我国SSCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率的国际对比研究
|
摘要
【目的】分析我国SSCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率(Self-Cited Rate in Correlation with Impact Factor,SCR-IF)的状况,为我国SSCI收录期刊今后发展提供参考。【方法】以我国和G7国家(美国、英国、德国、法国、意大利、加拿大、日本)以及新兴国家代表(韩国、印度、俄罗斯)的SSCI收录期刊为研究对象,分别计算样本期刊的自被引率(Self-Cited Rate,SCR),同时计算SCR-IF、非影响因子相关自被引率(Self-Cited Rate Non-Correlation with Impact Factor,SCR-NIF),以及二者比值(K),对11个国家SSCI收录期刊的SCR-IF、SCR-NIF、SCR、K进行比较分析。【结果】11个国家SSCI收录期刊的SCR-IF均值均大于SCR-NIF均值和SCR均值,K的均值范围为1.358～3.040;我国SSCI收录期刊SCR-IF和SCR-NIF均低于法国、韩国、俄罗斯,SCR-IF还低于德国,SCR-NIF还低于意大利、印度,高于其他国家。我国SSCI收录期刊中,SCR-IF为0的期刊占比为9.09%,只高于美国、英国和俄罗斯,低于其他国家;我国SSCI收录期刊中,K>1.0且SCR-NIF>0.2的期刊占比为9.09%。【结论】我国SSCI收录期刊的SCR不高,但是SCR-IF高于SCR,可能与我国被SSCI收录期刊数量较少有关。
[Purposes]This paper aims to analyze the status quo of self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor( SCR-IF) of Chinese journals indexed in SSCI database,and further interpret the role of self-citation in the impact factors to provide references for scientific journals and master journals development directions. [Methods] The SSCI journals from China,the G7 countries( USA,UK,Germany,France,Italy,Canada,and Japan),and emerging countries( South Korea,India,and Russia) were taken as the research objects. All self-cited rates( SCR) of the above journals were calculated,and the SCR-IF,the self-cited rate noncorrelation with impact factor( SCR-NIF),and the ratio( K) among them were calculated at the same time. This study took a comparative analysis on the SCR-IF,SCR-NIF,SCR,and K for these countries. [Findings]The mean SCR-IF in 11 countries is all higher than the mean SCR-NIF and the mean SCR,and the mean K ranges from 1.358 to 3.040. SCR-IF and SCR-NIF in China are lower than those of France,South Korea,and Russia. Furthermore,the SCR-IF is lower than those of Germany,and SCR-NIF is lower than those of Italy and India,but higher than those of other countries. In China,the proportion of SSCI journals with SCRIF as 0 is 9.09%,only higher than those of USA,UK,and Russia,but lower than those of other countries. In China,the proportion of SSCI journals with K>1.0 and SCR-NIF >0.2 is 9.09%. [Conclusions] SCR of SSCI journals in China is not relatively high,but SCR-IF is relatively higher than SCR. It may attributed to the fact that there are few journals indexed by SSCI.
[Purposes]This paper aims to analyze the status quo of self-cited rate in correlation with impact factor( SCR-IF) of Chinese journals indexed in SSCI database,and further interpret the role of self-citation in the impact factors to provide references for scientific journals and master journals development directions. [Methods] The SSCI journals from China,the G7 countries( USA,UK,Germany,France,Italy,Canada,and Japan),and emerging countries( South Korea,India,and Russia) were taken as the research objects. All self-cited rates( SCR) of the above journals were calculated,and the SCR-IF,the self-cited rate noncorrelation with impact factor( SCR-NIF),and the ratio( K) among them were calculated at the same time. This study took a comparative analysis on the SCR-IF,SCR-NIF,SCR,and K for these countries. [Findings]The mean SCR-IF in 11 countries is all higher than the mean SCR-NIF and the mean SCR,and the mean K ranges from 1.358 to 3.040. SCR-IF and SCR-NIF in China are lower than those of France,South Korea,and Russia. Furthermore,the SCR-IF is lower than those of Germany,and SCR-NIF is lower than those of Italy and India,but higher than those of other countries. In China,the proportion of SSCI journals with SCRIF as 0 is 9.09%,only higher than those of USA,UK,and Russia,but lower than those of other countries. In China,the proportion of SSCI journals with K>1.0 and SCR-NIF >0.2 is 9.09%. [Conclusions] SCR of SSCI journals in China is not relatively high,but SCR-IF is relatively higher than SCR. It may attributed to the fact that there are few journals indexed by SSCI.
