摘要
高职学报多数只设专职编辑而不设置专职校对人员,从而实行编校合一的工作模式,编辑兼任校对。针对高职学报稿源质量不高的问题,提出高职学报编辑应正确处理编辑和校对的关系,全面审读和加工整理作者的稿件,充分发挥编辑自校、作者自校、集体交叉校对和责任编辑校对的优势,提高自身素质和技能,保证高职学报的编校质量。
There are only full-time editors instead of full-time proofreaders in most journals of higher vocational colleges. So the working mode of editing-proofreading integration is implemented, that is, editors work as proofreaders. Aiming at the problem of the poor quality of papers of journals of higher vocational colleges, this paper puts forward that editors should correctly handle the relationship between editing and proofreading, comprehensively review and edit the authors' manuscripts, give full play to advantages of editor proofreading, author proofreading, cross proofreading and editor-in-charge proofreading, improve their own quality and skills, to ensure the quality of editing and proofreading of journals of higher vocational colleges.
引文
[1]杨呈祥.对学术期刊实行“编校合一”的思考[J].科教文汇(上旬刊),2015,(11):147-148.
[2]陆惠敏.正确认识高校学报编校合一模式[J].南京审计学院学报,2006,3(4):87-88.
[3]徐玉梅.编校合一的体制有利于提高高校学报质量[C]//第八届沈阳科学学术年会论文集,2011.
[4]方志蓉.从校对的基本功能和主体看编校合一[J].湖南轻工业高等专科学校学报,2003,15(4):52-53.
[5]刘晓萍,张平.从校对的认知特点看编校合一[J].中国科技期刊研究,2002,13(5):378-380.
[6]周奇.编辑阅读与校对阅读比较研究[J].出版科学,2008,16(3):21-27.
[7]黄静.出版专业职业资格考试校对内容备考指南[J].中国编辑,2015,(4):84-86.
[8]王晓珍.作者全程参与的科技期刊编校质量控制[J].科技与出版,2016,(5):53-56.
[9]王桂珍,颜志森.作者自校清样有利于提高期刊编校质量[J].中国科技期刊研究,2005,16(5):716-718.
[10]谢金海.综合性科技期刊应正确认识并实施编校合一[J].编辑学报,2012,24(6):576-577.
[11]孙艳.“编校合一”模式下的高校学报校对质量[J].大连海事大学学报(社会科学版),2013,12(6):127-129.
[12]杨敬.从辩证角度谈“编校合一”的好处与弊端[J].出版广角,2016,(1):143-144.