稻田径流易发期不同类型肥料的氮素流失风险
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Nitrogen loss risk of paddy field under different fertilizations in runoff prone period
  • 作者:侯朋福 ; 薛利祥 ; 俞映倞 ; 江瑜 ; 汪吉东 ; 薛利红 ; 杨林章
  • 英文作者:HOU Peng-fu;XUE Li-xiang;YU Ying-liang;JIANG Yu;WANG Ji-dong;XUE Li-hong;YANG Lin-zhang;Institute of Agricultural Resources and Environment, Jiangsu Academy of Agricultural Sciences;Institute of Crop Science, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences;
  • 关键词:稻田 ; 径流 ; 易发期 ; 肥料类型 ; 氮素流失
  • 英文关键词:paddy field;;runoff;;prone period;;fertilizer type;;nitrogen loss
  • 中文刊名:NHBH
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Agro-Environment Science
  • 机构:江苏省农业科学院农业资源与环境研究所;中国农业科学院作物科学研究所;
  • 出版日期:2017-07-20
  • 出版单位:农业环境科学学报
  • 年:2017
  • 期:v.36;No.263
  • 基金:公益性行业(农业)科研专项(201503106);; 国家自然科学基金青年科学基金项目(41601319);; 国家重点研发计划项目(2017YFD0300100)~~
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:NHBH201707018
  • 页数:9
  • CN:07
  • ISSN:12-1347/S
  • 分类号:135-143
摘要
依据60年典型自然降雨资料分析了太湖地区稻田径流易发期,结合不同肥料减量运筹长期定位试验(2009年开始)近3年的径流监测数据,比较了径流易发期内不同处理的实际径流氮素控制效果。结果表明,太湖地区水稻生长前期降雨概率较大,6月21日—7月6日单日降雨概率均超过50%。从阶段统计结果来看,基肥期和蘖肥期(含基肥-蘖肥阶段)降雨概率和降雨量均明显高于穗肥期、蘖肥-穗肥阶段和穗肥后至成熟阶段,降雨概率分别达48.15%和49.81%,降雨量分别为12.81 mm和12.84 mm,均超过实际监测到径流的同期最低降雨量11.5 mm,产生径流可能性较大,是稻季径流易发期。从定位试验的实际产生径流和田面水氮素浓度结果来看,易发期径流和田面水氮素以铵态氮为主,硝态氮差异不显著。与常规用量分次施肥处理(CN)相比,化肥减量优化处理(RF)和有机无机减量配施处理(OCN)径流易发期径流氮素浓度分别较CN处理平均降低8.83%和19.18%。缓控释肥减量替代处理(SCU)的基肥期和基肥-蘖肥阶段径流氮素浓度和田面水氮素浓度明显高于其他处理,径流氮素浓度较CN处理分别增加了20.3%和11.72%,但蘖肥期径流氮素浓度减少30.72%。全有机肥减量替代处理(OF)肥期径流和田面水氮素浓度降低,其中基肥期径流氮素浓度较CN处理降低9.04%、蘖肥期降低28.53%,但基肥-蘖肥阶段氮素浓度较CN处理增加了19.7%,增加了氮素径流损失风险。不同氮肥减量措施能够降低易发期内不同阶段径流氮素浓度,但在径流易发期的径流氮素损失控制效果不能一概而论。
        The runoff prone period of paddy field in Taihu Lake region was analyzed according to the typical natural rainfall data of 60 years in this study. Then, the actual runoff nitrogen control effect from paddy field in runoff prone period of different fertilization reduction treatment were compared using the runoff monitoring data in recent 3 years of a long-term fertilization reduction experiment that initiated in2009. The results showed that, the rainfall probability was larger in early rice growth stage in Taihu Lake region and daily rainfall probability between June 21 st and July 6th were more than 50%. The rainfall probability of basal fertilization stage and tillering fertilization stage were48.15% and 49.81%, respectively, obviously higher than other stages. The mean precipitation of these two stages were 12.81 mm and 12.84 mm, both exceed the minimum rainfall for runoff(11.5 mm), implying high probability for paddy runoff in these two periods. The nitrogen in runoff water and surface water in the runoff prone period were mainly ammonium nitrogen as the long-term experiment study indicated. Compared with conventional nitrogen rate nitrogen rate(CN) treatment, the nitrogen concentrations of reduced nitrogen rate treatment(RF)and organic combined with chemical nitrogen treatment(OCN)were decreased 8.83% and 19.18%, respectively. The nitrogen concentrations in runoff water and surface water of sulfur coating urea treatment(SCU) in basal fertilization and basal fertilization-tiller-ing fertilization stage were higher than those of other treatments, which increased 20.3% and 11.72% respectively incomparasion with CN treatment. The nitrogen concentration in runoff water of organic fertilizer treatment(OF)decreased 9.04% and 28.53% in basal fertilization and tillering fertilization stage, respectively, but increased 19.7% in tillering fertilization-panicle fertilization stage compared with CN treat-ment, which increased the risk of runoff nitrogen loss. The nitrogen reduction measures referred in this study can reduce the runoff water nitrogen concentrations in the runoff prone period of paddy field, but the effect on nitrogen loss control in the runoff prone period are different.
