论北宋政治对陈祥道《礼书》创作之影响
|
摘要
陈祥道《礼书》虽为私人撰述,但是其由创作到最后成书,都受到当时政治的深刻影响。北宋礼制改革奖掖精研礼学者,并且对于进献礼典者有升迁官职的奖励,为陈祥道创作《礼书》创造了良好的政治氛围。王安石变法迫切需要一部礼典来统一思想,陈祥道作为王安石门人,变法为其创作《礼书》提供了契机。司马光推出的"十科取士"政策要求举荐人才,并且有举荐指标,许将、范祖禹之举荐,直接促成了《礼书》由一百卷扩充到一百五十卷,最终定稿。
Li Shu was written for the individual,but from the creation to the final writing,it was deeply influenced by the politics of the time. The Northern Song Dynasty's reform of ritual system rewards people who are deeply involved in the study of rituals,and rewards the people of submit Ritual rules with the promotion of official positions,which provides a good political atmosphere for Chen Xiangdao's creation of Li Shu. The political reformation of Wang Anshi urgently needed a book of Ritual to unify thoughts. As Wang Anshi's discipline,The political reformation of Wang Anshi provided a chance for Chen Xiangdao's book Li Shu. Sima Guang launched the"Examination of Ten Subjects System"policy which required recommended talents and had recommended indicators. On this occasion,Xujiang and Fan Zuyu's work contribute to the final documents of Li Shu,which enlarge the volumefrom one hundred to one hundred and fifty.
Li Shu was written for the individual,but from the creation to the final writing,it was deeply influenced by the politics of the time. The Northern Song Dynasty's reform of ritual system rewards people who are deeply involved in the study of rituals,and rewards the people of submit Ritual rules with the promotion of official positions,which provides a good political atmosphere for Chen Xiangdao's creation of Li Shu. The political reformation of Wang Anshi urgently needed a book of Ritual to unify thoughts. As Wang Anshi's discipline,The political reformation of Wang Anshi provided a chance for Chen Xiangdao's book Li Shu. Sima Guang launched the"Examination of Ten Subjects System"policy which required recommended talents and had recommended indicators. On this occasion,Xujiang and Fan Zuyu's work contribute to the final documents of Li Shu,which enlarge the volumefrom one hundred to one hundred and fifty.
引文
[1]黄侃.黄侃论学杂著[M].北京:中华书局,1964:451.
[2]陈旸.乐书[M].中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.
[3]吴丽娱.礼与中国古代社会[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016:268.
[4]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第8册[M].北京:中华书局,1995:2 451.
[5]赵汝愚.宋朝诸臣奏议:下册[M].北京大学中国中古史研究中心校点整理.上海:上海古籍出版社,1999:1 034.
[6]陈祥道.礼书[M].中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2006.
[7]聂崇义.新定三礼图[M].古刻新韵丛书.杭州:浙江人民美术出版社,2015:4.
[8]欧阳修.太常因革礼:第821册[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:409.
[9]朱熹.绍熙州县释奠仪图:第648册[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:10.
[10]陈振孙.直斋书录解题[M].徐小蛮,顾美华,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:50.
[11]晁公武.郡斋读书志校证:上册[M].孙猛,校证.上海:上海古籍出版社,2005:136.
[12]黄宗羲.宋元学案[M].黄宗羲全集本.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1999:820.
[13]永2).四库全书总目:上册[M].北京:中华书局,1965:179.
[14]马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986:293.
[15]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第17册[M].北京:中华书局,1995:5 570.
[16]范祖禹.范太史集:第1 100册[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[17]张晓宇.从元明递修百五十卷本《礼书》略论陈祥道《礼书》的进献过程及意义[J].历史文献研究,2017(1):291-300.
[18]沈钦韩.幼学堂文稿:第514册[M].清代诗文集汇编本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010:356.
[19]王应麟.玉海:第944册[M].文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:102.
[20]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第26册[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
(1)按:有关“元祐更化”,沈松勤《北宋文人与党争》(北京:人民出版社,1998年10月)、方诚峰《北宋晚期的政治体制与政治文化》(北京:北京大学出版社,2016年1月)论之甚详,可以参看,此不赘述。
[2]陈旸.乐书[M].中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.
[3]吴丽娱.礼与中国古代社会[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2016:268.
[4]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第8册[M].北京:中华书局,1995:2 451.
[5]赵汝愚.宋朝诸臣奏议:下册[M].北京大学中国中古史研究中心校点整理.上海:上海古籍出版社,1999:1 034.
[6]陈祥道.礼书[M].中华再造善本.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2006.
[7]聂崇义.新定三礼图[M].古刻新韵丛书.杭州:浙江人民美术出版社,2015:4.
[8]欧阳修.太常因革礼:第821册[M].续修四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2002:409.
[9]朱熹.绍熙州县释奠仪图:第648册[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:10.
[10]陈振孙.直斋书录解题[M].徐小蛮,顾美华,点校.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:50.
[11]晁公武.郡斋读书志校证:上册[M].孙猛,校证.上海:上海古籍出版社,2005:136.
[12]黄宗羲.宋元学案[M].黄宗羲全集本.杭州:浙江古籍出版社,1999:820.
[13]永2).四库全书总目:上册[M].北京:中华书局,1965:179.
[14]马端临.文献通考[M].北京:中华书局,1986:293.
[15]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第17册[M].北京:中华书局,1995:5 570.
[16]范祖禹.范太史集:第1 100册[M].影印文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987.
[17]张晓宇.从元明递修百五十卷本《礼书》略论陈祥道《礼书》的进献过程及意义[J].历史文献研究,2017(1):291-300.
[18]沈钦韩.幼学堂文稿:第514册[M].清代诗文集汇编本.上海:上海古籍出版社,2010:356.
[19]王应麟.玉海:第944册[M].文渊阁四库全书本.上海:上海古籍出版社,1987:102.
[20]李焘.续资治通鉴长编:第26册[M].北京:中华书局,1995.
(1)按:有关“元祐更化”,沈松勤《北宋文人与党争》(北京:人民出版社,1998年10月)、方诚峰《北宋晚期的政治体制与政治文化》(北京:北京大学出版社,2016年1月)论之甚详,可以参看,此不赘述。