不同诱捕器和诱芯对橘小实蝇诱捕效果的比较
|
摘要
为了筛选诱捕效果最佳的诱捕器及诱芯,于2012年5月8日至8月9日,在海南省文昌市迈号镇面积为5.3hm2的莲雾种植园进行了4种类型诱捕器和5种材质诱芯对橘小实蝇雄虫的诱捕效果比较研究。结果表明:涡旋式诱捕器(Victor trap)诱捕效果最佳,且与其他诱捕器差异极显著,自制矿泉水瓶诱捕器效果最差;4种诱捕器诱捕效果从高到低顺序依次为涡旋式诱捕器>Steiner诱捕器>Combined诱捕器>自制矿泉水瓶诱捕器。纤维板诱芯诱捕效果最好,与海绵诱芯差异不显著,与椰壳块诱芯差异显著,但未达到极其显著水平。插花泥诱捕效果最差,与纤维板和海绵差异极其显著;5种诱芯试材诱捕效果从高到低顺序依次为纤维板>海绵>椰壳块>脱脂棉>插花泥。综合考虑材质的诱捕效果及体积吸水率,在实蝇发生高峰期,使用涡旋式诱捕器和低密度纤维板进行诱杀,可取得最佳效果;当虫口密度较低时,则推荐使用高密度海绵作诱芯,效果相当,且节约人力和用药。
Four kinds of traps and five kinds of lure cores for capturing Bactrocera dorsalis(Hendel) were compared during May 8 to August 9, 2012 in a Syzygium samarangense orchard of Hainan Province, China. The results showed that Victor trap was the most effective type, which was extremely significant different from other three traps. Home-made plastic bottle trap was worst. Trapping effects of the tested four traps were, in order, Victor trap, Steiner trap, Combined trap, and home-made plastic bottle trap. Lure core of fibre board was most effective, which was not significant different from sponge. Fibre board was significant different from coconut shell, however, not extremely significant. Ikebana mud were worst, which was extremely significant different from fibre board and sponge. Trapping effects of the tested five lure cores were, in order, fibre board, sponge, coconut shell, absorbent cotton and ikebana mud. Based on the volumetric water absorption and trapping effects of different materials, combination of Victor trap and lure core of fibre board was recommended when the population density of fruit flies was high. However, when the population density was low, lure core of sponge should be used, which was more economical.
Four kinds of traps and five kinds of lure cores for capturing Bactrocera dorsalis(Hendel) were compared during May 8 to August 9, 2012 in a Syzygium samarangense orchard of Hainan Province, China. The results showed that Victor trap was the most effective type, which was extremely significant different from other three traps. Home-made plastic bottle trap was worst. Trapping effects of the tested four traps were, in order, Victor trap, Steiner trap, Combined trap, and home-made plastic bottle trap. Lure core of fibre board was most effective, which was not significant different from sponge. Fibre board was significant different from coconut shell, however, not extremely significant. Ikebana mud were worst, which was extremely significant different from fibre board and sponge. Trapping effects of the tested five lure cores were, in order, fibre board, sponge, coconut shell, absorbent cotton and ikebana mud. Based on the volumetric water absorption and trapping effects of different materials, combination of Victor trap and lure core of fibre board was recommended when the population density of fruit flies was high. However, when the population density was low, lure core of sponge should be used, which was more economical.
引文
[1]Demilo A B,Cunningham R T,Mcgovern T P.Structural variants of methyl eugenol and their attractiveness to the oriental fruit fly(Diptera:Tephritidae).Journal of Economic Entomology,1994,87(4):957-964.
[2]Wee S L,Alvin K W,Tan K H.Comparative sensitivity to and consumption of methyl eugenol in three Bactrocera dorsalis(Diptera:Tephritidae)complex sibling species.Chemoecology,2002(12):193-197.
[3]Intemational atomic energy agency,IAEA.Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes.Vienna,Austria:IAEA,2003:1-47.
