比较情境下的政策变迁:西欧和北美之外的倡议联盟框架应用
|
摘要
倡议联盟框架(ACF)是应用最广泛的政策过程理论之一,主要应用于西欧和北美。本文在回顾ACF的基础上,概述了ACF在西欧和北美之外的现有应用,并对本期专刊的四篇关于ACF在菲律宾、中国、印度与肯尼亚的实践应用的文章进行了介绍。最后,本文提出了西欧和北美以外继续应用ACF的论点,以及克服在比较公共政策研究中使用ACF的挑战的研究议程。
The Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF) is one of the most widely used policy process theories, primarily in Western Europe and North America. Based on a review of ACF, this article outlines the existing applications of ACF in Western Europe and North America, and introduces the four articles in this special issue on the practical application of ACF in the Philippines, China, India and Kenya. Finally, this article presents the arguments for continued application of ACF outside Western Europe and North America, as well as the research agenda to overcome the challenge of using ACF in comparative public policy research.
The Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF) is one of the most widely used policy process theories, primarily in Western Europe and North America. Based on a review of ACF, this article outlines the existing applications of ACF in Western Europe and North America, and introduces the four articles in this special issue on the practical application of ACF in the Philippines, China, India and Kenya. Finally, this article presents the arguments for continued application of ACF outside Western Europe and North America, as well as the research agenda to overcome the challenge of using ACF in comparative public policy research.
引文
[1]Ainuson,K.,2009,An advocacy coalition approach to water policy change in Ghana:A look at belief systems and policy oriented learning.Journal of African Studies and Development,1(2),pp.16–27.
[2]Arnold,F.E.,2003,Native forest policy in Chile:Understanding sectoral process dynamics in a country with an emerging economy.International Forestry Review,5(4),pp.317–328.doi:10.1505/IFOR.5.4.317.22662.
[3]Beverwijk,J.,2005,The Genesis of a System:Coalition Formation in Mozambican Higher Education,1993–2003,(The Netherlands:CHEPS/UT).
[4]Beverwijk,J.,Goedegebuure,L.and Huisman,J.,2008,Policy change in Nascent subsystems:Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003.Policy Sciences,41,pp.357–377.doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9072-0.
[5]Bulkeley,H.,2000,Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network.Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy,18(6),pp.727–748.doi:10.1068/c9905j.
[6]Cairney,P.,2012,Understanding Public Policy:Theories and Issues,(New York,NY:Palgrave).
[7]Capano,G.and Howlett,M.,2009,Introduction:The determinants of policy change:Advancing the debate.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11(1),pp.1–5.doi:10.1080/13876980802648227.
[8]Capano,G.,2009,Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11,pp.7–31.doi:10.1080/13876980802648284.
[9]Carter,N.,2001,The Politics of the Environment:Ideas,Activism,Policy,(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press).
[10]Carvalho,G.O.,2001,Metallurgical development in the Caraja’s area:A case study of the evolution of environmental policy formation in Brazil.Society and Natural Resources,14,pp.127–143.doi:10.1080/089419201300000535.
[11]Chen,P.,2003,Advocating online censorship.Australian Journal of Public Administration,62(2),pp.41–64.doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00324.
[12]Christopoulos,D.and Ingold,K.,2011,Distinguishing between political brokerage&political entrepreneurship.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,10,pp.36–42.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.006.
[13]Dressel,B.,2012,Targeting the public purse:Advocacy coalitions and public?nance in the Philippines.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.65S–84S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460055.
[14]Easton,D.,1971,The Political System:An Inquiry Into the State of Political Sciences,2nd ed.(New York,NY:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc).
[15]Elliott,C.and Schlaepfer,R.,2001,The advocacy coalition framework:Application to the policy process for the development of forest certi?cation in Sweden.Journal of European Public Policy,8(4),pp.642–661.doi:10.1080/13501760110064438.
[16]Farquharson,K.,2003,In?uencing policy transnationally:Pro-and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks.Australian Journal of Public Administration,62(4),pp.80–92.doi:10.1111/j..2003.00351.x.
[17]Feldman,E.J.,Heidenheimer,A.J.,Heclo,H.,Adams,C.T.,Smith,T.A.,Hayward,J.,Watson,M.,1978,Comparative public policy:Field or method?Comparative Politics,10(2),pp.287–305.doi:10.2307/421650.
