科学基金创新研究群体科研产出特征的文献计量分析
|
摘要
创新研究群体在科技攻关等重大项目问题上发挥着重要作用。科研产出是创新研究群体最重要的成果之一,科学论文是科研产出的主要表现形式之一。对创新研究群体近年来的科学论文产出特征进行分析,有利于总结其科研发展规律和掌握不同科学领域的研究状况,为创新研究群体的下一步发展提供支撑。本文基于文献计量的视角,对科学基金创新研究群体科研产出从总体情况、各学科领域情况、影响力情况以及国际合作情况等方面进行了量化分析。结果表明:随着科学基金资助力度的不断加大和稳定支持,创新研究群体科研产出数量不断提升;资助的持续性对创新研究群体科研影响力的提升至关重要,中国在部分领域科研水平已处于领先地位,但一些领域科研水平提升空间仍然较大;创新研究群体科研国际合作以多边合作为主,合作伙伴以美国等发达国家为主,在个别领域也存在与资源优势型发展中国家合作的例子,国际合作科研影响力远大于非合作影响力。
Creative research groups play an important role in major scientific and technological research projects,and have been paid attention by various countries.In recent years,creative research groups have made great progress in our country.Scientific research output is one of the most important achievements of innovative research groups.Scientific papers are one of the main forms of scientific research output.The analysis of the output characteristics of scientific papers in creative research groups will help to summarize the laws of scientific research and master the research status in different fields of science,and provide support for the further development of creative research groups.Based on the perspective of bibliometric,this paper makes a quantitative analysis of the scientific research output of the scientific research group from the general situation,the situation of each subject field,the influence situation and the international cooperation situation,the results showed that with the increase of scientific fund and the steady support,the number of scientific research output of innovation research group is increasing.The sustainability of funding is critical to the improvement of research impact of innovative research groups.China has been leading in some areas,but the level of scientific research in some areas has increased considerably.Innovation research group international cooperation is mainly based on multilateral cooperation.Partners are mainly developed countries such as the United States.There are also examples of cooperation with resource dominant developing countries in some areas.The influence of international cooperation is far greater than that of non-cooperation.Finally,we have a summary of the work and outlook.
Creative research groups play an important role in major scientific and technological research projects,and have been paid attention by various countries.In recent years,creative research groups have made great progress in our country.Scientific research output is one of the most important achievements of innovative research groups.Scientific papers are one of the main forms of scientific research output.The analysis of the output characteristics of scientific papers in creative research groups will help to summarize the laws of scientific research and master the research status in different fields of science,and provide support for the further development of creative research groups.Based on the perspective of bibliometric,this paper makes a quantitative analysis of the scientific research output of the scientific research group from the general situation,the situation of each subject field,the influence situation and the international cooperation situation,the results showed that with the increase of scientific fund and the steady support,the number of scientific research output of innovation research group is increasing.The sustainability of funding is critical to the improvement of research impact of innovative research groups.China has been leading in some areas,but the level of scientific research in some areas has increased considerably.Innovation research group international cooperation is mainly based on multilateral cooperation.Partners are mainly developed countries such as the United States.There are also examples of cooperation with resource dominant developing countries in some areas.The influence of international cooperation is far greater than that of non-cooperation.Finally,we have a summary of the work and outlook.
引文
[1]德鲁克·P.等.未来的管理.四川人民出版社,2000:49—52.
[2]Robbins SP.Organizational Behavior(9th.ed.).清华大学出版社,2002:258.
[3]于洋,黄忠德,于淼.高校科技创新团队建设的思考及政策建议.研究与发展管理,2014,26(2):129—132.
[4]邢一亭,孙晓琳,王刊良.科研团队合作效果研究—一个高校科研团队合作状况的调查分析.科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(1):181—184.
[5]王慧.创新型企业创新团队的构建.人力资源管理,2011(4):64—65.
[6]杨林.创业型企业高管团队垂直对差异与创业战略导向:产业环境和企业所有制的调节效应.南开管理评论,2014,17(01):134—144.
[7]贺小刚,沈瑜.创业型企业的成长:基于企业家团队资本的实证研究.管理世界,2008,(01):82—95.
[8]Hancher D,Lambert S.Quality-based prequalification of contractors.Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2002,1813(1):260—274.
[9]Hollenbeck JR,Moon H,Ellis APJ,et al.Structural contingency theory and individual differences:Examination of external and internal person-team fit.Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(3):599—606.
[10]Zuckerman HA.Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers:A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity.American Journal of Sociology,1968,74(3):276—291.
[11]王峥,王永梅.我国科研项目负责人胜任特征研究成果的计量学分析.科技管理研究,2010,30(22):165—168.
[12]孟太生.科研团队领导行为及其影响团队效能的研究.电子科技大学,2008.