[4]Steiner L F,Mitchell W C,Harris E J,et al.Oriental fruit fly eradication by male annihilation.Journal of Economic Entomology,1965,58(5):961-964.
[5]Steiner L F,Hart W G,Harris E J,et al.Eradication of the Oriental fruit fly from the Mariana Islands by the method of male annihilation and sterile insect release.Journal of Economic Entomology,1970,63(1):131-135.
[6]王艳平,汪兴鉴,张润志,等.实蝇类昆虫的引诱剂和诱捕器.昆虫学报,2009,52(6):699-706.
[7]吴佳教,顾渝娟,刘海军,等.实蝇监测技术要素II.植物检疫,2009,23(2):41-45.
[8]SN/T 2029-2007实蝇监测方法.
[9]广东省植保植检总站.检疫性实蝇监测技术规范(试行)[EB/OL].(2008-12-22)[2013-07-28].http://hcyj.gdzbz.com/PestMonitor/Test/Jiance/jyxsyjc.htm.
[10]吴佳教,李春苑,刘海军,等.新式综合型实蝇诱捕器的研制.植物检疫,2013,27(2):65-67.
[11]匡石兹,田世尧,曾杨,等.黄板诱杀技术在防治桔小实蝇成虫中的应用研究.广东农业科学,2009(10):105-106.
[12]禄祖盛,钟伟,张萍,等.柑桔小实蝇诱捕器的制作方法及其应用效果.江西果树,1996(3):21-22.
[13]徐洁莲,韩诗畴,欧剑峰,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对桔小实蝇的诱杀效果.中国南方果树,2004,33(4):13-14.
[14]黄月英,陈军,沈金发,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对桔小实蝇的诱捕效果.中国农学通报,2008,24(7):390-392.
[15]郑思宁,黄居昌,陈家骅,等.诱芯和诱捕器对橘小实蝇诱捕效果的影响.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2010,39(5):455-459.
[16]周湾,施祖华,万华建,等.探索不同诱捕器对橘小实蝇的引诱力//植物保护与农产品质量安全论文集.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2008:373-375.
[17]明珂,郑章麟,谢宝玉,等.不同诱捕器对柑橘小实蝇引诱效果的研究.浙江柑橘,2010,27(3):20-27.
[18]李月红,何陆芳,叶良松,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对柑橘小实蝇的诱捕效果.浙江农业科学,2010(6):1137-1139.
[19]刘桂良,吴降星,王贤飞,等.不同性信息素及诱瓶对柑橘小实蝇的诱捕效果.浙江农业科学,2011(4):884-885.
[20]张意颖,蒋翠英.鲜花保存用插花泥.化学世界,1993(10):509-511.
[21]Steiner L F.A low-cost plastic fruit fly trap.J Econ Entomol,1957(50):508-509.
[22]王清玲.作物虫害非农药防治资材.行政院农委会农业试验所特刊(台),2010(142):1-183.
[23]何坤耀,洪士程,陈健忠,等.涡旋式诱蝇器对东方果实蝇(双翅目:果实蝇科)之诱杀效果.中华农业研究(台),2003(52):62-72.
[24]梁家尧,李凯声.果蝇诱捕器诱捕杨桃桔小实蝇的效果观察.广西植保,2007,20(1):12-14.
[25]李云明,顾云琴,项顺尧,等.98%诱蝇谜诱杀柑橘小实蝇(雄)成虫效果试验初报.现代农业科技,2008,8:73-79.
[26]Djeen Cheou.French Polynesia[EB/OL].(2007-10-23)[2013-07-28].http://www.spc.int/pacifly/Country_profiles/Fr._Polynesia.htm.
[2]Wee S L,Alvin K W,Tan K H.Comparative sensitivity to and consumption of methyl eugenol in three Bactrocera dorsalis(Diptera:Tephritidae)complex sibling species.Chemoecology,2002(12):193-197.
