社会因素对大学生心理状况的影响——心理灵活性的中介作用
|
摘要
目的考察不同心理状况大学生的心理灵活性与社会因素间存在的差异,探究心理灵活性在心理状况和社会因素之间的中介作用。方法采用认知融合分问卷(CFQ-F)、接纳与行动问卷第二版(AAQ-Ⅱ)以及自编一般信息调查表,对某医科大学350名普通大学生和32名心理测试提示异常且行为、情绪出现改变,或确诊患有精神疾病的心理高危大学生进行调查。结果 (1)普通大学生和心理高危大学生的心理灵活性存在差异(P<0.001);(2)社会因素在对心理状态的影响过程中,心理灵活性起到了部分中介的作用。结论社会因素可直接对心理状况产生影响,也可通过心理灵活性间接影响心理状况。
Objective To investigate the difference between psychological ?exibility and social factors in college students with different mental status,and to explore the mediating role of psychological ?exibility between mental status and social factors.Methods A total of 350 general college students and 32 high-risk psychological students with abnormal psychological behaviors and mood changes,or diagnosed with mental illness from a medical university were investigated by using the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-F(CFQ-F),Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition(AAQ-II),and a self-made general information questionnaire.Result ① There is a signi?cant difference in the psychological ?exibility of ordinary college students and psychologically high-risk college students(P<0.01);② In the process of social factors in?uencing mental state,psychological?exibility plays a part of mediating role.Conclusion Social factors can directly affect the mental status or indirectly in?uence the mental status through psychological ?exibility.
Objective To investigate the difference between psychological ?exibility and social factors in college students with different mental status,and to explore the mediating role of psychological ?exibility between mental status and social factors.Methods A total of 350 general college students and 32 high-risk psychological students with abnormal psychological behaviors and mood changes,or diagnosed with mental illness from a medical university were investigated by using the Cognitive Fusion Questionnaire-F(CFQ-F),Acceptance and Action Questionnaire-Second Edition(AAQ-II),and a self-made general information questionnaire.Result ① There is a signi?cant difference in the psychological ?exibility of ordinary college students and psychologically high-risk college students(P<0.01);② In the process of social factors in?uencing mental state,psychological?exibility plays a part of mediating role.Conclusion Social factors can directly affect the mental status or indirectly in?uence the mental status through psychological ?exibility.
引文
[1]许英华.大学生心理健康状况的调查[J].中国公共卫生管理,2018,34(1):138-140.
[2]陈顺森,陈春玉.近20年大学生心理健康状况的变迁[J].漳州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2011,24(2):96-101.
[3]万玲玲.心理社会因素对现代大学生健康的影响与对策[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(17):180-181.
[4]Mccracken L M.Committed Action:An Application of the Psychological Flexibility Model to Activity Patterns in Chronic Pain[J].The Journal of Pain,2013,14(8):828-835.
[5]Hussey I,Barnes-Holmes D.The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Implicit Depression and the Role of Psychological Flexibility[J].Cognitive and Behavioral Practice,2012,19(4):573-582.
[6]王平.心理灵活性:心理健康的保护性要素[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2015,3(2):57-64.
[7]李新,吉阳,祝卓宏.大学生心理灵活性与心理健康相关研究[J].中国卫生统计,2015,32(2):313-316.
[8]张维晨,吉阳,李新,等.认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(1):40-44.
[9]陈小梅.大学生心理危机与宿舍人际关系[J].福建商业高等专科学校学报,2011,14(2):65-68.
[10]郭梅华,陈虹,黄伟东.大学生宿舍人际和谐度与心理健康的关系研究[J].赣南师范学院学报,2012,33(4):97-101.
[11]赵进法,梁亚兰,郑艳秋.大学生宿舍人际关系与心理健康的调查研究[J].科技视界,2015,5(4):190-191.
[12]张维晨,吉阳,李新,等.认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(1):40-44.
[13]王平.心理灵活性:心理健康的保护性要素[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2015,3(2):57-64.
[14]Hayes Sc,Strosahl Kd,Kg Wilson.接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)正念改变之道[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2016.
[15]曹静,吉阳,祝卓宏.接纳与行动问卷第二版中文版测评大学生的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(11):873-877.
[16]王淑娟,张婍,祝卓宏.关系框架理论:接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(11):877-880.
[2]陈顺森,陈春玉.近20年大学生心理健康状况的变迁[J].漳州师范学院学报(自然科学版),2011,24(2):96-101.
[3]万玲玲.心理社会因素对现代大学生健康的影响与对策[J].临床合理用药杂志,2014,7(17):180-181.
[4]Mccracken L M.Committed Action:An Application of the Psychological Flexibility Model to Activity Patterns in Chronic Pain[J].The Journal of Pain,2013,14(8):828-835.
[5]Hussey I,Barnes-Holmes D.The Implicit Relational Assessment Procedure as a Measure of Implicit Depression and the Role of Psychological Flexibility[J].Cognitive and Behavioral Practice,2012,19(4):573-582.
[6]王平.心理灵活性:心理健康的保护性要素[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2015,3(2):57-64.
[7]李新,吉阳,祝卓宏.大学生心理灵活性与心理健康相关研究[J].中国卫生统计,2015,32(2):313-316.
[8]张维晨,吉阳,李新,等.认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(1):40-44.
[9]陈小梅.大学生心理危机与宿舍人际关系[J].福建商业高等专科学校学报,2011,14(2):65-68.
[10]郭梅华,陈虹,黄伟东.大学生宿舍人际和谐度与心理健康的关系研究[J].赣南师范学院学报,2012,33(4):97-101.
[11]赵进法,梁亚兰,郑艳秋.大学生宿舍人际关系与心理健康的调查研究[J].科技视界,2015,5(4):190-191.
[12]张维晨,吉阳,李新,等.认知融合问卷中文版的信效度分析[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2014,28(1):40-44.
[13]王平.心理灵活性:心理健康的保护性要素[J].苏州大学学报(教育科学版),2015,3(2):57-64.
[14]Hayes Sc,Strosahl Kd,Kg Wilson.接纳与承诺疗法(ACT)正念改变之道[M].北京:知识产权出版社,2016.
[15]曹静,吉阳,祝卓宏.接纳与行动问卷第二版中文版测评大学生的信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2013,27(11):873-877.
[16]王淑娟,张婍,祝卓宏.关系框架理论:接纳与承诺治疗的理论基础(述评)[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2012,26(11):877-880.