《突发公共卫生事件的应对及管理》在公共卫生硕士教育的实践
|
摘要
目的了解《突发公共卫生事件的应对及管理》课程在公共卫生硕士教育中的实践情况和课程满意度的影响因素。方法编制调查问卷,对四川大学选修过该课程的公共卫生硕士进行网络调查,分析该课程的实践情况,并构建结构方程模型,定量分析影响课程满意度的因素。结果 (1) 96. 6%的调查对象认为该课程有助于扩大知识量,93. 7%的调查对象认为助于职业,95. 0%的调查对象认为该课程提升了应对突发公共卫生事件的能力,98. 3%的调查对象愿意更加深入的学习该课程;(2)课程满意度影响因素主要为感知质量和学生期望(P <0. 01)。结论 (1)有必要在公共卫生硕士培养中开设《突发公共卫生事件的应对及管理》课程;(2)增加该课程的感知质量和学生期望有助于增加课程满意度。
Objective To evaluate the practice and associated factors of satisfaction of the course " Public Health Emergency Response and Management" among masters of Public Health. Methods The questionnaire was used to conduct a network survey among masters of Public Health in Sichuan University who had chosen this course,which aimed to analyze the practice of the course. The structural equation model was used to analyze factors associated with satisfaction and relationships quantitatively. Results( 1) 96. 6% of respondents held that the course was helpful in expanding students' knowledge,93. 7%of respondents thought that the course was helpful for their careers,95. 0% of the respondents viewed that the course enhanced their responses to public health emergencies,and 98. 3% of the respondents were willing to learn the course further.( 2)Coefficients between satisfaction and perceived quality( 0. 44,P < 0. 01),student expectations( 0. 56,P < 0. 01) and perceived value( 0. 03,P > 0. 05) were detected. Conclusion( 1) The course of " Public Health Emergency Response and Management" is necessary for the education of masters of Public Health.( 2) Increasing the perceived quality and students' expectations of the course will be beneficial for increasing the satisfaction of the course.
Objective To evaluate the practice and associated factors of satisfaction of the course " Public Health Emergency Response and Management" among masters of Public Health. Methods The questionnaire was used to conduct a network survey among masters of Public Health in Sichuan University who had chosen this course,which aimed to analyze the practice of the course. The structural equation model was used to analyze factors associated with satisfaction and relationships quantitatively. Results( 1) 96. 6% of respondents held that the course was helpful in expanding students' knowledge,93. 7%of respondents thought that the course was helpful for their careers,95. 0% of the respondents viewed that the course enhanced their responses to public health emergencies,and 98. 3% of the respondents were willing to learn the course further.( 2)Coefficients between satisfaction and perceived quality( 0. 44,P < 0. 01),student expectations( 0. 56,P < 0. 01) and perceived value( 0. 03,P > 0. 05) were detected. Conclusion( 1) The course of " Public Health Emergency Response and Management" is necessary for the education of masters of Public Health.( 2) Increasing the perceived quality and students' expectations of the course will be beneficial for increasing the satisfaction of the course.
引文
[1]周勇,贺莉萍,谭徽,等.校外导师制对预防医学本科生应急能力培养的效果评价[J].现代预防医学,2010,37(12):2253-2254.
[2]谭江涛,黄丽婷.餐饮业顾客满意度指数模型的实证研究——基于大学饮食服务中心的实地调研[J].兰州商学院学报,2014,31(1):102-110.
[3]张燕.澳大利亚高等教育质量学生满意度调查分析——以阿德莱德大学学生学习和教学评价为例[J].世界教育信息,2010,24(11):31-35.
[4]李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544.
[5]柴辉.调查问卷设计中信度及效度检验方法研究[J].世界科技研究与发展,2010,32(4):548-550.
[6]温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.
[7]刘鹏程,徐鹏,孙梅,等.我国突发公共卫生事件应急处置关键问题确认[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(7):38-43.
[8]郭旖雪,李颖,周来新.美国全日制公共卫生硕士课程研究及启示[J].重庆医学,2014,43(27):3674-3676.