[3]Intemational atomic energy agency,IAEA.Trapping guidelines for area-wide fruit fly programmes.Vienna,Austria:IAEA,2003:1-47.
[4]Steiner L F,Mitchell W C,Harris E J,et al.Oriental fruit fly eradication by male annihilation.Journal of Economic Entomology,1965,58(5):961-964.
[5]Steiner L F,Hart W G,Harris E J,et al.Eradication of the Oriental fruit fly from the Mariana Islands by the method of male annihilation and sterile insect release.Journal of Economic Entomology,1970,63(1):131-135.
[6]王艳平,汪兴鉴,张润志,等.实蝇类昆虫的引诱剂和诱捕器.昆虫学报,2009,52(6):699-706.
[7]吴佳教,顾渝娟,刘海军,等.实蝇监测技术要素II.植物检疫,2009,23(2):41-45.
[8]SN/T 2029-2007实蝇监测方法.
[9]广东省植保植检总站.检疫性实蝇监测技术规范(试行)[EB/OL].(2008-12-22)[2013-07-28].http://hcyj.gdzbz.com/PestMonitor/Test/Jiance/jyxsyjc.htm.
[10]吴佳教,李春苑,刘海军,等.新式综合型实蝇诱捕器的研制.植物检疫,2013,27(2):65-67.
[11]匡石兹,田世尧,曾杨,等.黄板诱杀技术在防治桔小实蝇成虫中的应用研究.广东农业科学,2009(10):105-106.
[12]禄祖盛,钟伟,张萍,等.柑桔小实蝇诱捕器的制作方法及其应用效果.江西果树,1996(3):21-22.
[13]徐洁莲,韩诗畴,欧剑峰,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对桔小实蝇的诱杀效果.中国南方果树,2004,33(4):13-14.
[14]黄月英,陈军,沈金发,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对桔小实蝇的诱捕效果.中国农学通报,2008,24(7):390-392.
[15]郑思宁,黄居昌,陈家骅,等.诱芯和诱捕器对橘小实蝇诱捕效果的影响.福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2010,39(5):455-459.
[16]周湾,施祖华,万华建,等.探索不同诱捕器对橘小实蝇的引诱力//植物保护与农产品质量安全论文集.北京:中国农业科学技术出版社,2008:373-375.
[17]明珂,郑章麟,谢宝玉,等.不同诱捕器对柑橘小实蝇引诱效果的研究.浙江柑橘,2010,27(3):20-27.
[18]李月红,何陆芳,叶良松,等.不同诱捕器与诱芯对柑橘小实蝇的诱捕效果.浙江农业科学,2010(6):1137-1139.
[19]刘桂良,吴降星,王贤飞,等.不同性信息素及诱瓶对柑橘小实蝇的诱捕效果.浙江农业科学,2011(4):884-885.
[20]张意颖,蒋翠英.鲜花保存用插花泥.化学世界,1993(10):509-511.
[21]Steiner L F.A low-cost plastic fruit fly trap.J Econ Entomol,1957(50):508-509.
[22]王清玲.作物虫害非农药防治资材.行政院农委会农业试验所特刊(台),2010(142):1-183.
[23]何坤耀,洪士程,陈健忠,等.涡旋式诱蝇器对东方果实蝇(双翅目:果实蝇科)之诱杀效果.中华农业研究(台),2003(52):62-72.
[24]梁家尧,李凯声.果蝇诱捕器诱捕杨桃桔小实蝇的效果观察.广西植保,2007,20(1):12-14.
[25]李云明,顾云琴,项顺尧,等.98%诱蝇谜诱杀柑橘小实蝇(雄)成虫效果试验初报.现代农业科技,2008,8:73-79.
[26]Djeen Cheou.French Polynesia[EB/OL].(2007-10-23)[2013-07-28].http://www.spc.int/pacifly/Country_profiles/Fr._Polynesia.htm.