基于语料库的有益性话语评价语义系统建构研究
|
摘要
本研究以功能语言学评价理论和功能语义系统为理论框架,以有益性话语《瓦尔登湖》为语料,采用语料库方法提取评价性语义配置,建立有益性话语的评价语义框架,考察不同类别的语义配置是否能够反映有益性话语的人与自然和谐相处的生态哲学观。研究结果显示:《瓦尔登湖》中出现6种评价语义(动作性评价语义、心理性评价语义、关系性评价语义、行为性评价语义、交流性评价语义和存在性评价语义),这些语义类型均能反应人与自然的和谐相处,说明评价语义系统可以应用到未来有益性话语研究中。
The study analyzes the corpus Walden, utilizes a corpus-based approach to select the evaluative semantic configurations to construct an evaluative semantic system for the beneficial discourse by combining the appraisal theory and functional semantic system within Systemic Functional Linguistics, and to observe whether the evaluative semantic configurations can reflect the ecosophy of beneficial discourse "harmony between human and nature". The study shows that there are mainly six evaluative semantic configurations in Walden: action evaluative semantic configuration, mental evaluative semantic configuration, relational evaluative semantic configuration, behavioral evaluative semantic configuration, communicative evaluative semantic configuration and existential evaluative semantic configuration. These evaluative semantic configurations can reveal the ecosophy of "harmony between human and nature". Consequently, the evaluative semantic system can be applied in the future study of beneficial discourse.
The study analyzes the corpus Walden, utilizes a corpus-based approach to select the evaluative semantic configurations to construct an evaluative semantic system for the beneficial discourse by combining the appraisal theory and functional semantic system within Systemic Functional Linguistics, and to observe whether the evaluative semantic configurations can reflect the ecosophy of beneficial discourse "harmony between human and nature". The study shows that there are mainly six evaluative semantic configurations in Walden: action evaluative semantic configuration, mental evaluative semantic configuration, relational evaluative semantic configuration, behavioral evaluative semantic configuration, communicative evaluative semantic configuration and existential evaluative semantic configuration. These evaluative semantic configurations can reveal the ecosophy of "harmony between human and nature". Consequently, the evaluative semantic system can be applied in the future study of beneficial discourse.
引文
[1] Alexander,R.& A.Stibbe.From the analysis of ecological discourse to the ecological analysis of discourse[J].Language Sciences,2014(41):104-110.
[2] Bate,J.The Song of the Earth[M].London:Picador,2000.
[3] Bednarek,M.& H.Caple.Playing with environmental stories in the news good or bad practice?[J].Discourse and Communication,2010(4):5-31.
[4] Bunting,M.We need an attentiveness to nature to understand our own humanity[N].The Guardian,2007:July 30.
[5] Bringhurst,R.The Tree of Meaning:Language,Mind,and Ecology[M].Berkeley,CA:Counterpoint,2008.
[6] Carlson,A.Aesthetics and the Environment:The Appreciation of Nature,Art and Architecture[M].London and New York:Routledge,2000.
[7] Chilton,P.,Tom,C.,Kasser,T.,Maio,G.& A.Nolan.Communicating bigger-than-self problems to extrinsically-oriented audiences[J].WWF UK,2012.
[8] Darnton,A.& M.Kirk.Finding frames:new ways to engage the UK public in global poverty.Bond[Z/OL].[2014-01-24].Available from:http://bond3.brix.fatbeehive.com/data/files/finding_frames.pdf.
[9] Fawcett,R.P.Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics Through the Cardiff Grammar:An Extension and Simplification of Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar[M].London:Equinox,2008.
[10]Halliday,M.A.K.Language and the reshaping of human experience[A].In M.A.K.Halliday & J.Webster(eds.)The Language of Science:Vol.5 of the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Continuum,1995/2006:7-23.
[11]He,W.,Zhang,R.J.,Dan,X.H.,Zhang,F.& R.Wei.Functional Semantic Analysis of English[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2017.
[12]Hedgepeth,W.The Hog Book (2nd edn.)[M].Athens:University of Georgia Press,1998.
[13]Knight,C.The discourse of ‘encultured nature' in Japan:The concept of satoyama and its role in 21st-century nature conservation[J].Asian Studies Review,2010(4):421-441.
[14]Macfarlane,R.New words on the wild[J].Nature,2013(498):166-167.
[15]Martin,J.R.Beyond exchange:Appraisal systems in English[A].In S.Hunston & G.Thompson(eds.).Evaluation in Text.Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000:142-175.
[16]Naess,A.The shallow and the deep,long-range ecology movement[J].Inquiry,1973(16):95-100.
[17]Naess,A.Ecology,Community and Lifestyle:Outline of an Ecosophy (trans.by D.Rothenberg)[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989.
