“行动者网络理论”的机体哲学解读
|
摘要
"行动者"是拉图尔"行动者网络理论"的核心概念,其特点在于将人和"非人"的事物都视为具有能动作用的行动者,通过结成网络而相互作用。从机体哲学角度看,"非人"的行动者的能动性来自各种类型机体相互作用时"生机"的转移,而"行动者网络"体现了机体的存在方式和相互作用路径。对行动者网络理论的机体哲学解读,有助于发现"行动者网络"演化的目的性、意向性和"转译"的动力机制,使科学技术的社会建构活动得到更深入的阐释。
"Actor"is the core concept of Bruno Latour's actor-network theory(ANT),which is characterized by regarding both human and non-human things as active actors that can interact by forming a network.From the perspective of philosophy of organism,the agency of non-human actors comes from the transfer of vitality in the interaction of various types of organism,whereas the actor-network embodies the way of existence and the path of interaction of the organism.The philosophical interpretation of the actor-network theory helps to find the purpose and intention of actor-network evolution,and the dynamic mechanism of translation,so that the social construction activities of science and technology can be further explained.
"Actor"is the core concept of Bruno Latour's actor-network theory(ANT),which is characterized by regarding both human and non-human things as active actors that can interact by forming a network.From the perspective of philosophy of organism,the agency of non-human actors comes from the transfer of vitality in the interaction of various types of organism,whereas the actor-network embodies the way of existence and the path of interaction of the organism.The philosophical interpretation of the actor-network theory helps to find the purpose and intention of actor-network evolution,and the dynamic mechanism of translation,so that the social construction activities of science and technology can be further explained.
引文
[1]布鲁诺·拉图尔.科学在行动:怎样在社会中跟随科学家和工程师[M].刘文旋,郑开,译.北京:东方出版社,2005.
[2] Latour B.Reassembling the Social:An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.
[3]唐·伊德.技术与生活世界:从伊甸园到尘世[M].韩连庆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:72-117.
[4]李雪垠,刘鹏.从空间之网到时间之网——拉图尔本体论思想的内在转变[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(7):52.
[5]罗嘉昌.从物质实体到关系实体[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:3.
[6]刘世风.相对主义与实在论之间:拉图尔的关系主义分析[J].自然辩证法通讯,2012,34(1):21.
[7]刘鹏.现代性的本体论审视——拉图尔“非现代性”哲学的理论架构[J].南京社会科学,2014(6):47-48.
[8]布鲁诺·拉图尔.我们从未现代过——对称性人类学论集[M].刘鹏,安涅思,译.苏州:苏州大学出版社,2010.
[9] Callon M.Struggles and Negotiations to Define What Is Problematic and What Is Not:The Socio-logics of Translation[M]∥Knorr K D,Krohn R,Whitley R.The Social Process of Scientific Investigation.Dordrecht:Springer,1980:197-220.
[10]布鲁诺·拉图尔.巴斯德的实验室——细菌的战争与和平[M].伍启鸿,陈荣泰,译.台北:群学出版有限公司,2016:42.
[11]张卫,王前.道德可以被物化吗?——维贝克“道德物化”思想评介[J].哲学动态,2013(3):72.
[12]安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞——时间、力量与科学[M].邢冬梅,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004:222.
[13] Schaffer S,Latour B.The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour[J].Studies in History&Philosophy of Science,1991,22(1):175-192.
[14]王前.生机的意蕴——中国文化背景的机体哲学[M].北京:人民出版社,2017:219-223.
[2] Latour B.Reassembling the Social:An Introduction to Actor-Network-Theory[M].Oxford:Oxford University Press,2005.
[3]唐·伊德.技术与生活世界:从伊甸园到尘世[M].韩连庆,译.北京:北京大学出版社,2012:72-117.
[4]李雪垠,刘鹏.从空间之网到时间之网——拉图尔本体论思想的内在转变[J].自然辩证法研究,2009,25(7):52.
[5]罗嘉昌.从物质实体到关系实体[M].北京:中国人民大学出版社,2012:3.
[6]刘世风.相对主义与实在论之间:拉图尔的关系主义分析[J].自然辩证法通讯,2012,34(1):21.
[7]刘鹏.现代性的本体论审视——拉图尔“非现代性”哲学的理论架构[J].南京社会科学,2014(6):47-48.
[8]布鲁诺·拉图尔.我们从未现代过——对称性人类学论集[M].刘鹏,安涅思,译.苏州:苏州大学出版社,2010.
[9] Callon M.Struggles and Negotiations to Define What Is Problematic and What Is Not:The Socio-logics of Translation[M]∥Knorr K D,Krohn R,Whitley R.The Social Process of Scientific Investigation.Dordrecht:Springer,1980:197-220.
[10]布鲁诺·拉图尔.巴斯德的实验室——细菌的战争与和平[M].伍启鸿,陈荣泰,译.台北:群学出版有限公司,2016:42.
[11]张卫,王前.道德可以被物化吗?——维贝克“道德物化”思想评介[J].哲学动态,2013(3):72.
[12]安德鲁·皮克林.实践的冲撞——时间、力量与科学[M].邢冬梅,译.南京:南京大学出版社,2004:222.
[13] Schaffer S,Latour B.The Eighteenth Brumaire of Bruno Latour[J].Studies in History&Philosophy of Science,1991,22(1):175-192.
[14]王前.生机的意蕴——中国文化背景的机体哲学[M].北京:人民出版社,2017:219-223.