扶贫制度环境对东部企业西部分支机构绩效的影响机制研究
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Impact of Anti-Poverty Institutional Environment on Performance of Western Branches of Firms Based in Developed East China
  • 作者:田宇 ; 王克 ; 黄卫 ; 郑雁玲
  • 英文作者:TIAN Yu;WANG Ke;HUANG Wei;ZHENG Yanling;Sun Yat-sen University;Jishou University;Guilin University of Aerospace Technology;
  • 关键词:扶贫制度环境 ; 本地嵌入 ; 绩效 ; 制度距离
  • 英文关键词:poverty relief institutional environment;;local embeddedness;;company performance;;institutional distance
  • 中文刊名:GLXB
  • 英文刊名:Chinese Journal of Management
  • 机构:中山大学管理学院;吉首大学商学院;桂林航天工业学院管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-03-01
  • 出版单位:管理学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.16;No.150
  • 基金:国家自然科学基金资助项目(71662012,71503101)
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GLXB201903004
  • 页数:8
  • CN:03
  • ISSN:42-1725/C
  • 分类号:32-39
摘要
基于制度理论和金字塔底层市场理论,采用122份有效样本数据,探究了我国西部地区扶贫制度环境与东部企业西部分支机构绩效之间关系的作用机制及边界条件。研究结果表明,扶贫制度环境对东部企业西部分支机构绩效具有显著正向影响;扶贫制度环境直接正向影响本地嵌入,本地嵌入对分支机构绩效也存在显著正向影响,以及在扶贫制度环境与东部企业西部分支机构绩效间起中介作用;制度距离调节了扶贫制度环境与东部企业西部分支机构绩效之间的中介作用。研究结果不仅对于西部地区扶贫政策制定具有理论指导作用,也为东部地区企业如何在西部地区提高企业绩效提供了参考。
        From institutional and BOP perspective,the study attempts to investigate the relationship between anti-poverty institutional environment and company performance as well as its boundary conditions,with data of 122 valid samples. It is found that anti-poverty institutional environment has significant positive effect on the performance of the western branches of firms located in the developed East China and on local embeddedness as well,and affects the performance of the branches significantly and positively. Local embeddedness plays a mediating role in between and institutional distance moderates the mediation. These findings contribute theoretically to future anti-poverty policy-making,and practically to company operation in undeveloped region.
引文
[1]李元旭,宋渊洋.地方政府通过所得税优惠保护本地企业吗---来自中国上市公司的经验证据[J].中国工业经济,2011,30(5):149-159.
    [2]宋渊洋,黄礼伟.为什么中国企业难以国内跨地区经营?[J].管理世界,2014(12):115-133.
    [3]宋铁波,吴小节,汪秀琼.制度差异、企业跨区域经营经验与市场进入模式[J].管理评论,2016,28(4):166-177.
    [4]LONDON T,HART S L.Reinventing Strategies for E-merging Markets:Beyond the Transnational Model[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2004,35(5):350-370.
    [5]RIVERA-SANTOS M,RUFIN C.Global Village vs.Small Town:Understanding Networks at the Base of the Pyramid[J].International Business Review,2010,19(2),126-139.
    [6]汪三贵.在发展中战胜贫困---对中国30年大规模减贫经验的总结与评价[J].管理世界,2008(11):78-88.
    [7]刘林.少数民族贫困地区扶贫制度变迁的特殊性与优化[J].西部论坛,2013(1):54-58.
    [8]凌文豪,刘欣.中国特色扶贫开发的理念、实践及其世界意义[J].社会主义研究,2016(4):69-75.
    [9]游俊,冷志明,丁建军.中国连片特困区发展报告(2016-2017)[M].北京:社会科学文献出版社,2017.
    [10]PANDE R,UDRY C.Institutions and Development:AView from Below[C].New Haven:Yale University Working Paper,2006.
    [11]LONDON T,ANUPINDI R,SHETH S.Creating Mutual Value:Lessons Learned from Ventures Serving Base of the Pyramid Producers[J].Journal of Business Research,2010,63(6):582-594.
    [12]HAHN R,GOLD S.Resources and Governance in“Base of the Pyramid”Partnerships:Assessing Collaborations between Businessesand Non-Business Actors[J].Journal of Business Research,2014,67(7):1321-1 333.
    [13]ANDERSON J,MARKIDES C.Strategic Innovation at the Base of the Pyramid[J].Mit Sloan Management Review,2010,49(1):83-93.