[18]Newman,J.Values reflection and the Earth Charter[A].In A.Stibbe(ed.).The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy:Skills for a Changing World[C].Dartington,UK:Green Books,2009:99-104.
[19]Stibbe,A.Haiku and beyond:Language,ecology,and reconnection with the natural world[J].Anthrozo?s,2007(2):101-112.
[20]Stibbe,A.Animals Erased:Discourse,Ecology,and Reconnection with the Natural World[C].Middletown,CT:Wesleyan University Press,2012a.
[21]Stibbe,A.From counter-discourses to alternative discourses:Environmental education in Japan[A].In A.Stibbe(ed.).Animals Erased:Discourse,Ecology,and Reconnection with the Natural World[C].Middletown,CT:Wesleyan University Press,2012b:121-143.
[22]Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Discourse,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London and New York:Routledge,2015.
[23]Thoreau,H.D.Walden[M].Beijing:Central Compilation and Translation Press,2010.
[24]陈令君.基于自建英语学术书评语料库的评价参数模型探析[J].外语与外语教学,2012(2):23-27.
[25]程爱民.论瓦尔登湖的生态学意义——纪念《瓦尔登湖》发表152周年[J].外语研究,2007(4):101-104.
[26]程微.庭审语篇中“态度”对法律事实的建构[J].西安外国语大学学报,2011(3):34-38.
[27]房红梅.论评价理论对系统功能语言学的发展[J].现代外语,2014(3):303-311.
[28]何伟,魏榕.系统功能语言学及物性理论发展综述[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):1-20.
[29]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018(4):113-123.
[30]何伟,魏榕,Arran Stibbe.2018.生态语言学的超学科发展——阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018(2):22-26.
[31]何伟,张瑞杰,淡晓红,张帆,魏榕.英语功能语义分析[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2017.
[32]黄国文.自然诗歌中的元功能和语法隐喻分析[J].外语教学,2018(3):1-5.
[33]李琳.基于语料库的商务话语评价建模研究[J].外语教学与研究,2016(5):370-381.
[34]李想.走向社会主义生态文明新时代[J].长春:吉林出版集团股份有限公司,2016.
[35]刘世铸.基于语料库的情感评价意义构型研究[J].外语教学,2009(2):22-25.
[36]刘世铸.评判的结构潜势与语义构式[J].中国外语,2011(1):22-27,50.
[37]罗坚.加里·斯奈德的“深层生态文化观”及其文学意义[J].中国文学研究,2016(3):14-17,48.
[38]马军红.美国生态文学在中国的译介研究[J].中国翻译,2015(4):32-37.
[39]蒙培元.人与自然——中国哲学生态观[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[40]王坤.生态伦理视阈下当代西部生态小说的文化价值[J].小说评论,2016(3):92-97.
[41]王宁.生态文学与生态翻译学:解构与建构[J].中国翻译,2011(2):10-15.
[42]王孺童.道德经讲义[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
[43]王振华.“硬新闻”的态度研究——“评价系统”应用研究之二[J].外语教学,2004a(5):31-36.
[44]王振华.物质过程的评价价值——以分析小说人物形象为例[J].外国语,2004b(5):41-47.
[45]张建国.美国的陶渊明:生态批评视角中的巴勒斯散文[J].西安外国语大学学报,2012(3):85-88.
[46]朱永生.概念意义中的隐性评价[J].外语教学,2009(4):1-5.基金项目
[2] Bate,J.The Song of the Earth[M].London:Picador,2000.
[3] Bednarek,M.& H.Caple.Playing with environmental stories in the news good or bad practice?[J].Discourse and Communication,2010(4):5-31.
[4] Bunting,M.We need an attentiveness to nature to understand our own humanity[N].The Guardian,2007:July 30.
[5] Bringhurst,R.The Tree of Meaning:Language,Mind,and Ecology[M].Berkeley,CA:Counterpoint,2008.
[6] Carlson,A.Aesthetics and the Environment:The Appreciation of Nature,Art and Architecture[M].London and New York:Routledge,2000.
[7] Chilton,P.,Tom,C.,Kasser,T.,Maio,G.& A.Nolan.Communicating bigger-than-self problems to extrinsically-oriented audiences[J].WWF UK,2012.
[8] Darnton,A.& M.Kirk.Finding frames:new ways to engage the UK public in global poverty.Bond[Z/OL].[2014-01-24].Available from:http://bond3.brix.fatbeehive.com/data/files/finding_frames.pdf.
[9] Fawcett,R.P.Invitation to Systemic Functional Linguistics Through the Cardiff Grammar:An Extension and Simplification of Halliday's Systemic Functional Grammar[M].London:Equinox,2008.
[10]Halliday,M.A.K.Language and the reshaping of human experience[A].In M.A.K.Halliday & J.Webster(eds.)The Language of Science:Vol.5 of the Collected Works of M.A.K.Halliday[C].London:Continuum,1995/2006:7-23.