引文
[1]刘雪立.全球SCI现象和影响因子崇拜[J].中国科技期刊研究,2012,23(2):185-190.
[2]郭建顺,张学东,李文红,等.我国科技期刊的高自引率及其不合理自引的甄别[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(4):455-458.
[3]刘昌来,葛华忠,田正华,等.我国63个学科期刊平均自引率与学科期刊数量、被引集中度相关性分析[J].科技与出版,2017(11):153-156.
[4]金铁成.采用自被引率与2年自被引率检测学术期刊过度自引的比较与分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(9):949-952.
[5]盛丽娜.我国SCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率的国际比较[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,28(1):69-74.
[6]范皑皑,徐阳. SSCI收录中国期刊的发展及其影响力(一)——基于学科视角的比较研究[J].科技与出版,2015(1):71-74.
[7]方红玲. SSCI收录我国社科期刊文献计量学指标的国际对比研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(1):93-97.
[8]张玉华,潘云涛,马峥.科技期刊自引情况的国际对比研究[J].编辑学报,2005,17(1):74-78.
[9]任胜利,程维红. 2008—2013年中外科技期刊载文与引证指标分析[J].编辑学报,2015,27(5):500-503.
[10]刘雪立,魏雅惠,盛丽娜,等.科技期刊总被引频次和影响因子构成中的自引率比较——兼谈影响因子的人为操纵倾向[J].编辑学报,2017,29(6):602-606.
[11] Tighe P,Rice K J,Gravenstein N,et al. Artifactual increase in journal self-citation[J]. Anesthesia Analgesia,2011,113(2):378-382.
[12]尤金·加菲尔德.引文索引法的理论及应用[M].侯汉清,译.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.
[2]郭建顺,张学东,李文红,等.我国科技期刊的高自引率及其不合理自引的甄别[J].中国科技期刊研究,2010,21(4):455-458.
[3]刘昌来,葛华忠,田正华,等.我国63个学科期刊平均自引率与学科期刊数量、被引集中度相关性分析[J].科技与出版,2017(11):153-156.
[4]金铁成.采用自被引率与2年自被引率检测学术期刊过度自引的比较与分析[J].中国科技期刊研究,2016,27(9):949-952.
[5]盛丽娜.我国SCI收录期刊影响因子相关自被引率的国际比较[J].中国科技期刊研究,2018,28(1):69-74.
[6]范皑皑,徐阳. SSCI收录中国期刊的发展及其影响力(一)——基于学科视角的比较研究[J].科技与出版,2015(1):71-74.
[7]方红玲. SSCI收录我国社科期刊文献计量学指标的国际对比研究[J].中国科技期刊研究,2015,26(1):93-97.
[8]张玉华,潘云涛,马峥.科技期刊自引情况的国际对比研究[J].编辑学报,2005,17(1):74-78.
[9]任胜利,程维红. 2008—2013年中外科技期刊载文与引证指标分析[J].编辑学报,2015,27(5):500-503.
[10]刘雪立,魏雅惠,盛丽娜,等.科技期刊总被引频次和影响因子构成中的自引率比较——兼谈影响因子的人为操纵倾向[J].编辑学报,2017,29(6):602-606.
[11] Tighe P,Rice K J,Gravenstein N,et al. Artifactual increase in journal self-citation[J]. Anesthesia Analgesia,2011,113(2):378-382.
[12]尤金·加菲尔德.引文索引法的理论及应用[M].侯汉清,译.北京:北京图书馆出版社,2004.