风险认知视角下的邻避冲突整体性分析框架
详细信息    查看全文 | 推荐本文 |
  • 英文篇名:The Integrity Analysis Framework of Not in My Back Yard in the Perspective of Perception of Risk
  • 作者:陈丽君 ; 金铭
  • 英文作者:Chen Lijun;Jin Min;School of Public Management,Zhejiang University;
  • 关键词:邻避冲突 ; 邻避风险认知分析框架 ; 风险认知评估 ; 风险感知情绪
  • 中文刊名:GSXX
  • 英文刊名:Journal of Gansu Administration Institute
  • 机构:浙江大学公共管理学院;
  • 出版日期:2019-02-20
  • 出版单位:甘肃行政学院学报
  • 年:2019
  • 期:No.131
  • 语种:中文;
  • 页:GSXX201901004
  • 页数:10
  • CN:01
  • ISSN:62-1143/D
  • 分类号:38-47
摘要
邻避冲突是社会治理研究亟待解决的问题之一。基于不同学科视角,现有邻避冲突研究大致形成了"影响因素-互动关系-行为动机-技术工具-内在机制"的研究谱系,但邻避问题离不开公众对邻避设施的认知,现有研究却缺乏将外部客观影响因素与公众主观认知结合起来的分析。本研究以杭州九峰垃圾焚烧事件为例,通过对案例素材和访谈资料的详细分析,提出了个体风险认知评估和风险感知情绪引致邻避冲突的三个研究命题,并由此构建了整合性的邻避风险认知分析框架。将邻避冲突置于"主体-客体-场域"三要素闭环内,围绕影响因素这一内核,从风险认知视角探究风险认知评估与风险感知情绪双路径诱发邻避冲突的过程机制,为邻避冲突提供机理性解读。该分析框架在补足现有研究短板的同时为邻避冲突治理提供了几点启示:重视事前风险沟通的必要性,关注地方民众的情绪调控,及时回应地方民众的利益诉求。
        
引文
[1]Renn O,Burns W J,Kasperson J X,et al. The Social Amplification of Risk:Theoretical Foundations and Empirical Applications[J].Journal of Social Issues,1992,48(4):137-160.
    [2]Maarten Wolsink,Jeroen Devilee.The motives for accepting or rejecting waste infrastructure facilities.Shifting the focus from the planners'perspective to fairness and community commitment[J].Journal of Environmental Planning&Management,2009,52(2):217-236.
    [3]Aoki N.Who Would Be Willing to Accept Disaster Debris in Their Backyard Investigating the Determinants of Public Attitudes in Post-Fukushima Japan[J].Risk Analysis:An Official Publication of the Society for Risk Analysis,2017,(1).
    [4]管在高.邻避型群体性事件产生的原因及预防对策[J].管理学刊,2010,(6):58-62.
    [5]何艳玲.“邻避冲突”及其解决:基于一次城市集体抗争的分析[J].公共管理研究,2006,(00):93-103.
    [6]何艳玲.“中国式”邻避冲突:基于事件的分析[J].开放时代,2009,(12):102-114.
    [7]陈宝胜.公共政策过程中的邻避冲突及其治理[J].学海,2012,(5):110-115.
    [8]陈宝胜.邻避冲突治理模式比较研究[J].理论与改革,2015,(3):100-106.
    [9]赵小燕.邻避冲突的政府决策诱因及对策[J].武汉理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(2):164-168.
    [10]夏志强,罗书川.分歧与演化:邻避冲突的博弈分析[J].新视野,2015,(5):67-73.
    [11]刘冰.邻避设施选址的公众态度及其影响因素研究[J].南京社会科学,2015,(12):62-69.
    [12]王佃利,王庆歌.风险社会邻避困境的化解:以共识会议实现公民有效参与[J].理论探讨,2015,(5):138-143.
    [13]王立剑.城市邻避冲突的理论解释及其治理策略[J].城市发展研究,2015,(3):44-50.
    [14]魏娜,韩芳.邻避冲突中的新公民参与:基于框架建构的过程[J].浙江大学学报(人文社会科学版),2015,(4):157-173.
    [15]田亮,郭佳佳.城市化进程中的地方政府角色与“邻避冲突”治理[J].同济大学学报(社会科学版),2016,(5):61-67.
    [16]陈玲,李利利.政府决策与邻避运动:公共项目决策中的社会稳定风险触发机制及改进方向[J].公共行政评论,2016,(1):26-38.
    [17]李宇环.邻避事件治理中的政府注意力配置与议题识别[J].中国行政管理,2016,(9).
    [18]王学栋,陈菲菲.邻避行动的内在运作逻辑及其回应路径[J].行政论坛,2016,(1):36-40.
    [19]马奔.邻避设施选址规划中的协商式治理与决策——从天津港危险品仓库爆炸事故谈起[J].南京社会科学,2015,(12):55-61.
    [20]Gregory R,Kunreuther H,Easterling D,et al.Incentives Policies to Site Hazardous Waste Facilities[J].Risk Analysis,2010,11(4):667-675.
