靖海湾和五垒岛湾三疣梭子蟹增殖放流对资源补充效果的比较分析
|
摘要
根据2010—2016年在靖海湾与五垒岛湾进行的三疣梭子蟹放流前本底调查和放流后跟踪调查结果,对比分析靖海湾与五垒岛湾三疣梭子蟹苗种的贡献率及成活率.调查结果表明,靖海湾与五垒岛湾三疣梭子蟹自然群体资源量均较低,2010—2016年靖海湾三疣梭子蟹放流群体资源贡献率分别为50%,80%,90%,60%,81. 25%,76. 36%和92. 31%,五垒岛湾三疣梭子蟹放流群体资源贡献率为分别为60%,50%,75%,75%,95%,85. 71%和72. 73%,放流群体贡献率较大.近7年,靖海湾三疣梭子蟹苗种成活率分别为12. 86%,16. 33%,14. 24%,11. 37%,24. 87%,70. 32%和68. 88%,五垒岛湾苗种成活率分别为6. 86%,3. 42%,5. 68%,5. 84%,37. 76%,23. 85%和30. 86%,靖海湾放流苗种成活率略高于五垒岛湾.通过靖海湾与五垒岛湾三疣梭子蟹放流效果对比分析得出,增殖放流对三疣梭子蟹资源有极大的补充作用.
The original survey before releasing and the tracking survey after releasing of Portunus trituberculatus were conducted in Jinghai Bay and Wuleidao Bay in 2010—2016. The contribution rate and survival rate of Portunus trituberculatus seedling in Jinghai Bay and Wuleidao Bay were analyzed based on the results of this survey. The survey results showed that resource of wild population in the two bays was low. From 2010 to 2016,the contribution rate of releasing population of Portunus trituberculatus seedling were 50%,80%,90%,60%,81. 25%,76. 36%and 92. 31%,respectively,in Jinghai Bay. While the contribution rate of releasing population of Portunus trituberculatus seedling were 60%,50%,75%,75%,95%,85. 71% and 72. 73%,respectively,in Wuleidao Bay.This suggests that the contribution rate of releasing population was high. In addition,during 7 years,the survival rates of seedling were 12. 86%,16. 33%,14. 24%,11. 37%,24. 87%,70. 32% and 68. 88%,respectively,in Jinghai Bay. The survival rates of seedling were 6. 86%,3. 42%,5. 68%,5. 84%,37. 76%,23. 85% and30. 86%,respectively,in Wuleidao Bay. On the whole,the survival rates in Jinghai Bay were higher than those in Wuleidao Bay. Further analysis results showed that the enhancements of Portunus trituberculatus played important roles in resource supplement.
The original survey before releasing and the tracking survey after releasing of Portunus trituberculatus were conducted in Jinghai Bay and Wuleidao Bay in 2010—2016. The contribution rate and survival rate of Portunus trituberculatus seedling in Jinghai Bay and Wuleidao Bay were analyzed based on the results of this survey. The survey results showed that resource of wild population in the two bays was low. From 2010 to 2016,the contribution rate of releasing population of Portunus trituberculatus seedling were 50%,80%,90%,60%,81. 25%,76. 36%and 92. 31%,respectively,in Jinghai Bay. While the contribution rate of releasing population of Portunus trituberculatus seedling were 60%,50%,75%,75%,95%,85. 71% and 72. 73%,respectively,in Wuleidao Bay.This suggests that the contribution rate of releasing population was high. In addition,during 7 years,the survival rates of seedling were 12. 86%,16. 33%,14. 24%,11. 37%,24. 87%,70. 32% and 68. 88%,respectively,in Jinghai Bay. The survival rates of seedling were 6. 86%,3. 42%,5. 68%,5. 84%,37. 76%,23. 85% and30. 86%,respectively,in Wuleidao Bay. On the whole,the survival rates in Jinghai Bay were higher than those in Wuleidao Bay. Further analysis results showed that the enhancements of Portunus trituberculatus played important roles in resource supplement.
引文
[1]从旭日.莱州湾蟹类群落结构以及三疣梭子蟹营养生态位的研究[D].上海:上海海洋大学,2013:3-4.
[2]尹增强,章守宇.对我国渔业资源增殖放流的思考[J].资源与环境,2008(3):9-11.
[3]邓景耀.海洋渔业资源保护与可持续利用[J].中国渔业经济,2000(6):21-22.
[4]薛俊楠,堵南山,赖伟,等.山东省渔业资源增值放流现状与展望[J].中国渔业经济,2009,27(2):51-88.
[5]邓景耀.赵传絪.海洋渔业生物学[M].北京:农业出版社,1991:584-587.
[6]林庆贵.三疣梭子蟹养殖技术[J].现代农业科技,2009(16):290-294.
[7]王兴强,曹梅,阎斌伦,等.三疣梭子蟹综合养殖技术[J].水产科学,2009(2):105-108.
[8]戴爱云,冯钟琪,宋玉枝,等.三疣梭子蟹渔业生物学的初步调查[J].动物学杂志,1977(2):30-33.