引文
[1]杨林章,施卫明,薛利红,等.农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——总体思路与“4R”治理技术[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(1):1-8.YANG Lin-zhang,SHI Wei-ming,XUE Li-hong,et al.Reduce-retainreuse-restore technology for the controlling the agricultural non-point source pollution in countryside in China:General countermeasures and technologies[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2013,32(1):1-8.
    [2]Yang S,Peng S,Xu J,et al.Nitrogen loss from paddy field with different water and nitrogen managements in Taihu Lake region of China[J].Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis,2013,44(16):2393-2407.
    [3]Zhao X,Zhou Y,Min J,et al.Nitrogen runoff dominates water nitrogen pollution from rice-wheat rotation in the Taihu Lake region of China[J].Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2012,156(4):1-11.
    [4]王桂良,崔振岭,陈新平,等.南方稻田活性氮损失途径及其影响因素[J].应用生态学报,2015,26(8):2337-2345.WANG Gui-liang,CUI Zhen-ling,CHEN Xin-ping,et al.Reactive nitrogen loss pathways and their effective factors in paddy field in Southern China[J].Chinese Journal of Applied Ecology,2015,26(8):2337-2345.
    [5]薛利红,俞映倞,杨林章.太湖流域稻田不同氮肥管理模式下的氮素平衡特征及环境效应评价[J].环境科学,2011,32(4):1133-1138.XUE Li-hong,YU Ying-liang,YANG Lin-zhang.Nitrogen balance and environmental impact of paddy field under different N management methods in Taihu Lake region[J].Environmental Science,2011,32(4):1133-1138.
    [6]薛利红,杨林章,施卫明,等.农村面源污染治理的“4R”理论与工程实践——源头减量技术[J].农业环境科学学报,2013,32(5):881-888.XUE Li-hong,YANG Lin-zhang,SHI Wei-ming,et al.Reduce-retainreuse-restore technology for controlling the agricultural non-point pollution in countryside in China:Source reduction technology[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2013,32(5):881-888.
    [7]Ye Y S,Liang X Q,Chen Y X,et al.Alternate wetting and drying irrigation and controlled-release nitrogen fertilizer in late-season rice.Effects on dry matter accumulation,yield,water and nitrogen use[J].Field Crops Research,2013,144(6):212-224.
    [8]侯朋福,薛利祥,范立慧,等.氮肥类型及施用方式对节水抗旱稻田面水氮动态及产量的影响[J].中国稻米,2016,22(3):43-48.HOU Peng-fu,XUE Li-xiang,FAN Li-hui,et al.Effects of nitrogen fertilizer type and application method on surface water nitrogen dynamics and yield of drought-resistance rice[J].China Rice,2016,22(3):43-48.
    [9]Shaviv A,Mikkelsen R L.Controlled-release fertilizers to increase efficiency of nutrient use and minimize environmental degradation:A review[J].Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems,1993,35(1):1-12.
    [10]Xue L H,Yu Y L,Yang L Z.Maintaining yields and reducing nitrogen loss in rice-wheat rotation system in Taihu Lake region with proper fertilizer management[J].Environmental Research Letters,2014,9(11):115010.
    [11]Yu Y L,Xue L H,Yang L Z.Winter legumes in rice crop rotations reduces nitrogen loss,and improves rice yield and soil nitrogen supply[J].Agronomy for Sustainable Development,2014,34(3):633-640.
    [12]Qiao J,Yang L Z,Yan T M,et al.Nitrogen fertilizer reduction in rice production for two consecutive years in the Taihu Lake area[J].Agriculture Ecosystems&Environment,2012,146(1):103-112.
    [13]纪雄辉,郑圣先,鲁艳红,等.施用尿素和控释氮肥的双季稻田表层水氮素动态及其径流损失规律[J].中国农业科学,2006,39(12):2521-2530.JI Xiong-hui,ZHENG Sheng-xian,LU Yan-hong,et al.Dynamics of floodwater nitrogen and its runoff loss,urea and controlled release nitrogen fertilizer application regulation in rice[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2006,39(12):2521-2530.
    [14]傅朝栋.基于Arc GIS的区域尺度稻田降雨径流氮磷流失负荷估算[D].杭州:浙江大学,2015.FU Chao-dong.Arc GIS based regional estimation of nitrogen and phosphorus loss loads in surface runoff from rice paddy fields[D].Hangzhou:Zhejiang University,2015.
    [15]郭智,周炜,陈留根,等.施用猪粪有机肥对稻麦两熟农田稻季养分径流流失的影响[J].水土保持学报,2013,27(6):21-25.GUO Zhi,ZHOU Wei,CHEN Liu-gen,et al.Effect of pig manure application on surface runoff losses of soil nitrogen and phosphorus during the paddy season in intersive rice-wheat rotation field[J].Journal of Soil and Water Conservation,2013,27(6):21-25.
    [16]Guo H Y,Zhu J G,Wang X R,et al.Case study on nitrogen and phosphorus emissions from paddy field in Taihu region[J].Environmental Geochemistry and Health,2004,26(2):209-219.