[13]杨芳娟,刘云,刘文澜.基于文献计量的数理科学部创新研究群体科学基金资助绩效分析.中国基础科学,2014,16(04):39—43.
[14]朱军文,刘念才.我国研究型大学科研产出的计量学分析.高等教育研究,2009,30(02):30—35.
[15]杨凌春,周辉,蔡晖,等.NIH院内研究所和洛克菲勒大学科研产出对比分析.科研管理,2011,32(06):150—156.
[16]由由,吴红斌,闵维方.高校经费水平、结构与科研产出—基于美国20所世界一流大学数据的分析.高等教育研究,2016,37(04):31—40.
[17]温珂,张敬,宋琦.科研经费分配机制与科研产出的关系研究—以部分公立科研机构为例.科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(04):10—18.
[18]余谦,马俊杰,刘雅琴.基于创新群体培育评价的创新研究群体基金资助成效分析.中国科学基金,2015,29(02):99—107.
[19]毕建新,郑建明,杨永华.创新研究群体形成规律研究—基于国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目的实证分析.科技管理研究,2015,35(10):175—180.
[20]王贤文,刘则渊,侯海燕.全球主要国家的科学基金及基金论文产出现状:基于Web of Science的分析.科学学研究,2010,28(1):61—66.
[21]许海云,刘春江,雷炳旭,等.学科交叉的测度、可视化研究及应用—一个情报学文献计量研究案例.图书情报工作,2014,58(12):95—101.
(1)2014年前实行“3+3”或“3+3+3”的资助模式,2014年后改为“6+3”的持续稳定资助模式。
[2]Robbins SP.Organizational Behavior(9th.ed.).清华大学出版社,2002:258.
[3]于洋,黄忠德,于淼.高校科技创新团队建设的思考及政策建议.研究与发展管理,2014,26(2):129—132.
[4]邢一亭,孙晓琳,王刊良.科研团队合作效果研究—一个高校科研团队合作状况的调查分析.科学学与科学技术管理,2009,30(1):181—184.
[5]王慧.创新型企业创新团队的构建.人力资源管理,2011(4):64—65.
[6]杨林.创业型企业高管团队垂直对差异与创业战略导向:产业环境和企业所有制的调节效应.南开管理评论,2014,17(01):134—144.
[7]贺小刚,沈瑜.创业型企业的成长:基于企业家团队资本的实证研究.管理世界,2008,(01):82—95.
[8]Hancher D,Lambert S.Quality-based prequalification of contractors.Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board,2002,1813(1):260—274.
[9]Hollenbeck JR,Moon H,Ellis APJ,et al.Structural contingency theory and individual differences:Examination of external and internal person-team fit.Journal of Applied Psychology,2002,87(3):599—606.
[10]Zuckerman HA.Patterns of Name Ordering Among Authors of Scientific Papers:A Study of Social Symbolism and Its Ambiguity.American Journal of Sociology,1968,74(3):276—291.
[11]王峥,王永梅.我国科研项目负责人胜任特征研究成果的计量学分析.科技管理研究,2010,30(22):165—168.
[12]孟太生.科研团队领导行为及其影响团队效能的研究.电子科技大学,2008.
[13]杨芳娟,刘云,刘文澜.基于文献计量的数理科学部创新研究群体科学基金资助绩效分析.中国基础科学,2014,16(04):39—43.
[14]朱军文,刘念才.我国研究型大学科研产出的计量学分析.高等教育研究,2009,30(02):30—35.
[15]杨凌春,周辉,蔡晖,等.NIH院内研究所和洛克菲勒大学科研产出对比分析.科研管理,2011,32(06):150—156.
[16]由由,吴红斌,闵维方.高校经费水平、结构与科研产出—基于美国20所世界一流大学数据的分析.高等教育研究,2016,37(04):31—40.
[17]温珂,张敬,宋琦.科研经费分配机制与科研产出的关系研究—以部分公立科研机构为例.科学学与科学技术管理,2013,34(04):10—18.
[18]余谦,马俊杰,刘雅琴.基于创新群体培育评价的创新研究群体基金资助成效分析.中国科学基金,2015,29(02):99—107.
[19]毕建新,郑建明,杨永华.创新研究群体形成规律研究—基于国家自然科学基金创新研究群体项目的实证分析.科技管理研究,2015,35(10):175—180.
[20]王贤文,刘则渊,侯海燕.全球主要国家的科学基金及基金论文产出现状:基于Web of Science的分析.科学学研究,2010,28(1):61—66.
[21]许海云,刘春江,雷炳旭,等.学科交叉的测度、可视化研究及应用—一个情报学文献计量研究案例.图书情报工作,2014,58(12):95—101.
(1)2014年前实行“3+3”或“3+3+3”的资助模式,2014年后改为“6+3”的持续稳定资助模式。