保水剂与氮肥协同作用对绿竹抗性生理影响的综合评价
|
摘要
以福建省沿海沙地木麻黄林下套种的2年生绿竹为研究对象,对其进行保水剂与氮肥试验,测定不同处理对绿竹叶片叶绿素含量等生理指标的影响,利用主成分分析法和隶属函数法对不同保水剂与氮肥处理效果进行综合评价。结果表明:保水剂与氮肥的施用能够提高绿竹抵御福建沿海沙地夏季高温干旱的能力。在夏季不同处理时期,叶绿素含量差异不明显,可溶性蛋白含量、可溶性糖含量、脯氨酸含量、超氧化物歧化酶活性和过氧化物酶活性活性均在8月表现最低,9月表现最高,丙二醛含量和电解质渗透率在7月表现最低,8月表现最高。运用主成分分析法筛选出可溶性蛋白含量、可溶性糖含量、脯氨酸含量和丙二醛含量作为保水剂与氮肥施用效果综合评价指标,通过隶属函数法进行综合评价,A_2B_1和A_1B_3平均隶属函数值最大,该保水剂与氮肥处理综合效果优于其他处理。
Taking the 2-year-old Bambusa oldhamii under the Casuarina equisetifolia forest in the coastal sand field of Fujian Province as the research object, the water-retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer test were carried out. The effects of different treatments on physiological indexes such as chlorophyll content of B. oldhamii leaves were determined. Principal component analysis and membership function method were used to comprehensively evaluate the effects of different water retention agents and nitrogen fertilizers. The results show that the application of water retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer could improve the ability of B. oldhamii to resist the high temperature and drought in coastal sands of Fujian. The chlorophyll content is not significantly different in different treatment periods in summer. Soluble protein content, soluble sugar content, proline content, superoxide dismutase activity and peroxidase activity are the lowest in August, and highest in September. Malondialdehyde content and electrolyte permeability were the lowest in July and highest in August. Principal component analysis is used to screen out soluble protein content, soluble sugar content, proline content and malondialdehyde content as comprehensive evaluation indicators for water retention agent and nitrogen fertilizer application effect.Through the comprehensive evaluation of the membership function method, the average membership function values of A2 B1 and A1 B3 are the largest, and the comprehensive effect of the water retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer treatment is better than other treatments.
Taking the 2-year-old Bambusa oldhamii under the Casuarina equisetifolia forest in the coastal sand field of Fujian Province as the research object, the water-retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer test were carried out. The effects of different treatments on physiological indexes such as chlorophyll content of B. oldhamii leaves were determined. Principal component analysis and membership function method were used to comprehensively evaluate the effects of different water retention agents and nitrogen fertilizers. The results show that the application of water retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer could improve the ability of B. oldhamii to resist the high temperature and drought in coastal sands of Fujian. The chlorophyll content is not significantly different in different treatment periods in summer. Soluble protein content, soluble sugar content, proline content, superoxide dismutase activity and peroxidase activity are the lowest in August, and highest in September. Malondialdehyde content and electrolyte permeability were the lowest in July and highest in August. Principal component analysis is used to screen out soluble protein content, soluble sugar content, proline content and malondialdehyde content as comprehensive evaluation indicators for water retention agent and nitrogen fertilizer application effect.Through the comprehensive evaluation of the membership function method, the average membership function values of A2 B1 and A1 B3 are the largest, and the comprehensive effect of the water retaining agent and nitrogen fertilizer treatment is better than other treatments.
引文
[1]林武星.沿海木麻黄基干林带更新方式和更新效果研究[J].江西农业大学学报,2016,22(4):576-580.
[2]林武星.闽南沿海沙地引种树种的评价[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(1):42-45.
[3]谭芳林,徐俊森,林武星,等.福建滨海沙地造林树种的适应性与选择研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(S1):100-105.
[4]杜澜,陈亮,谢锦忠,等.干旱胁迫及复水对绿竹容器苗生理特征的影响[J].林业科学研究,2018,31(4):164-171.
[5]郑容妹,郑郁善,张梅,等.盐分胁迫对沿海绿竹光合作用及叶绿素的影响[J].竹子学报,2002,21(4):76-80.
[6]林爱玉,涂志华,上官保国,等.沿海沙地引种竹子和木麻黄固沙功能比较研究[J].福建林学院学报,2013,33(1):28-33.
[7]张梅,郑郁善,陈礼光.滨海沙地竹子引种试验初报[J].西南林学院学报,2007,27(1):48-50.
