摘要
采用A、B、C等3种组分配置了低表面能缓释型除冰涂层材料,分别采用冷冻试验、敲击和落球冲击试验对该除冰涂层的抗凝冰效果进行了评价,采用负荷轮碾压试验评价了除冰涂层耐久性;分别将涂有低表面能缓释型除冰涂层、工业除冰盐和未做处理的马歇尔、小梁及湿轮磨耗试件置于室外凝冻天气条件下,对比3种试件表面凝冰情况,对该涂层材料的除冰雪效果进行了分析;铺筑了除冰涂层试验路,并对试验路进行了渗水性能和抗滑性能检测,对低表面能缓释型除冰涂层对路面表面性能的影响进行了分析。结果表明:所配置的凝冰涂层材料具有较好的抗凝冰和除雪效果,基本不影响原路面的表面性能。
The low surface energy slow-release deicing coating material is prepared by A,B and C three kinds of component,and its icing-resistance effect is evaluated by freezing test,percussion test and falling ball impact test,and the durability of its coating is assessed by load wheel rolling test.Testspecimens which are respectively coated with low surface energy slow-release deicing coating,industrial deicing salt,and untreated Marshall specimens,trabecular and wet abrasion wheel specimens and agitation are placed in outdoor freezing weather conditions to compare and analyze the de-icing effect of the above specimens.Further a test road section is paved which is coated with low surface energy slow-release deicing coating material,and tests are conducted to monitor its anti-permeability and anti-sliding performance,and the impact of low surface energy slow-release de-icing coating material on the performance of the road surface is analyzed.Results show that the prepared coating material has a good anticoagulant and deicing effect on the road surface which hardly affect the performance of the original road surface.
引文
[1]杜小玲,彭芳,武文辉,等.贵州冻雨频发地带分布特征及成因分析[J].气象,2010,36(5):92-97.
[2]王启,吴方.2008年初我国南方低温冻雨灾害的气候特征[J].中国海洋大学学报:自然科学版,2012,42(3):1-9.
[3]但汉成,李亮,刘扬,等.潮湿山区路面凝冰机理及路面抗滑性研究综述[J].武汉理工大学学报:交通科学与工程版,2014,(4):719-724.
[4]洪丹.浅谈凝冰状态下粗糙路面抗滑效果[J].公路,2010,(2):167-169.
[5]陈瑶,单丽岩,谭忆秋,等.沥青混凝土路面抗凝冰损伤功能性修复材料试验研究[J].建筑材料学报,2013,16(3):529-533.
[6]张洪伟,韩森,刘洪辉.沥青路面除冰雪技术综述[J].黑龙江交通科技,2008,169(3):8-9.
[7]高青,于鸣,刘小兵.基于蓄能的道路热融雪化冰技术及其分析[J].公路,2007,(5):170-175.
[8]丛培良,陈拴发,陈华鑫.除冰盐对沥青混凝土性能的影响[J].公路,2011,(6):180-184.
[9]杨全兵.盐及融雪剂种类对混凝土剥蚀破坏影响的研究[J].建筑材料学报,2006,9(4):464-467.
[10]周纯秀.冰雪地区橡胶颗粒沥青混合料[D].哈尔滨:哈尔滨工业大学,2006.
[11]谭忆秋,周纯秀.橡胶颗粒路面抑制路面结冰技术[M].北京:科学出版社,2012.