    [17]金洁,杨京平,施洪鑫,等.水稻田面水中氮磷素的动态特征研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2005,24(2):357-361.JIN Jie,YANG Jing-ping,SHI Hong-xin,et al.Variations of nitrogen and phosphorus in surface water body of a paddy field[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2005,24(2):357-361.
    [18]焦瑞锋,张鸿睿,卞新民.稻田降雨径流扰动系数的解析分析[J].浙江农业学报,2012,24(5):898-903.JIAO Rui-feng,ZHANG Hong-rui,BIAN Xin-min.Analytical analysis of paddy runoff disturbance coefficient[J].Acta Agriculturae Zhejiangensis,2012,24(5):898-903.
    [19]Mishra A,Ghorai A K,Singh S R.Rainwater,soil and nutrient conservation in rainfed rice lands in Eastern India[J].Agricultural Water Management,1998,38(1):45-57.
    [20]薛利红,李刚华,侯朋福,等.太湖地区稻田持续高产的减量施氮技术体系研究[J].农业环境科学学报,2016,35(4):729-736.XUE Li-hong,LI Gang-hua,HOU Peng-fu,et al.Nitrogen reduction technique system for sustaining high yield of paddy fields[J].Journal of Agro-Environment Science,2016,35(4):729-736.
    [21]林晶晶.水稻对基蘖穗肥氮素的吸收利用差异及适宜比例的研究[D].南京:南京农业大学,2014.LIN Jing-jing.Studies on absorption and utilization and optimum proportion of nitrogen of basic,tillering and panicle fertilizer in rice[D].Nanjing:Nanjing Agricultural University,2014.
    [22]范立慧,徐珊珊,侯朋福,等.不同地力下基蘖肥运筹比例对水稻产量及氮肥吸收利用的影响[J].中国农业科学,2016,49(10):1872-1884.FAN Li-hui,XU Shan-shan,HOU Peng-fu,et al.Effect of different ratios of basal to tiller nitrogen on rice yield and nitrogen utilization under different soil fertility[J].Scientia Agricultura Sinica,2016,49(10):1872-1884.
    [23]谷佳林,徐凯,付铁梅,等.不同密闭材料硫包衣尿素氮素释放特性及对夏玉米生长的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2011,17(3):630-637.GU Jia-lin,XU Kai,FU Tie-mei,et al.Nitrogen release characteristics of different hermetic material sulfur coated urea and their effects on summer maize[J].Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer Science,2011,17(3):630-637.
    [24]Miao X K,Xing X M,Ding Y F,et al.Yield and nitrogen uptake of bowl-seedling machine-transplanted rice with slow-release nitrogen fertilizer[J].Agronomy Journal,2015,108(1):313-320.
    [25]李敏,郭熙盛,叶舒娅,等.硫膜和树脂膜控释尿素对水稻产量、光合特性及氮肥利用率的影响[J].植物营养与肥料学报,2013,19(4):808-815.LI Min,GUO Xi-sheng,YE Shu-ya,et al.Effects of sulfur-and polymer-coated controlled release urea on yield,photosynthetic characteristics and nitrogen fertilizer efficiency of rice[J].Journal of Plant Nutrition and Fertilizer,2013,19(4):808-815.
    [26]刘更另,金维续.中国有机肥料[M].北京:农业出版社,1991.LIU Geng-ling,JIN Wei-xu.Chinese organic fertilizer[M].Beijing:Agricultural Press,1991.
    [27]朱大威,黄耀,卢燕宇.有机肥氮素释放动态模型的初步研究[J].南京农业大学学报,2006,29(3):146-150.ZHU Da-wei,HUANG Yao,LU Yan-yu.A primary study on modeling nitrogen release from organic manure[J].Journal of Nanjing Agricultural University,2006,29(3):146-150.
    [28]张璐,石林,蔡泽江,等.有机肥与化肥不同比例配施下水稻土铵态氮释放特征[J].中国土壤与肥料,2015(4):15-22.ZHANG Lu,SHI Lin,CAI Ze-jiang,et al.The ammonium nitrogen release characteristic of paddy soil with mixed application of different ratios of organic and inorganic fertilizer[J].Soil and Fertilizer Sciences in China,2015(4):15-22.
    [29]Chantigny M H,Angers D A,Prévost D,et al.Dynamics of soluble organic C and C mineralization in cultivated soils with varying N fertilization[J].Soil Biology&Biochemistry,1999,31(4):543-550.
    [30]Sikora L J,Enkiri N K.Efficiency of compost-fertilizer blends compared with fertilizer alone[J].Soil Science,2000,165(5):444-451.
    [31]张威,张旭东,何红波,等.干湿交替条件下土壤氮素转化及其影响研究进展[J].生态学杂志,2010,29(4):783-789.ZHANG Wei,ZHANG Xu-dong,HE Hong-bo,et al.Research advances in soil nitrogen transformation as related to drying/wetting cycles[J].Chinese Journal of Ecology,2010,29(4):783-789.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700