邹汉勋古韵学述略
|
摘要
邹汉勋的古韵研究以传统哲学中的"数理"思想为指导,分古韵为正韵十五类,另有入声十部属之。邹氏正韵十五类与段玉裁的古韵十七部高度密合,其间传承关系颇为明显;在入声韵部的处理上邹与顾炎武、江永、戴震、段玉裁大为不同。邹氏开启了参酌方音以求古韵部音值的先河,他对语音演变的认识已有离散式音变理论的萌芽;然而,邹氏狃于南楚方音,推求古韵音值的过程中,失当之处不少。
The study on ancient rhymes by Zou Hanxun is based on the mathematical ideology from the traditional philosophy,and it classifies the ancient rhymes into fifteen types of basic rhymes and ten types of entering tones. The fifteen types of basic rhymes by Zou have a high degree of unity with the seventeen types of ancient rhymes by Duan Yucai. The relationship of transmission between them is quite obvious,but in terms of dealing with rhymes of entering tone,Zou is quite different from Gu Yanwu,JiangYong,DaiZhen and DuanYucai. Zou Hanxun pioneers to get the sound of ancient rhymes,referring to dialects,and his awareness of pronunciation changes reveals an embryo of the theory of dispersive phonetic change in western countries. However,being restricted to the Nancu dialect,the study on ancient rhymes by Zou made many mistakes in the process of deriving the sound of ancient rhymes.
The study on ancient rhymes by Zou Hanxun is based on the mathematical ideology from the traditional philosophy,and it classifies the ancient rhymes into fifteen types of basic rhymes and ten types of entering tones. The fifteen types of basic rhymes by Zou have a high degree of unity with the seventeen types of ancient rhymes by Duan Yucai. The relationship of transmission between them is quite obvious,but in terms of dealing with rhymes of entering tone,Zou is quite different from Gu Yanwu,JiangYong,DaiZhen and DuanYucai. Zou Hanxun pioneers to get the sound of ancient rhymes,referring to dialects,and his awareness of pronunciation changes reveals an embryo of the theory of dispersive phonetic change in western countries. However,being restricted to the Nancu dialect,the study on ancient rhymes by Zou made many mistakes in the process of deriving the sound of ancient rhymes.
引文
[1]邹汉勋撰,蔡梦麒点校.邹叔子遗书七种[M].长沙:岳麓书社,2011.
[2]周祖谟.问学集[M].北京:中华书局,1966.
[3]钱玄同.钱玄同文字音韵学论集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011.
[4]王力.汉语语音史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985.
[5]王祖霞.《清嘉录》的语言学资料及辞书编写价值[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(6).
[6]麦耘.论近代汉语-m韵尾消变的时限[J].古汉语研究,1991(4).
[7]徐通锵.汉语研究方法论初探[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[8]程刚.苏轼的易象与意象[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(2).
①郑贾:东汉经学家郑玄与贾逵;江戴:清代音韵学名家江永与戴震。
②何九盈、许良越等先生认为章炳麟是第一个对上古声纽有系统认识的学者,李葆嘉先生则认为清代中期的邹汉勋便已构设上古声纽体系,详细内容请参阅李葆嘉所著《清代古声纽学》。
[2]周祖谟.问学集[M].北京:中华书局,1966.
[3]钱玄同.钱玄同文字音韵学论集[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,2011.
[4]王力.汉语语音史[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1985.
[5]王祖霞.《清嘉录》的语言学资料及辞书编写价值[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2009(6).
[6]麦耘.论近代汉语-m韵尾消变的时限[J].古汉语研究,1991(4).
[7]徐通锵.汉语研究方法论初探[M].北京:商务印书馆,2004.
[8]程刚.苏轼的易象与意象[J].西华大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012(2).
①郑贾:东汉经学家郑玄与贾逵;江戴:清代音韵学名家江永与戴震。
②何九盈、许良越等先生认为章炳麟是第一个对上古声纽有系统认识的学者,李葆嘉先生则认为清代中期的邹汉勋便已构设上古声纽体系,详细内容请参阅李葆嘉所著《清代古声纽学》。