[18]Francesch-Huidobro,M.and Mai,Q.,2012,Climate advocacy coalitions in Guangdong,China.Administration&Society,44,pp.43S–64S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460068.
[19]Freeman,G.P.,1985,National styles and policy sectors:Explaining structured variation.Journal of Public Policy,5(4),pp.467–496.doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003287.
[20]Gupta,K.,2012,Comparative public policy:Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process.Policy Studies Journal,40(S1),pp.11–26.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00443.x.
[21]Gupta,K.,2014,A Comparative Policy Analysis of Coalition Strategies:Case Studies of Nuclear Energy and Forest Management in India.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.356–372.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.886812.
[22]Han,H.,Swedlow,B.and Unger,D.,2014,Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China?Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.313–334.doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.857065.
[23]Henry,A.D.,2011,Ideology,power,and the structure of policy networks.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.361–383.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x Henry,A.D.and Dietz,Th.,2011,Information,networks,and the complexity of trust in commons governance.International Journal of the Commons,5(2),pp.188–212.
[24]Henry,A.D.and Dietz,Th.,2012,Understanding environmental cognition.Organization&Environment,25(3),pp.238–258.doi:10.1177/1086026612456538.
[25]Hogl,K.,2000,The Austrian domestic forest policy community in change?Impacts of the globalisation and Europeanisation of forest politics.Forest Policy and Economics,1,pp.3–13.
[26]Holmes,T.and Scoones,I.,2001,Participatory environmental processes:Experiences from North and South,in:Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment.International Institute of Environment and Empowerment.International Institute for Environment and Development,Sustainable Agriculture Programme.
[27]Howlett,M.and Cashore,B.,2009,The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change:Understanding policy change as a methodological problem.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11(1),pp.33–46.doi:10.1080/13876980802648144.
[28]Hsu,S.,2005,Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan.The Social Science Journal,42,pp.215–229.doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.002.
[29]Ingold,K.,2011,Network structures within policy processes:Coalitions,power,and brokerage in Swiss climate policy.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.435–459.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x.
[30]Ingold,K.and Varone,F.,2011,Treating policy brokers seriously:Evidence from the climate policy.Journal of Public Administration Research Theory(JPART),22,pp.319–346.
[31]Jang,J.H.and Han,C.H.,2010,Advocacy Coalitions in Regulating Big Business in South Korea:Change of Chaebols Holding Company Policy.Korea Observer,41(2),pp.161–188.
[32]Jenkins-Smith,H.,Nohrstedt,D.,Weible,C.and Sabatier,P.,2014,The advocacy coalition framework:Foundations,evolution,and ongoing research,in:P.Sabatier and C.Weible(Eds)Theories of the Policy Process,3rd ed.(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.183–223.
[33]John,P.,1998,Analyzing Public Policy,(New York,NY:Cassell).
[34]Jones,B.D.and Baumgartner,F.R.,2012,From there to here:Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing.Policy Studies Journal,40(1),pp.1–20.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x.
[35]Kickert,W.,2003,Beneath consensual corporatism:Traditions of governance in the Netherlands.Public Administration,81(1),pp.119–140.doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00339.
[36]Kim,P.S.,2012,Advocacy coalitions and policy change:The case of South Korea’s Saemangeum project.
[37]Kim,S.,2003,Irresolvable cultural con?icts and conservation/development arguments:Analysis of Korea’s Saemangeum project.Policy Sciences,36,pp.125–149.doi:10.1023/A:1024866323901.
[38]Kingiri,A.N.,2011,Conflicting advocacy coalitions in an evolving modern biotechnology regulatory subsystem:Policy learning and in?uencing Kenya’s regulatory policy process.Science and Public Policy,38(3),pp.199–211.doi:10.3152/030234211X12924093660273.
[39]Kingiri,A.N.,2014,Comparative Strategic Behavior of Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Brokers:The Case of Kenya’s Biosafety Regulatory Policy.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.373–395.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.942569.
[40]Kübler,D.,2001,Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework:An application to Swiss drug policy.Journal of European Public Policy,8(4),pp.623–641.doi:10.1080/1350176011 0064429.
[41]Lahat,L.,2011,How can leaders’perceptions guide policy analysis in an era of governance?Policy Sciences,44(2),pp.135–155.