    [21]Roger E.Kasperson,Dominic Golding,Seth Tuler.Social Distrust as a Factor in Siting Hazardous Facilities and Communicating Risks[J].Journal of Social Issues,1992,48(4):161-187.
    [22]Kraft M E,Clary B B.Citizen Participation and the Nimby Syndrome:Public Response to Radioactive Waste Disposal[J].Western Political Quarterly,1991,44(2):299-328.
    [23]Wu Y,Zhai G,Li S,et al.Comparative research on NIMBY risk acceptability between Chinese and Japanese college students[J].Environmental Monitoring&Assessment,2014,186(10):6683.
    [24]Wu Y,Zhai G,Li S,et al.Comparative research on NIMBY risk acceptability between Chinese and Japanese college students[J].Environmental Monitoring&Assessment,2014,186(10):6683-94.
    [25]彭皓玥.邻避危机中的生态信任:从流失到重塑——“邻避冲突”的探索性解析[J].天津师范大学学报(社科版),2016,(2):76-80.
    [26]叶啸,关欣,叶中华.风险社会视域下政府公信力的影响因素及建构策略研究——基于15起“邻避”事件的案例分析[J].公共管理评论,2014,(1).
    [27]张乐,童星.“邻避”冲突中的社会学习——基于7个PX项目的案例比较[J].学术界,2016,(8):38-54.
    [28]Kunreuther H,Easterling D.The role of compensation in siting hazardous facilities[J].Journal of Policy Analysis&Management,2010,15(4):601-622.
    [29]Frey B S,Oberholzer-Gee F.Fair siting procedures:An empirical analysis of their importance and characteristics[J].Journal of Policy Analysis&Management,1996,15(3):353-376.
    [30]Claro E.Exchange Relationships and the Environment:The Acceptability of Compensation in the Siting of Waste Disposal Facilities[J].Environmental Values,2007,16(2):187-208.
    [31]Sakai,Toyotaka.Fair waste pricing:an axiomatic analysis to the NIMBY problem[J].Economic Theory,2012,50(2):499-521.
    [32]Zaal M P,Terwel B W,Mors E T,et al.Monetary compensation can increase public support for the siting of hazardous facilities[J].Journal of Environmental Psychology,2014,37(1):21-30.
    [33]孟薇,孔繁斌.邻避冲突的成因分析及其治理工具选择——基于政策利益结构分布的视角[J].江苏行政学院学报,2014,(2):119-124.
    [34]陶鹏,童星.邻避型群体性事件及其治理[J].南京社会科学,2010,(8):63-68.
    [35]刘小峰.邻避设施的选址与环境补偿研究[J].中国人口·资源与环境,2013,(12):70-75.
    [36]吕书鹏,王琼.地方政府邻避项目决策困境与出路——基于“风险-利益”感知的视角[J].中国行政管理,2017,(4).
    [37]朱正威,王琼,吴佳.邻避冲突的产生与演变逻辑探析——基于对A煤矿设施当地民众的实证调查[J].南京社会科学,2017,(3):81-89.
    [38]Johansson M,Laike T.Intention to respond to local wind turbines:the role of attitudes and visual perception[J].Wind Energy,2007,10(5):435-451.
    [39]Braun C.Not in My Backyard:CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS[J].Risk Analysis,2017,37(12).
    [40]张磊,王彩波.从环境群体性事件看中国地方政府的环保困境[J].天津行政学院学报,2014,(2):57-62.
    [41]王刚,张霞飞.风险的社会放大分析框架下沿海核电“去污名化”研究[J].中国行政管理,2017,(3).
    [42]Paul Slovic,Mark Layman,Flynn J.Risk Perception,Trust,and Nuclear Waste:Lessons from Yucca Mountain[J].Environment Science&Policy for Sustainable Development,1991,33(3):6-30.
    [43]Slovic P.Perceived Risk,Trust,and Democracy[J].Risk Analysis,2010,13(6):675-682.
    [44]Portney K E.Siting Hazardous Waste Treatment Facilities[J].Zeitschrift Für Orthopdie,1991,106(1):162-72.
    [45]Michael Dear.Understanding and Overcoming the NIMBY Syndrome.Journal of American Planning Association.1992,58,3.
    [46]Siegrist M,Cvetkovich G.Perception of Hazards:The Role of Social Trust and Knowledge[J].Risk Analysis,2000,20(5):713-720.
    [47]Langford I H,Georgiou S,Bateman I J,et al.Public Perceptions of Health Risks from Polluted Coastal Bathing Waters:A Mixed Methodological Analysis Using Cultural Theory[J].Risk Anal-ysis,2000,20(5):691-704.
    [48]Desteno D,Petty R E,Wegener D T,et al.Beyond valence in the perception of likelihood:The role of emotion specificity[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2000,78(3):397-416.
    [49]Keltner D.Harker L A,Expressions of positive emotion in women's college yearbook pictures and their relationship to personality and life outcomes across adulthood[J].Journal of Personality&Social Psychology,2001,80(1):112-24.
    [50]许尧.群体性事件中主观因素对冲突升级的影响分析[J].中国行政管理,2013,(11).
    [51]谭爽.邻避项目社会稳定风险的生成及防范——基于焦虑心理的视角[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2013,(3):25-29.
