金属桩口腔修复、预成纤维桩在口腔修复中的作用
|
摘要
目的比较金属桩修复、预成纤维桩在口腔桩核冠修复中的作用。方法选取本院口腔科行口腔修复患者106例,按随机分组法分为对照组(n=53)及观察组(n=53),分别行金属桩、预成纤维桩修复。比较2组患者修复效果。结果观察组修复成功率为93. 06%,高于对照组的78. 57%,失败率为6. 94%,低于对照组的21. 43%,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);观察组牙齿松动率为2. 78%,低于对照组的14. 29%,差异有统计学意义(P <0. 05);观察组每颗患牙平均修复时间短于对照组(P <0. 05)。结论与金属桩桩核冠修复相比,预成纤维桩具较高的修复成功率,且作用显著。
Objective To analyze the role of metal post dental restoration and pre-fibrous pile in oral prosthesis. Methods A total of 106 patients with oral prosthetics from January 2016 to January 2018 were enrolled in the Department of Stomatology in our department,and were randomly divided into control group( n = 53) and observation group( n = 53),given metal piles and pre-fibre piles,respectively. The repair effects of the two groups were compared. Results The success rate of recovery of observation group was higher than that of the control group( 93. 06% vs. 78. 57%,P <0. 05),the failure rate was lower than that of the control group( 6. 94% vs. 21. 43%,P < 0. 05).The tooth loosening rate was 2. 78%,which was lower than 14. 29% in the control group( P <0. 05). The average repair time of each tooth in the observation group was shorter than that of the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with metal post dental restoration,pre-fibre piles have a higher success rate of repair and have a significant effect.
Objective To analyze the role of metal post dental restoration and pre-fibrous pile in oral prosthesis. Methods A total of 106 patients with oral prosthetics from January 2016 to January 2018 were enrolled in the Department of Stomatology in our department,and were randomly divided into control group( n = 53) and observation group( n = 53),given metal piles and pre-fibre piles,respectively. The repair effects of the two groups were compared. Results The success rate of recovery of observation group was higher than that of the control group( 93. 06% vs. 78. 57%,P <0. 05),the failure rate was lower than that of the control group( 6. 94% vs. 21. 43%,P < 0. 05).The tooth loosening rate was 2. 78%,which was lower than 14. 29% in the control group( P <0. 05). The average repair time of each tooth in the observation group was shorter than that of the control group( P < 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with metal post dental restoration,pre-fibre piles have a higher success rate of repair and have a significant effect.
引文
[1]吴宁,陆瑛,杜越英,等.玻璃纤维桩应用于牙体缺损修复的效果及远期修复成功率[J].检验医学与临床,2017,14(22):146-148.
[2]刘菁彧,日孜瓦古力·阿木提,黄庆丰. 2种形态纤维桩修复前磨牙残冠的效果评价[J].上海口腔医学,2016,25(2):245-247.
[3]陈薇,欧龙,刘学军,等.纤维桩与铸造金属桩核治疗较大面积缺损患牙的效果[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2016,17(5):285-287.
[4]印奇志.纤维桩核冠和铸造金属桩核冠在后牙牙体大面积缺损修复中的应用[J].安徽医药,2017,21(1):91-93.
[5]贺会平,林彤,谢一敦,等.金属桩与玻璃纤维桩对老年上颌前牙残根残冠修复的临床疗效比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(23):4472-4474.
[6]张莉华.纤维桩核与铸造金属桩核、二氧化锆全锆桩核修复上颌前磨牙残冠残根对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(6):703-704.
[7]王频,范丽苑,谢翠柳,等.不同体积和材料的桩核修复薄弱根管的应力分析[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(9):953-956.
[8]林捷,林珍香,郑志强,等.纤维桩长度和预备体高度对桩核修复应力分布的影响[J].口腔医学,2018,38(3):202-205.
[9]胡静,李广,张娜,等. EverStick可塑纤维桩用于扁形根管桩核冠修复的临床研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(1):27-29.
[10]魏丽君,曹均凯,赵迪.玻璃纤维桩与铸造金属桩在老年患者前牙修复中的临床效果观察[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2016,15(4):270-273.