[42]Laudan,L.,1977,Progress and Its Problems:Towards a Theory of Scienti?c Growth,(Berkeley,CA:University of California Press).
[43]Le ifeld,P.,20 13,Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework:A discourse network analysis of German Pension politics.Policy Studies Journal,41(1),pp.169–198.doi:10.1111/psj.12007.
[44]Li,W.,2012,Advocating environmental interests in China.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.26S–42S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460079.
[45]Lindvall,J.and Rothstein,B.,2006,Sweden:The fall of the strong state.Scandinavian Political Studies,29(1),pp.47–63.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x.
[46]Marfo,E.and Mc Keown,J.P.,2013,Negotiating the supply of legal timber to the domestic market in Ghana:Explaining policy change intent using the advocacy coalition framework.Forest Policy and Economics,32,pp.23–31.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.007.
[47]Mc Dougal,M.S.,1952,The comparative study of law for policy purposes:Value clari?cation as an instrument of democratic world order.The Yale Law Journal,61,pp.915–946.doi:10.2307/793456.
[48]Montefrio,M.and Sonnenfeld,D.A.,2011,Forests,fuel,or food?Competing coalitions and biofuels policy making in the Philippines.The Journal of Environment&Development,20(1),pp.27–49.doi:10.1177/1070496510394321.
[49]Montefrio,M.,2014,State versus Indigenous Peoples’Rights:Comparative Analysis of Stable System Parameters,Policy Constraints and the Process of Delegitimation.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.335–355.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.938912.
[50]Nagel,P.,2006,Policy games and venue shopping:Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in Rehab services.Australian Journal of Policy Analysis,65(4),pp.3–16.
[51]Nohrstedt,D.and Weible,C.M.,2010,The logic of policy change after crisis:Proximity and subsystem interaction.Risk,Hazards&Crisis in Public Policy,1(2),pp.1–32.doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1035.
[52]Ortmann,S.,2012,Policy advocacy in a competitive authoritarian regime:The growth of civil society and agenda setting in Singapore.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.13S–25S.doi:10.1177/009539971 2460080.
[53]Parsons,W.,1995,Public Policy:An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis,(Northampton,MA:Edward Elgar).
[54]Rommetvedt,H.,2005,Norway:Resources count,but votes decide?From neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism.West European Politics,28(4),pp.740–763.doi:10.1080/01402380500 216674.
[55]Runkle,K.,La Follette,S.and Alamu,J.,2013,Public health policy options for Improving well-Water Quality in West Point,Liberia.World Medical&Health Policy,5(4),pp.304–323.doi:10.1002/wmh3.73.
[56]Sabatier,P.A.and Jenkins-Smith,H.,1993,Policy Change and Learning:An Advocacy Coalition Approach,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press).
[57]Sabatier,P.A.and Jenkins-Smith,H.,1999,The advocacy coalition framework:An assessment,in:P.A.Sabatier(ed)Theories of the Policy Process,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.117–166.
[58]Sabatier,P.A.and Weible,C.M.,2007,The advocacy coalition framework:Innovations and clarifications,in:P.A.Sabatier(Ed)Theories of the Policy Process,2nd ed.(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.189–222.
[59]Sabatier,P.A.,1988,An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.Policy Sciences,21,pp.129–168.doi:10.1007/BF00136406.
[60]Sabatier,P.A.,1998,The advocacy coalition framework:Revisions and relevance for Europe.Journal of European Public Policy,5(1),pp.98–130.doi:10.1080/13501768880000051.
[61]Sabatier,P.A.,1999,Fostering the development of policy theory,in:P.A.Sabatier(Ed)Theories of the Policy Process,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.261–276.
[62]Santa,E.D.,2013,The politics of implementing Philippine tourism policy:A policy network and advocacy coalition framework approach.Asia Paci?c Journal of Tourism Research,18(8),pp.913–933.doi:10.1080/10941665.2012.717958.
[63]Sato,H.,1999,The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis:The case of smoking control in Japan.Policy Studies Journal,27(1),pp.28–44.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01951.x.
[64]Schattschneider,E.E.,1960,The Semi-Sovereign People,(New York,NY:Holt).
[65]Scott,I.,2012,Analyzing advocacy issues in Asia.Administration and Society,44,pp.4S–12S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460081.
[66]Simon,H.A.,1996,The Sciences of the Arti?cial,3rd ed.(Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press).
