摘要
基于2007—2015年中国30个省(市、区)的统计数据,对中国东、中、西部地区企业清洁技术创新水平及其影响因素的区域差异进行分析,结果表明:市场型环境规制强度对清洁技术创新水平有显著正向影响,其中对东部地区影响最为明显;环境补贴对清洁技术创新水平产生正向影响,但对中、西部地区影响为负,不能有效激发地区创新主动性;排污收费对各地区清洁技术创新水平产生明显负向影响,其原因是排污收费门槛远低于治污成本。此外,企业规模对东、西部清洁技术创新水平产生显著正向影响。
Based on the statistics of 30 provinces, municipalities and autonomous regions in China from 2007 to 2015, an empirical analysis was conducted to analyze the impact of clean technology innovations in the eastern, central and western regions in China. Findings indicate that the intensity of market-based environmental regulation has a significant positive effect on clean technology innovation, and such impact is the most prominent in the eastern region.Environmental subsidies have a positive effect on clean-technological innovation, but such influence is negative in the central and western regions for it fails to stimulate local innovation initiative. On the other hand, sewage charges have a significant negative effect on such innovation in each region for the reason that the sewage charges are far lower than pollution control costs. Moreover, the size of the enterprise has a salient positive impact on clean technology innovation in the eastern and western regions.
引文
[1]刘海英,谢建政.排污权交易与清洁技术研发补贴能提高清洁技术创新水平吗--来自工业SO2排放权交易试点省份的经验证据[J].上海财经大学学报哲学社会科学版,2016,18(5):79-90.
[2]袁丽静,郑晓凡.环境规制、政府补贴对企业技术创新的耦合影响[J].资源科学,2017,39(5):911-923.
[3]Santis D R,Lasinio C J.Environmental Policies,Innovation and Productivity in the EU[J].Global Economy Journal,2015,51(2):249-262.
[4]Hamamoto M.Environmental Regulation and the Productivity of Japanese Manufacturing Industries[J].Resource and Energy Economics,2006,28(4):299-312.
[5]Xepapadeas A,de Zeeuw A.Environmental Policy and Competitiveness:The Porter Hypothesis and the Composition of Capital[J].Journal of Environmental Economics and Management,1999,37(2):165-182.
[6]黄德春,刘志彪.环境规制与企业自主创新--基于波特假设的企业竞争优势构建[J].中国工业经济,2006(3):100-106.
[7]景维民,张璐.环境管制、对外开放与中国工业的绿色技术进步[J].经济研究,2014(9):34-47.
[8]郝海波.环境规制是否会影响企业国际竞争力?--关于波特假说的新思考[J].山东财政学院学报,2008(3):85-89.
[9]Brannlund R.,R.Fare and S.Grosskopf.Environmental Regulation and Profitability:An Application to Swedish Pulp and Paper Mills[J].Environmental and Resource Economics,1995,6(1):23-36.
[10]Jaffe A.B.and K.Palmer.Environmental Regulation and Innovation:A Panel Data Study[J].Review of Economics&Statistics,1997,79(4):610-619.Leonard J.Pollution and the Struggle for the World Product[J].Cambridge University Press,1998(5):223-251
[11]赵细康.引导绿色创新:技术创新导向的环境政策研究[M[.北京:经济科学出版社,2006.
[12]Acemoglu D,Aghion P,Bursztyn L,et al.The Environment and Directed Technical Change[J].American Economic Review,2012,102(1):131-166.
[13]Lanoie P,Lucchetti J,Johnstone N,Ambec S.Environmental Policy,Innovation and Performance:New Insights on the Porter Hypothesis[R].CIRANOScientific Series,September 2007[2012-02-16].http://www.cirano.qc.ca/pdf/publication/2007s-19.pdf.
[14]Jaffe A B,Stavins R N.Dynamic Incentives of Environmental Regulations:The Effects of Alternative Policy Instruments on Technology Diffusion[J].Journal of Environmental Economics&Management,1995,29(3):S43-S63.
[15]董直庆,焦翠红.环境规制能有效激励清洁技术创新吗?--源于非线性门槛面板模型的新解释[J].东南大学学报哲学社会科学版,2015(2):64-74.
[16]李勃昕,韩先锋,宋文飞.环境规制影响清洁生产型产业技术的创新效率吗?[J].中国科技论坛,2013(5):68-75+80.
[17]刘伟,童健,薛景.行业异质性、环境规制与工业技术创新[J].科研管理,2017,38(5):1-11.
[18]王芳玲.我国环境规制对清洁技术创新的影响研究[D].长春:吉林大学,2014.
[19]张国勇.环境规制对技术创新的影响研究--基于辽宁省的实证分析[J].生态经济,2018,34(6):68-72.
[20]张雯.我国税收的环保效应实证研究[D].成都:西南财经大学,2013.
(1)东部地区为北京、天津、河北、辽宁、上海、江苏、浙江、福建、山东、广东、海南;中部地区是山西、吉林、黑龙江、安徽、江西、河南、湖北、湖南;西部地区是内蒙古、广西、重庆、四川、贵州、云南、陕西、甘肃、青海、宁夏、新疆。