[11]洪席超,李懿,文静. 3种纤维桩修复前牙抗折力的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(09):90-92,108.
[12]李丹,曲晨,刘侠,等.纤维桩核材料及预备时机对粘接界面密合性影响的实验研究[J].北京口腔医学,2018,26(1):11-14.
[13]王涛,赵永兴,林建能,等.预成纤维桩对口腔修复患者牙周指数的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(5):138-138.
[14]郭兴怀.预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复应用的临床对比[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(10):1190-1192.
[15]朱福瑶.预成纤维桩对口腔修复疗效及满意度的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(8):975-976.
[16]郑荣裕,许骋,孙健康,等.预成性纤维桩应用于残根残冠修复的临床效果及对咀嚼功能的影响分析[J].贵州医药,2017,41(10):1070-1071.
[17]刘梦娜,邹红,赵燕,等.传统金属桩、预成纤维桩和可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中的临床效果观察[J].检验医学与临床,2018,15(10):157-160.
[18]王晓婧,乔梦婷,郝智莉,等.预成纤维桩和可塑纤维桩修复残根残冠的临床效果[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(22):4280-4282.
[2]刘菁彧,日孜瓦古力·阿木提,黄庆丰. 2种形态纤维桩修复前磨牙残冠的效果评价[J].上海口腔医学,2016,25(2):245-247.
[3]陈薇,欧龙,刘学军,等.纤维桩与铸造金属桩核治疗较大面积缺损患牙的效果[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志,2016,17(5):285-287.
[4]印奇志.纤维桩核冠和铸造金属桩核冠在后牙牙体大面积缺损修复中的应用[J].安徽医药,2017,21(1):91-93.
[5]贺会平,林彤,谢一敦,等.金属桩与玻璃纤维桩对老年上颌前牙残根残冠修复的临床疗效比较[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(23):4472-4474.
[6]张莉华.纤维桩核与铸造金属桩核、二氧化锆全锆桩核修复上颌前磨牙残冠残根对比研究[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(6):703-704.
[7]王频,范丽苑,谢翠柳,等.不同体积和材料的桩核修复薄弱根管的应力分析[J].口腔医学研究,2016,32(9):953-956.
[8]林捷,林珍香,郑志强,等.纤维桩长度和预备体高度对桩核修复应力分布的影响[J].口腔医学,2018,38(3):202-205.
[9]胡静,李广,张娜,等. EverStick可塑纤维桩用于扁形根管桩核冠修复的临床研究[J].临床口腔医学杂志,2017,33(1):27-29.
[10]魏丽君,曹均凯,赵迪.玻璃纤维桩与铸造金属桩在老年患者前牙修复中的临床效果观察[J].中华老年多器官疾病杂志,2016,15(4):270-273.
[11]洪席超,李懿,文静. 3种纤维桩修复前牙抗折力的研究[J].实用医学杂志,2018,34(09):90-92,108.
[12]李丹,曲晨,刘侠,等.纤维桩核材料及预备时机对粘接界面密合性影响的实验研究[J].北京口腔医学,2018,26(1):11-14.
[13]王涛,赵永兴,林建能,等.预成纤维桩对口腔修复患者牙周指数的影响[J].实用临床医药杂志,2016,20(5):138-138.
[14]郭兴怀.预成纤维桩或可塑纤维桩在口腔修复应用的临床对比[J].西南国防医药,2016,26(10):1190-1192.
[15]朱福瑶.预成纤维桩对口腔修复疗效及满意度的影响[J].陕西医学杂志,2016,45(8):975-976.
[16]郑荣裕,许骋,孙健康,等.预成性纤维桩应用于残根残冠修复的临床效果及对咀嚼功能的影响分析[J].贵州医药,2017,41(10):1070-1071.
[17]刘梦娜,邹红,赵燕,等.传统金属桩、预成纤维桩和可塑纤维桩在口腔修复中的临床效果观察[J].检验医学与临床,2018,15(10):157-160.
[18]王晓婧,乔梦婷,郝智莉,等.预成纤维桩和可塑纤维桩修复残根残冠的临床效果[J].现代生物医学进展,2016,16(22):4280-4282.