刑事案件运行的困境及其破解——以某区检察院刑事案件的实证调查为视角
|
摘要
在规范司法行为的背景下,刑事案件运行仍然存在着社会危险性调查取证不足、犯罪嫌疑人的羁押率过高、侦查主导性与检警关系的失衡以及强制措施刑罚化等准规范司法行为问题。基于对某区检查院刑事案件的实证分析,以相对精确的案件数据为分析样本,审视刑事案件运行的突出特征,并对其规范性阐释,提出逮捕必要性深度化、侦查监督职能化以及强制措施区分化的合理诉求,强化司法公正在诉讼终端的既定力和权威性,顺应以审判为中心的改革要求,彰显司法公平正义的终极价值的对策。
The judicial standardization would unify complicated and repeated things and concepts by means of establishing laws and regulations in judicial activities,aiming at resolving practical and potential problems such as judicial judgment and case settlement. Based on this background,there are new normal background of quasi-standardization judicial acts about operation in criminal cases such as inadequate investigation and evidence collection about social risk,high-rate custody of criminal suspects,domination in investigation,the imbalance of relationship between the prosecutor and the police,criminal punishment of coercive measures. Therefore,based on the empirical analysis in criminal cases and analytical samples with relatively precise case data,examining its prominent features and interpret it normatively,we propose some countermeasures such as enlarging the depth of arrest necessity,the fictionalization of investigation supervision,the differentiation of coercive to strengthen established power and authority of justice in legation terminal and conform to the reform requirement of trial centralism,in order to reveal the ultimate value of judicial fairness and justice and promote the modern process of rule of law in China.
The judicial standardization would unify complicated and repeated things and concepts by means of establishing laws and regulations in judicial activities,aiming at resolving practical and potential problems such as judicial judgment and case settlement. Based on this background,there are new normal background of quasi-standardization judicial acts about operation in criminal cases such as inadequate investigation and evidence collection about social risk,high-rate custody of criminal suspects,domination in investigation,the imbalance of relationship between the prosecutor and the police,criminal punishment of coercive measures. Therefore,based on the empirical analysis in criminal cases and analytical samples with relatively precise case data,examining its prominent features and interpret it normatively,we propose some countermeasures such as enlarging the depth of arrest necessity,the fictionalization of investigation supervision,the differentiation of coercive to strengthen established power and authority of justice in legation terminal and conform to the reform requirement of trial centralism,in order to reveal the ultimate value of judicial fairness and justice and promote the modern process of rule of law in China.
引文
[1]王青.“无逮捕必要”情形的社会危险性分析[J].中国检察官,2013(13):7-8.
[2]杨秀莉,关振海.逮捕条件中社会危险性评估模式之构建[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014(1):63-70.
[3]张吉喜.以审判为中心的诉讼制度[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2015(3):44-52.
[4]闵春雷.以审判为中心:内涵解读及实现路径[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2015(3):35-43.
[5]朱孝青.略论“以审判为中心”[J].人民检察,2015(1):6-8.
[6]单民,董坤.以审判为中心背景下的诉审关系探讨[J].人民检察,2015(12):18-22.
[7]关于检警关系改革的探讨[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinalawedu.com/new/16900a173a2011/201186caoxin145828.shtml.
[8]中华人民共和国最高人民检察院.预防纠正超期羁押和久押不决[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/micro-reading/dzh/2015-08-04/content_14074792.html.
[9]李荞明系看守所内牢头狱霸殴打致死[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinavalue.net/Finance/Article/2009-6-18/181352.html.
[10]江苏泰州高港.细化社会危险性证明标准防止“构罪即捕”[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201508/t20150804_102431.shtml.
[11]两男车祸后拿刀要修车款无社会危险性未批捕[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://heilongjiang.dbw.cn/system/2015/07/24/056696043.shtml.
[2]杨秀莉,关振海.逮捕条件中社会危险性评估模式之构建[J].中国刑事法杂志,2014(1):63-70.
[3]张吉喜.以审判为中心的诉讼制度[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2015(3):44-52.
[4]闵春雷.以审判为中心:内涵解读及实现路径[J].法律科学(西北政法大学学报),2015(3):35-43.
[5]朱孝青.略论“以审判为中心”[J].人民检察,2015(1):6-8.
[6]单民,董坤.以审判为中心背景下的诉审关系探讨[J].人民检察,2015(12):18-22.
[7]关于检警关系改革的探讨[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinalawedu.com/new/16900a173a2011/201186caoxin145828.shtml.
[8]中华人民共和国最高人民检察院.预防纠正超期羁押和久押不决[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/micro-reading/dzh/2015-08-04/content_14074792.html.
[9]李荞明系看守所内牢头狱霸殴打致死[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.chinavalue.net/Finance/Article/2009-6-18/181352.html.
[10]江苏泰州高港.细化社会危险性证明标准防止“构罪即捕”[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://www.spp.gov.cn/zdgz/201508/t20150804_102431.shtml.
[11]两男车祸后拿刀要修车款无社会危险性未批捕[EB/OL].[2015-08-09].http://heilongjiang.dbw.cn/system/2015/07/24/056696043.shtml.