[67]Steinberg,P.F.,2003,Understanding policy change in developing countries:The spheres of in?uence frame-work.Global Environmental Politics,3(1),pp.11–32.doi:10.1162/152638003763336365.
[68]Tewari,D.D.,2001,Is commercial forestry sustainable in South Africa?The changing institutional and policy needs.Forest Policy and Economics,2,pp.333–353.doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00028-4.
[69]Villamor,G.B.,2006,The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy:An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF).Forest Policy and Economics,9(2),pp.162–178.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.003.
[70]Weible,C.M.and Nohrstedt,D.,2012,The advocacy coalition framework:Coalitions,learning,and policy change,in:E.Araral,S.Fritzen,M.Howlett,M.Ramesh,and X.Wu(Eds)Handbook of Public Policy,(New York,NY:Routledge).
[71]Weible,C.M.and Sabatier,P.A.,2005,Comparing policy networks:Marine protected areas in California.The Policy Studies Journal,33(2),pp.181–201.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00101.x
[72]Weible,C.M.,Sabatier,P.A.and Mc Queen,K.,2009,Themes and variations:Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework.Policy Studies Journal,37(1),pp.121–140.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
[73]Weible,C.M.,Sabatier,P.A.,Jenkins-Smith,H.C.,Nohrstedt,D.,Henry,A.D.and de Leon,P.,2011,A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework:An introduction to the special issue.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.349–360.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x.
[74]Zafonte,M.and Sabatier,P.A.,2004,Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process:Automotive pollution control,1963–1989.The Policy Studies Journal,32(1),pp.75–107.doi:10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00054.
(1)表1中所列的27个ACF应用研究是在Pro Quest全文数据库和谷歌学术中通过关键词“advocacy coalition framework”搜集的。所得结果是通过手动搜索确定(不一定)使用ACF作为实证研究的主要理论视角。参见参考文献[32],简金斯-斯密斯等人对224项ACF应用研究的描述。
[2]Arnold,F.E.,2003,Native forest policy in Chile:Understanding sectoral process dynamics in a country with an emerging economy.International Forestry Review,5(4),pp.317–328.doi:10.1505/IFOR.5.4.317.22662.
[3]Beverwijk,J.,2005,The Genesis of a System:Coalition Formation in Mozambican Higher Education,1993–2003,(The Netherlands:CHEPS/UT).
[4]Beverwijk,J.,Goedegebuure,L.and Huisman,J.,2008,Policy change in Nascent subsystems:Mozambican higher education policy 1993–2003.Policy Sciences,41,pp.357–377.doi:10.1007/s11077-008-9072-0.
[5]Bulkeley,H.,2000,Discourse coalitions and the Australian climate change policy network.Environment and Planning C:Government and Policy,18(6),pp.727–748.doi:10.1068/c9905j.
[6]Cairney,P.,2012,Understanding Public Policy:Theories and Issues,(New York,NY:Palgrave).
[7]Capano,G.and Howlett,M.,2009,Introduction:The determinants of policy change:Advancing the debate.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11(1),pp.1–5.doi:10.1080/13876980802648227.
[8]Capano,G.,2009,Understanding policy change as an epistemological and theoretical problem.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11,pp.7–31.doi:10.1080/13876980802648284.
[9]Carter,N.,2001,The Politics of the Environment:Ideas,Activism,Policy,(Cambridge:Cambridge University Press).
[10]Carvalho,G.O.,2001,Metallurgical development in the Caraja’s area:A case study of the evolution of environmental policy formation in Brazil.Society and Natural Resources,14,pp.127–143.doi:10.1080/089419201300000535.
[11]Chen,P.,2003,Advocating online censorship.Australian Journal of Public Administration,62(2),pp.41–64.doi:10.1111/1467-8497.00324.
[12]Christopoulos,D.and Ingold,K.,2011,Distinguishing between political brokerage&political entrepreneurship.Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,10,pp.36–42.doi:10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.01.006.
[13]Dressel,B.,2012,Targeting the public purse:Advocacy coalitions and public?nance in the Philippines.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.65S–84S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460055.
[14]Easton,D.,1971,The Political System:An Inquiry Into the State of Political Sciences,2nd ed.(New York,NY:Alfred A.Knopf,Inc).
