中美空军飞行学员医学选拔对照实证研究——斜视
|
摘要
目的通过对比中美招收飞行学员医学选拔斜视标准,分析2012~2015年空军招飞定选学员体检数据,探讨中美招飞医学选拔标准的差异,为完善我国招飞体检标准积累数据、提供参考。方法对比中美招收飞行员医学选拔标准,统计分析近4年招飞定选阶段因斜视被淘汰学员的体检数据,参照美军医学标准重新判定其合格情况。结果美军招飞医学选拔在隐斜标准上较我军标准更宽松,我军招飞定选中部分被淘汰的学员参考美军标准可能合格,所占比例4年平均为13.87%;显斜方面,中美医学选拔标准基本一致。结论我军招收空军飞行员体检过程中,可结合我国国情,参考美军标准,适当放宽隐斜方面的招飞标准并长期跟踪因放宽现行标准而入选的学员成飞比例,进而为我军制定更为成熟、完善、合理的招飞标准积累数据,提供依据。
Objective To determine whether the candidates who were disqualified for having phoria or tropia in People's Liberation Army Air Force( PLAAF) medical selection of flying cadets are qualified or not according to United States Air Force( USAF) Medical Standards Directory,and to raise suggestions on revising PLAAF medical standards.Methods All the candidates who had participated in the final medical selection of flying cadets were reevaluated and determined as qualified or not according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. Results There was a marked difference between disqualification rates of PLAAF and USAF. 13. 87% of the candidates who were regerded as disqualified by PLAAF standards were qualified according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. These cadets might be eliminated by mistake.Conclusion The standard on heterophonies of the PLAAF is more stringent than that of the USAF. We shoucd revise PLAAF standards using USAF standards for reference.
Objective To determine whether the candidates who were disqualified for having phoria or tropia in People's Liberation Army Air Force( PLAAF) medical selection of flying cadets are qualified or not according to United States Air Force( USAF) Medical Standards Directory,and to raise suggestions on revising PLAAF medical standards.Methods All the candidates who had participated in the final medical selection of flying cadets were reevaluated and determined as qualified or not according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. Results There was a marked difference between disqualification rates of PLAAF and USAF. 13. 87% of the candidates who were regerded as disqualified by PLAAF standards were qualified according to USAF Medical Standards Directory. These cadets might be eliminated by mistake.Conclusion The standard on heterophonies of the PLAAF is more stringent than that of the USAF. We shoucd revise PLAAF standards using USAF standards for reference.
引文
[1]王益蓉,蒋纪文,柯善华.民航飞行学生眼科停飞25年回顾分析[J].中国校医,2008,22(3):285-286.
[2]杨明迪,曾利群,颜少明,等.飞行员斜视的临床研究[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2012,23(4):286-287.
[3]刘家琦,李凤鸣.实用眼科学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:561-578.
[4]葛坚.眼科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:406-415.
[5]Kevin JN,Brian GM,Nancy ND.The course of intermittent exotropia in a population--based cohort[J].Ophthalmology,2006,113(7):1154-1158.
[6]徐秉兴,麦英全,曾晓明.1997~2004年南航招飞体检眼科淘汰情况分析[J].民航医学,2005,(1):1-4.
[7]任新民,王勤,韩冰,等.海军飞行员的隐斜视调查[J].海军医学杂志,2000,21(1):50-51.
[2]杨明迪,曾利群,颜少明,等.飞行员斜视的临床研究[J].中华航空航天医学杂志,2012,23(4):286-287.
[3]刘家琦,李凤鸣.实用眼科学[M].3版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:561-578.
[4]葛坚.眼科学[M].2版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2010:406-415.
[5]Kevin JN,Brian GM,Nancy ND.The course of intermittent exotropia in a population--based cohort[J].Ophthalmology,2006,113(7):1154-1158.
[6]徐秉兴,麦英全,曾晓明.1997~2004年南航招飞体检眼科淘汰情况分析[J].民航医学,2005,(1):1-4.
[7]任新民,王勤,韩冰,等.海军飞行员的隐斜视调查[J].海军医学杂志,2000,21(1):50-51.