[11]He,W.,Zhang,R.J.,Dan,X.H.,Zhang,F.& R.Wei.Functional Semantic Analysis of English[M].Beijing:Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press,2017.
[12]Hedgepeth,W.The Hog Book (2nd edn.)[M].Athens:University of Georgia Press,1998.
[13]Knight,C.The discourse of ‘encultured nature' in Japan:The concept of satoyama and its role in 21st-century nature conservation[J].Asian Studies Review,2010(4):421-441.
[14]Macfarlane,R.New words on the wild[J].Nature,2013(498):166-167.
[15]Martin,J.R.Beyond exchange:Appraisal systems in English[A].In S.Hunston & G.Thompson(eds.).Evaluation in Text.Authorial Stance and the Construction of Discourse[C].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2000:142-175.
[16]Naess,A.The shallow and the deep,long-range ecology movement[J].Inquiry,1973(16):95-100.
[17]Naess,A.Ecology,Community and Lifestyle:Outline of an Ecosophy (trans.by D.Rothenberg)[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,1989.
[18]Newman,J.Values reflection and the Earth Charter[A].In A.Stibbe(ed.).The Handbook of Sustainability Literacy:Skills for a Changing World[C].Dartington,UK:Green Books,2009:99-104.
[19]Stibbe,A.Haiku and beyond:Language,ecology,and reconnection with the natural world[J].Anthrozo?s,2007(2):101-112.
[20]Stibbe,A.Animals Erased:Discourse,Ecology,and Reconnection with the Natural World[C].Middletown,CT:Wesleyan University Press,2012a.
[21]Stibbe,A.From counter-discourses to alternative discourses:Environmental education in Japan[A].In A.Stibbe(ed.).Animals Erased:Discourse,Ecology,and Reconnection with the Natural World[C].Middletown,CT:Wesleyan University Press,2012b:121-143.
[22]Stibbe,A.Ecolinguistics:Discourse,Ecology and the Stories We Live By[M].London and New York:Routledge,2015.
[23]Thoreau,H.D.Walden[M].Beijing:Central Compilation and Translation Press,2010.
[24]陈令君.基于自建英语学术书评语料库的评价参数模型探析[J].外语与外语教学,2012(2):23-27.
[25]程爱民.论瓦尔登湖的生态学意义——纪念《瓦尔登湖》发表152周年[J].外语研究,2007(4):101-104.
[26]程微.庭审语篇中“态度”对法律事实的建构[J].西安外国语大学学报,2011(3):34-38.
[27]房红梅.论评价理论对系统功能语言学的发展[J].现代外语,2014(3):303-311.
[28]何伟,魏榕.系统功能语言学及物性理论发展综述[J].北京科技大学学报(社会科学版),2016(1):1-20.
[29]何伟,魏榕.生态语言学:发展历程与学科属性[J].国外社会科学,2018(4):113-123.
[30]何伟,魏榕,Arran Stibbe.2018.生态语言学的超学科发展——阿伦·斯提布教授访谈录[J].外语研究,2018(2):22-26.
[31]何伟,张瑞杰,淡晓红,张帆,魏榕.英语功能语义分析[M].北京:外语教学与研究出版社,2017.
[32]黄国文.自然诗歌中的元功能和语法隐喻分析[J].外语教学,2018(3):1-5.
[33]李琳.基于语料库的商务话语评价建模研究[J].外语教学与研究,2016(5):370-381.
[34]李想.走向社会主义生态文明新时代[J].长春:吉林出版集团股份有限公司,2016.
[35]刘世铸.基于语料库的情感评价意义构型研究[J].外语教学,2009(2):22-25.
[36]刘世铸.评判的结构潜势与语义构式[J].中国外语,2011(1):22-27,50.
[37]罗坚.加里·斯奈德的“深层生态文化观”及其文学意义[J].中国文学研究,2016(3):14-17,48.
[38]马军红.美国生态文学在中国的译介研究[J].中国翻译,2015(4):32-37.
[39]蒙培元.人与自然——中国哲学生态观[M].北京:人民出版社,2004.
[40]王坤.生态伦理视阈下当代西部生态小说的文化价值[J].小说评论,2016(3):92-97.
[41]王宁.生态文学与生态翻译学:解构与建构[J].中国翻译,2011(2):10-15.
[42]王孺童.道德经讲义[M].北京:中华书局,2013.
[43]王振华.“硬新闻”的态度研究——“评价系统”应用研究之二[J].外语教学,2004a(5):31-36.
[44]王振华.物质过程的评价价值——以分析小说人物形象为例[J].外国语,2004b(5):41-47.
[45]张建国.美国的陶渊明:生态批评视角中的巴勒斯散文[J].西安外国语大学学报,2012(3):85-88.
[46]朱永生.概念意义中的隐性评价[J].外语教学,2009(4):1-5.基金项目