[15]Elliott,C.and Schlaepfer,R.,2001,The advocacy coalition framework:Application to the policy process for the development of forest certi?cation in Sweden.Journal of European Public Policy,8(4),pp.642–661.doi:10.1080/13501760110064438.
[16]Farquharson,K.,2003,In?uencing policy transnationally:Pro-and anti-tobacco global advocacy networks.Australian Journal of Public Administration,62(4),pp.80–92.doi:10.1111/j..2003.00351.x.
[17]Feldman,E.J.,Heidenheimer,A.J.,Heclo,H.,Adams,C.T.,Smith,T.A.,Hayward,J.,Watson,M.,1978,Comparative public policy:Field or method?Comparative Politics,10(2),pp.287–305.doi:10.2307/421650.
[18]Francesch-Huidobro,M.and Mai,Q.,2012,Climate advocacy coalitions in Guangdong,China.Administration&Society,44,pp.43S–64S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460068.
[19]Freeman,G.P.,1985,National styles and policy sectors:Explaining structured variation.Journal of Public Policy,5(4),pp.467–496.doi:10.1017/S0143814X00003287.
[20]Gupta,K.,2012,Comparative public policy:Using the comparative method to advance our understanding of the policy process.Policy Studies Journal,40(S1),pp.11–26.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2012.00443.x.
[21]Gupta,K.,2014,A Comparative Policy Analysis of Coalition Strategies:Case Studies of Nuclear Energy and Forest Management in India.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.356–372.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.886812.
[22]Han,H.,Swedlow,B.and Unger,D.,2014,Policy Advocacy Coalitions as Causes of Policy Change in China?Analyzing Evidence from Contemporary Environmental Politics.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.313–334.doi:10.1080/13876988.2013.857065.
[23]Henry,A.D.,2011,Ideology,power,and the structure of policy networks.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.361–383.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00413.x Henry,A.D.and Dietz,Th.,2011,Information,networks,and the complexity of trust in commons governance.International Journal of the Commons,5(2),pp.188–212.
[24]Henry,A.D.and Dietz,Th.,2012,Understanding environmental cognition.Organization&Environment,25(3),pp.238–258.doi:10.1177/1086026612456538.
[25]Hogl,K.,2000,The Austrian domestic forest policy community in change?Impacts of the globalisation and Europeanisation of forest politics.Forest Policy and Economics,1,pp.3–13.
[26]Holmes,T.and Scoones,I.,2001,Participatory environmental processes:Experiences from North and South,in:Deliberative Democracy and Citizen Empowerment.International Institute of Environment and Empowerment.International Institute for Environment and Development,Sustainable Agriculture Programme.
[27]Howlett,M.and Cashore,B.,2009,The dependent variable problem in the study of policy change:Understanding policy change as a methodological problem.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,11(1),pp.33–46.doi:10.1080/13876980802648144.
[28]Hsu,S.,2005,Advocacy coalitions and policy change on nuclear power utilization in Taiwan.The Social Science Journal,42,pp.215–229.doi:10.1016/j.soscij.2005.03.002.
[29]Ingold,K.,2011,Network structures within policy processes:Coalitions,power,and brokerage in Swiss climate policy.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.435–459.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00416.x.
[30]Ingold,K.and Varone,F.,2011,Treating policy brokers seriously:Evidence from the climate policy.Journal of Public Administration Research Theory(JPART),22,pp.319–346.
[31]Jang,J.H.and Han,C.H.,2010,Advocacy Coalitions in Regulating Big Business in South Korea:Change of Chaebols Holding Company Policy.Korea Observer,41(2),pp.161–188.
[32]Jenkins-Smith,H.,Nohrstedt,D.,Weible,C.and Sabatier,P.,2014,The advocacy coalition framework:Foundations,evolution,and ongoing research,in:P.Sabatier and C.Weible(Eds)Theories of the Policy Process,3rd ed.(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.183–223.
[33]John,P.,1998,Analyzing Public Policy,(New York,NY:Cassell).
[34]Jones,B.D.and Baumgartner,F.R.,2012,From there to here:Punctuated equilibrium to the general punctuation thesis to a theory of government information processing.Policy Studies Journal,40(1),pp.1–20.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00431.x.
[35]Kickert,W.,2003,Beneath consensual corporatism:Traditions of governance in the Netherlands.Public Administration,81(1),pp.119–140.doi:10.1111/1467-9299.00339.