[9]张金浩.山东半岛南部海蜇增殖放流效果评价[D].烟台:烟台大学,2013:4-5.
[10]潘绪伟,杨林林,纪炜炜,等.增值放流技术进展[J].江苏农业科学,2010(4):236-240.
[11] LI J L. An appraisal of factors constraining the success of fish stock enhancement programmes[J]. Fisheries Management and Ecilogy,2001,6(2):161-169.
[12] WANG Q Y,ZHUANG ZH M,DENG J Y,et al. Stock enhancement and translocation of the shrimp Penaeus chinensis in China[J]. Fisheries Research,2006,80(1):67-69.
[13]张秀梅,王熙杰,涂忠,等.山东省渔业资源增殖放流现状与展望[J].中国渔业经济,2009,27(2):51-58.
[14]周军,李怡群,张海鹏,等.中国对虾、梭子蟹放流区本底调查[J].河北渔业,2006(6):38-40.
[15]宋海棠,丁耀平,许源剑,等.浙北近海三疣梭子蟹洄游分布和群体组成特征[J].海洋通报,1989,8(1):66-68.
[16]詹秉义.渔业资源评估[M].北京:农业出版社,1995.
[17]金显仕,唐启升.渤海渔业资源结构、数量分布及其变化[J].中国水产科学,1998,5(3):19-25.
[18]凌建忠,严利平,李建生.应用资源密度面积法估算东海区头足类资源量[J].海洋渔业,2008,30(1):56-61.
[19]金显仕,唐启升.渤海渔业资源结构、数量分布及其变化[J].中国水产科学,1998,5(3):19-25.
[20]谢周全,邱盛尧,侯朝伟,等.山东半岛南部海域三疣梭子蟹增殖放流群体回捕率[J].中国水产科学,2014(5):1000-1009.
[21]叶昌臣.渤海对虾增殖的合理放流密度[J].水产科学,1986(10):4-6.
[22]耿宝龙,邱盛尧.靖海湾三疣梭子蟹增殖放流资源量贡献率的调查研究[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),2014,27(1):72-73.
[2]尹增强,章守宇.对我国渔业资源增殖放流的思考[J].资源与环境,2008(3):9-11.
[3]邓景耀.海洋渔业资源保护与可持续利用[J].中国渔业经济,2000(6):21-22.
[4]薛俊楠,堵南山,赖伟,等.山东省渔业资源增值放流现状与展望[J].中国渔业经济,2009,27(2):51-88.
[5]邓景耀.赵传絪.海洋渔业生物学[M].北京:农业出版社,1991:584-587.
[6]林庆贵.三疣梭子蟹养殖技术[J].现代农业科技,2009(16):290-294.
[7]王兴强,曹梅,阎斌伦,等.三疣梭子蟹综合养殖技术[J].水产科学,2009(2):105-108.
[8]戴爱云,冯钟琪,宋玉枝,等.三疣梭子蟹渔业生物学的初步调查[J].动物学杂志,1977(2):30-33.
[9]张金浩.山东半岛南部海蜇增殖放流效果评价[D].烟台:烟台大学,2013:4-5.
[10]潘绪伟,杨林林,纪炜炜,等.增值放流技术进展[J].江苏农业科学,2010(4):236-240.
[11] LI J L. An appraisal of factors constraining the success of fish stock enhancement programmes[J]. Fisheries Management and Ecilogy,2001,6(2):161-169.
[12] WANG Q Y,ZHUANG ZH M,DENG J Y,et al. Stock enhancement and translocation of the shrimp Penaeus chinensis in China[J]. Fisheries Research,2006,80(1):67-69.
[13]张秀梅,王熙杰,涂忠,等.山东省渔业资源增殖放流现状与展望[J].中国渔业经济,2009,27(2):51-58.
[14]周军,李怡群,张海鹏,等.中国对虾、梭子蟹放流区本底调查[J].河北渔业,2006(6):38-40.
[15]宋海棠,丁耀平,许源剑,等.浙北近海三疣梭子蟹洄游分布和群体组成特征[J].海洋通报,1989,8(1):66-68.
[16]詹秉义.渔业资源评估[M].北京:农业出版社,1995.
[17]金显仕,唐启升.渤海渔业资源结构、数量分布及其变化[J].中国水产科学,1998,5(3):19-25.
[18]凌建忠,严利平,李建生.应用资源密度面积法估算东海区头足类资源量[J].海洋渔业,2008,30(1):56-61.
[19]金显仕,唐启升.渤海渔业资源结构、数量分布及其变化[J].中国水产科学,1998,5(3):19-25.
[20]谢周全,邱盛尧,侯朝伟,等.山东半岛南部海域三疣梭子蟹增殖放流群体回捕率[J].中国水产科学,2014(5):1000-1009.
[21]叶昌臣.渤海对虾增殖的合理放流密度[J].水产科学,1986(10):4-6.
[22]耿宝龙,邱盛尧.靖海湾三疣梭子蟹增殖放流资源量贡献率的调查研究[J].烟台大学学报(自然科学与工程版),2014,27(1):72-73.