[8]陈礼光,郑郁善,姚庆端,等.沿海沙地新造绿竹林生物量结构[J].福建林学院学报,2002,22(3):249-252.
[9]郑郁善,郑容妹,姚庆端.盐分胁迫对沿海沙地绿竹生理生化的效应[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2003,32(4):478-481.
[10]涂志华,潘瑞,卢仁锋,等.沿海沙地8个竹种根际土壤的酶活性[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2012,41(3):243-247.
[11]郑晶晶,蔡锰柯,林宇,等.6种不同沿海防护混交林凋落叶持水性能比较[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):111-116.
[12]李大培,李生萍,高向倩,等.安康‘紫仁’核桃响应干旱胁迫的生理评价研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(1):202-206.
[13]马晓华,郑坚,张旭乐,等.干旱胁迫对大花紫薇与毛萼紫薇生理生化特征的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(5):205-209.
[14]马丙尧,刘方春,马海林,等.保水剂-尿素凝胶对核桃苗根际土壤微生态环境影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(27):55-59.
[15]宋双双,孙保平,张建锋.保水剂和微生物菌肥对半干旱区造林和土壤改良的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):334-339.
[16]章桂芝.沿海沙地竹林施肥效应与经营管理措施研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.
[17]高俊凤.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[18]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[19]温延臣,李燕青,袁亮,等.长期不同施肥制度土壤肥力特征综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):91-99.
[20]吴晓凤,倪沛,杨涛,等.10种菊科植物的抗旱性与抗盐性评价[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(7):1959-1968.
[21]庞海颖,牛东伟,李彦慧.施用保水剂对仁用杏抗旱生理特性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2017,40(4):43-49.
[22]李佳,刘立云,李艳,等.保水剂对干旱胁迫槟榔幼苗生理特征的影响[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(1):104-108.
[23]黄慧青,周林涛,安勐颍,等.保水剂对海滨雀稗抗旱性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(8):1828-1833.
[24]王海珍,徐雅丽,张翠丽,等.干旱胁迫对胡杨和灰胡杨幼苗渗透调节物质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(12):125-130.
[25]王东清,李国旗,苏德喜.干旱胁迫对两种罗布麻渗透调节物质积累和保护酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(12):177-181.
[26]陈丽培,刘瑞霞,杨玉珍,等.干旱胁迫对刺槐、皂荚叶片渗透调节物质含量及保护酶活性的影响[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(10):122-127.
[27]Farhangi A S,Torabianb S.Antioxidant enzyme and osmotic adjustment changes in bean seedlings as affected by biochar under salt stress[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2017,137:64-70.
[28]周伟伟,王雁,杜静.干旱胁迫对景天属植物生理生化特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(6):829-834.
[29]王红梅,包维楷,李芳兰.不同干旱胁迫强度下白刺花幼苗叶片的生理生化反应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,14(6):757-762.
[30]顾建勤,闫志利,牛俊义,等.干旱胁迫及复水对豌豆苗期保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(3):159-164.
[31]刘佳,郁继华,徐秉良,等.干旱气候条件下水分胁迫对辣椒叶片生理特性的影响[J].核农学报,2012,26(8):1197-1203.
[32]原慧芳,肖荣才,黄菁,等.东试早柚对不同保水处理的生理响应及综合评价[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(4):586-594.
[33]赵和琼,谷丽萍,郑科,等.不同集水保水措施对金沙江干热河谷区林地土壤储水量的影响[J].西部林业科学,2018,47(6):85-89.
[34]杨磊,苏文强.化肥对保水剂吸水性能的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2004,32(5):37-38.
[2]林武星.闽南沿海沙地引种树种的评价[J].中南林学院学报,2005,25(1):42-45.
[3]谭芳林,徐俊森,林武星,等.福建滨海沙地造林树种的适应性与选择研究[J].林业科学,2003,39(S1):100-105.
[4]杜澜,陈亮,谢锦忠,等.干旱胁迫及复水对绿竹容器苗生理特征的影响[J].林业科学研究,2018,31(4):164-171.
[5]郑容妹,郑郁善,张梅,等.盐分胁迫对沿海绿竹光合作用及叶绿素的影响[J].竹子学报,2002,21(4):76-80.
[6]林爱玉,涂志华,上官保国,等.沿海沙地引种竹子和木麻黄固沙功能比较研究[J].福建林学院学报,2013,33(1):28-33.
[7]张梅,郑郁善,陈礼光.滨海沙地竹子引种试验初报[J].西南林学院学报,2007,27(1):48-50.