[36]Kim,P.S.,2012,Advocacy coalitions and policy change:The case of South Korea’s Saemangeum project.
[37]Kim,S.,2003,Irresolvable cultural con?icts and conservation/development arguments:Analysis of Korea’s Saemangeum project.Policy Sciences,36,pp.125–149.doi:10.1023/A:1024866323901.
[38]Kingiri,A.N.,2011,Conflicting advocacy coalitions in an evolving modern biotechnology regulatory subsystem:Policy learning and in?uencing Kenya’s regulatory policy process.Science and Public Policy,38(3),pp.199–211.doi:10.3152/030234211X12924093660273.
[39]Kingiri,A.N.,2014,Comparative Strategic Behavior of Advocacy Coalitions and Policy Brokers:The Case of Kenya’s Biosafety Regulatory Policy.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.373–395.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.942569.
[40]Kübler,D.,2001,Understanding policy change with the advocacy coalition framework:An application to Swiss drug policy.Journal of European Public Policy,8(4),pp.623–641.doi:10.1080/1350176011 0064429.
[41]Lahat,L.,2011,How can leaders’perceptions guide policy analysis in an era of governance?Policy Sciences,44(2),pp.135–155.
[42]Laudan,L.,1977,Progress and Its Problems:Towards a Theory of Scienti?c Growth,(Berkeley,CA:University of California Press).
[43]Le ifeld,P.,20 13,Reconceptualizing major policy change in the advocacy coalition framework:A discourse network analysis of German Pension politics.Policy Studies Journal,41(1),pp.169–198.doi:10.1111/psj.12007.
[44]Li,W.,2012,Advocating environmental interests in China.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.26S–42S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460079.
[45]Lindvall,J.and Rothstein,B.,2006,Sweden:The fall of the strong state.Scandinavian Political Studies,29(1),pp.47–63.doi:10.1111/j.1467-9477.2006.00141.x.
[46]Marfo,E.and Mc Keown,J.P.,2013,Negotiating the supply of legal timber to the domestic market in Ghana:Explaining policy change intent using the advocacy coalition framework.Forest Policy and Economics,32,pp.23–31.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2012.12.007.
[47]Mc Dougal,M.S.,1952,The comparative study of law for policy purposes:Value clari?cation as an instrument of democratic world order.The Yale Law Journal,61,pp.915–946.doi:10.2307/793456.
[48]Montefrio,M.and Sonnenfeld,D.A.,2011,Forests,fuel,or food?Competing coalitions and biofuels policy making in the Philippines.The Journal of Environment&Development,20(1),pp.27–49.doi:10.1177/1070496510394321.
[49]Montefrio,M.,2014,State versus Indigenous Peoples’Rights:Comparative Analysis of Stable System Parameters,Policy Constraints and the Process of Delegitimation.Journal of Comparative Policy Analysis:Research and Practice,16(4),pp.335–355.doi:10.1080/13876988.2014.938912.
[50]Nagel,P.,2006,Policy games and venue shopping:Working the stakeholder interface to broker policy change in Rehab services.Australian Journal of Policy Analysis,65(4),pp.3–16.
[51]Nohrstedt,D.and Weible,C.M.,2010,The logic of policy change after crisis:Proximity and subsystem interaction.Risk,Hazards&Crisis in Public Policy,1(2),pp.1–32.doi:10.2202/1944-4079.1035.
[52]Ortmann,S.,2012,Policy advocacy in a competitive authoritarian regime:The growth of civil society and agenda setting in Singapore.Administration&Society,44(6 Suppl),pp.13S–25S.doi:10.1177/009539971 2460080.
[53]Parsons,W.,1995,Public Policy:An Introduction to the Theory and Practice of Policy Analysis,(Northampton,MA:Edward Elgar).
[54]Rommetvedt,H.,2005,Norway:Resources count,but votes decide?From neo-corporatist representation to neo-pluralist parliamentarism.West European Politics,28(4),pp.740–763.doi:10.1080/01402380500 216674.
[55]Runkle,K.,La Follette,S.and Alamu,J.,2013,Public health policy options for Improving well-Water Quality in West Point,Liberia.World Medical&Health Policy,5(4),pp.304–323.doi:10.1002/wmh3.73.
