张载的“化”论探析——对刘君同志质疑的质疑
|
摘要
刘君同志对笔者提出"王安石是变法激进派,张载是温和派"的观点进行质疑,其文所引典籍漏洞百出,结论不科学、不可靠。张载认为,"化"是气之运化流行过程,是一种变化形式,也是人生理想的一种境界。"渐"是气之运化流行过程中呈现出的一种状态,表现为逐渐的、缓慢的、细微的变化。"神"与"化"构成了一对极为重要的范畴,"神"为体,为形而上;"化"为用,为形而下。神体、气化体用圆融,不即不离。
Liu Jun questioned my view that Wang Anshi was a radical and Zhangaai was a moderate in the reform.There are many loopholes in the classics cited in Liu Jun's articles,and the conclusions is unscientific and unreliable.Zhang Zai believed that transformation is a popular process in of Qi the transportation,a form of change and a realm of ideal life. "Grading"is a kind of state presented in the process of transportation and popularization of Qi,which is manifested as gradual,slow and subtle changes."Deity"and "transformation"constitute a pair of extremely important scopes."Deity"as the body,is metaphysics."Transformation"as for use,is physical. Deity and transformation exist harmoniously with a discreet distance.
Liu Jun questioned my view that Wang Anshi was a radical and Zhangaai was a moderate in the reform.There are many loopholes in the classics cited in Liu Jun's articles,and the conclusions is unscientific and unreliable.Zhang Zai believed that transformation is a popular process in of Qi the transportation,a form of change and a realm of ideal life. "Grading"is a kind of state presented in the process of transportation and popularization of Qi,which is manifested as gradual,slow and subtle changes."Deity"and "transformation"constitute a pair of extremely important scopes."Deity"as the body,is metaphysics."Transformation"as for use,is physical. Deity and transformation exist harmoniously with a discreet distance.
引文
[1]刘君.中国文化语境下的“渐变”概念源流考[J].江苏科技大学学报:社会科学版,2018(2).
[2]卢有才.张载与王安石:熙宁变法中的温和派与激进派[J].南昌大学学报:人文社会科学版,2015(3).
[3]庞朴.阴阳五行探源[J].中国社会科学,1984(3).
[4]陆思贤.《周易》潜龙、飞龙源流考辨[J].内蒙古大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1988(4).
[5]徐志锐.周易大传新注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1986.
[6]张载.张载集[M].北京:中华书局,1978.
[7]程颢,程颐.二程集:下[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
[8]谢浩苑,朱迎平.管子全译:上[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1996.
[9]黎靖德.朱子语类:第5册[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[10]王力,岑麒祥,林焘,等.古汉语常用字字典[K].4版.蒋绍愚,唐作藩,张万起,等增订.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
[11]朱伯崑.易学哲学史:第2卷[M].北京:昆仑出版社,2005.
[12]黎靖德.朱子语类:第7册[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[13]辛亚民.张载易学“化”论缕析[J].中国哲学史,2013(3).
[14]王夫之.张子正蒙注[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[15]牟宗三.心体与性体:上[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
[16]唐君毅.中国哲学原论:原教篇[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
[17]冯憬远.冯憬远文集[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1999.
[18]卢有才.张载与邵雍的学术关系辨析[J].南昌大学学报:人文社会科学版,2018(2).
[19]牟宗三.宋明儒学的问题与发展[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004.
[2]卢有才.张载与王安石:熙宁变法中的温和派与激进派[J].南昌大学学报:人文社会科学版,2015(3).
[3]庞朴.阴阳五行探源[J].中国社会科学,1984(3).
[4]陆思贤.《周易》潜龙、飞龙源流考辨[J].内蒙古大学学报:哲学社会科学版,1988(4).
[5]徐志锐.周易大传新注[M].济南:齐鲁书社,1986.
[6]张载.张载集[M].北京:中华书局,1978.
[7]程颢,程颐.二程集:下[M].北京:中华书局,2004.
[8]谢浩苑,朱迎平.管子全译:上[M].贵阳:贵州人民出版社,1996.
[9]黎靖德.朱子语类:第5册[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[10]王力,岑麒祥,林焘,等.古汉语常用字字典[K].4版.蒋绍愚,唐作藩,张万起,等增订.北京:商务印书馆,2005.
[11]朱伯崑.易学哲学史:第2卷[M].北京:昆仑出版社,2005.
[12]黎靖德.朱子语类:第7册[M].北京:中华书局,1986.
[13]辛亚民.张载易学“化”论缕析[J].中国哲学史,2013(3).
[14]王夫之.张子正蒙注[M].北京:中华书局,1975.
[15]牟宗三.心体与性体:上[M].上海:上海古籍出版社,1999.
[16]唐君毅.中国哲学原论:原教篇[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,2006.
[17]冯憬远.冯憬远文集[M].郑州:中州古籍出版社,1999.
[18]卢有才.张载与邵雍的学术关系辨析[J].南昌大学学报:人文社会科学版,2018(2).
[19]牟宗三.宋明儒学的问题与发展[M].上海:华东师范大学出版社,2004.