摘要
《专利法》第65条第1款第2句是为了减轻权利人的举证责任,以侵权人因侵权所获得的利益来推定权利人实际损失的规定。在司法实践中,权利人很难证明侵权人的销售费用以及一般管理费用。如果要求权利人承担销售费用以及一般管理费的举证责任,显然与"减轻权利人举证责任"之立法目的相抵触。
In the second sentence of Article 65, paragraph 1 of the Patent Law, in order to alleviate the burden of proof of patentees, the infringer's tort income is determined as the loss of the patentee. However,it is dif?cult in practice for patentees to prove the speci?c problem of the infringer's selling expenses and general management expenses. If the general burden of infringer's selling expenses and general management expenses is asked to be borne by patentees, it will contravene the purpose of this regulation, "to lighten the proof of patentees".
引文
[1]田村善之.知的財産法[M].第5版.日本:有斐閣,2010:312.
[2]尹新天.中国专利法详解(缩编版)[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2012:568.
1浙江省温州市中级人民法院(2006)温民三初字第135号。
2 1984年制定的《专利法》和1992年修改的《专利法》均没有涉及专利侵权赔偿数额的规定。本条是2000年修改《专利法》时增加的条款,2008年修改《专利法》时对其内容作了调整。