[56]Sabatier,P.A.and Jenkins-Smith,H.,1993,Policy Change and Learning:An Advocacy Coalition Approach,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press).
[57]Sabatier,P.A.and Jenkins-Smith,H.,1999,The advocacy coalition framework:An assessment,in:P.A.Sabatier(ed)Theories of the Policy Process,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.117–166.
[58]Sabatier,P.A.and Weible,C.M.,2007,The advocacy coalition framework:Innovations and clarifications,in:P.A.Sabatier(Ed)Theories of the Policy Process,2nd ed.(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.189–222.
[59]Sabatier,P.A.,1988,An advocacy coalition framework of policy change and the role of policy-oriented learning therein.Policy Sciences,21,pp.129–168.doi:10.1007/BF00136406.
[60]Sabatier,P.A.,1998,The advocacy coalition framework:Revisions and relevance for Europe.Journal of European Public Policy,5(1),pp.98–130.doi:10.1080/13501768880000051.
[61]Sabatier,P.A.,1999,Fostering the development of policy theory,in:P.A.Sabatier(Ed)Theories of the Policy Process,(Boulder,CO:Westview Press),pp.261–276.
[62]Santa,E.D.,2013,The politics of implementing Philippine tourism policy:A policy network and advocacy coalition framework approach.Asia Paci?c Journal of Tourism Research,18(8),pp.913–933.doi:10.1080/10941665.2012.717958.
[63]Sato,H.,1999,The advocacy coalition framework and the policy process analysis:The case of smoking control in Japan.Policy Studies Journal,27(1),pp.28–44.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.1999.tb01951.x.
[64]Schattschneider,E.E.,1960,The Semi-Sovereign People,(New York,NY:Holt).
[65]Scott,I.,2012,Analyzing advocacy issues in Asia.Administration and Society,44,pp.4S–12S.doi:10.1177/0095399712460081.
[66]Simon,H.A.,1996,The Sciences of the Arti?cial,3rd ed.(Cambridge,MA:The MIT Press).
[67]Steinberg,P.F.,2003,Understanding policy change in developing countries:The spheres of in?uence frame-work.Global Environmental Politics,3(1),pp.11–32.doi:10.1162/152638003763336365.
[68]Tewari,D.D.,2001,Is commercial forestry sustainable in South Africa?The changing institutional and policy needs.Forest Policy and Economics,2,pp.333–353.doi:10.1016/S1389-9341(01)00028-4.
[69]Villamor,G.B.,2006,The rise of protected area policy in the Philippine forest policy:An analysis from the perspective of Advocacy Coalition Framework(ACF).Forest Policy and Economics,9(2),pp.162–178.doi:10.1016/j.forpol.2005.04.003.
[70]Weible,C.M.and Nohrstedt,D.,2012,The advocacy coalition framework:Coalitions,learning,and policy change,in:E.Araral,S.Fritzen,M.Howlett,M.Ramesh,and X.Wu(Eds)Handbook of Public Policy,(New York,NY:Routledge).
[71]Weible,C.M.and Sabatier,P.A.,2005,Comparing policy networks:Marine protected areas in California.The Policy Studies Journal,33(2),pp.181–201.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2005.00101.x
[72]Weible,C.M.,Sabatier,P.A.and Mc Queen,K.,2009,Themes and variations:Taking stock of the advocacy coalition framework.Policy Studies Journal,37(1),pp.121–140.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2008.00299.x.
[73]Weible,C.M.,Sabatier,P.A.,Jenkins-Smith,H.C.,Nohrstedt,D.,Henry,A.D.and de Leon,P.,2011,A quarter century of the advocacy coalition framework:An introduction to the special issue.Policy Studies Journal,39(3),pp.349–360.doi:10.1111/j.1541-0072.2011.00412.x.
[74]Zafonte,M.and Sabatier,P.A.,2004,Short-term versus long-term coalitions in the policy process:Automotive pollution control,1963–1989.The Policy Studies Journal,32(1),pp.75–107.doi:10.1111/j.0190-292X.2004.00054.
(1)表1中所列的27个ACF应用研究是在Pro Quest全文数据库和谷歌学术中通过关键词“advocacy coalition framework”搜集的。所得结果是通过手动搜索确定(不一定)使用ACF作为实证研究的主要理论视角。参见参考文献[32],简金斯-斯密斯等人对224项ACF应用研究的描述。