牙种植修复在慢性牙周炎患者与牙周健康者的疗效及预后分析
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Analysis on the Curative Effect and Prognosis of Dental Implant Restoration in Patients with Chronic Periodontitis and Periodontal Health
  • 作者:罗涛 ; 彭婉笑 ; 张瑾
  • 英文作者:LUO Tao;PENG Wanxiao;ZHANG Jin;Dongguan Third People's Hospital;
  • 关键词:牙种植修复 ; 慢性牙周炎 ; 周健 ; 疗效 ; 预后 ; 骨吸收
  • 英文关键词:Dental implant restoration;;Chronic periodontitis;;Periodontal health;;Curative effect;;Prognosis;;Bone resorption
  • 中文刊名:YBQJ
  • 英文刊名:Clinical Medicine & Engineering
  • 机构:东莞市第三人民医院;
  • 出版日期:2019-01-15
  • 出版单位:临床医学工程
  • 年:2019
  • 期:v.26;No.239
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:YBQJ201901048
  • 页数:2
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:44-1655/R
  • 分类号:99-100
摘要
目的分析牙种植修复在慢性牙周炎患者与牙周健康者的疗效及预后。方法选择我院2013年12月至2018年5月进行牙种植修复的63例患者,其中32例(37枚)慢性牙周炎患者为研究组, 31例(35枚)牙周健康者为对照组。比较两组的修复效果与预后情况。结果修复后6个月、 1年,两组的种植成功率比较无统计学差异(P>0.05);修复后3年、 5年,研究组的种植成功率均低于对照组(P <0.05)。研究组修复后的PIS、 MSBI、 PD均高于对照组(P <0.05)。研究组修复后1年、 3年、 5年的牙槽骨吸收分别为(1.37±0.23) mm、(1.56±0.34) mm、(1.64±0.42) mm,均高于对照组的(0.37±0.10) mm、(0.43±0.12) mm、(0.54±0.13) mm (P <0.05)。结论牙种植修复对牙周健康者与慢性牙周炎患者的近期疗效无明显差异,但慢性牙周炎患者的远期疗效较差,主要是因为慢性牙周炎致使牙槽骨吸收增加。
        Objective To analyze the curative effect and prognosis of dental implant restoration in patients with chronic periodontitis and periodontal health. Methods 63 cases of patients undergoing dental implant restoration in our hospital from December 2013 to May2018 were selected. 32 patients(37 pieces) with chronic periodontitis were selected as study group, and 31 patients(35 pieces) with periodontal health were selected as control group. The restoration effect and prognosis of the two groups were compared. Results 6 months and 1 year after restoration, no statistical difference was found in the success rates of implantation between the two groups(P >0.05). 3 years and 5 years after restoration, the success rates of implantation of the study group were lower than those of the control group(P <0.05).After restoration, the PIS, MSBI and PD of the study group were higher than those of the control group(P <0.05). 1 year, 3 years and 5 years after restoration, the alveolar bone resorption of the study group were respectively(1.37 ± 0.23) mm,(1.56 ± 0.34) mm and(1.64 ± 0.42)mm, higher than(0.37 ± 0.10) mm,(0.43 ± 0.12) mm and(0.54 ± 0.13) mm of the control group(P <0.05). Conclusions No significant difference is found in the short-term curative effect of dental implant restoration on patients with chronic periodontitis and periodontal health.However, patients with chronic periodontitis have worse long-term curative effect, mainly due to the increase of alveolar bone resorption caused by chronic periodontitis.
引文
[1]关达荣,邹康元,张佩芬.慢性牙周炎患者种植修复的临床疗效评价[J].口腔颌面修复学杂志, 2016, 17(3):144-147.
    [2]谢文高.牙种植修复在慢性牙周炎患者中的疗效观察[J].临床医学, 2015, 35(3):104-106.
    [3]刘唯,李红玖,杨安.牙种植修复在慢性牙周炎患者中的临床疗效[J].数理医药学杂志, 2016, 29(7):984-985.
    [4]刘磊,吕东达.口腔种植修复技术对慢性牙周炎患者种植体松动度、 PD及SBI指数影响研究[J].陕西医学杂志, 2018, 47(3):305-307.
    [5]秦孝鹏,孙贵峰,岳丽娟,等.对比分析牙种植修复在合并慢性牙周炎患者与无慢性牙周炎患者的疗效差异[J].中国医疗美容, 2017,7(5):60-62.
    [6]王涛,贺平,薛鑫.牙种植修复在慢性牙周炎患者与牙周健康者的疗效比较[J].中国药物经济学, 2017, 12(8):127-129.
    [7]王统伍.慢性牙周炎患者与牙周健康者种植修复后的长期临床疗效差异[J].中外医学研究, 2017, 15(12):24-25.
    [8]李春林.牙种植修复技术在慢性牙周炎患者中的临床应用[J].医学临床研究, 2017, 34(6):1112-1114.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700