公平取向的社区教育:政策影响因素和实践改进路径
|
摘要
我国社区教育在蓬勃发展过程中呈现出明显的区域间、城乡间不平衡且社区居民对社区教育的知晓度低的实然状态。社区教育政策是影响社区教育"质"和"量"提升的一项重要因素,在复杂和多元的社区教育政策体系中,其政策环境、政策内容、政策产出和政策过程等影响着社区教育的公平取向。要疏解社区教育政策运行阻滞,需通过实践的深化来促进、完善政策,进而达至政策的更新,即通过保障资源供给彰显政策内容公平,通过打造以政府为主导的"多力合一"平台促进政策过程平衡,通过开发多元学习途径调试政策环境发展,通过向弱势群体倾斜回应政策价值诉求。
In the process of vigorous development of community education in China, there are obvious imbalances between regions and between urban and rural areas, and community residents have low awareness of community education. Community education policy is an important factor affecting the quality and quantity of community education. In the complex and pluralistic community education policy system, its policy environment, policy content, policy output and policy process affect the equity orientation of community education. To ease the blockage of community education policy, we need to deepen the practice to promote and improve the policy, and then to update the policy. That is to say, by ensuring the supply of resources to highlight the fairness of policy content,by building a government-led "multi-force integration" platform to promote policy process balance, by developing a multi-learning approach to debug the development of policy environment, and by tilting to vulnerable groups to respond to policy value demands.
In the process of vigorous development of community education in China, there are obvious imbalances between regions and between urban and rural areas, and community residents have low awareness of community education. Community education policy is an important factor affecting the quality and quantity of community education. In the complex and pluralistic community education policy system, its policy environment, policy content, policy output and policy process affect the equity orientation of community education. To ease the blockage of community education policy, we need to deepen the practice to promote and improve the policy, and then to update the policy. That is to say, by ensuring the supply of resources to highlight the fairness of policy content,by building a government-led "multi-force integration" platform to promote policy process balance, by developing a multi-learning approach to debug the development of policy environment, and by tilting to vulnerable groups to respond to policy value demands.
引文
[1]刘复兴.我国教育政策的公平性与公平机制[J].教育研究,2002,(10).
[2]叶忠.试论教育制度公平[J].教育与经济,2003,(2).
[3]宋亦芳.社区教育政府经费的使用效益研究——以上海市长宁区为例[J].中国职业技术教育,2013,(3).
[4]马丽华,等.老年学员网络自信影响因素路径分析[J].开放教育研究,2018,(3).
[5]转引自张金马.政策科学导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992:17-18.
[6][8]孙绵涛.教育政策分析——理论与实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011:65,66.
[7]陈伯璋,王如哲.教育公平[M].台湾:高等教育文化事业有限公司,2014:17.
[9]吴开明.政策执行偏差防治路径探析--基于政策执行控制的视角[J].中国行政管理,2009,(1).
[10]马丽华.中国都市部における社区教育政策[M].东京:大学教育出版,2016:222-223.
[11]孙绵涛.专业化教育政策分析探讨[J].教育研究,2017,(12).
[12]汪国新,项秉健.社区学习共同体:重拾共同体生活的现实载体[J].教育发展研究,2018,(9).
[13]叶忠海.学习型社会建设研究与探索[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2013:99.
[14]马丽华,等.韩国“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的终身教育推展框架及思考[J].外国教育研究,2018,(11).
[15]马丽华,叶忠海.社区数字化学习服务体系建设效益提升研究[J].教育发展研究,2018,(9).
[16]陈恩伦.论学习权[J].中国教育学刊,2003,(2).
[17][18]尹力.学习权保障:学习型社会教育法律与政策的价值基础[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(3).
[2]叶忠.试论教育制度公平[J].教育与经济,2003,(2).
[3]宋亦芳.社区教育政府经费的使用效益研究——以上海市长宁区为例[J].中国职业技术教育,2013,(3).
[4]马丽华,等.老年学员网络自信影响因素路径分析[J].开放教育研究,2018,(3).
[5]转引自张金马.政策科学导论[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,1992:17-18.
[6][8]孙绵涛.教育政策分析——理论与实务[M].重庆:重庆大学出版社,2011:65,66.
[7]陈伯璋,王如哲.教育公平[M].台湾:高等教育文化事业有限公司,2014:17.
[9]吴开明.政策执行偏差防治路径探析--基于政策执行控制的视角[J].中国行政管理,2009,(1).
[10]马丽华.中国都市部における社区教育政策[M].东京:大学教育出版,2016:222-223.
[11]孙绵涛.专业化教育政策分析探讨[J].教育研究,2017,(12).
[12]汪国新,项秉健.社区学习共同体:重拾共同体生活的现实载体[J].教育发展研究,2018,(9).
[13]叶忠海.学习型社会建设研究与探索[M].上海:同济大学出版社,2013:99.
[14]马丽华,等.韩国“自上而下”和“自下而上”相结合的终身教育推展框架及思考[J].外国教育研究,2018,(11).
[15]马丽华,叶忠海.社区数字化学习服务体系建设效益提升研究[J].教育发展研究,2018,(9).
[16]陈恩伦.论学习权[J].中国教育学刊,2003,(2).
[17][18]尹力.学习权保障:学习型社会教育法律与政策的价值基础[J].北京师范大学学报(社会科学版),2010,(3).