[9]张晓玲,屈伟,马骁.中国与美国公共卫生硕士课程体系比较研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2016,33(2):133-136.
[10] Cassoobhoy M,Wetterhall SF,Collins DF,et al. Development of an interactive bioterrorism and emerging infections curriculum for medical students and internal medicine residents[J]. Public Health Reports,2005,120(Suppl 1):59-63.
[11]姜凡晓,职心乐,侯心玥,等.医学院校突发公共卫生事件应急管理课程的探讨[J].基础医学教育,2014,16(4):270-273.
[12]王宁,琚向红,葛正鹏.开放教育网络课程学习满意度影响因素[J].开放教育研究,2014,20(6):111-118.
[13]张蓓,林家宝.大学教学满意度影响因素实证分析——基于学生期望与学生感知质量的视角[J].复旦教育论坛,2014,12(4):59-65.
[14]杨文正,熊才平,丁继红,等.教育信息资源质量满意度影响因素及机制研究——基于296份中学教师调查问卷的结构方程模型分析[J].中国电化教育,2014,328(5):104-112.
[15]周桂林.研究生课程满意度研究[D].广州:广东外语外贸大学,2015.
[16]刘武,杨雪.中国高等教育顾客满意度指数模型的构建[J].公共管理学报,2007,4(1):84-88,125.
[17]汪侠,顾朝林,梅虎.旅游景区顾客的满意度指数模型[J].地理学报,2005,60(5):807-816.
[2]谭江涛,黄丽婷.餐饮业顾客满意度指数模型的实证研究——基于大学饮食服务中心的实地调研[J].兰州商学院学报,2014,31(1):102-110.
[3]张燕.澳大利亚高等教育质量学生满意度调查分析——以阿德莱德大学学生学习和教学评价为例[J].世界教育信息,2010,24(11):31-35.
[4]李灿,辛玲.调查问卷的信度与效度的评价方法研究[J].中国卫生统计,2008,25(5):541-544.
[5]柴辉.调查问卷设计中信度及效度检验方法研究[J].世界科技研究与发展,2010,32(4):548-550.
[6]温忠麟,侯杰泰,马什赫伯特.结构方程模型检验:拟合指数与卡方准则[J].心理学报,2004,36(2):186-194.
[7]刘鹏程,徐鹏,孙梅,等.我国突发公共卫生事件应急处置关键问题确认[J].中国卫生政策研究,2014,7(7):38-43.
[8]郭旖雪,李颖,周来新.美国全日制公共卫生硕士课程研究及启示[J].重庆医学,2014,43(27):3674-3676.
[9]张晓玲,屈伟,马骁.中国与美国公共卫生硕士课程体系比较研究[J].中国卫生事业管理,2016,33(2):133-136.
[10] Cassoobhoy M,Wetterhall SF,Collins DF,et al. Development of an interactive bioterrorism and emerging infections curriculum for medical students and internal medicine residents[J]. Public Health Reports,2005,120(Suppl 1):59-63.
[11]姜凡晓,职心乐,侯心玥,等.医学院校突发公共卫生事件应急管理课程的探讨[J].基础医学教育,2014,16(4):270-273.
[12]王宁,琚向红,葛正鹏.开放教育网络课程学习满意度影响因素[J].开放教育研究,2014,20(6):111-118.
[13]张蓓,林家宝.大学教学满意度影响因素实证分析——基于学生期望与学生感知质量的视角[J].复旦教育论坛,2014,12(4):59-65.
[14]杨文正,熊才平,丁继红,等.教育信息资源质量满意度影响因素及机制研究——基于296份中学教师调查问卷的结构方程模型分析[J].中国电化教育,2014,328(5):104-112.
[15]周桂林.研究生课程满意度研究[D].广州:广东外语外贸大学,2015.
[16]刘武,杨雪.中国高等教育顾客满意度指数模型的构建[J].公共管理学报,2007,4(1):84-88,125.
[17]汪侠,顾朝林,梅虎.旅游景区顾客的满意度指数模型[J].地理学报,2005,60(5):807-816.