双颌前突正畸治疗后女性和美貌女性的侧貌软组织对比
|
摘要
目的比较双颌前突矫治后女性和美貌女性的侧貌软组织特征和差异。方法选取25名美貌女性的右侧面像(美貌组),以及25例双颌前突矫治结束后女性的右侧面像(矫治组)。使用Adobe Photoshop CS6软件进行图像标准化处理。测量12个角度指标及4个线距指标,以分析两组女性侧貌软组织的差异。结果美貌组的面突角、全面突角、鼻突角、鼻底点-H线距离均大于矫治组,上唇颏突角、下唇颏突角、H角、上唇突点-E线距离、下唇突点-E线距离小于矫治组(均P <0. 05)。结论相对于双颌前突矫治结束后的女性,美貌女性的软组织侧貌相对更为直立,唇部软组织凸度相对较小。
Objective To compare the features and difference of soft tissues in profile between females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics and beautiful females. Methods The right facial images of 25 beautiful females( beauty group) and 25 females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics( orthodontics group) were selected.Adobe Photoshop CS6 software was used to standardize the images. Then 12 indices of angle and 4 indices of line spacing were measured to assess the difference in the soft tissues in profile between females of the two groups. Results The beauty group had larger angle of facial process,angle of overall process,and angle of nasal process,longer distance between subnasale and line H,but smaller angle between upper lip and chin protrusion,angle between lower lip and chin protrusion,and angle H,shorter distance between upper lip anterior and line E,and distance between lower lip anterior and line E than the orthodontics group( all P < 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics,beautiful females obtain relatively upright soft tissue facial profile and relatively smaller convexity of labial soft tissues.
Objective To compare the features and difference of soft tissues in profile between females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics and beautiful females. Methods The right facial images of 25 beautiful females( beauty group) and 25 females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics( orthodontics group) were selected.Adobe Photoshop CS6 software was used to standardize the images. Then 12 indices of angle and 4 indices of line spacing were measured to assess the difference in the soft tissues in profile between females of the two groups. Results The beauty group had larger angle of facial process,angle of overall process,and angle of nasal process,longer distance between subnasale and line H,but smaller angle between upper lip and chin protrusion,angle between lower lip and chin protrusion,and angle H,shorter distance between upper lip anterior and line E,and distance between lower lip anterior and line E than the orthodontics group( all P < 0. 05). Conclusion Compared with females with bimaxillary protrusion after orthodontics,beautiful females obtain relatively upright soft tissue facial profile and relatively smaller convexity of labial soft tissues.
引文
[1] Leonardi R,Annunziata A,Licciardello V,et al. Soft tissue changes following the extraction of premolars in nongrowing patients with bimaxillary protrusion. A systematic review[J].Angle Orthod,2010,80(1):211-216.
[2]李九军,孙静.双颌前突患者正畸治疗对美容的影响[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(7):126-127.
[3]谢永建,麦理想,许跃.成人双颌前突患者正畸治疗前后鼻唇颏关系的性别差异[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2017,11(4):230-233.
[4]李雪莲,陈辉,石瑛,等.拔牙矫治对双颌前突患者正侧貌美观的影响[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2015,2(4):75-76,78.
[5]王兴,张震康,王洪君.中国美貌人群的侧貌软组织X线头影测量研究[J].口腔医学纵横,1991,7(2):86-90.
[6] Peck H,Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics[J]. Angle Orthod,1970,40(4):284-318.
[7] Esthetics RR. Esthetics,environment,and the law of lip relation[J]. Am J Orthod,1968,54(4):272-289.
[8] Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. PartⅠ[J]. Am J Orthod,1983,84(1):1-28.
[9]曲靖,路瑆,葛红珊,等.年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析[J].上海口腔医学,2014,23(5):586-589.
[10]赵震锦,王丽萍,郑雪松,等.侧貌美观评价的影响因素[J].中国医科大学学报,2017,46(6):540-543,547.
[11]谢吉晔.颌面部软组织侧貌的美学研究进展[J].广东牙病防治,2015,23(4):219-222.
[12]王凌.正畸颜面审美中鼻、唇、颏三者之间的关系[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2014,35(1):80-82.
[13]罗卫红,王壬,傅民魁,成人正常牙合与双颌前突错牙合侧貌特点的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2000,16(3):226-228.
[14]李青,李斌.影响高角型骨性Ⅰ类青年女性面下1/3侧貌美的软硬组织分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2015,2(3):82-83.
[15]刘锋波.正颌联合正畸治疗骨性双颌前突畸形的效果分析[J].中国医疗美容,2015(1):85-86.
[16]刘仲,刘思颖,杨妍.颏唇角改变对中国汉族人群软组织侧貌影响的审美评价[J].北京口腔医学,2017,25(4):197-201.
[17]石聪聪.鼻-唇-颏软组织侧貌影响因素的研究进展[J].医学研究生学报,2014,27(3):313-316.
[2]李九军,孙静.双颌前突患者正畸治疗对美容的影响[J].中国实用医药,2015,10(7):126-127.
[3]谢永建,麦理想,许跃.成人双颌前突患者正畸治疗前后鼻唇颏关系的性别差异[J].中华口腔医学研究杂志(电子版),2017,11(4):230-233.
[4]李雪莲,陈辉,石瑛,等.拔牙矫治对双颌前突患者正侧貌美观的影响[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2015,2(4):75-76,78.
[5]王兴,张震康,王洪君.中国美貌人群的侧貌软组织X线头影测量研究[J].口腔医学纵横,1991,7(2):86-90.
[6] Peck H,Peck S. A concept of facial esthetics[J]. Angle Orthod,1970,40(4):284-318.
[7] Esthetics RR. Esthetics,environment,and the law of lip relation[J]. Am J Orthod,1968,54(4):272-289.
[8] Holdaway RA. A soft-tissue cephalometric analysis and its use in orthodontic treatment planning. PartⅠ[J]. Am J Orthod,1983,84(1):1-28.
[9]曲靖,路瑆,葛红珊,等.年轻美貌人群颜面美学评判分析[J].上海口腔医学,2014,23(5):586-589.
[10]赵震锦,王丽萍,郑雪松,等.侧貌美观评价的影响因素[J].中国医科大学学报,2017,46(6):540-543,547.
[11]谢吉晔.颌面部软组织侧貌的美学研究进展[J].广东牙病防治,2015,23(4):219-222.
[12]王凌.正畸颜面审美中鼻、唇、颏三者之间的关系[J].西北民族大学学报(自然科学版),2014,35(1):80-82.
[13]罗卫红,王壬,傅民魁,成人正常牙合与双颌前突错牙合侧貌特点的临床研究[J].实用口腔医学杂志,2000,16(3):226-228.
[14]李青,李斌.影响高角型骨性Ⅰ类青年女性面下1/3侧貌美的软硬组织分析[J].全科口腔医学电子杂志,2015,2(3):82-83.
[15]刘锋波.正颌联合正畸治疗骨性双颌前突畸形的效果分析[J].中国医疗美容,2015(1):85-86.
[16]刘仲,刘思颖,杨妍.颏唇角改变对中国汉族人群软组织侧貌影响的审美评价[J].北京口腔医学,2017,25(4):197-201.
[17]石聪聪.鼻-唇-颏软组织侧貌影响因素的研究进展[J].医学研究生学报,2014,27(3):313-316.