环境地表γ辐射剂量率测定规范[S].北京:中国标准出版社,1993.