[8]陈礼光,郑郁善,姚庆端,等.沿海沙地新造绿竹林生物量结构[J].福建林学院学报,2002,22(3):249-252.
[9]郑郁善,郑容妹,姚庆端.盐分胁迫对沿海沙地绿竹生理生化的效应[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2003,32(4):478-481.
[10]涂志华,潘瑞,卢仁锋,等.沿海沙地8个竹种根际土壤的酶活性[J].福建农林大学学报(自然科学版),2012,41(3):243-247.
[11]郑晶晶,蔡锰柯,林宇,等.6种不同沿海防护混交林凋落叶持水性能比较[J].水土保持通报,2015,35(5):111-116.
[12]李大培,李生萍,高向倩,等.安康‘紫仁’核桃响应干旱胁迫的生理评价研究[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(1):202-206.
[13]马晓华,郑坚,张旭乐,等.干旱胁迫对大花紫薇与毛萼紫薇生理生化特征的影响[J].西南林业大学学报(自然科学),2018,38(5):205-209.
[14]马丙尧,刘方春,马海林,等.保水剂-尿素凝胶对核桃苗根际土壤微生态环境影响[J].中国农学通报,2018,34(27):55-59.
[15]宋双双,孙保平,张建锋.保水剂和微生物菌肥对半干旱区造林和土壤改良的影响[J].水土保持学报,2018,32(3):334-339.
[16]章桂芝.沿海沙地竹林施肥效应与经营管理措施研究[D].福州:福建农林大学,2014.
[17]高俊凤.植物生理学[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2006.
[18]李合生.植物生理生化实验原理和技术[M].北京:高等教育出版社,2000.
[19]温延臣,李燕青,袁亮,等.长期不同施肥制度土壤肥力特征综合评价方法[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(7):91-99.
[20]吴晓凤,倪沛,杨涛,等.10种菊科植物的抗旱性与抗盐性评价[J].生态学杂志,2018,37(7):1959-1968.
[21]庞海颖,牛东伟,李彦慧.施用保水剂对仁用杏抗旱生理特性的影响[J].河北农业大学学报,2017,40(4):43-49.
[22]李佳,刘立云,李艳,等.保水剂对干旱胁迫槟榔幼苗生理特征的影响[J].南方农业学报,2018,49(1):104-108.
[23]黄慧青,周林涛,安勐颍,等.保水剂对海滨雀稗抗旱性的影响[J].西南农业学报,2016,29(8):1828-1833.
[24]王海珍,徐雅丽,张翠丽,等.干旱胁迫对胡杨和灰胡杨幼苗渗透调节物质及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2015,29(12):125-130.
[25]王东清,李国旗,苏德喜.干旱胁迫对两种罗布麻渗透调节物质积累和保护酶活性的影响[J].干旱区资源与环境,2012,26(12):177-181.
[26]陈丽培,刘瑞霞,杨玉珍,等.干旱胁迫对刺槐、皂荚叶片渗透调节物质含量及保护酶活性的影响[J].河南农业科学,2017,46(10):122-127.
[27]Farhangi A S,Torabianb S.Antioxidant enzyme and osmotic adjustment changes in bean seedlings as affected by biochar under salt stress[J].Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety,2017,137:64-70.
[28]周伟伟,王雁,杜静.干旱胁迫对景天属植物生理生化特性的影响[J].林业科学研究,2009,22(6):829-834.
[29]王红梅,包维楷,李芳兰.不同干旱胁迫强度下白刺花幼苗叶片的生理生化反应[J].应用与环境生物学报,2008,14(6):757-762.
[30]顾建勤,闫志利,牛俊义,等.干旱胁迫及复水对豌豆苗期保护酶活性及膜脂过氧化的影响[J].干旱地区农业研究,2012,30(3):159-164.
[31]刘佳,郁继华,徐秉良,等.干旱气候条件下水分胁迫对辣椒叶片生理特性的影响[J].核农学报,2012,26(8):1197-1203.
[32]原慧芳,肖荣才,黄菁,等.东试早柚对不同保水处理的生理响应及综合评价[J].浙江农业学报,2016,28(4):586-594.
[33]赵和琼,谷丽萍,郑科,等.不同集水保水措施对金沙江干热河谷区林地土壤储水量的影响[J].西部林业科学,2018,47(6):85-89.
[34]杨磊,苏文强.化肥对保水剂吸水性能的影响[J].东北林业大学学报,2004,32(5):37-38.