乡村旅游绅士化及其空间响应机制研究——以苏州市旺山村为例
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:Study on Rural Tourism Gentleman and Its Spatial Response Mechanism:Taking Wangshan Village in Suzhou City as An Example
  • 作者:郭吉
  • 英文作者:GUO Ji;School of Architecture and Urban Planning, Suzhou University of Science and Technology;
  • 关键词:乡村旅游绅士化 ; 空间响应 ; 机制 ; 旺山村
  • 英文关键词:rural tourism gentrification;;spatial response;;mechanism;;Wangshan village
  • 中文刊名:HBNY
  • 英文刊名:Hubei Agricultural Sciences
  • 机构:苏州科技大学建筑与城市规划学院;
  • 出版日期:2018-06-25
  • 出版单位:湖北农业科学
  • 年:2018
  • 期:v.57;No.609
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:HBNY201812032
  • 页数:6
  • CN:12
  • ISSN:42-1255/S
  • 分类号:122-127
摘要
地方政府协同资本下乡参与乡村建设已成为一种普遍现象,并在乡村地区掀起了绅士化浪潮。以乡村旅游绅士化与乡村空间重构关系互动为核心研究议题,基于村域尺度,以旺山村为例,对乡村旅游绅士化进程及空间特征进行了深入分析。结果表明,依据旅游建设历程及绅士化机制,可将旺山村乡村旅游绅士化分为政府主导的准备期、政府主导+资本参与的发展期以及文化导向+社会互动的成熟期三个阶段,不同阶段空间重构呈现不同特征。
        It has been a normal phenomenon that local government and capital to the countryside take deeply part in rural construction. And set off a wave of gentrification in the countryside. This paper focuses on the interaction between rural tourism gentrification and spatial reconstruction. It bases on village scale and study from a case of Suzhou Wangshan Village,and it makes an in-depth analysis on the mechanism of spatial reconstruction of Tourism Village. It is found that,according to the tourism construction process and the gentrification mechanism,the rural tourism gentrification can be divided into three stages:The preparation period of government-led,the development period of government-led + capital participation and the mature stage of the cultural orientation+social interaction. At different stages,there are different features in space.
引文
[1]GLASS R.Introduction//Centre for Urban Studies.London:Aspects of Change[M].London:Mac Gibbon&Kee,1964.
    [2]宋伟轩.西方城市绅士化理论纷争及启示[J].人文地理,2013(1):32-35.
    [3]何深静,钱俊希,徐雨璇,等.快速城市化背景下乡村绅士化的时空演变特征[J].地理学报,2012,67(8):1044-1056.
    [4]GOTHAM K.Tourism gentrification:The case of new Orleans Vieux Carre(French Quarter)[J].Urban Studies,2005a,42(7):1099-1121.
    [5]张娟,王茂军.乡村绅士化进程中旅游型村落生活空间重塑特征研究——以北京爨底下村为例[J].人文地理,2017,32(2):137-144.
    [6]郑皓文,朱霞.传统村落保护利用的乡村绅士化发展路径研究[A].新常态:传承与变革——2015中国城市规划年会论文集(14乡村规划)[C].中国城市规划学会,贵阳市人民政府,2015.
    [7]李广斌,王勇,袁中金.中国城市群空间演化的制度分析框架——基于法团主义的视角[J].城市规划,2013,37(10):9-13.
    [8]DARLING E.The city in the country:Wilderness gentrification and the rent gap[J].Environment&Planning A,2005,37(6):1015-1032.
    [9]王勇,李广斌.苏南乡村聚落功能三次转型及其空间形态重构——以苏州为例[J].城市规划,2011(7):54-60.
    [10]龙花楼.论土地整治与乡村空间重构[J].地理学报,2013(8):1019-1028.
    [11]赵玉宗,顾朝林,李东和,等.旅游绅士化:概念、类型与机制[J].旅游学刊,2006(11):70-74.
    [12]冯淑华,沙润.我国自驾车旅游与旅游绅士化研究[J].人文地理,2009(3):61-65.
    [13]赵玉宗,寇敏,卢松,等.城市旅游绅士化特征及其影响因素——以南京“总统府”周边地区为例[J].经济地理,2009(8):1391-1396.
    [14]HE S J.State-sponsored gentrification under market transition:The case of Shanghai[J].Urban Affairs Review,2007,43(2):171-198.
    [15]张京祥,申明锐,赵晨.超越线性转型的乡村复兴——基于南京市高淳区两个典型村庄的比较[J].经济地理,2015(3):1-8.
    [16]LEY D.Gentrification and the politics of the new middle class[J].Environment and Planning D,1994,12(1):53-74.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700