    [52]谭爽.邻避项目社会稳定风险的生成与防范——以“彭泽核电站争议”事件为例[J].北京交通大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(4):46-51.
    [53]谭爽,胡象明.邻避型社会稳定风险中风险认知的预测作用及其调控——以核电站为例[J].武汉大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2013,(5):75-81.
    [54]吴开松,李华胤,徐晓晨.群体性事件的社会心理因素研究[M].华中科技大学出版社,2014.
    [55]胡象明,王锋.一个新的社会稳定风险评估分析框架:风险感知的视角[J].中国行政管理,2014,(4).
    [56]王锋,胡象明,刘鹏.焦虑情绪、风险认知与邻避冲突的实证研究——以北京垃圾填埋场为例[J].北京理工大学学报(社会科学版),2014,(6).
    [57]侯光辉,王元地.邻避危机何以愈演愈烈——一个整合性归因模型[J].公共管理学报,2014,(3):80-92.
    [58]侯光辉,王元地.“邻避风险链”:邻避危机演化的一个风险解释框架[J].公共行政评论,2015,(1):4-28.
    [59]谢晓非,徐联仓.风险认知研究概况及理论框架[J].心理科学进展,1995,(2):17-22.
    [60]Sitkin S B,Pablo A L.Reconceptualizing the determinants of risk behavior[J].Academy of Management Review,1992,17(1):9-38.
    [61]Van Z M,Spears R,Fischer A H,et al.Put your money where your mouth is Explaining collective action tendencies through group-based anger and group efficacy[J].J Pers Soc Psychol,2004,87(5):649-664.
    [62]Greenberg M R.NIMBY,CLAMP,and the location of new nuclear-related facilities:U.S.national and11 site-specific surveys[J].Risk Analysis,2009,29(9):1242-1254.
    [63]Devine-Wright P.Explaining“NIMBY”Objections to a Power Line The Role of Personal,Place Attachment and Project-Related Factors[J].Environment&Behavior,2013,45(45):761-781.
    [64]Moysiadis Y.The role of NIMBY in opposing the siting of wind farms:evidence from Greece[J].Journal of Environmental Planning&Management,2015,58(2):229-251.
    [65]李小敏,胡象明.邻避现象原因新析:风险认知与公众信任的视角[J].中国行政管理,2015,(3):131-135.
    [66]Vittes M E,Iii P H P,Lilie S A.Factors contributing to NIMBY attitudes[J]. Waste Management,1993,13(2):125-129.
    [67]王奎明,于文广,谭新雨.“中国式”邻避运动影响因素探析[J].江淮论坛,2013,(3):35-44.
    [68]Braun C.Not in My Backyard:CCS Sites and Public Perception of CCS[J].Risk Analysis,2016(6309).
    [69]杨拓.邻避冲突主体间认知差异评估框架与建构方法——基于模糊德尔菲法的综合运用[J].北京航空航天大学学报(社会科学版),2015,(2):24-30.
    [70]Wright,Stepehen C.“The Next Generation of Colective Action Research.”Journal of Social Isues,65(2009):859-879.
    [71]杨雪锋,何兴斓,徐周芳.环境邻避效应感知风险的建构逻辑与影响因素[J].甘肃行政学院学报,2018,(2).
    [72]Loewenstein G F,Weber E U,Hsee C K,et al.Risk as feelings[J].Psychological Bulletin,2001,127(2):267-286.
    [73]Fischhoff B,Gonzalez R M,Lerner J S,et al.Evolving judgments of terror risks:foresight,hindsight,and emotion[J].Journal of Experimental Psychology Applied,2005,11(2):124-39.
    [74]乌尔里希·贝克.风险社会[M].南京:译林出版社,2004:15.
    [75]张书维,李纾.行为公共管理学探新:内容、方法与趋势[J].公共行政评论,2018,(1).
    [76]李纾,梁竹苑,孙彦.人类决策:基础科学研究中富有前景的学科[J].中国科学院院刊,2012,(s1):52-65.
    [77]刘智勇,陈立,郭彦宏.重构公众风险认知:邻避冲突治理的一种途径[J].领导科学,2016,(32):29-31.
    [78]Vittes M E.Pollock P H.Lilie S A.Factors Contributing to NIMBY Attitudes[J].Waste Management.1993.13:125-129.
    [79]Lee J E,Lemyre L.A Social-cognitive Perspective of Terrorism Risk Perception and Individual Response in Canada[J].Risk A-nalysis,2009,29(9):1265-1280.
    [80]贾留战,马红宇,郭永玉.群体性事件的认知与情绪整合模型[J].云南师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版),2012,(4):77-83.
    [81]ChangTay Chiou,Joanna Lee,Tung Fung.Negotiated Compensation for NIMBY Facilities:Siting of Incinerators in Taiwan[J].Asian Geographer,2011,28(2):105-121.

© 2004-2018 中国地质图书馆版权所有 京ICP备05064691号 京公网安备11010802017129号

地址:北京市海淀区学院路29号 邮编:100083

电话:办公室:(+86 10)66554848;文献借阅、咨询服务、科技查新:66554700