    [14]SHIN H D,LEE K C.The Impact of Subsidiary Autonomy on Subsidiary Performance[J].International Business Journal,2013,24(1):1-22.
    [15]CANTWELL J,DUNNING J H,LUNDAN S M.An Evolutionary Approach to Understanding International Business Activity:The Co-Evolution of MNEs and the Institutional Environment[J].Journal of International Business Studies,2010,41(4):567-586.
    [16]TILO F,HALASZOVICH,SARIANNA M.The Moderating Role of Local Embeddedness on the Performance of Foreign and Domestic Firms in Emerging Markets[J].International Business Review,2016,25(9):1136-1 148.
    [17]田宇,卢芬芬,张怀英.中国贫困地区情境下的包容性商业模式构建机制:基于武陵山片区的多案例研究[J].管理学报,2016,13(2):184-194.
    [18]田宇,杨艳玲.贫困地区新创企业创业者关系网络对其组织合法性的影响机制研究[J].管理学报,2017,14(2):176-184.
    [19]KLEER R.Government R&D Subsidies as a Signal for Private Investors[J].Research Policy,2010(39):1361-1 374.
    [20]VACHANI S,SMITH N C.Socially Responsible Distribution:Distribution Strategies for Reaching the Bottom of the Pyramid[J].California Management Review,2008,50(2):52-84.
    [21]LPEZ T,ARCELI A.Defining Success in Subsistence Businesses[J].Journal of Business Research,2012,65(12):1 658-1 664.
    [22]SHAHZAD A,MUNIR K,GREGG T.Impact at the“Bottom of the Pyramid”:The Role of Social Capital in Capability Development and Community Empowerment[J].Journal of Management Studies,2012,49(4):813-842.
    [23]宋渊洋,李元旭.制度环境多样性、跨地区经营经验与服务企业产品市场绩效[J].南开管理评论,2013,16(1):70-82.
    [24]樊纲,王小鲁,朱恒鹏.中国市场化指数---各地区市场化相对进程2009年度报告[M].北京:经济科学出版社,2010.
    [25]叶广宇,刘美珍.制度地位与横向整合管理模式多案例研究[J].管理学报,2013,10(4):494-501.
    [26]MAIR J,VENTRESCA M.Building Inclusive Markets in Rural Bangladesh[J].Academy of Management Journal,2012,55(4):819-850.
    [27]XU D,SHENKAR O.Institutional Distance and the Multinational Enterprise[J].Academy of Management Review,2002,27(3):608-618.
    [28]GILBERT B A,MCDOUGALL P P,AUDRETSCH DB.New Venture Growth:A Review and Extension[J].Journal of Management,2006,32(6):781-799.
    [29]CIAVARELLA M A,BUCHHOLTZ A K,RIORDAN CM.The Big Five and Venture Survival:Is There a Linkage?[J].Joumal of Business Venturing,2004,19(5),465-483.
    [30]周立新,苟靠敏,杨于桃.政策环境、关系网络与微型企业创业成长[J].重庆大学学报:社会科学版,2014,20(3):70-76.
    [31]朱红根,翁贞林,陈昭玖.政策支持对农民工返乡创业影响的实证分析---基于江西调查数据[J].农林经济管理学报,2011,10(1):19-27.
    [32]FIGUEIREDO P N,KLAUBERBRITO.The Innovation Performance of MNE Subsidiariesand Local Embeddedness:Evidence from an Emergingeconomy[J].Evol Econ,2011(21):141-165.
    [33]ANDERSSON U,FORSGREN M,HOLM U.The Strategic Impact of External Networks:Subsidiary Performance and Competence Development in the Multinational Corporation[J].Strategic Management Journal,2002,23(11):979-991.
    [34]HUANG Y,STERNQUIST B.Retailers’Foreign Market Entry Decisions:An Institutional Perspective[J].International Business Review,2007,16(5):613-629.
    [35]FEINBERG S E,GUPTA A K.MNC Subsidiaries and Country Risk:Internalization as a Safeguard Against Weak External Institutions[J].Academy of Management Journal,2009,52(2):381-399.
    (1)指武陵山片区、乌蒙山片区、滇桂黔石漠化片区、滇西边境片区、秦巴山片区、六盘山片区、吕梁山片区、燕山-太行山片区、大兴安岭南麓片区、大别山片区、罗霄山片区,以及西藏自治区、四川省藏区、新疆南疆地区。
    (1)即湘、鄂、渝、黔交界的11个地(州)、71个县(市),集革命老区、民族地区、贫困地区于一体的我国14个集中连片特困地区之一。

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700